Scott Ritter Exposed: Dark Secrets! Ukraine missile threat - Russia is ready to attack NATO!

Summary

Dieses Video-Skript enthüllt eine beunruhigende Realität: Die US-Regierung hat einen Bürger willkürlich seines Passes beraubt, unter dem Vorwand von国家安全, was seine Grundrechte verletzt. Der Diskurs erweitert sich auf die geopolitischen Auswirkungen, wo die USA und NATO Russland provozieren, was zu einem möglichen Atomkrieg führen könnte. Der Sprecher warnt vor der gefährlichen Spirale der gegenseitigen Bedrohungen und der Notwendigkeit, die Konsequenzen eines solchen Konflikts ernst zu nehmen.

Takeaways

• 🛂 Ein Reisender namens William Scott Ritter Jr. wurde von uniformierten Zoll- und Grenzschutzbeamten an der Flughafenabreise gestoppt und ihm sein US-Pass wurde beschlagnahmt.
• 🤔 Die Beamten gaben keine genaue Begründung oder eine Quittung für die Beschlagnahme des Passes, verwiesen auf Anweisungen des US-Außenministeriums, aber konnten keine spezifische Person oder Stelle nennen.
• 📜 Ritter Jr. diskutierte die möglichen Verletzungen seiner Redefreiheit und des Rechts auf befreiung von willkürlichen Durchsuchungen und Beschlagnahmen, die durch die Verfassung geschützt sind.
• 👥 Es wird erwähnt, dass auch ein Sponsor namens Alexander Zirano verhaftet wurde, was die Sorge um die Sicherheit und die Absicht des US-Regierungs einbringt.
• 📖 Ritter Jr. und der Sprecher diskutierten die möglichen rechtlichen Schritte gegen das US-Außenministerium wegen Verletzung seiner Rechte.
• 🇺🇸 Die Diskussion umfasst die Rolle des US-Außenministeriums und der Ukraine im Zusammenhang mit der Bekämpfung von Desinformation und der Erstellung einer schwarzen Liste sogenannter 'Informations-Terroristen'.
• 🚫 Die USA und die Ukraine werden beschuldigt, den Freiheitsrechten von US-Bürgern durch die Finanzierung und Unterstützung von Aktivitäten, die auf die Einschränkung von Redefreiheit abzielen, zu schaden.
• 💥 Es wird eine Eskalation der Konflikte zwischen den USA, der Ukraine und Russland beschrieben, mit der Androhung von Krieg und der möglichen Verwendung von Nuklearwaffen.
• 🔍 Der Sprecher warnt davor, dass die gegenwärtige US-Regierung und ihre NATO-Verbündeten möglicherweise die Ernsthaftigkeit der russischen Androhungen unterschätzen und so ein potenziell katastrophales Szenario herbeiführen könnten.
• 🌏 Die Diskussion hebt hervor, dass eine militärische Eskalation zwischen den USA und Russland Folgen für die gesamte Welt haben könnte, einschließlich der möglichen Zerstörung von Europa, der USA und Russland.
• 🛑 Schließlich wird betont, dass es dringend notwendig ist, dass die US-Regierung und ihre Verbündeten die Schwere der Situation anerkennen und Maßnahmen ergreifen, um eine nukleare Konfrontation zu vermeiden.

Q & A

Was passierte kurz vor dem Einstieg in das Flugzeug mit William Scott Ritter Jr.?

William Scott Ritter Jr. wurde von drei uniformierten, bewaffneten Zoll- und Grenzschutzbeamten aufgefordert, aus der Schlange zu kommen, nachdem er sein Ticket und seinen Pass gezeigt hatte. Die Beamten konfiszierten seinen Pass auf Anordnung des US-Außenministeriums.

Welche Rechte wurden nach Ansicht des Gesprächspartners verletzt, als der Pass konfisziert wurde?

Die Rechte auf freie Meinungsäußerung (Erster Verfassungszusatz), auf Schutz vor willkürlichen Durchsuchungen und Beschlagnahmen (Vierter Verfassungszusatz) und das Recht, sich frei zu bewegen (mehrere Verfassungszusatzseinschränkungen) wurden verletzt.

Wer empfing die Empfehlung, nicht nach Russland zu reisen, und warum wurde diese Empfehlung gegeben?

Der Gesprächspartner empfing die Empfehlung, nicht nach Russland zu reisen. Die Empfehlung wurde gegeben, weil der Gesprächspartner befürchtete, dass Alexander Zirano, der Sponsor, auf dem Weg nach St. Petersburg festgenommen werden könnte.

