The Embalmer Analysis Results Will Blow Your Mind
Summary
TLDRA group of anonymous scientists have released a document detailing unusual blood clot patterns observed in embalming fluid, which they believe requires urgent investigation. The clots, first noticed in 2021, are reported to occur in both the deceased and the living, with characteristics significantly different from normal clots. The implications are grave, suggesting that standard treatments for clot-related conditions may become less effective. The scientific community is urged to acknowledge and investigate these findings to mitigate potential risks to public health.
Takeaways
- π¬ A group of anonymous scientists has been researching unusual blood clots and has produced a document detailing their findings, which they believe is critical for further investigation.
- π€ The scientists are concerned about the implications of their work for their personal and professional lives, hence their decision to remain anonymous.
- 𧬠They have observed an unusual pattern of blood clots, primarily in 2021, which has not been widely acknowledged or investigated by the medical community.
- π¨ββοΈ The script suggests that doctors and scientists should be more curious and proactive in investigating these clots, as ignoring them could be negligent.
- π©Έ A whistleblower from a cath lab in the US confirmed that the unusual clots are not only found in embalming fluid but also in living individuals.
- π The document shared by the scientists includes detailed analysis and images of the clots, indicating that they are very different from normal blood clots.
- π The analysis shows that the clots have abnormal protein compositions, including fibrinogen beta, gamma, and alpha, which could suggest a different clotting mechanism.
- β οΈ The implications of these findings are serious, as they could indicate that standard treatments for clots may become less effective, and that even blood thinners might not be as effective.
- π΄ The document includes data from clots taken from individuals of different ages and genders, suggesting that the phenomenon is not limited to a specific demographic.
- π The script calls for further scientific investigation and discussion to understand the mechanisms behind these clots and to mitigate their potential impact on public health.
Q & A
What has the group of scientists been investigating over the past year?
-The group of scientists has been investigating the unusual occurrence of blood clots, particularly focusing on their characteristics and implications.
Why have the scientists been working quietly on this research?
-The scientists have been working quietly due to anxiety about the potential personal and professional implications of their findings.
What is the significance of the document they have shared publicly?
-The document is significant because it contains critical information and observations that the scientists believe necessitate further investigation into the unusual pattern of blood clots.
Why are the scientists remaining anonymous?
-The scientists are remaining anonymous to protect their identities, likely due to the controversial nature of their findings and potential backlash.
What is the 'unusual pattern' mentioned in the script?
-The 'unusual pattern' refers to the observation of blood clots that are different from the norm, which has primarily been noticed since 2021.
Why is the whistleblower's message significant?
-The whistleblower's message is significant because it confirms that the occurrence of these unusual blood clots is not limited to a specific group but is also happening in the general living population.
What did the analysis of the blood clots reveal?
-The analysis revealed that the blood clots had unusual characteristics, including differences in the proteins involved and the way they form, which is distinct from standard clots.
What are the potential implications if these blood clots are not studied further?
-If these blood clots are not studied further, there could be serious implications for public health, including ineffective standard treatments for clot-related conditions and an increased risk of clot-related events.
What is the role of the medical community in addressing this issue?
-The medical community has a responsibility to investigate these findings, understand any changes in disease presentation, and adapt treatments accordingly to mitigate the risks associated with these unusual blood clots.
Why is it important not to dismiss these findings as a conspiracy theory?
-It is important not to dismiss these findings as a conspiracy theory because they are based on real evidence and have potential serious implications for health and treatment efficacy. Dismissing them could lead to overlooking a significant public health issue.
What is the significance of the 19-inch long clot mentioned in the script?
-The 19-inch long clot is significant because it represents an abnormal and unusually large blood clot, which further emphasizes the need for understanding the mechanisms behind these occurrences.
