Purnawirawan Ingatkan Prabowo: Jangan Jadi Presiden Boneka! | Lanturan

Summary

The transcript discusses concerns raised by retired military personnel regarding former President Jokowi's continued influence under Prabowo's administration. These concerns center around the concentration of power within the Jokowi family, including Gibran as vice president and Bobi as governor, which some perceive as nepotism. The conversation also touches on a petition initiated by retired officials to remind Prabowo that such practices cannot be allowed to continue. The discourse reflects a broader unease about the current political landscape and the potential return to old practices of corruption, collusion, and nepotism.

Takeaways

• 😀 The former military officers are concerned about the continued influence of ex-President Jokowi on the current administration of Prabowo.
• 😀 There is discomfort among retired officers regarding Jokowi's involvement in the government despite his departure from office.
• 😀 A significant issue is the concentration of power within the Jokowi family, with family members holding key positions, such as Gibran being considered for Vice President and Bobby for Governor of North Sumatra.
• 😀 The focus on family-based power is seen as a violation of the reform agenda, which aimed to reject corruption, collusion, nepotism, and the concentration of power in one family.
• 😀 The retired officers express frustration with the perception that such nepotism is being tolerated and not addressed, despite being a major issue during the reform era.
• 😀 The petition from the retired officers was formulated around February, long before Prabowo's trip abroad, indicating that concerns had been brewing for some time.
• 😀 The actions of the retired officers appear to be a response to Prabowo's actions, including interactions with Jokowi's family members and the apparent continuation of familial influence in politics.
• 😀 The retired officers are worried that this continued influence undermines the democratic values of Indonesia, especially given the legacy of the Reformasi era, which rejected such practices.
• 😀 The discourse surrounding this issue has evolved since February, reflecting a growing sense of unease among those who believe the system is being manipulated for personal and familial gain.
• 😀 The retired officers’ criticism is not just political but also focuses on the ethical implications of family members maintaining control over significant government positions, despite historical rejection of such practices.

Q & A

What concern do retired military officers (purnawirawan) have regarding the involvement of former President Jokowi in the current administration?

The retired military officers are concerned about the continued involvement of former President Jokowi in the current government, particularly in how his influence may affect the current administration under Prabowo. They feel uneasy about the ongoing presence of Jokowi's influence in the new regime.

What was the issue with the legitimacy of the constitution during Jokowi's presidency, according to the retired officers?

The retired officers pointed out the perceived forced legitimacy of certain constitutional actions during Jokowi's presidency, specifically related to the 90th decision (likely referring to a controversial political decision), which they saw as problematic.

How did the concentration of power within Jokowi's inner circle impact the perception of his administration?

The retired officers were concerned about the concentration of power within Jokowi's inner circle, particularly with family members holding significant political roles. Gibran became Vice President, Bobby was appointed Governor of North Sumatra, and there were discussions about Gibran potentially becoming the Deputy Governor of Jakarta.

What was the criticism about nepotism and corruption during Jokowi's administration?

There was criticism regarding nepotism, corruption, and collusion during Jokowi's administration, particularly because of the prominent roles given to family members in political positions. The retired officers highlighted that these practices went against the values of reform established after the fall of Suharto's regime, where corruption, collusion, and nepotism (KKN) were meant to be rejected.

How did the retired officers react to the concentration of power within Jokowi's family?

The retired officers were vocal in their discontent, suggesting that the concentration of political power in one family violated the principles of the reform era, where corruption, collusion, and nepotism were to be avoided.

What prompted the petition from retired military officers and others regarding Prabowo's leadership?

The petition arose following Prabowo's ministers attending a halal bihalal (a traditional post-Ramadan gathering) in Solo, where they referred to Prabowo as 'my boss.' The retired officers and others viewed this as a troubling sign of influence and control that could undermine the governance and were concerned that Prabowo might be tolerating this kind of dynamic.

Was the petition against Prabowo's leadership an immediate response to any specific event?

Yes, the petition came shortly after Prabowo's ministers had a public event where they expressed excessive loyalty to him ('my boss'), which raised concerns about the potential abuse of power and undermining democratic principles.

How did the retired officers plan and prepare for the petition against Prabowo's leadership?

The discussions and planning for the petition began in February, several months before the public events that led to the petition. The petition was carefully formulated over time, with strategic points being discussed and created well ahead of the situation.

What does the reference to 'surrender' in the script imply about the officers' perspective?

The reference to 'surrender' suggests that the retired officers felt trapped or forced into a position where they had to tolerate the political dynamics they were witnessing. This feeling of being 'surrendered' indicates their frustration with the situation.

What role did the 'source' mentioned in the script play in the petition process?

The 'source' mentioned in the script appears to be a key figure or group that the retired officers and others turned to for support or guidance as they gathered momentum for the petition. The repeated reference to the source suggests it played a critical role in the orchestration of the petition.