Urgensi Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila - TITIK PANDANG

Summary

In this discussion, Friska Clarissa and prominent political figures Ahmad Basarah and Harso explore the urgent need for strengthening Indonesia's national ideology, Pancasila, in response to foreign ideological threats and internal divisions. They examine the importance of creating a robust legal framework for ideological education to preserve national unity. The conversation touches on the controversy surrounding the draft law on Pancasila's ideological guidance, with both experts agreeing on the necessity of transparent public consultations and a clear focus on the law's substantive goals, while addressing concerns over political influence and societal perceptions.

Takeaways

• 😀 The urgency of strengthening the Pancasila ideology is emphasized, especially in response to external ideological threats, including hoaxes, racial issues, and growing primordialism that challenge national unity.
• 😀 There has been a long gap in the Indonesian government's efforts to foster the Pancasila ideology, especially following the dismantling of the BP7 (Pancasila Ideology Development Agency) in 2003 and the elimination of Pancasila as a compulsory subject in schools.
• 😀 The government under President Jokowi has recognized the need for an official structure to strengthen Pancasila, leading to the establishment of the BPIP (Pancasila Ideology Development Agency) in 2017.
• 😀 Controversies surrounding the draft law for Pancasila ideology development have created debates, particularly about whether it should be a law or merely a presidential regulation (Perpres), with concerns over political influence and ideological bias.
• 😀 The idea of making the Pancasila ideology development permanent through legislation is supported by the MPR (People's Consultative Assembly), to ensure it remains beyond the changing political environment.
• 😀 Several influential organizations, like Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah, have been instrumental in upholding Pancasila at the grassroots level in Indonesia, especially in promoting tolerance and national unity.
• 😀 A major point of contention is the need for the Pancasila ideology development framework to be broad, open to public dialogue, and involve various societal stakeholders to avoid misunderstanding or controversy.
• 😀 The purpose of the proposed law is to create a robust legal framework that protects Indonesia from transnational ideologies and radical movements, and to provide a permanent and consistent structure for fostering Pancasila values.
• 😀 The debate on whether the law should be more ideological or technical is ongoing, with concerns that it could end up being too politically motivated, rather than focused on legal needs and national unity.
• 😀 Public consultation and transparency in the drafting process are essential for the success of the law, and both the government and parliament must ensure the public understands and supports the goals of strengthening Pancasila ideology.
• 😀 Finally, the Pancasila ideology development law should not only focus on the legal standing of institutions like BPIP but also on ensuring the law remains flexible and relevant through widespread consultation with all Indonesian stakeholders.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the conversation?

The main topic discussed is the urgency of strengthening the Pancasila ideology in Indonesia, addressing the threats of foreign ideologies, hoaxes, and rising primordialism.

Why is the strengthening of Pancasila ideology seen as urgent?

It is considered urgent due to the growing external ideological threats, such as liberalism, capitalism, and religious extremism, which could undermine Indonesia’s national unity and Pancasila as the foundation of the nation.

What historical events are mentioned as contributing to the current need for strengthening Pancasila?

The dissolution of BP7 in 2003, the removal of Pancasila from the national curriculum in 1998, and the lack of consistent efforts by the government to strengthen the national ideology are all cited as factors contributing to the current need.

What was the role of BP7 in the past?

BP7, established during the New Order era, was responsible for fostering the Pancasila ideology among the public. It was later dissolved in 2003, which is seen as a critical turning point in the ideological development of the nation.

What is the controversy surrounding the draft of the Pancasila Ideology Bill (RUU HIP)?

The controversy stems from the perception that the bill was politically motivated and ideologically driven, leading to debates on its necessity and potential to distort the principles of Pancasila.

What is the government's current approach to the Pancasila Ideology Bill?

The government is currently focusing on public consultations and gathering input from various stakeholders, such as religious organizations and civil society groups, to ensure that the bill addresses the true needs of the nation.

What is the importance of involving the public in the discussion of the Pancasila Ideology Bill?

Involving the public helps ensure transparency, reduces misconceptions, and fosters broader acceptance of the bill. It also ensures that the legislation is aligned with the values and aspirations of the people.

How does the discussion around the Pancasila Ideology Bill reflect broader political dynamics?

The discussion highlights political divides, as different factions within the government and society express varying opinions on how best to implement the Pancasila ideology, balancing national interests with political preferences.

Why do some people believe a law is needed to strengthen the Pancasila ideology?

Some argue that a formal legal framework would provide stability and prevent ideological shifts with each change in leadership, ensuring that Pancasila remains a permanent foundation for the nation.

What are the expected outcomes if the law is enacted?

The expected outcome is a more structured, consistent, and permanent approach to fostering Pancasila as the ideology of the nation, with oversight and participation from various sectors of society to ensure its relevance and sustainability.