Waketum Projo Berang, Debat Roy Suryo dan Ahli Digital Forensik soal Ijazah Jokowi | Rakyat Bersuara

Summary

In this heated discussion, the authenticity of President Jokowi's thesis and diploma is scrutinized. Experts like Dr. Roy Suryo, Dr. Rismon, and Dr. Tifa challenge the legitimacy of the documents, citing scientific analysis and digital forensics. The debate centers around the use of modern fonts in the thesis and inconsistencies in signatures, raising questions about the document's validity. As the conversation progresses, tensions rise with legal and scientific claims, while the media and public are urged to consider these findings carefully. The issue sparks a wider conversation about the responsibility of scientists to publicly share their research.

Takeaways

• 😀 The main discussion revolves around allegations that President Jokowi's thesis and diploma are fake, with multiple experts claiming to have evidence of this.
• 😀 Several experts, including Dr. Tifa, Roy Suryo, and Mr. Rismon, are involved in the scientific investigation and analysis of Jokowi's thesis and diploma.
• 😀 The debate includes a focus on document verification methods, such as the use of digital forensics to detect fake documents, images, and signatures.
• 😀 The thesis document's authenticity is questioned, with experts claiming that it does not match the criteria of an authentic 1985 document, including the use of Times New Roman font, which wasn't available at that time.
• 😀 A central point of the argument is the inconsistency between the thesis supervisor's signature and the claimed signature of Jokowi's supervisor, suggesting possible falsification of the document.
• 😀 There is a significant focus on the legitimacy of the thesis' approval sheet, with the experts noting that it lacks the necessary signatures from examiners, further supporting the claim of falsification.
• 😀 The media is urged to ensure that such scientific findings are shared with the public, even if they are not yet legally validated, to inform and educate the public on the authenticity of the thesis.
• 😀 The individuals involved in exposing the thesis' falsity emphasize the importance of scientific inquiry and fact-checking, noting that scientific results should be challenged and tested through proper processes.
• 😀 Legal implications are discussed, with questions raised about who has the authority to validate or invalidate these findings. It's pointed out that this should ideally be handled through legal and judicial processes, rather than just academic ones.
• 😀 The conversation touches on the broader issue of information manipulation and the role of media and experts in presenting truth to the public in a responsible manner.

Q & A

What is the main claim discussed in the transcript?

The main claim discussed in the transcript is that President Joko Widodo's (Jokowi's) thesis and diploma are fake. The individuals in the discussion, including experts in digital forensics, argue that the thesis and diploma documents are falsified.

What evidence is presented to support the claim of a fake thesis?

The evidence presented includes an analysis of the thesis document, such as the use of a modern font, Times New Roman, which was not available in 1985, the lack of an approval sheet from the board of examiners, and discrepancies in the signature of the supervisor. These factors are used to suggest that the thesis is not authentic.

Who are the main individuals involved in the discussion?

The main individuals involved in the discussion are Dr. Tifa, Dr. Rismon, Roy Suryo, and Aiman Aksono. They are experts and individuals who are challenging the authenticity of Jokowi's thesis and diploma.

What role does the font, Times New Roman, play in the argument?

The use of Times New Roman is central to the argument because it is claimed that this font did not exist in 1985, the year when Jokowi is said to have completed his thesis. The experts argue that this modern font is evidence of document manipulation or forgery.

What is the significance of the absence of the board of examiner's approval sheet?

The absence of the approval sheet from the board of examiners is significant because it raises doubts about the legitimacy of the thesis. In official academic documents, the approval of a thesis by the board is essential, and its absence further supports the claim that the thesis might be fake.

How do the experts defend their conclusions about the thesis being fake?

The experts defend their conclusions by emphasizing the scientific nature of their analysis, which includes examining font usage, signatures, and document inconsistencies. They also highlight the importance of using primary sources and forensic methods in their examination of the thesis and diploma.

What is the role of digital forensics in this case?

Digital forensics plays a crucial role in analyzing the authenticity of the documents. Experts like Dr. Rismon are involved in verifying the documents through scientific methods, including the identification of fake documents, audio, images, and videos. The analysis is presented as a scientific process to uncover the truth.

What challenges are posed to the scientific analysis presented in the discussion?

The main challenge posed is the legal validity of the scientific analysis. There are questions about whether such findings can be legally accepted or whether they are merely for academic or public consumption. The discussion suggests that only a legal process can officially determine the authenticity of the documents.

What role does public dissemination of the findings play in the discussion?

The public dissemination of the findings is a key point in the discussion. The experts argue that their scientific findings should be shared with the public, despite legal concerns, in order to educate the public about the authenticity of the documents and prevent misinformation.

How does the discussion address the legitimacy of UGM's involvement in the issue?

The discussion raises concerns about the legitimacy of UGM's (Gajah Mada University) involvement, questioning the authenticity of the thesis documents held at UGM and accusing individuals within the institution of falsifying documents. The experts challenge UGM's silence on the issue and call for more transparency.