Was ist das Zentrum für die Bekämpfung von Desinformation, und in welchem Zusammenhang wird es im Gespräch erwähnt?

Das Zentrum für die Bekämpfung von Desinformation ist eine Einrichtung, die vom US-Außenministerium finanziert und gelenkt wird und die eine Schwarze Liste sogenannter 'Informations-Terroristen' erstellt hat, darunter auch US-Bürger.

Wie plant der Gesprächsteilnehmer, gegen die Pass-Konfiszierung vorzugehen?

Der Gesprächsteilnehmer erwägt, eine Klage gegen das US-Außenministerium vor Gericht zu erheben, um die Verfassungsmäßigkeit der Pass-Konfiszierung in Frage zu stellen.

Was ist die Haltung der US-Regierung gegenüber der Ukraine und wie wird sie im Gespräch kritisiert?

Die US-Regierung wird im Gespräch dafür kritisiert, die Ukraine als Proxy im Konflikt gegen Russland zu nutzen und finanzielle Unterstützung zu leisten, ohne die potenziellen Gefahren einer Eskalation zu berücksichtigen.

Welche Rolle spielen GPS- und Trägersysteme bei der Lenkung der Waffensysteme wie das 'Attack'?

GPS- und Trägersysteme sind für die Zielführung von Waffensystemen wie 'Attack' verantwortlich und erfordern spezifische Informationen, die nur von amerikanischen Händler eingegeben werden können.

Was bedeuten die Hypersonic-Raketen für die Verteidigungsstrategie von NATO und Russland?

Hypersonic-Raketen stellen eine große Herausforderung für die Verteidigungsstrategie von NATO dar, da sie in der Lage sind, bestehende Raketenabwehrsysteme zu umgehen und sind daher schwer zu verteidigen.

Wie wird die Situation der Ukraine und Russlands in Bezug auf die militärische Eskalation im Gespräch dargestellt?

Die Situation wird als gefährlich und instabil dargestellt, mit der Möglichkeit einer Eskalation zu einem Atomkrieg, wenn bestimmte rote Linien überschritten werden.

Was ist die Haltung der US-Regierung gegenüber der russischen Regierung im Hinblick auf die militärische Operation in der Ukraine?

Die US-Regierung wird im Gespräch als unterstützend der Ukraine und kritischer gegenüber Russland dargestellt, was zu einer Verschärfung des Konflikts beiträgt.

Welche Rolle spielt die freie Meinungsäußerung in der Diskussion über die politischen Entscheidungen und Ereignisse?

Die freie Meinungsäußerung wird als grundlegendes Recht und gleichzeitig als Opfer von politischen Entscheidungen und Machtmissbrauch diskutiert, die die Meinungsfreiheit einschränken oder untergraben.

Outlines

00:00

🛂 'Pass sequestration' durch CBP-Beamte

Der Sprecher erzählt von einer unerwarteten Begegnung mit uniformierten Zoll- und Grenzschutzbeamten, die sein Pass einziehen. Er diskutiert das Vorgehen der Beamten, die ohne nennenswerte Begründung oder Aufsicht handeln und ihm weisen, den US-Außenministerium zu kontaktieren, um weitere Informationen zu erhalten. Er reflektiert über seine Reaktion und die fehlenden Maßnahmen, die er hätte ergreifen sollen, und erwähnt die möglichen Verletzungen seiner Rede- und Reisefreiheit gemäß der Verfassung.

05:00

📜 Rechtliche Konsequenzen und freie Meinungsäußerung

Der Sprecher diskutiert die rechtlichen Schritte, die der Betroffene ergreifen kann, um gegen die Entscheidung des US-Außenministeriums vorzugehen, sein Pass einzuziehen. Er betont die Bedeutung der freien Meinungsäußerung und die Unverletzlichkeit durch staatliche Maßnahmen. Zudem wird die mögliche Beteiligung des US-Außenministeriums an der Schaffung einer 'Schwarzen Liste' von sogenannten 'Informations-Terroristen' thematisiert, einschließlich der des Sprechers selbst.

10:02

💣 Die Eskalation der Ukraine-Krise und die Bedrohung des Weltfriedens

Der Sprecher warnt vor den Gefahren der gegenwärtigen Ukraine-Krise und der damit verbundenen militärischen Aggression, die von der Ukraine und unterstützt von den USA und der NATO ausgeht. Er kritisiert die Bereitstellung von Waffen und die Eskalation als Proxy-Krieg zwischen der Ukraine und Russland. Zudem wird die Haltung der USA gegenüber Russland und die möglichen Folgen einer weiteren Eskalation diskutiert.

