What happens when tech and human bodies meld together?

CNBC International
31 May 202404:19

Summary

TLDRThe video introduces the concept of the 'Internet of Bodies' (IoB), a term coined by Dr. Andrea M. Matwyshyn, which refers to a network of human bodies enhanced by technology. It categorizes IoB devices into three generations: external (like smartwatches), internal (such as pacemakers), and fully integrated systems (e.g., Neuralink's brain-computer interface). While proponents highlight benefits in healthcare and cost savings, critics raise concerns over data protection, ethical implications, and potential societal divides. With the market for connected medical devices projected to double by 2029, the dialogue around regulation and personal safety remains crucial.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The Internet of Bodies (IoB) extends the concept of the Internet of Things by integrating human bodies with the internet and related technologies.
  • 😀 Dr. Andrea M. Matwyshyn coined the term 'Internet of Bodies' in 2016, defining it as a network where human bodies depend on the internet and technologies for functionality.
  • 😀 IoB devices are categorized into three generations: external (wearables), internal (implants and ingested devices), and merged (devices that integrate fully with the body).
  • 😀 First-generation external devices include smartwatches and smart glasses that monitor health metrics and enhance user experience.
  • 😀 Second-generation internal devices involve technologies like pacemakers, smart prosthetics, and digital pills that can transmit health data.
  • 😀 Third-generation devices, such as Neuralink's 'the Link', fully merge with the body and facilitate real-time interaction with external machines.
  • 😀 Proponents of IoB highlight benefits such as enhanced cognitive functions, improved healthcare, and significant cost savings for individuals and companies.
  • 😀 Critics raise concerns about data protection, privacy issues, and the potential misuse of personal health information by governments and corporations.
  • 😀 Ethical considerations include the risk of exacerbating social inequalities between augmented and non-augmented individuals and challenges to human autonomy.
  • 😀 The IoB market is rapidly growing, projected to reach over $132 billion by 2029, indicating significant potential and interest in connected medical devices.

Q & A

  • What is the Internet of Bodies (IoB)?

    -The Internet of Bodies (IoB) is a term coined by Dr. Andrea M. Matwyshyn in 2016, describing a network of human bodies whose integrity and functionality rely on the internet and related technologies like artificial intelligence.

  • What are the three generations of IoB devices?

    -The three generations of IoB devices are: 1) External devices, such as smartwatches and rings that track health metrics; 2) Internal devices, which include implanted or ingested devices like pacemakers and digital pills; 3) Merged devices, which integrate with the body and maintain real-time connections to external machines, exemplified by Neuralink.

  • What role does Neuralink play in the IoB space?

    -Neuralink is developing a brain-computer interface called 'the Link,' which is a coin-sized chip implanted under the skull to read brain signals and allow users to control external machines, demonstrating the potential of merged IoB devices.

  • What are the potential benefits of IoB devices?

    -Proponents argue that IoB devices can improve body cognition and function, enhance healthcare, and provide significant cost savings for individuals and corporations.

  • What risks are associated with IoB devices?

    -Risks include data protection issues, potential misuse of personal information by governments or companies, concerns about dependency and addiction, and ethical questions regarding equity in access to enhancements.

  • What were Dick Cheney's concerns about IoB technology?

    -Former Vice President Dick Cheney expressed fears about the wireless function of his heart implant, admitting that he had it disabled to prevent potential assassination attempts.

  • What regulatory challenges exist for IoB devices?

    -Most IoB implantable and ingestible devices are regulated by agencies like the FDA; however, IoB consumer devices currently lack comprehensive regulatory oversight, leading to a patchwork of legislation.

  • How do existing laws like GDPR and HIPAA relate to IoB?

    -Existing laws such as the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) could be extended to provide safeguards for IoB data, protecting individuals from data breaches and unauthorized disclosures.

  • What is the projected growth of the connected medical device market?

    -According to Mordor Intelligence, the global connected medical device market is expected to reach around $66 billion in 2024 and over $132 billion by 2029, indicating a robust growth rate of nearly 15% annually.

  • What ethical considerations arise from the adoption of IoB technology?

    -Ethical considerations include concerns about the potential for socioeconomic disparities, where only the wealthy can afford enhancements, as well as questions regarding human autonomy, privacy, and the responsibility for monitoring the risks associated with IoB devices.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Internet of BodiesHealth TechnologyData PrivacyEthical ImplicationsWearable DevicesNeuralinkMedical InnovationHealthcare EquityAI IntegrationRegulatory Challenges