Destroy Lonely - Love Lasts Forever ALBUM REVIEW

Summary

In his review of Destroy Lonely’s *Love Lasts Forever*, Anthony Fantano discusses the artist’s attempt to shift away from his rage-rap roots, exploring more psychedelic trap elements. While the album shows some improvement in production clarity, it still falls short in terms of originality, with weak vocals, uninspired lyrics, and basic beats. Fantano notes that although the album is more listenable than his previous work, it doesn’t stand out in a crowded genre and lacks the creativity of artists like Travis Scott and Lil Uzi Vert. The album ultimately receives a rating between a strong 2 or a light 3 out of 10.

Takeaways

• 😀 Destroy Lonely's album 'Love Lasts Forever' marks a shift in style from his previous rage-driven music, incorporating a psychedelic trap vibe.
• 😀 The album is more listenable than his previous work, but still falls short in terms of creativity and originality.
• 😀 Despite a more polished production, the album's beats lack depth and texture, and many sound derivative of other artists like Travis Scott.
• 😀 Destroy Lonely's vocal performance remains weak, with one-dimensional flows and a lack of range or personality compared to peers like Lil Uzi Vert and Young Thug.
• 😀 The album's lyrics are often unintelligible, and the use of effects on his voice further weakens his vocal delivery.
• 😀 The production on 'Love Lasts Forever' is clearer compared to his earlier projects, but still lacks the epic scale and complexity of artists like Travis Scott or Don Toliver.
• 😀 The move into a new style is commendable, but Destroy Lonely does not bring enough innovation or standout qualities to make the shift compelling.
• 😀 The album feels like a step towards a more dynamic sound but ultimately exposes Destroy Lonely's creative shortcomings in songwriting and production.
• 😀 Fans of Destroy Lonely may be disappointed by the lack of a fresh approach, especially as the album moves away from the Playboi Carti-inspired rage sound.
• 😀 The reviewer rates the album a 'strong two to a light three,' indicating that it has some merit but is ultimately a lackluster effort compared to his contemporaries.

Q & A

What is the main critique of Destroy Lonely's album *Love Lasts Forever*?

The main critique of the album is that it lacks originality, with many of the tracks feeling derivative and uninspired. The reviewer also highlights weak vocal delivery and repetitive, unmemorable production choices.

How does the reviewer describe the production quality on *Love Lasts Forever*?

The production is described as more dynamic and listenable compared to previous projects, with some tracks adopting a psychedelic trap vibe. However, it still lacks the epic or colorful feel of other trap artists like Travis Scott or Don Toliver.

What is said about Destroy Lonely’s vocal performance on the album?

Destroy Lonely's vocal performance is criticized for being weak, with unintelligible delivery and one-dimensional inflections. The reviewer suggests that his vocals don't have the same range or personality as artists like Lil Uzi Vert or Young Thug.

How does the reviewer feel about Destroy Lonely's shift in musical style?

The reviewer acknowledges that the shift to a more psychedelic trap sound is an interesting change and a departure from his previous rage-driven style. However, they feel that this change exposes the artist’s creative shortcomings, as it still doesn't bring anything unique or standout.

Which artists does the reviewer compare Destroy Lonely to on this album?

The reviewer compares Destroy Lonely to artists like Travis Scott, Lil Uzi Vert, Don Toliver, and Young Thug, noting that while he draws influence from them, he doesn't match their vocal ability, creativity, or production quality.

Does the reviewer think that *Love Lasts Forever* will appeal to Destroy Lonely’s fanbase?

The reviewer suggests that the shift in style might disappoint some of Destroy Lonely's hardcore fans, as the album lacks the rage-driven sound that fans of his previous work might expect. The change in direction, while a potential improvement, may not be enough to satisfy those fans.

What specific elements of the album does the reviewer consider an improvement over Destroy Lonely’s previous work?

The reviewer mentions that *Love Lasts Forever* is more listenable than Destroy Lonely's previous album, as it doesn't induce as much ear fatigue. The production quality and dynamic range of certain tracks also stand out as improvements.

How does the reviewer feel about the instrumental choices on the album?

The reviewer feels that the instrumental choices, while not outright bad, are very basic and lack character. They suggest that the beats feel unremarkable and could easily be found by searching for similar styles from other artists, particularly Travis Scott.

What is the final rating the reviewer gives *Love Lasts Forever*?

The reviewer gives the album a rating between 2 and 3 out of 10, indicating that while it has some improvements, it is still a largely disappointing and unremarkable project.

Does the reviewer see potential in Destroy Lonely as an artist?

While the reviewer acknowledges that there is some potential for growth, they feel that Destroy Lonely has yet to demonstrate significant artistic depth or originality. They suggest that his current style and vocal performance still leave much to be desired.