Why Naruto Has So Many Retcons

Summary

In this video, the creator discusses the frequent use of retcons in the Naruto series, exploring their impact on the narrative and character development. The video delves into how retcons, such as the introduction of the Tailed Beasts, the deification of Hashirama Senju, and changes to the power system, can enhance the story without necessarily breaking it. The creator acknowledges the flaws in the series, notably the controversial Black Zetsu and Otsutsuki retcons, but praises Kishimoto's writing overall, emphasizing the evolution of the plot and characters over time. Despite criticisms, the creator highlights how retcons can work effectively when thoughtfully implemented.

Takeaways

• 😀 Redcons in the Naruto series are frequent and interesting, but not necessarily negative; they can enhance the story.
• 😀 The term 'redcon' stands for 'retroactive continuity,' where new elements contradict previously established facts without necessarily creating plot holes.
• 😀 The introduction of the Tail Beasts is an example of a redcon, as it was not part of the original plan in the early Naruto series, but it works well in the narrative.
• 😀 Hashirama Senju's deification is another redcon that adds depth to the story without breaking the narrative's flow.
• 😀 Some redcons, like the inclusion of the Otsutsuki clan and the reincarnations of Naruto and Sasuke, are considered much more problematic and detract from the story.
• 😀 Many redcons occurred between Naruto part 1 and Naruto Shippuden, where new elements were introduced that weren’t initially planned for.
• 😀 Not all redcons are bad; some, like the development of the power system and new techniques, are handled well and fit within the existing framework.
• 😀 Kishimoto didn’t initially plan for Naruto to be a long series, which led to the need for redcons to extend the story after it became unexpectedly successful.
• 😀 Criticisms of Kishimoto as a bad writer are unfair; despite redcons, his ability to develop characters and structure the narrative is commendable.
• 😀 The Otsutsuki and Kaguya redcons are widely disliked due to their lack of foreshadowing and the way they disrupt the established world-building of Naruto.

Q & A

What is a 'retcon' in storytelling?

A 'retcon' is short for retroactive continuity, which refers to the act of introducing a new element into a story that contradicts previously established elements. It doesn't necessarily create a plot hole but can change or reinterpret earlier details of the narrative.

Why does the introduction of the tail beasts in Naruto count as a retcon?

The tail beasts were initially not intended to be part of a larger family. In the Chunin Exams, characters like Shukaku were simply treated as chakra demons, not part of a family of tail beasts. The concept of the tail beasts was introduced later in the story, making it a retroactive change.

How does the deification of Hashirama Senju serve as a retcon in the series?

Initially, Minato Namikaze was portrayed as the strongest Hokage. However, in Naruto Shippuden, Hashirama Senju's strength is shown to be greater than Minato's, which contradicts earlier statements in the series. This was a retroactive change but it doesn't break the story, as it adds depth to Hashirama's character.

What makes the retcon of the Otsutsuki clan problematic for some fans?

The introduction of the Otsutsuki clan, especially the revelation that Naruto's and Sasuke's powers were linked to ancient alien gods, was not foreshadowed in the earlier parts of the series. This change required a significant rewrite of the story's history, and for many fans, it felt out of place and detrimental to the narrative.

How does Kishimoto's writing process contribute to the presence of retcons in Naruto?

Kishimoto initially planned Naruto to be a much shorter series, likely around 300 chapters. However, due to its success, the story expanded significantly, which led to new ideas being introduced later. The lack of a fixed long-term plan meant retcons were inevitable as the story grew.

Why do some people argue that the retcons in Naruto enhance the story?

Many fans appreciate that some retcons, like the development of Hashirama's character or the introduction of new powers like Sage Mode, are well-executed and contribute to the story's depth. These changes often improve the narrative and character development without breaking the story.

What is the significance of the retcon involving the Chidori and wind-style jutsu?

Originally, techniques like the Chidori and wind-style jutsu were not fully explained within the five-element transformation system. Over time, the power system of Naruto became more defined, which resulted in retcons like the categorization of these techniques, aligning them with the established elements.

How does the retcon involving Obito and Tobi impact the story?

The retcon revealing that Tobi was Obito all along was planned from the beginning, as shown by Obito’s image appearing early in the series. This retcon doesn't break the continuity of the story and is viewed as an effective narrative twist.

What role does the editor play in the creation of Naruto, especially regarding retcons?

Kishimoto’s editor played a significant role in shaping the direction of Naruto. For example, the character Sasuke was not originally Kishimoto's creation but was suggested by his editor. Editors also helped extend the series beyond its original scope, contributing to the need for retcons as the story evolved.

What is the difference between a 'retcon' and a 'plot hole' in storytelling?

A retcon introduces a new idea or concept that contradicts previously established elements, but it doesn't necessarily break the narrative. A plot hole, on the other hand, is an inconsistency or contradiction that undermines the logic of the story. Retcons can be used creatively, while plot holes are usually seen as errors in the narrative.