Separah Apa Hubungan Buruk Prabowo-Gibran | Bocor Alus Politik

Summary

This video delves into the complexities of Indonesia's political landscape, focusing on former President Jokowi’s continued involvement in projects post-office, military influence on politics, and the challenges faced by Jokowi’s son, Gibran. The conversation critiques the efforts of retired military figures to regain power, the potential dangers of reverting to the original 1945 Constitution, and the broader implications for democracy in Indonesia. It highlights the tension between democratic processes and military control, raising concerns over the future of civilian governance.

Takeaways

• 😀 Jokowi is still involved in business projects after his presidency, specifically a sugarcane farming project in Merauke that aims to clear 600,000 hectares of forest.
• 😀 There are delays in the Merauke sugarcane project, which involves high-level business interests and has raised questions about government transparency.
• 😀 A significant meeting was held between Jokowi and a minister regarding the project, but the minister did not have the necessary updates, highlighting inefficiencies in post-presidential governance.
• 😀 Tensions within the Indonesian National Police (POLRI) emerged due to an unreported meeting, causing unrest within the police force about the lack of proper reporting.
• 😀 Jokowi and his son Gibran face growing public criticism, particularly in Solo, with some questioning Jokowi's actions post-presidency, especially concerning criticism and fake information.
• 😀 Despite criticism, Jokowi has been actively addressing these concerns by filing reports to the Polda Metro Jaya, signaling his continued influence in handling public perception.
• 😀 Tempo magazine sees the involvement of retired military officers aiming to disrupt Gibran's political trajectory and to challenge democratic processes in Indonesia.
• 😀 A push to revert to the pre-amendment Indonesian Constitution is seen as a step backward, potentially undermining democratic reforms and shifting Indonesia to a parliamentary system.
• 😀 The Tempo editorial expresses concern that reverting to the old constitution could weaken democratic norms and increase military involvement in political decision-making.
• 😀 Tempo warns against the growing influence of former military officials, who are seeking to regain power, potentially leading to a return to authoritarian practices from the New Order era.

Q & A

What is the focus of the political discussion in the script?

The script primarily focuses on the political dynamics following the administration of President Jokowi, with a particular emphasis on the sugar cane project in Merauke and the political maneuvers involving Gibran, Prabowo, and military figures.

What is the issue surrounding the Merauke sugar cane project?

The issue involves a request to release 600,000 hectares of forest land for a sugar cane project, which has been delayed despite former President Jokowi's interest in seeing it completed. The project is backed by businessmen and has encountered regulatory challenges.

How does Jokowi's involvement in the Merauke project after his presidency raise concerns?

Jokowi's ongoing involvement in the Merauke project after his presidency raises concerns about the continuation of political influence, particularly with his ties to business tycoons. It suggests that even after stepping down, Jokowi still plays a role in shaping economic ventures.

What controversy arises from the meeting between Jokowi and certain officials?

The controversy stems from a meeting between Jokowi and certain ministers that wasn't reported up the chain of command, particularly within the police force (POLRI). This caused internal issues, as there was a failure to inform superiors, which was seen as an attempt to avoid scrutiny during sensitive times.

Why does the script mention the involvement of former military personnel (purnawirawan)?

The script mentions the involvement of former military personnel because there are efforts by them to influence the political landscape, including attempting to derail Gibran's political career. The script also discusses the implications of military involvement in civilian affairs and democratic processes.

What stance does the 'Tempo' publication take on the military's influence in politics?

Tempo opposes the increasing influence of the military in politics. The publication argues that military personnel should not meddle in civilian matters, especially after retirement, and that democracy should remain in the hands of civilians, not the military or former military leaders.

What is the argument against returning to the original 1945 Constitution?

The argument against returning to the original 1945 Constitution is that it would mean reverting to a parliamentary system, which could undermine the democratic progress made since the constitutional amendments. This could potentially weaken the presidential system and lead to less direct political participation by the public.

What potential risks does the script identify with military figures pushing for changes in the constitution?

The risks identified include the strengthening of military power, which could result in a shift away from democratic principles. Specifically, the script warns that revising the constitution to favor military influence could undermine civilian control and reintroduce authoritarian practices.

What does the script suggest about Jokowi's current position in relation to military influence?

The script suggests that Jokowi is in a difficult position, as he has limited influence over the military, which remains a powerful force in Indonesian politics. His administration faced challenges in managing military loyalty and was seen as unable to fully control the military’s political involvement.

How does the script portray the political situation regarding Gibran and Jokowi's family?

The script portrays the political situation involving Gibran as contentious, with rising criticism from various factions. Public opinion appears to be turning against both Jokowi and Gibran, with negative discourse surrounding them, particularly in relation to the handling of political criticism and media narratives.