15:03

⚔️ Die potenzielle Ausbreitung des Krieges und die Bedrohung durch nukleare Waffen

Der Sprecher schildert die Risiken einer möglichen Ausweitung des Krieges und wie diese die globale Sicherheit bedrohen könnte. Er beschreibt die Reaktion Russlands auf eine militärische Aggression und die damit verbundenen nuklearen Risiken. Zudem wird die fehlende Vermittlerrolle der USA in der gegenwärtigen Situation thematisiert und die möglichen Auswirkungen auf den bevorstehenden Friedensprozess diskutiert.

20:05

🌏 Die nukleare Strategie der USA und die globale Bedrohung

Der Sprecher reflektiert über die nukleare Strategie der USA und die damit verbundenen Gefahren für die Welt. Er kritisiert die Haltung der US-Regierung gegenüber der nuklearen Abschreckung und die fehlende Erkenntnis für die potenziellen Folgen. Zudem wird die historische Perspektive der核战略 und die Reaktion von Präsidenten auf die nukleare Kriegsplanung herangehoben.

25:06

🕊️ Die historische Bedeutung von Präsident Kennedys Haltung gegenüber der Atommacht

Der Sprecher erinnert an John F. Kennedys Haltung und sein Verständnis für die Verantwortung, die mit der Führung einer Atommacht einhergeht. Er betont Kennedys Ablehnung der damaligen nuklearen Kriegsstrategie und die Notwendigkeit, alternative Optionen zu finden, die nicht auf der Zerstörung der gesamten Welt beruhen. Zudem wird die Bedeutung dieser Haltung für die heutige politische Führung thematisiert.

Keywords

💡First Amendment

Das First Amendment ist ein Teil der US-Verfassung, das den Freiheitsrechten gewährleistet, einschließlich der Redefreiheit. Im Video wird es erwähnt, um zu betonen, dass die Meinungsäußerungen des Gesprächsteilnehmers geschützt sind und dass die Einreiseverweigerung möglicherweise gegen dieses Recht verstößt.

💡Fourth Amendment

Das Fourth Amendment schützt vor willkürlichen Durchsuchungen und Beschlagnahmen. Im Kontext des Skripts wird es angesprochen, um die Beschlagnahme des Passes zu kritisieren, da es ohne ausreichende Begründung geschah und möglicherweise gegen diese Verfassungsgarantie verstößt.

💡State Department

Das US-Außenministerium (State Department) ist für die Führung der Außenpolitik der USA zuständig. Im Video wird vermutet, dass das Ministerium die Beschlagnahme des Passes angeordnet hat, was auf eine mögliche politische Motivation hindeutet.

💡Customs and Border Patrol

Die Zoll- und Grenzschutzbehörde (Customs and Border Patrol) ist für die Kontrolle an den Grenzen der USA verantwortlich. Im Video werden Beamte dieser Behörde dargestellt, die den Pass des Gesprächsteilnehmers beschlagnahmen.

💡Seizure of passport

Die Beschlagnahme des Passes ist eine Maßnahme, die im Video als unangemessen und möglicherweise illegal dargestellt wird. Sie wird als Mittel zur Verhinderung der Reise des Gesprächsteilnehmers nach Russland verwendet.

💡Free speech rights

Freie Meinungsäußerung ist ein Kernprinzip der US-Demokratie. Im Video wird argumentiert, dass die Handlungen der US-Behörden diese Rechte verletzen, da sie die Meinungsäußerung und das Reisen des Gesprächsteilnehmers einschränken.

💡Unreasonable searches and seizures

Willkürliche Durchsuchungen und Beschlagnahmen sind im Fourth Amendment verankert und verboten. Im Video wird die Beschlagnahme des Passes als möglicherweise willkürlich und somit verfassungswidrig dargestellt.

💡Blacklist

Eine Schwarze Liste ist eine Aufstellung von Personen, die aus bestimmten Gründen ausgeschlossen oder gesperrt werden. Im Video wird erwähnt, dass das Gesprächsteilnehmer und andere auf eine von der US-Regierung unterstützte Liste gesetzt wurden, was ihre Meinungsfreiheit einschränkt.

💡Proxy war

Ein Stellvertreterkrieg ist ein Konflikt, in dem zwei Länder durch Drittstaaten kämpfen. Im Video wird argumentiert, dass der Konflikt zwischen Russland und der Ukraine ein solcher Krieg ist, bei dem die USA und NATO die Ukraine unterstützen.

