Cerita Awal Kecurigaan Ijazah Jokowi Palsu, Roy Suryo: Berawal dari Kelakar IPK | Sindo Flash

Summary

The video script discusses the controversy surrounding the academic credentials of Indonesian President Jokowi, focusing on allegations about his university thesis and diploma. In 2013, Jokowi joked about his low GPA, sparking public curiosity. By 2022, questions about his graduation from Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) resurfaced, especially after discrepancies in his thesis and diploma were pointed out by experts. The script emphasizes the need for transparency, with a call for an independent investigation into the authenticity of his academic documents. The debate touches on issues of public trust and the integrity of government officials.

Takeaways

• 😀 The conversation highlights a controversial discussion about the legitimacy of President Jokowi's academic credentials.
• 😀 Jokowi once joked about his GPA being below 2, raising suspicions about the authenticity of his university degree.
• 😀 Concerns arose when evidence surfaced in 2022, showing that Jokowi's thesis and diploma could be questionable.
• 😀 Sigit Sunarta, the Dean of the Faculty of Forestry at UGM, presented photocopies of Jokowi’s thesis and diploma, sparking further analysis.
• 😀 Experts, including Dr. Rismon, visited UGM to inspect the thesis and found significant inconsistencies, such as incorrect fonts and signatures.
• 😀 The thesis had multiple glaring errors, suggesting it was not of the quality expected from a prestigious institution like UGM.
• 😀 The authenticity of the thesis and diploma was further questioned due to missing official documents, such as examination sheets and signatures.
• 😀 Despite the findings, Jokowi reportedly submitted a report to the police, which was seen as a way to address defamation concerns rather than clarify the legitimacy of his credentials.
• 😀 The law allows public figures to be transparent about their documents, which could help clarify the situation if Jokowi shares the evidence publicly.
• 😀 There are concerns that if the issue is only treated as defamation, it could overshadow the deeper issue of potentially forged academic credentials.

Q & A

What was the issue discussed in the 2013 conversation involving Jokowi's academic record?

The issue raised in the 2013 conversation was Jokowi's reported low GPA, which was allegedly below 2. This led to public questioning about how someone with such a low GPA could graduate, especially from Universitas Gajah Mada (UGM).

What was the public's reaction to Jokowi's GPA of below 2?

The public was skeptical about Jokowi's academic record, especially given that he was reported to have graduated from a prestigious university like UGM. People wondered how a person with such a low GPA could have graduated and whether it was even possible.

What document was presented by Sigit Sunarta in 2022 to raise further concerns?

In 2022, Sigit Sunarta, the Dean of UGM's Faculty of Forestry, presented photocopies of what he claimed was Jokowi's diploma and original thesis, which further raised questions about the authenticity of his academic credentials.

What did Dr. Rismon discover when he examined Jokowi's thesis at UGM?

Dr. Rismon, upon examining Jokowi's thesis at UGM, found discrepancies such as incorrect fonts, inaccurate wording, and other issues suggesting the thesis was not authentic and possibly fabricated.

How did the team of experts (including Dr. Rismon and Dr. Respon) respond to the thesis evidence?

The team, after reviewing the thesis, concluded that there were several irregularities, such as missing signatures from examiners and other significant errors that cast doubt on its authenticity. They argued that such a thesis could not have passed in a reputable institution like UGM.

What is the significance of Jokowi's legal actions regarding his diploma and thesis?

Jokowi reportedly filed a legal complaint to the police regarding defamation, but the experts argue that the core issue is the authenticity of his diploma and thesis. They emphasize the need for transparency and independent analysis to confirm whether the documents are genuine.

What is the role of the Public Information Disclosure Law in this case?

The Public Information Disclosure Law (Law No. 14 of 2008) allows public figures to be held accountable for their documents. This law supports the notion that Jokowi's academic records, as a public figure, should be transparent and available for public scrutiny, especially when questions of authenticity arise.

Why is the authenticity of Jokowi's diploma so important in this case?

The authenticity of Jokowi's diploma is crucial because it could undermine his credibility and reputation. If the documents are proven to be falsified, it could affect his public image, especially since he is a prominent public figure and former president of Indonesia.

What is the legal significance of the criminal charge related to defamation?

The defamation charge, under article 160, has less legal weight than other accusations, as it is not applicable to Jokowi anymore due to his change in status from a government official. However, the legal proceedings could be used to sidetrack the more serious issue of the alleged forged diploma.

What evidence does the team argue supports their claim that the diploma is fake?

The team claims that the physical evidence, including the thesis, shows numerous flaws such as inconsistent fonts, errors in the wording, missing signatures, and incorrect formatting. These irregularities suggest that the thesis and diploma are not authentic and may be fabricated.