[AULA1] Como argumentar BEM na Redação do ENEM? | Método Argumentação Inteligente

Summary

This educational script focuses on the essential skill of crafting strong arguments for writing essays, particularly for the ENEM exam. It highlights the importance of a structured approach, using the 'argumentative pyramid,' and explains the key components: thesis (opinion), arguments, and argumentative deepening. The theme of parental alienation and child protection is used to illustrate how to develop and support a well-founded opinion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of logical reasoning and argumentation techniques, aiming to help students effectively structure and excel in their essays.

Takeaways

• 😀 Argumentation in writing can be difficult, but improving it is essential for success, especially in exams like the Enem.
• 😀 Competence 3 evaluates your ability to argue effectively and requires you to deepen your knowledge and arguments.
• 😀 It's crucial to understand the main issue in any topic, such as the problem of parental alienation when discussing children's rights and protection.
• 😀 The technique of the argumentative pyramid is a useful tool for organizing thoughts and structuring an argument.
• 😀 The pyramid consists of three parts: the opinion (thesis) at the top, arguments that support the thesis, and a deepening argument at the base.
• 😀 The opinion is the simplest part of the argumentation process, where you clearly state whether the topic is a problem or not.
• 😀 Arguments support the opinion by providing evidence and reasoning, and should be two in number for balance.
• 😀 Deepening the argument (the base of the pyramid) adds depth to your argument, making it more compelling and thorough.
• 😀 The argumentation process should rely on logical reasoning, ensuring each part of the pyramid fits logically with the others.
• 😀 Using words with value judgment (like 'grave' or 'problem') helps strengthen your thesis by clearly indicating its significance.

Q & A

What is the primary focus of the script?

The primary focus of the script is to teach students how to improve their argumentative skills for the ENEM (National High School Exam) by explaining the structure and techniques of effective argumentation, particularly in the context of the theme 'parental alienation and children's protection rights'.

What does 'competência 3' evaluate in an ENEM essay?

'Competência 3' evaluates the student's ability to argue effectively in their essay. It specifically assesses how well the student develops their argumentation, how they deepen their knowledge and arguments, and how they avoid leaving argumentative gaps.

How does the 'pyramid argumentativa' (argumentative pyramid) work?

The 'pyramid argumentativa' is a structure used to organize the argumentation in an essay. At the top of the pyramid is the main opinion or thesis. The second layer contains the arguments that support this thesis, and the base of the pyramid involves deepening the arguments, which provides strength and clarity to the points made.

What is the role of the thesis (opinion) in the argumentation pyramid?

The thesis or opinion is at the top of the argumentative pyramid. It is the main point of the essay and represents the student's perspective on the issue. This opinion is essential as it guides the entire essay and serves as the foundation for the arguments and deeper analysis.

What is meant by 'argumentative gaps' (lacunas argumentativas) and how should they be avoided?

Argumentative gaps refer to missing or incomplete reasoning that weakens an argument. To avoid these gaps, the student must ensure that each argument is fully developed, with clear explanations, evidence, and connections to the thesis.

How should a student approach choosing arguments for their ENEM essay?

Students should not create new arguments from scratch but instead select relevant, pre-existing arguments that align with the theme. The chosen arguments should support the thesis and be grounded in logical reasoning. This ensures that the essay remains structured and coherent.

What is the importance of using words with 'value judgments' (juízo de valor) in the thesis?

Words with value judgments, like 'grave' (serious) or 'problem', are essential in the thesis because they help express an evaluation of the issue. These words clarify the student's stance and emphasize the seriousness or significance of the problem being discussed.

How does the student deepen their arguments according to the script?

To deepen their arguments, the student should build on their initial arguments with further explanation and logical reasoning. This is the most challenging part of the argumentation, as it involves providing detailed support for each point to strengthen the overall thesis.

What are 'raciocínios lógicos argumentativos' (logical argumentative reasoning) and why are they important?

Logical argumentative reasoning refers to the logical structures and methods used to support the thesis and arguments in an essay. They are important because they ensure that the argumentation is rational, coherent, and persuasive, which strengthens the student's position.

How can a student select effective arguments for the theme of parental alienation?

For the theme of parental alienation, the student should choose arguments that relate to the severity of the issue, its impact on children, and the broader implications for society. These arguments should be selected from a pool of pre-existing logical structures that relate to the topic, ensuring relevance and coherence in the essay.