Joaquim Bosch "DESMONTA en DIRECTO" un BULO a Ana Terradillos y a un juez ultra - ¡Menudo ridículo!

Summary

Spanish judge Joaquim Bos has gone viral for refuting claims by TV host Ana Terradillos linking recent amnesty law changes to possible benefits for ETA prisoners. Terradillos alleged the changes could help ETA members not convicted of blood crimes. Bos clarified the amnesty applies only to Catalan independence events from 2012-2019, not ETA terrorism before 2012. Some claim the Basque Nationalist Party is discreetly working to extend amnesty benefits to ETA prisoners. While the law only covers Catalan prisoners now, its vague wording risks unintended consequences.

Takeaways

• 😡 The judge Joaquim Bos has gone viral for debunking lies from the journalist Ana Terradillos.
• 📺 The lies were about a recent amnesty law aired on her TV program La Mirada Critica.
• 👩‍⚖️ Terradillos tried to falsely link the amnesty law to benefiting ETA prisoners.
• 😡 Bos called out the manipulation and made clear the law only applies to Catalan independence.
• ⏳ The amnesty is for events from 2012-2022 related to the Catalan independence movement.
• 🚫 It excludes serious human rights crimes or blood crimes.
• 😕 Some speculate the Basque Nationalist Party wants to expand it to benefit ETA.
• ⚠ There are risks in expanding the law beyond its intended scope.
• 🤔 The amnesty law could possibly be applied to some ETA members in the future.
• 😠 Terradillos crossed a red line by linking the law to ETA terrorism.

Q & A

Who is Joaquim Bos and what did he do in the video script?

Joaquim Bos is a magistrate who became viral for debunking the misinformation spread by journalist Ana Terradillos regarding the amnesty law, specifically addressing its implications and clarifying its scope.

What was the main topic of Ana Terradillos' program discussed in the script?

The main topic was the changes in the amnesty law and the speculation that these changes could potentially benefit ETA convicts, a topic brought up by Ana Terradillos in her program 'La Mirada Crítica' on Tele5.

What specific aspect of the amnesty law did Joaquim Bos clarify?

Joaquim Bos clarified that the amnesty law would affect events related to the Catalan independence process, including consultations, protests against police and judicial actions, and specified that it would apply to a certain period from January 1, 2012, to November 13 of the previous year, excluding terrorism crimes that gravely violate human rights.

How does the script suggest the amnesty law could affect ETA prisoners?

The script suggests that while the amnesty law primarily targets actions related to the Catalan independence process, there could be a possibility for modifications that might indirectly affect ETA prisoners, particularly those not convicted of blood crimes, with 40 out of 134 ETA prisoners potentially benefiting.

What concerns does Joaquim Bos express regarding the implications of the amnesty law?

Joaquim Bos expresses concerns over the unpredictability and the potential unintended consequences of designing laws for specific individuals or situations, which might inadvertently affect others, indicating a grave risk with uncertain outcomes.

What are the actions of Basque nationalist parties in relation to the amnesty law as mentioned in the script?

The script mentions that the Basque Nationalist Party and Bildu are discreetly working to find mechanisms that could extend the penal benefits of the amnesty law to also benefit ETA prisoners, especially after observing the Socialist Party's approach to terrorism.

What is the stance of the amnesty law on terrorism crimes according to the script?

According to the script, the amnesty law specifically excludes terrorism crimes that gravely violate human rights, focusing instead on crimes related to the Catalan independence process.

How does the script describe the potential application of the amnesty law to ETA members?

The script describes a scenario where, despite the law's intended scope, there could be potential, albeit uncertain, ways to apply the amnesty law to ETA members, especially for those not involved in blood crimes, reflecting broader concerns about the law's application.

What historical context related to ETA is mentioned in the script?

The script notes that ETA declared a ceasefire before 2012 and that no terrorist attacks have been committed since then, providing context for the discussion on the amnesty law's potential implications.

What is the script's perspective on the Spanish Socialist Party's stance on terrorism?

The script suggests that the Spanish Socialist Party has crossed its own red line regarding terrorism, implied through the discussion on the amnesty law's potential to benefit ETA prisoners, reflecting a contentious political debate.