Sidang Perkara Nomor 169/PUU-XXII/2024. Jum'at, 9 Mei 2025.

Mahkamah Konstitusi RI

9 May 202506:31

Summary

TLDRThe transcript captures the proceedings of a court session in a constitutional court case, numbered 169/PUU/GAR/22/2024, held on May 9, 2025. The session is opened and addressed by the presiding judge, with various parties, including petitioners, government representatives, and legal teams, present both in-person and virtually. Due to the absence of key officials, the session is adjourned for a follow-up hearing on May 28, 2025, to hear the testimonies of the President and the DPR. The court session concludes with a respectful acknowledgment of all attendees.

Takeaways

😀 The session of the court case numbered 169/PUU GAR 22/2024 is officially opened and accessible to the public.
😀 The session is being conducted in the absence of the chairperson and vice-chairperson due to official duties, and the oldest judge has been tasked to lead the session.
😀 The petitioner's legal representative, Nur Fauzi Ramadan, introduces the petitioner and two other legal representatives, including Ibu Mikewati and Ibu Titi Angger.
😀 Virtual attendees from the petitioner's side, including Ibu Ninis Listiowati and two other legal representatives, are also recognized.
😀 The government representatives present at the session include Rudi Hendra Pakpahan, Director of Litigation and Non-litigation from the Ministry of Law, and other government officials from the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
😀 The Director-General of Politics and General Government, Dr. Drandus Batiar, was unable to attend and notified the court of his absence at the last minute, though written statements from him are already available to the judges.
😀 The court agrees to postpone hearing the government’s testimony until a later date, with the next session set for Wednesday, May 28, 2025, at 1:30 PM.
😀 The session is adjourned, and all parties are informed of the next session's date and the need for Esalon 1 representatives to attend.
😀 The petitioners inquire about accessing the government’s written statements before the next hearing, which is confirmed to be possible once the documents are read in court.
😀 The session concludes with a formal thank you to all attendees, including the petitioners, government representatives, and guests from the School of Law Jantera, before closing the session.

Q & A

What is the case number discussed in the hearing?
-The case number discussed in the hearing is 169/PUU-GAR/22/2024.
What was the reason for the absence of the Chairman and Vice Chairman during the session?
-The Chairman and Vice Chairman were absent due to an official event that could not be left unattended.
Who is presiding over the session in the absence of the Chairman and Vice Chairman?
-The session is being presided over by the oldest judge, who was assigned this responsibility in accordance with the law.
Who is representing the petitioner in this case?
-The petitioner is represented by Nur Fauzi Ramadan, who introduced himself as the legal representative in the case.
Who are the attendees from the petitioner’s side?
-The attendees from the petitioner’s side include Ibu Mikewati, who is associated with KPI, and Ibu Titi Angger.
Who are the government representatives in the session?
-The government representatives in the session include Rudi Hendra Pakpahan, Director of Litigation and Non-Litigation, and several other officials from the Ministry of Law and the Ministry of Home Affairs.
Why was there a delay in presenting the testimony from the government?
-The testimony from the government was delayed because the originally scheduled speaker, Dr. Drandus Batiar, the Director General of Politics and General Government, could not attend unexpectedly.
What was the scheduled date for the next hearing?
-The next hearing was scheduled for Wednesday, May 28, 2025, at 1:30 PM.
What was the purpose of the session that was postponed?
-The purpose of the postponed session was to hear the testimony from the President and the DPR (People's Representative Council).
How will the petitioner's side receive the government's written statement?
-The petitioner's side will be able to access the government's written statement after it is read aloud in the session, and they can request it from the court registry.