💡NATO

Die NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) ist eine militärische Allianz, die im Video als Akteur im Ukraine-Konflikt erwähnt wird. Ihre Rolle und die der USA werden im Kontext von Unterstützung und möglichen Konsequenzen für ihre Beteiligung diskutiert.

💡Center for countering disinformation

Ein Zentrum zur Bekämpfung von Desinformation ist eine Einrichtung, die im Video als Teil der Regierung der Ukraine dargestellt wird und von der US-Regierung unterstützt wird. Es soll zur Kontrolle und Gegenwehr von Informationen dienen, die die Regierung nicht unterstützen.

💡Nuclear war strategy

Eine Nuklearkriegsstrategie ist eine Planung für den Fall eines Atomkriegs. Im Video wird warnend auf die Gefahren hingewiesen, die mit einer solchen Strategie verbunden sind und wie sie in der gegenwärtigen politischen Situation missbraucht werden könnte.

Highlights

Passenger's passport was seized by Customs and Border Patrol officers without a clear authority.

The State Department's involvement in the passport seizure is implied but the specific authority is not disclosed.

Concerns raised about the violation of First and Fourth Amendment rights due to the seizure and lack of a warrant or receipt.

The Center for Countering Disinformation, funded by the State Department, is accused of targeting free speech and creating blacklists.

The term 'information terrorist' is used to justify hunting down and silencing individuals who disagree with the Ukrainian government.

The US government's indirect attempts to suppress free speech by funding foreign entities that target American citizens are highlighted.

The potential for the US and Russia to be on a dangerous path towards war due to escalating tensions and proxy conflicts.

The role of the US and NATO in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, including the provision of military equipment.

The potential for a broader war if the US and its allies continue to push Russia without understanding the consequences.

The lack of direct communication between the US and Russia and the absence of an American ambassador to mediate discussions.

The possibility of a peace summit being undermined by the actions of the US and its allies.

The strategic implications of allowing NATO into Ukraine and the potential for American missiles to threaten Russian facilities.

The potential for a single missile launch to escalate into a full-scale nuclear war, given the current geopolitical climate.

The historical context of nuclear war planning and the shift in US strategy post-9/11.

The current US administration's understanding or lack thereof regarding the gravity of a potential nuclear conflict.

The technical aspects of missile guidance systems and the role of the US in providing targeting data to Ukraine.

The potential for Russia to retaliate against any attack, including the use of nuclear weapons, if they perceive an existential threat.

