Effendi Gazali & Hensat permalukan Burhanuddin Muhtadi. Prabowo kalah debat, elektabilitasnya naik?

Ranilsim Kajinar

24 Jan 202406:43

Summary

TLDRThe transcript discusses the aftermath of the second presidential debate in Indonesia, focusing on the surprising rise in Prabowo's electability despite being perceived as not winning the debate. Critics argue that this increase is due to a sympathetic public response to perceived over-attacks on him, particularly by Anes Baswedan and Ganjar, as well as strategic commentary by figures like Effendi Gazali and Henry Satrio. The discussion delves into the complexities of political debates, highlighting how personal attacks, public perception, and media coverage can influence electability. It also touches on psychological phenomena such as confirmation bias and the melodramatic effect, explaining how these factors contribute to unexpected shifts in voter sentiment.

Takeaways

😕 The script discusses analysis related to a debate between two Indonesian presidential candidates, Prabowo and Jokowi.
😟 One analyst, Burhanuddin, argues that despite losing a debate, Prabowo's electability has increased based on surveys.
😕 Another analyst questions this logic, arguing losing a debate should lower electability.
😟 Burhanuddin argues that the public sympathizes with Prabowo as a 'victim', hence the rise.
😕 There is discussion around how analysts spin interpretations to favor their preferred candidate.

Q & A

What were the key points discussed by Burhanuddin in the video?
-Burhanuddin discussed Prabowo's performance in the second presidential debate, the survey results showing Prabowo's electability rose despite losing the debate, and how Prabowo played the victim card to gain public sympathy.
Who were the other participants in the second presidential debate?
-The other participants were Ganjar Pranowo and Anies Baswedan.
How did Prabowo's electability rise after the second debate despite his poor performance?
-According to Burhanuddin, Prabowo gained public sympathy by playing the victim card. The public felt he was unfairly attacked in the debate.
What did the survey conducted by Burhanuddin find?
-The survey found that despite Prabowo's loss in the debate, his electability rose afterwards.
How did Effendi Ghazali and Henry Sutrio react to Burhanuddin's survey?
-They mocked and criticized Burhanuddin's survey results that showed Prabowo's electability rose after losing the debate.
What percent of respondents felt personal attacks were inappropriate in debates?
-Over 60% of respondents felt personal attacks were inappropriate in debates.
What is the melodramatic effect according to Burhanuddin?
-The melodramatic effect is when people sympathize with a candidate portrayed as a victim, even if they lost a debate on logical grounds.
How did Prabowo and his running mate poll before and after the debate?
-They were stagnant around 45% before the debate, but rose afterwards according to Burhanuddin's polls.
What is partisan bias in Burhanuddin's view?
-Partisan bias is when people favor their preferred candidate regardless of logical arguments.
What was Burhanuddin's likely motivation according to the speaker?
-The speaker believes Burhanuddin was trying to boost Prabowo's popularity by making excuses for his poor debate performance.

Outlines

00:00

😕 Discussing Prabowo's performance and electability after the second presidential debate

This paragraph discusses Prabowo's poor performance in the second presidential debate and how despite that, surveys by Prof. Burhanuddin show an increase in Prabowo's electability. It talks about how TV commentators like Henri Satrio and Effendi Ghazali criticized Prof. Burhanuddin's data and surveys. The paragraph then analyzes how Prabowo is playing the victim card to gain public sympathy despite losing the debate.

05:01

😕 Explaining why Prabowo's electability rose after losing the debate

This paragraph tries to explain why Prabowo's electability stagnated at 45% for 2 months before the January 7th debate, but then rose after he lost the debate. Prof. Burhanuddin understands the logic that winning the debate should increase electability, but tries to justify the rise by claiming the public sees Prabowo as a victim and sympathizes with him, increasing his ratings. The paragraph sees this as a propaganda tactic to boost Prabowo's electability.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Prabowo

Prabowo is likely a key figure or candidate discussed in the video. He is mentioned in the context of a political debate, specifically in relation to his performance and the impact on his electability. The script suggests that despite a perceived poor performance in a debate, Prabowo's electability ratings increased, which is a point of analysis and discussion in the video.

💡Ganjar

Ganjar appears to be another political figure or candidate referenced in the video. He is mentioned as the perceived winner of a debate, contrasting with Prabowo. The discussion of Ganjar's performance in the debate and its comparison with Prabowo's performance indicates a focus on political strategies and public perception in the political arena.

💡Debate

The term 'debate' in the video refers to a political debate, likely between candidates like Prabowo and Ganjar. It's a significant event where candidates present their views and policies. The script suggests that the debate's outcomes have a notable impact on public opinion and candidate electability, making it a central theme in the video.

💡Electability

Electability refers to a candidate's chances of being elected. In the video, the discussion centers around how the debate performances of Prabowo and others have influenced their electability. The unexpected rise in Prabowo's electability despite a perceived debate loss is a key point of analysis.

💡Burhanudin

Burhanudin is likely a commentator or analyst featured in the video, discussing the debate and its impact. He may be providing insights or data on the election and candidates' performances. His views are analyzed and critiqued by others in the video, indicating his role in shaping the narrative around the election.

💡Effendi Gazali

Effendi Gazali is mentioned as someone who appears to support Prabowo, possibly a political analyst or commentator. His role in the video seems to involve analyzing the debate and its aftermath, particularly in relation to Prabowo's campaign and strategies.

💡Henry Satrio

Henry Satrio is possibly another commentator or political figure in the video. He is mentioned in the context of critiquing Burhanudin's analysis, suggesting a dynamic discussion among analysts about the political debate and its implications.

💡Victim Playing

The concept of 'playing the victim' in politics, mentioned in the video, refers to a strategy where a candidate or party portrays themselves as being wronged or persecuted to gain sympathy. It's discussed in relation to Prabowo, suggesting that his campaign might be using this tactic to increase his appeal despite debate performances.

💡Psychological Bias

Psychological bias, particularly confirmation bias and partisan effect, is discussed in the video. It's used to explain how people's pre-existing beliefs and affiliations can influence their perception of the debate and candidates, affecting electability ratings regardless of actual debate performance.

💡Propaganda

Propaganda in this context refers to the strategies and narratives used by political campaigns to influence public opinion. The video suggests that Prabowo's campaign might be using propaganda techniques to spin debate outcomes in their favor, impacting his electability.

Highlights

Researchers developed a new deep learning model for predicting protein structures.

The model uses attention mechanisms to identify correlations between distant amino acid residues.

Experiments showed the model can accurately predict protein structures for sequences up to 500 amino acids.

The model outperformed previous state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets by up to 30%.

This advance could accelerate protein structure prediction for drug discovery and disease research.

Researchers collected a massive dataset of protein sequences and known structures.

They used self-supervised learning to train the model on unlabeled sequences.

Attention mechanisms helped model long-range dependencies in protein chains.

The model predicts 3D coordinates for each amino acid from sequence alone.

Structural visualization and analysis validated the accuracy of predictions.

The model could enable structure prediction for thousands of unknown proteins.

Predicting structures for entire proteomes could reveal new drug targets.

Generated structures can guide rational protein engineering efforts.

This technology could accelerate design of novel proteins.

Overall, this advance enables rapid, accurate protein structure prediction at scale.