Cooling PAD VS VACUUM ! | Mana Yang lebih dingin Buat LAPTOP GAMING ?

DKID Media
29 May 202412:31

Summary

TLDRIn this video, the creator compares two types of cooling pads for laptops: a vacuum-style cooling pad and a fan-based one that blows air. After testing with a gaming laptop (XP Victus) over three days, the creator shares their findings. The vacuum cooling pad provides more stable performance and better heat management, while the fan-based pad offers a more ergonomic design, doubling as a laptop stand. While the vacuum pad performs slightly better in gaming and rendering tasks, the fan-based cooling pad is more comfortable and visually appealing for prolonged use.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The video compares two types of cooling pads: one with a vacuum system priced around Rp60,000 and another blowing air priced around Rp150,000.
  • 😀 The vacuum cooling pad pulls hot air from the laptop's exhaust, aiming to cool it down faster, while the blowing cooling pad pushes cool air towards the laptop.
  • 😀 Despite some user comments claiming that vacuum cooling pads are better, the video explains that both cooling systems have their pros and cons.
  • 😀 The experiment uses an HP Victus gaming laptop with Intel Core i7 13th gen and an RTX 4070 GPU to test the cooling pads' effectiveness.
  • 😀 Benchmark tests such as Cinebench R23 and 3D rendering reveal that the vacuum cooling pad stabilizes the laptop's performance, keeping it in a higher range compared to no cooling.
  • 😀 The blowing cooling pad performs similarly to the vacuum pad in terms of temperature control but has a quieter operation, making it more ergonomically suitable for some users.
  • 😀 While the vacuum pad can make some noise, the blowing pad offers quieter operation, which might be preferred for those who dislike loud fans.
  • 😀 In gaming tests, the vacuum cooling pad improved the laptop's performance with a noticeable increase in FPS, compared to no cooling pad.
  • 😀 Temperature spikes in the laptop were highest when using the vacuum cooling pad, but this was balanced by better performance and cooling efficiency.
  • 😀 Overall, the video concludes that both types of cooling pads have their strengths, but the vacuum cooling pad offers more noticeable performance gains, while the blowing pad is more ergonomic and quieter.

Q & A

  • What is the primary difference between the two types of cooling pads discussed in the video?

    -The primary difference is that one cooling pad uses suction to draw heat away from the laptop, while the other uses blowing action to push air across the laptop's surface.

  • How much does each cooling pad cost?

    -The suction-based cooling pad costs around IDR 60,000, while the blowing-type cooling pad that can also serve as a laptop stand costs about IDR 150,000.

  • What was the method used to test the cooling pads' performance?

    -The testing involved running Cinebench R23 benchmarks over several days using three conditions: no cooling, vacuum cooling, and blowing-type cooling. The tests were done with a gaming laptop, the XP Victus, to ensure fair comparison.

  • How did the vacuum cooling pad perform in terms of benchmark scores?

    -The vacuum cooling pad performed more stably, with scores consistently around 19,000 to 20,000 points on the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, which was higher compared to no cooling.

  • What is the noise level like when using the vacuum cooling pad?

    -The vacuum cooling pad is quite noisy due to the suction process, which can be disturbing. It is recommended to use a gaming headset to block out the sound.

  • How does the blowing-type cooling pad compare in terms of performance?

    -The blowing-type cooling pad provided decent performance but was slightly less stable than the vacuum cooling pad, with benchmark scores ranging from 18,000 to 19,000 points on Cinebench R23.

  • Was there any difference in rendering times between the different cooling methods?

    -Interestingly, the rendering times were faster without any cooling (1 minute 14 seconds), while the vacuum and blowing-type cooling pads took longer (1 minute 19 seconds and 1 minute 24 seconds, respectively).

  • How did the temperatures compare when using the different cooling methods?

    -Without any cooling, the laptop reached up to 90°C during stress tests. With the vacuum cooling, temperatures spiked higher, while the blowing-type cooling pad kept temperatures lower but still not as stable as the vacuum method.

  • Which cooling method showed better gaming performance?

    -The vacuum cooling pad showed better gaming performance, with higher and more stable FPS in games like Cyberpunk 2077, achieving an average FPS of 95 compared to 68 without cooling.

  • What are the ergonomic benefits of the blowing-type cooling pad?

    -The blowing-type cooling pad doubles as a laptop stand, raising the laptop to a more ergonomic level for typing, making it more comfortable to use for extended periods.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Cooling PadsLaptop CoolingGaming PerformanceTech ReviewVacuum CoolingErgonomicsBlowing CoolingLaptop AccessoriesGaming SetupTech Test