Transcripts

well I I was in the process of doing the

final boarding of the aircraft where you

know right before you crossed the

threshold into the airplane uh the uh

the airline attendants asked you know

just to review your tickets and your

passport and I handed it to them they

motioned to go on the airplane and

suddenly three um uniformed armed

Customs and Border Patrol um officers

came up and uh asked if I was um you

know William Scott Ritter Jr I said yes

I am they ushered me out of the line um

then they uh demanded that I give them

my passport which I complied with and

then they um asked me that if this was

my only travel Document do I have any

other travel documents uh I said no uh

this is my US Passport it's the passport

I use to travel overseas and I have used

frequently including to Russia and they

said well we're seizing it I said on

what Authority they said um on the

orders of the United States uh State

Department I said who in the state

department they said don't know I said

well who ordered you to do this so you

you obviously are we don't know we can't

tell you we're not authorized to tell

you um they wouldn't give me a receipt

for the passport um they just said you

got to contact the State Department I

said who in the state department they

said we don't know you just you're going

to have to figure that one out then they

um they got my bags off the airplane and

um escorted me out of the uh security

Zone um into the general you know where

you walk in and said you're free to

leave and uh that was

that do you have um uh the names of or a

photograph of any of the three of

them no I mean I was um I mean you know

judge in retrospect there's much that I

should have done um I was in my mindset

getting ready to get on an airplane and

go to the St Petersburg International

economic Forum I was focused on that my

mind was already what's going to happen

when I land in Russia um and so this

took me completely by surprise and I

failed to get the names of the three

officers um and I failed to get a

photograph I mean there are security

systems all over the place and um you

know I am going to be making a call to

the um customs and board Patrol unit at

the JFK to get the names of these

officers uh whether or not they'll give

them to me is another question well

eventually you'll get all of this under

the proper legal process but they

obviously interfered with your free

speech rights and your protected by the

First Amendment and your um your right

to be free from unreasonable searches

and seizures protected by the Fourth

Amendment and what the Supreme Court has

recognized protected by several

amendments uh is your right uh to travel

was I with

you no you weren't um actually you

weren't with me because I made a phone

call to you early in the earlier in the

morning um recommending that you not

travel to Russia um and it had nothing

to do with what happened to me and

everything to do with what happened to

our sponsor Alexander zirano who um from

my standpoint tragically was placed

under arrest in um in uh Nova sub on his

way to St Petersburg um you know we can

discuss that in a in a moment if you'd

like to um I did not you know I like you

I consider you a friend not just a

colleague and there was no way I you

know because I'm the guy who came to you

and said hey judge you need to come to

Russia you need to do this let's make

this happen I got people that want to

talk to you they extended invitation to

you in retrospect you could have gone to

Russia um but I couldn't guarantee a

positive outcome and I am not going to

be responsible for putting judge

napalitano on an airplane into an

unknown situation uh today I now know

that Alexander zerion of team uh

together with the presidential

administration had cobbled together a

group that was going to receive us and

lead us through the St Petersburg

economic Forum with to ensure no hassles

no anything uh that you know nothing bad

would have happened but when I initially

got this information there's my good

friend Alexander um when I got the

information I didn't know what was going

on um I didn't know if this was

reflective of a change in Russian

government attitude or policy and uh

while I am dumb enough to get on a plane

and fly into the unknown hoping for the

best um I wasn't going to be responsible

for that happening to you so I made a

phone call and I strongly recommended

that you not get on that airplane and

and we had we had that phone call about

5: in the morning as I was about to

leave my house the only reason I've

asked you this is because of all these

news reports that the same thing

happened to me as happened to you I am

deeply and profoundly grateful

for your friendship which will be a

lifelong friendship for the um uh the

care and courtesy you have for me as a

person for

my public

Persona uh and for these efforts to

introduce me to people who are

interested in what we have to say and I

know those efforts uh will be

unending um uh you have a very very

serious case against the United States

uh State Department and many many

lawyers will happily uh bring that case

for you in the United States district

court for the eastern district of New

York which sits in Brooklyn but which

covers uh events uh at JFK you could

also bring it in the Northern District

of New York up in New York state where

you uh live you could bring it uh in

either place I can't imagine what

conceivable defense there could be for

this no matter what you and I have said

anywhere on the planet

about Russia about Israel about Gaza

about Ukraine about Joe Biden about

Vladimir Putin it is all protected Free

Speech protected because we have the

natural right to speak and expressly

protected by the First Amendment the

same goes for your right to be free from

unreasonable search and seizures they

didn't have a warrant if they had a

warrant they would have shown it to you

and of course they violated their own

profound regulations by not giving you

uh a receip they're supposed to give you

a receipt so that when you sue them the

court will know who it is that took this

away from you now you're going to have

to do some investigation on your own the

state department is huge was this Tony

blinkin was this uh Jake Sullivan or was

this some local functionary who didn't

like something they heard you say it's

an outrageous abuse of power it is

