Sidang Perkara Nomor 105, 115/PUU-XXII/2024. Rabu, 10 Oktober 2024.
Summary
TLDRIn a court session, the proceedings for several cases are initiated, with a focus on case numbers 100, 5, 11, and 115. The session is delayed as some key representatives, including members from the DPR (Indonesian House of Representatives) and the President's office, are absent. The government representatives request a delay for preparing their testimonies. The session is adjourned with a new schedule for the next session, set for October 29, 2024, to hear testimonies from both the President and DPR. The session concludes with a formal closure and a reminder of the next case hearing.
Takeaways
- 😀 The session begins with the opening of the court for cases numbered 100, 5, 11, and 115.
- 😀 The court session is being led by the Constitutional Court and the attendees are being asked to be seated.
- 😀 The 105 case is the first to be addressed, with a brief pause for the absence of a few attendees.
- 😀 The representatives of the government introduce themselves, with officials from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights present.
- 😀 The court session was originally scheduled to hear statements from the President and the DPR (Indonesian Parliament), but the DPR is unable to attend and requests a rescheduling.
- 😀 The government (or President) also requested a delay in providing their statement, citing insufficient preparation.
- 😀 The court agrees to reschedule the hearing and announces that the next session will be on Tuesday, October 29, 2024, at 13:30 WIB.
- 😀 The session clarifies that while the DPR will be invited again for the next hearing, the government and the petitioners do not need to be called again.
- 😀 The session concludes with the judge thanking all attendees, and the court is adjourned.
- 😀 The next scheduled hearing will focus on case number 126/PUU on Thursday, October 10, 2024, at 14:30 WIB.
Q & A
What is the primary context of the transcript?
-The transcript is from a judicial proceeding in a constitutional court, where the judges are addressing multiple cases, discussing the absence of certain parties, and rescheduling the hearings for further proceedings.
Who were the key participants mentioned in the transcript?
-The key participants included the judges, government officials from the Ministry of Law, legal representatives (such as lawyers), and representatives of the DPR (House of Representatives) and the President.
Why was the session delayed or rescheduled?
-The session was delayed because the DPR (House of Representatives) and the President were unable to attend. The DPR had sent a letter requesting a rescheduled session, and the government stated that it was not ready to present the President's testimony.
What was the original purpose of the session?
-The original purpose of the session was to hear testimonies from the President and the DPR regarding a specific constitutional matter. However, due to their absence, the session could not proceed as planned.
When was the next scheduled hearing for the case?
-The next scheduled hearing for the case is set for Tuesday, October 29, 2024, at 13:30 WIB (Indonesian Western Time).
What was the role of the government in this session?
-The government was present to represent the President and explain the reasons for the delay in presenting the President's testimony. They also requested a postponement for the preparation of the President's statement.
What did the judges announce at the end of the session?
-The judges announced that the session had concluded and that the case would be rescheduled for the next session on October 29, 2024. They also confirmed that the DPR would be called again, but there was no need to summon the petitioner or the government again.
What is the significance of the case numbers mentioned in the transcript?
-The case numbers (100, 5, 11, and 115) represent the specific constitutional cases being discussed in the session. These case numbers help identify the proceedings and track the legal process.
How were the legal representatives introduced in the session?
-The legal representatives of the government were introduced by the judges. Among those present were Prananto from the Ministry of Law, Erwin Fauzi, and other legal counsels representing various parties.
What does the phrase 'sidang selesai dan ditutup' mean?
-'Sidang selesai dan ditutup' means 'the session is concluded and closed.' It marks the official end of the proceedings for that day.
Outlines

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video

Alur Sidang Perdata - Serial Hukum Acara Perdata #13

CONTOH PERSIDANGAN KASUS KORUPSI

SIDANG PERKARA PERDATA NOMOR 118/PDT/2021/PT KDI

Big Win for Khan: Supreme Court Rules in His Favor | Aleema Khan’s Court Showdown | What’s Next?

Sidang Semu | Gugat Cerai | Mahasiswa HKI IAI Cirebon | Pengadilan Agama Sumber Kab. Cirebon

BERENDO ARAH PENYIDIKAN KPK KASUS MANTAN GUBERNUR SEGMEN 1
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)