Respon Jokowi Usai Terima Tiga Pedemo Ijasah Palsu di Rumahnya!

Summary

The transcript depicts a tense situation where a group seeks to verify the authenticity of a public figure's academic credentials. Despite multiple attempts to obtain the original diploma, the individual involved denies showing it, citing a lack of legal obligation. The dialogue also touches upon legal procedures, public transparency, and the public's right to access information. The transcript concludes with an assertion that if required by a court, the original documents will be shown. Throughout, there is a back-and-forth between the public group and the individual, reflecting the complexity of proving or disproving claims about the credentials.

Takeaways

• 😀 The transcript discusses a situation where the authenticity of a diploma or certificate from Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) is being questioned.
• 😀 The main figure in the conversation is likely a former president (President Jokowi), and there are claims regarding the verification of his educational credentials.
• 😀 There is a legal debate about whether the certificate should be shown, as some believe it should be publicly available for verification, while others argue it is not legally required.
• 😀 UGM has reportedly stated that they cannot confirm the authenticity of the diploma, only that they cannot verify it yet, leading to confusion among the public.
• 😀 The transcript highlights a request for transparency regarding the diploma, with an emphasis on public access to information, especially for public figures.
• 😀 The group representing the issue has approached both the public figure and UGM, but the diploma was not shown, and no formal court order had been issued to compel its release.
• 😀 The conversation touches on the need for further legal action to obtain the diploma, including filing a public information request or pursuing a lawsuit.
• 😀 The script outlines frustration over legal systems where courts fail to rule on the issue, leaving the question of authenticity unresolved.
• 😀 Public figures, including President Jokowi, argue that there is no legal obligation to release the diploma unless ordered by a court, yet public demand for transparency remains high.
• 😀 The conversation also references ongoing legal processes, including complaints made to law enforcement regarding potential fraudulent documents, and the public's right to verify such claims.

Q & A

Why was there a request for President Jokowi to show his original diploma?

The request for President Jokowi to show his original diploma stemmed from concerns about the authenticity of his academic qualifications. The questioning was fueled by public speculation and doubts, and the TPUA (a group) sought to clarify these concerns.

What was the role of UGM (Gadjah Mada University) in this situation?

UGM's role was to verify the authenticity of President Jokowi's diploma. However, UGM clarified that it could not confirm the authenticity of the diploma, only providing information that it had not been verified yet. They emphasized that the matter required legal verification.

How did the court respond to the request for verifying the diploma's authenticity?

The court did not take action to verify the authenticity of the diploma, stating that it was not within their jurisdiction. They did not mandate the display of the diploma and declared that the case was not under their authority.

What steps did TPUA take after encountering obstacles in verifying the diploma?

After facing obstacles in verifying the diploma, TPUA filed a complaint with Bareskrim (the Criminal Investigation Unit), providing evidence related to concerns about the authenticity of the diploma and thesis. They planned to continue pushing for legal examination of these concerns.

What is TPUA's stance on the public's right to access information about President Jokowi's academic qualifications?

TPUA believes the public has a right to access information about President Jokowi's academic qualifications, especially considering his status as a former president. They argued that transparency should be upheld under the Public Information Disclosure Law.

What was President Jokowi's response when asked to show his original diploma?

President Jokowi responded by stating that he was not obliged to show his diploma to anyone, including the TPUA. He also emphasized that the decision to reveal the diploma rests with the judiciary, should it be required by a court order.

How did President Jokowi justify not showing his diploma?

President Jokowi justified not showing his diploma by asserting that there is no legal requirement for him to do so. He pointed out that UGM had already provided a clear statement regarding the diploma's status and that the issue was no longer his personal responsibility.

What did President Jokowi say about the allegations of defamation related to the diploma issue?

President Jokowi acknowledged that the situation had led to defamation and reputational harm. He mentioned considering legal action against those spreading such allegations, suggesting that he might pursue legal measures for the damage caused.

What is the next step if the diploma remains unverified in the legal process?

If the diploma remains unverified, TPUA indicated that they would continue to press for transparency, either through legal action to request the release of the information or by filing additional complaints with relevant authorities such as the Komisi Informasi Publik (Public Information Commission).

What was the atmosphere like during the interactions between TPUA and President Jokowi?

The interactions were tense and formal, with TPUA representatives seeking answers and President Jokowi maintaining a stance of legal caution. There were also moments of disruption, including crowd control and questions about the safety and conduct of the discussion.