profoundly

unconstitutional and I am grieved that

you my friend uh were hurt by this but

it's it's bigger than this judge um I

mean the state department using

government appropriated monies for this

purpose created a center for countering

disinformation as an adjunct of the

Ukrainian president's office they did

this in uh

2022 um one of the first things that

this Center for countering dis

information did under the guidance and

direction of the State Department of the

United States was to issue a blacklist

of people that they called information

terrorists and on that Black List were a

large number of of Americans including

myself and this list this this Center

since that time and here's the important

thing about being called an information

terrorist that's a specific term being

used by the ukrainians backed by the

United States government they said that

an information terrorist must be hunted

down and brought to Justice the same way

any terrorist would and so I've been

accused of saying things that make the

Ukrainian government unhappy they now

say that I must be hunted down and

arrested detained killed as would any

other terrorist in the world and other

Americans as well they have made me this

Center again with the US state

Department's uh support has put out a

list that you know a weekly list where

they say I'm the number one uh threat to

truth about Ukraine I'm the number one

threat to Ukraine I must be dealt with

they put out a monthly list where I top

this list regularly plus there's the Mir

thit Hit List run by the Ukrainian

intelligence services that I'm on which

marks you for death they actually

assassinate people they have made two

attempts against me uh on previous trips

to Russia the state department has never

condemned the Ukrainian intelligence

services for marking US citizens for

death simply because they disagree with

what they say Free Speech means nothing

in the Biden America today it actually

free speech has not only become

something that gets you targeted for

your passport removal that's an

inconvenience that I am confident will

be dealt with in due course they're

marking me for death judge and that's

something you don't come back

from and you're telling us that there's

some purported NGO which is actually

funded by the state department that is

behind this well it's behind the most

recent um outpouring of thing the the

the the center for countering

disinformation is not an NGO that's a

government that that works for the

president the Office of the President in

Ukraine but it's organized funded and

directed by the state dep department

when you look at the meetings where they

promulgated the back Blacklist in there

they say and at this meeting are the

following State Department of officials

and the following official from the

United States Embassy now one would

imagine that at any meeting of this

nature where somebody said topping our

agenda today is we're going to Blacklist

40 American citizens for exercising uh

their you know for saying things we

disagree with at that

juncture Duty demands that Americans

government officials stand up and say we

object you can't prosecute Americans for

free speech you can't use American money

for this regard but instead the US

government sat there and supported this

facilitated this and this is done on the

direction of the US Congress this money

was allocated by the US Congress voted

on by the US Congress

which appears to violate again not just

the intent but the letter of the law

Congress shall not pass any laws or

legislation that are designed to

infringe on the free speech of Americans

Congress gave the Ukrainian government

money which they're using to infringe on

the free speech of Americans another

example of the government attempting to

do indirectly through another government

what it can't do uh directly so the

American Congress Joe Biden allowed to

spend this money however he wants I

think it's 165 billion at last count he

can spend it however he wants and he's

chose to spend some of it uh in this

Gaggle uh of of people ukrainians and

Americans who have a list of people whom

they want to silence and whom they want

to kill this is just not the America

that the founders gave us Scott you are

uh a remarkable example not only of

intellectual honesty but of uh personal

courage uh as you know because we are

friends I will be happy to work on this

uh litigation uh with you uh I hope it

doesn't come to that I hope a couple of

phone calls will return your uh your

passport but there's much more of an AG

reeved situation here as you pointed out

than just uh the passport and those of

you watching ought to know the world

needs to know how corrupt the Joe Biden

Tony blink and state department is that

they would do something like this pay to

silence Scott Ritter interfere with his

freedom of travel suppress his rights to

free speech and I am sorry and almost

terrified to utter this threaten him

with

death well we'll see where this goes uh

my dear

friend um Joe Biden has threatened

Russians uh with death by publicly

authorizing the ukrainians to use

American military equipment to attack uh

inside Russia how crazy is

this it's the definition of insanity um

first well the the logic behind this the

ukrainians have tried to create a

narrative that says we can't defend

ourselves from Russian aggression

emanating from Russian soil um unless we

are allowed to use all the weapons that

we possess um they forget that this is a

special military operation that was

initiated by Russia in response to

Ukraine's 8-year war of aggression

against the citizens of dbas whom they

call terrorists who they BB bombarded

killing hundreds of children thousands

of civilians um that this isn't a war

Russia didn't invade Ukraine Russia

sought to bring an end to the Ukrainian

actions and because the United States

and other nations have decided to pour

in hundreds of billions of dollars and

financial and Military assistance this

conflict has been extended and turned

into a proxy war between Ukraine and

Russia this isn't about Ukraine wanting

to use these weapons this is about the

United States and its NATO allies

seeking to use Ukraine as a proxy to

inflict the maximum possible damage on

Russia but the fallacy here is they say

well Russia can't be allowed to have a

safe haven on Russian soil from which

