2024 White clot quantitative results

Summary

A survey of embalmers reveals a growing concern over unusual phenomena observed in corpses, particularly white fibrous clots and micro-clotting, which have become more prevalent since 2021. These clots are described as viscous and rubbery, often seen in younger individuals, and some embalmers suspect a link to recent medical interventions. However, the phenomenon remains largely unexplored in the medical community, with differing opinions within the embalming profession. While some professionals report concerns and seek explanations, others dismiss it as fearmongering or conspiracy. The lack of official research and transparency raises questions about these unsettling findings.

Takeaways

• 😀 Embalmers in 2024 report a continued presence of white fibrous clots, with 83% acknowledging their occurrence. This is an increase from the previous year's 75%.
• 😀 The prevalence of white fibrous clots in 2024 is 27.5% of corpses, up from 20% in 2023, suggesting a rising trend despite hopes for a decrease.
• 😀 Some embalmers attribute the increase in sightings to reduced stigma, as more professionals feel comfortable discussing the phenomenon after years of observing it.
• 😀 The phenomenon of white fibrous clots is described as a new occurrence, beginning post-2020, and is not yet officially documented in pathology journals.
• 😀 The white fibrous clots are seen in varying prevalence, with 74% of embalmers observing them in 21-40% of their cases, and 55% noting them in 41-60% of corpses.
• 😀 A small but notable percentage (22%) of embalmers also report micro-clotting, a condition that appears more frequently than in previous years, especially among hospitalized individuals.
• 😀 Many embalmers report seeing ‘grape jelly’ clots, which have become more viscous since 2020, suggesting a qualitative change in blood clots observed during embalming.
• 😀 The phenomenon of these clots is described by some embalmers as affecting individuals as young as their 50s, rather than only the elderly, challenging prior assumptions about the age demographics affected.
• 😀 Some embalmers and medical professionals speculate that these unusual clots could be linked to recent medical interventions, but there is a lack of conclusive published research on the topic.
• 😀 Despite a high percentage of embalmers acknowledging the clots, only a third of them report actively engaging with online discussions or videos about the phenomenon, reflecting a potential lack of curiosity or concern within the profession.
• 😀 There is a significant reluctance among professional embalming associations to address the issue publicly, with many associations avoiding or rejecting surveys on the topic, possibly due to fears of professional backlash or political sensitivities.

Q & A

What is the significance of the 'grape jelly' clots mentioned in the transcript?

The 'grape jelly' clots refer to larger, more viscous blood clots that embalmers have observed in deceased bodies. These clots are notable for their unusual texture and size, which are considered atypical compared to more common clots seen in embalming processes.

How have the 'grape jelly' clots changed since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic?

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, embalmers have reported a qualitative change in the grape jelly clots. Initially, these clots were described as similar to grape jelly, but they have become more viscous over time, resembling a more jam-like consistency.

What is the significance of the 2021 timeline mentioned by the embalmers?

The year 2021 is significant because it marks the point when embalmers first started noticing a notable increase in unusual clots, including white fibrous structures and grape jelly-like clots. This change is considered a new phenomenon that was not observed prior to that year.

What role do embalmers believe these clots might play in the cause of death?

Some embalmers speculate that the micro-clotting and grape jelly clots could be related to hospitalization or even death, as they observe these clots frequently in deceased bodies. However, the exact relationship between these clots and cause of death remains unconfirmed and is still under investigation.

How have embalmers reacted to the increase in these clotting phenomena?

Embalmers have had mixed reactions. Some are deeply concerned about the increase in these clots, while others hesitate to discuss them publicly, often due to professional confidentiality concerns. There is also a division between those who believe the phenomenon is linked to recent medical treatments and those who remain skeptical.

What was the reaction of the Canadian embalmer mentioned in the transcript?

The Canadian embalmer expressed skepticism about the presence of unusual clots, stating they had not observed anything out of the ordinary since the beginning of the pandemic. This embalmer also dismissed the theories surrounding these clots as conspiracy-driven propaganda and stressed that embalming professionals should not share such information publicly due to privacy concerns.

What does Richard Hman’s stance suggest about the ethical responsibilities of embalmers?

Richard Hman argues that while embalming professionals have confidentiality obligations, they also have an ethical duty to report unusual findings that could pose a serious health risk. He believes that if they observe something concerning, such as these unusual clots, they should bring it to the attention of authorities, especially if there is a potential public health impact.

Why do some embalmers hesitate to share their findings about these clots?

Many embalmers hesitate to share their findings due to concerns about breaching patient confidentiality, as well as fears of backlash from colleagues, medical authorities, or public opinion. There is also a sense of professional secrecy that discourages discussing anomalies observed during the embalming process.

What is the main difference between the perspectives of embalmers who believe in the existence of these clots and those who don’t?

The main difference lies in their approach to evidence and the broader narrative surrounding the phenomenon. Embalmers who acknowledge the clots often tie them to recent medical treatments and public health events, while those who dismiss them view the claims as exaggerated or rooted in conspiracy theories, with no solid evidence to support them.

What is the overall implication of these findings for public health, according to the embalmers in the transcript?

The overall implication is that these unusual clots may be indicative of a larger, underlying public health issue that needs more investigation. Embalmers suggest that these clots could be linked to increased mortality or other health complications, but further research is needed to confirm whether they are contributing to death rates or other serious health problems.