Paradigma Deduktif VS Induktif dalam Membuat Latar Belakang Skripsi | Seri Skripsi Part 5
Summary
TLDRThis video discusses the importance of a well-crafted closing statement in both quantitative and qualitative research paradigms. It explains how deductive and inductive methods approach research from different directions, with deductive moving from general to specific, and inductive from specific to general. The speaker emphasizes the need to start with a specific phenomenon or problem and choose the appropriate method to answer research questions. A key focus is the 'inductive pyramid,' which outlines the steps of qualitative research. The video also highlights the significance of finding research gaps and the implications of the study for policy-making.
Takeaways
- 😀 A strong closing statement is crucial in both quantitative and qualitative research paradigms. It should encapsulate the study's purpose and methodology.
- 😀 In research, the focus should always be on identifying the research problem first, then selecting the appropriate methodology (quantitative or qualitative) to solve it.
- 😀 Deductive research follows a 'general to specific' approach, starting from global perspectives and narrowing down to a specific local phenomenon or area.
- 😀 Inductive research follows a 'specific to general' approach, often starting with specific instances or cases and drawing broader conclusions.
- 😀 The key to good qualitative research is finding a relevant and up-to-date phenomenon to explore in depth.
- 😀 Both qualitative and quantitative research methods can address the same research questions, but choosing the right method depends on the type of data and the research problem.
- 😀 The 'phenomenon' you study should dictate the method. Research methods should align with the nature of the phenomenon being studied.
- 😀 A preliminary study helps identify gaps in the existing literature and theories, offering insights into how your research can contribute.
- 😀 Research in qualitative methods must focus on recent, significant phenomena to ensure the data gathered is still relevant and robust.
- 😀 A good closing statement should tie the research to policy implications or contribute to theoretical advancements, highlighting the gap it fills in existing knowledge.
Q & A
What is the main difference between deductive and inductive paradigms in research?
-The deductive paradigm starts with general concepts and narrows down to specific cases, while the inductive paradigm starts with specific observations and broadens into general conclusions.
How does the speaker describe qualitative research?
-Qualitative research is characterized by in-depth study of specific phenomena, typically using an inductive approach. It often looks at the specifics first before generalizing to broader conclusions.
What is the importance of the research problem in both quantitative and qualitative research?
-The research problem is the central focus of any study. Whether qualitative or quantitative, the research method is a tool to address the identified research problem.
What does the speaker say about the role of methodology in research?
-Methodology is just a tool to help solve the research problem. The key is to first identify the problem, and then choose the appropriate method (qualitative or quantitative) to address it.
Why is it important to have an updated phenomenon or research theme in qualitative research?
-Using an updated and relevant theme ensures that the data gathered will be more reliable and insightful, as older or outdated topics might lead to reduced or less relevant information from informants.
What does the speaker suggest when performing a preliminary study in qualitative research?
-The speaker recommends conducting a preliminary study to identify what distinguishes your research from others, by looking for gaps between existing theories and real-world phenomena.
What are the five criteria that qualitative research should meet?
-Qualitative research should focus on up-to-date phenomena, provide in-depth analysis, look for uniqueness in the topic, fill gaps in existing research, and offer practical implications for policy or theory.
What is the importance of the closing statement in research?
-The closing statement summarizes the research aim, outlines the research gap, and emphasizes how the study contributes to the field, often linking the study's findings to policy implications or theoretical advancements.
How does the speaker differentiate between qualitative and quantitative research methods in terms of data collection?
-In qualitative research, data collection is often done through in-depth interviews or field studies, while quantitative research typically uses surveys or questionnaires to gather larger-scale data.
What does the speaker recommend for researchers who want to study phenomena related to sensitive topics like loyalty to a company?
-The speaker advises using quantitative methods, such as surveys, when studying sensitive topics, as it allows for honest responses without building personal closeness, which might otherwise compromise the data's integrity.
Outlines

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video

Research Paradigms & Philosophy: Positivism, Interpretivism and Pragmatism Explained (With Examples)

Metodologi Penelitian - Paradigma Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif

PROF RACHMAT KRIYANTONO (PROF RK): Keabsahan Data PENELITIAN KONSTRUKTIVISTIK 1

Philosophical assumptions, paradigms and worldviews in mixed methods research

Framing Qualitative Research

Qualitative Vs. Quantitative Research (redux)~GM Lectures
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)