they get to launch an attack well what

do you think all of NATO in Europe is uh

from the Russian perspective it's a safe

haven for Ukraine you know they train

Ukrainian Pilots if uh if that was a

done training was done in Ukraine they'd

all be dead we have we rep repair uh the

Ukrainian equipment American Equipment

German equipment we repair it on polish

soil on German soil in the Baltic states

uh repair facilities are legitimate

military targets when you take a tank

off the battlefield take it back to

repair it to bring it back to the

battlefield that needs to be attacked

all the warehouses where we flow in

these hundreds of millions of dollars of

military equipment on polish soil

Romanian soil Etc they can't be attacked

by Russia Ukraine has this massive Safe

Haven which Russia is power to attack

and this is the danger because if we

start playing this game and attacking

the Russians the Russians have made it

quite clear that they will retaliate not

just on Ukrainian soil but on the soil

of NATO Nations and this heads us a very

down a very dangerous path that could

very well lead to no if they did they

wouldn't be going this far down this

path um they are being advised by people

who are saying that the Russians are

bluffing uh that the Russians lack the

capacity to back these words up with

meaningful Force um there's even a

people who say look Russia's focused on

the brick Summit in October and you know

on bringing the the the non-aligned

world together why would Russia risk you

know a war with the West well because

the West is threatening Russia's

existential survival and um this is the

danger I mean even President Putin came

out today and said you know this is a

very dangerous game that's being played

that will have fatal consequences for

the United

States judge in retrospect it might be a

good thing that you and I didn't go to

Russia because I'm very fearful that

while the St Petersburg International

economic forum is underway that a red

line will be crossed and Russia will

respond and we will be looking at a a an

outbreak of actual War between the

United States and Russia this is why I

wanted to travel because I was hopeful

that by speaking to the Russian

government speaking to the Russian

people speaking to the Russian Nation

about the potential of the American

people to do the right thing you know

come November maybe uh vote in somebody

who isn't hellbent on going to war with

Russia that the Russians might not be

inclined to um to to act precipitously

when we cross these red lines but um I

was denied that opportunity by the US

government and now sadly there's no

voice in Russia right now American Voice

that can caution this the US Embassy

isn't we don't have an American

ambassador that's meeting with the

Russians on a regular basis saying

that's is all misunderstanding what do

we need to do to avoid war we have a US

Government together with NATO allies

that think Russia's bluffing and they

are seeking to put as much pressure on

Russia as possible prior to this peace

Summit that's being convened by Ukraine

and Switzerland uh in the middle of this

month a peace Summit that's falling

apart before it even begins but the

operating notion is that we must

convince Russia that we are serious

about the consequences Russia will acre

if it continues a military engagement

against Ukraine that Russia's only

choice is to be compelled to the peace

table Russia's not playing that game

Russia's playing the game of we've won

this war and if you want to make it a

broader War we'll win that you know

there's a lot of Americans out there um

I I they're in the armchair Warrior

category uh who are are like unleash the

attacks the attacks of course is the

long range up to 300 kilometer range

missile that we have provided to the

ukrainians Ray McGovern and next time

you have rayon you can talk to him about

this um has highlighted you know some of

the Deo negotiations are taking place

between the Russians and the United

States before the initiation of the

special military operation and the

Russians kept saying we can't let NATO

into Ukraine because we can't allow

American missiles into Ukraine because a

lot of these Russian facilities command

centers Etc that Russia uses were

conceptualized and constructed during

the Soviet Union when Ukraine was part

of the Soviet Union so from a Russian

perspective they were deep in the

Russian rear protected but if Ukraine

now is carved out made part of NATO and

you insert American missiles there all

of these places that were thought to be

safe in the rear are now reachable and

if America allows Ukraine use attack

him's missiles to strike these

facilities Russia will nuke NATO not

Ukraine NATO and this is what lavro just

said if you do this now according to the

ukrainians they're complaining that the

United States will only allow them to

use the high Mars that they won't be

allowed to use the attacks to strike

Russia yet but just so everybody in your

audience understands we are one attack's

launch away from everybody dying We Are

One attackin launch away from everybody

dying the Russians aren't playing games

here the Russians

will and they will be well- grounded

morally and legally attack the places

from which the missiles came to which

the missiles were delivered at which

their um accelerant facilities are

stored and repaired and many Americans

who are Manning are Manning those

facilities do we have any idea how many

Americans are dead uh already didn't the

Russians recently attack some NATO

facility and you hear nothing with 100

people died and you hear nothing about

it in the west well I'm always a little

leery of these reports about The Magic

Russian Missile hit a underground bunker

because there's no reason for NATO the

United States to Hazard NATO members or

American members remember I I talked

about that safe haven why put 300 people

into Ukraine in a bunker when you could

have 300 people in Poland in a bunker

that's not going to get hit by a Russian

missile and have the same connectivity

so I I always view these reports is a

little suspicious um and it it just

makes no sense that from a force

protection standpoint um I can't see any

American or NATO member allowing that

many Americans or NATO officials to

congregate in one place on Ukrainian

soil knowing that the Russians would

find it and destroy it I do believe that

