BISIK #25 w/ M. Shokheh, S. Pd., M. A. (Dosen Sejarah Unnes) - HALUAN IDEOLOGI PANCASILA part 1

Summary

In this discussion, experts delve into the complexities surrounding Indonesia's Pancasila ideology, particularly the proposed Haluan Ideologi Pancasila (HIV) law. They explore its historical development from the founding of the nation to its role in modern politics. Key concerns include the potential misinterpretation and misuse of Pancasila as a tool for political leverage, and the challenges of interpreting it in a contemporary, democratic context. The conversation also touches on the role of Pancasila in national unity and governance, and whether new regulations are necessary or if the existing structure is sufficient to uphold its values.

Takeaways

• 😀 The discussion revolves around Pancasila, Indonesia's national ideology, and its historical evolution, starting from its origins during the colonial era.
• 😀 The importance of understanding Pancasila's role as the foundational philosophy of the Indonesian state and its relevance in today's political landscape is emphasized.
• 😀 The founding figures of Indonesia, such as Soekarno, Sutan Sjahrir, and Soepomo, played pivotal roles in shaping the ideology of Pancasila during the 1945 BPUPKI sessions.
• 😀 Pancasila was officially adopted as the nation's ideology on August 18, 1945, after a lengthy debate in the Indonesian independence preparation body (BPUPKI).
• 😀 The concept of Pancasila was challenged and refined during the New Order era, where it was used to strengthen political stability and accelerate economic growth under Soeharto's regime.
• 😀 The 1978 MPR Decree and the establishment of BP7 (Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila) further institutionalized the application of Pancasila across Indonesian society.
• 😀 The speaker critiques the recent proposal for the Haluan Ideologi Pancasila (HIV) law, arguing it risks undermining the historical integrity of Pancasila by reopening old debates.
• 😀 The Pancasila debate also raises concerns about a 'monolithic interpretation' that could be misused for political control, such as silencing opposition and consolidating power.
• 😀 The potential for the HIV law to complicate the hierarchy of legal authority is discussed, with concerns about it potentially elevating Pancasila above all other legal frameworks in Indonesia.
• 😀 The speaker suggests that rather than revising Pancasila, it would be more effective to focus on laws that support the practical implementation of Pancasila in daily governance, avoiding further historical regression.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the transcript?

The main topic is the ideology of Pancasila in Indonesia, its historical development, and its role in contemporary Indonesian governance. The discussion includes debates over the Haluan Ideologi Pancasila (Pancasila Ideology Guidelines) law and its potential impact on Indonesian society and politics.

Who is the guest featured in the discussion?

The guest in the discussion is Pak Soheh Innova, a history lecturer at Universitas Negeri Semarang (Unes). He is an expert in history and Pancasila, providing valuable insights into the topic.

What historical event marked the establishment of Pancasila as the foundation of the Indonesian state?

Pancasila was established as the foundation of the Indonesian state during a speech by President Soekarno on June 1, 1945, as part of the BPUPKI sessions, where Pancasila was debated and later formalized as the state's ideology.

What are the two main goals of the New Order (Orde Baru) government in relation to Pancasila?

During the New Order government under President Soeharto, Pancasila was used to strengthen political stability and accelerate economic growth. The government sought to use it as a unifying ideology while ensuring the nation's development.

What was the role of the BP7 institution in implementing Pancasila during the New Order?

The BP7 (Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila) was an institution created to oversee the implementation and promotion of Pancasila in Indonesian society. It was tasked with ensuring Pancasila's values were reflected in the nation's life and governance.

What is the concern about the potential impact of the 'Haluan Ideologi Pancasila' law?

The main concern is that the law may lead to a monolithic interpretation of Pancasila, which could be used by the ruling government to suppress opposition and strengthen its own power, potentially dividing the nation rather than uniting it.

How does the transcript address the issue of the Pancasila Ideology Law being viewed as a setback?

The speaker expresses concern that the law, which reintroduces historical concepts like Trisila and Ekasila, represents a regression, undermining the finality of Pancasila's position as Indonesia's state ideology established in 1945.

Why is there a debate over whether the 'Haluan Ideologi Pancasila' law is necessary?

The debate centers on whether the law is needed to guide the nation in implementing Pancasila or if it might unnecessarily complicate the ideological framework. Some argue that a simpler regulation could effectively promote Pancasila without overhauling it.

What role does the Indonesian government play in the process of making laws like the 'Haluan Ideologi Pancasila' law?

The Indonesian government, through the executive branch, has the responsibility to analyze and approve laws proposed by the legislature (DPR). The president and relevant ministers must evaluate the potential impact of such laws and decide whether they will be accepted or rejected.

How does the speaker view the role of BPIP (Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila) in Indonesia today?

The speaker suggests that BPIP, while established to promote Pancasila, has not been effective in capitalizing on its potential to foster national unity and implement Pancasila's values in society. The lack of clear direction and ineffective leadership in BPIP is a point of critique.