the Russians did take out an underground

facility it's a facility that was used

by the ukrainians there may have

been some um NATO advisers or U you know

contracted Personnel but the idea of 300

Americans and NATO that soldiers or

officials dying in one attack I just

think it's far-fetched and just part of

the U the fiction that um often appears

on social media do you think Russia

would attack

uh Berlin

Paris

London Russia said they will attack

Berlin Paris London Brussels Russia will

attack the decision-making centers

associated with any attack against

Russia that Russia deems to represent an

existential threat let's get back to the

attacks the attackin system uses a

guidance system a GPS uh guidance system

backed by an inertial guidance system

that requires specific information to be

loaded into the system that can only be

done by an American I'll just repeat

that one more time that can only be done

by an American got to be top secret

whatever it is and now it's not just

it's now we get to the next part that

information will be transmitted from

collection platforms overhead satellites

uh drones other ground and air breathing

um intelligence collection resources

they collect data that data goes to a

center inside Poland or in Germany where

that data is collated and then used to

create a Target uh a Target you know

model of data against a specific Target

what Target's going to be attacked how

they're going to attack it with what

from whereare that data then is put

together into a Target package which is

transmitted again using top secret uh

you know Communications channels that

the ukrainians don't have access to so

we have somebody on the ground in

Ukraine receiving this package from

somebody who planted it outside of

Ukraine and then they will put it into

the missile and then the ukrainians do

the last part which is to push the

button uh and launch it but every other

aspect was done by American hands and

the Russians know this and so wherever

in Europe This planning is taking place

this co co collation of intelligence

data this communication of targeting

data these are now legitimate targets

that Russia will take out either

conventionally or if required using

nuclear weapons and if the Germans are

party to this macron needs to understand

if they they the the ukrainians use the

French provided Scout missiles the same

thing applies the targeting data that

goes inside can only yes uh pretty much

every modern Russian missile is designed

to evade American and NATO missile

defense on the Strategic level um they

have Hypersonic missiles they have

maneuvering um Hypersonic Warheads uh

they have similar capabilities at the

Tactical and um you know what's called

intermediate uh level we can't defend

against this U and the bottom line is if

the Russians launch the missiles those

missiles will hit the targets they're

aimed at and if those targets if those

missiles have nuclear weapons those

nuclear weapons will detonate where

they're supposed to and this will be

devastating um it it it will be the the

end of Europe at a minimum and

potentially the end of the United States

and the end of Russia and the end of the

world

to

uh Biden

blinkin Sullivan Austin

Etc president the Secretary of State the

National Security advisor the Secretary

of

Defense understand the gravity of this

moment as you've explained it or are

they just

propagandists you know I used to have a

friend named William pul and I say used

to because tragically he passed away um

a couple years ago but William pulk was

a man who was in the Inner Circle for

John F Kennedy during the Cuban Missile

Crisis and he talks about and he's

talked to me many times about the

decision making that was going on and

the and the role that Kennedy played in

preventing a nuclear war the maturity

Kennedy had as a leader part of that

maturity came from when Kennedy was

first briefed on what was then called

the single integrated operation plan the

scop the American war plan he went to

the Pentagon and they briefed him they

said this is if we go to nuclear war

this is what we got and basically it was

premised on the notion that America will

be the largest surviving civilization

but in order to guarantee that we have

to kill everybody in the world and he

came out said that's insane I'm not

doing that and he turned to his advisor

said and we call ourselves the human

race and he said you have to give me

options every president since then or up

until George W bush reacted the same way

when they first got that briefing on how

America plans to go to war which is to

destroy the entire world so that when

the 20 to 30% of America that survives

will be the largest remaining

civilization cluster in the world

guaranteeing American global dominance

in a post-nuclear conflict Insanity um

they all said the same thing insane give

me options I can't go to that you can't

make me do this you have to give me

options and the Pentagon always gave

them options that inevitably led to that

since the end of the Soviet Union the

collapse of the Soviet Union uh the

Americans have downplayed their their

nuclear war plan uh we we detargeted our

missiles nothing was on a automatic

anymore we're heading in a path of you

know getting rid of nuclear weapons and

then George W bush came in a post 911

environment and said we will use our

nuclear weapons to ensure that a 911

never happens again and we reinserted

nuclear war planning into our military

Doctrine and today we have that same

mindset that same nuclear war strategy

without the maturity of John F Kennedy

we have people who look at the plan say

that's just a plan we're not really

going to do that and they say the

Russians are bluffing we don't have to

worry about this the problem is the

second something happens and that plan

is pulled out the dust is blushed off

and we start pushing buttons we go to

the scenario that John F Kennedy said

was Insanity judge we're going to blow

up the entire world because we know that

in a post-nuclear environment we can't

allow for instance India to survive

intact because we're going to be reduced

to 30% of our capacity we can't allow

India to have a superior civilization in

a post-nuclear conflict we're going to

destroy the entire world that's what the

American

[Music]

[Applause]

la oh

[Applause]

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

oh

[Music]