Outlines
𧬠Silent Scientific Investigation into Embus Clots
A group of anonymous scientists has been investigating the phenomenon of embus clots, which they believe could have significant implications for public health. They have published a document detailing their findings, which they consider critical for further research. The scientists have observed an unusual pattern that has largely been ignored by others in the field. The speaker emphasizes the importance of this research, suggesting that it is a matter of professional responsibility to raise awareness about these clots, even if it means risking their own careers. The document includes images and data that are compelling and warrant further investigation. The speaker also discusses a whistleblower from a cath lab who confirmed the occurrence of these clots in living individuals, which was a significant revelation that shifted the perspective on the issue.
π¬ Unusual Characteristics of Embus Clots
The scientists have discovered that the characteristics of embus clots are markedly different from those of normal clots. They have analyzed four different embus clots, each from a different individual, and found abnormal protein ratios and compositions. The document suggests that these clots contain a different main constituent, which may indicate a unique mechanism behind their formation. The scientists are calling for further analysis by experts in the field of clotting to understand these findings better. The implications of these findings are significant, as they suggest that standard treatments for clot-related conditions may become less effective if these unusual clots continue to occur.
π¨ Urgent Need for Medical Community Awareness
The speaker stresses the urgency for the medical community to acknowledge and investigate the phenomenon of embus clots. They argue that the potential implications of these clots are so serious that ignoring them could lead to higher risk events and ineffective treatments. The speaker calls for clinicians to observe and report any changes in the presentation of clot-related diseases and to consider the possibility that current medications may not be as effective as they once were. The document and the whistleblower interview serve as evidence that this is not a conspiracy theory but a real and present issue that requires immediate attention and action.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Embus clots
π‘Anomaly
π‘Whistleblower
π‘Pathophysiology
π‘Fibrinogen
π‘Thrombolysis
π‘Blood thinners
π‘Pulmonary embolus
π‘Ethical responsibility
π‘Substack
π‘Kickstarter
Highlights
Scientists have been working quietly to understand embus clots.
They have produced a document that could be groundbreaking for further investigations.
The scientists must remain anonymous due to personal and professional concerns.
An unusual pattern of embus clots primarily occurred in 2021, with no clear explanation.
The scientists have a responsibility to raise awareness about their findings.
A whistleblower from a cath lab in the US confirmed clot occurrences in the living.
The analysis of embus clots showed characteristics very different from normal clots.
The clots contain an important clotting protein in a way not seen in normal clots.
The clots have a very fibrous and elastic feel, which is unusual.
The implications of ignoring these findings could lead to higher risk events in the future.
Standard treatment methods may not be as effective against these unusual clots.
The medical community has a responsibility to check for changes in disease presentation.
The situation is likened to an 'elephant in the room' that needs acknowledgment and addressing.
The document provides a comprehensive view of the potential mechanisms behind the clots.
The scientists have broken down the science to understand what could be happening with the clots.
The findings are not a conspiracy theory but real evidence of abnormal clot patterns.
There is a call to action for understanding and mitigating the impact of these clots.
The Whistleblower video provides further evidence and should be viewed for more information.
Transcripts
over the past year a group of scientists
have been working quietly behind the
scenes trying to figure out exactly what
has been happening with embus clots
they've been doing this work quietly and
consistently because they are so anxious
about what it could mean for themselves
personally and in their profession
work but what it means is that they've
finally come up with a document that
will absolutely blow your mind now
listen very carefully they have to
remain anonymous and that's going to be
one of the challenges that we face is
that people are going to say you need to
show who you are but what they have done
is they have put together a document
which they have now shared publicly
which they believe is absolutely
critical for further investigations to
be done you have to remember that there
is an unusual pattern here and the
unusual pattern is that nobody seems to
be interested in what the Embers are
observing now some people may say well
the ambers are not doctors and they are
not scientists why are they talking
about it the reality is that they have
observed something that was unusual at
transition that primarily occurred in
2021 and they don't have an explanation
for it my view is that if they hadn't
raised awareness for it that would be
negligent they had the responsibility to
do that but not everyone is interested
in looking at these outcomes and so it
raises very very serious questions now I
keep on talking about it and you may
wonder why do I keep on raising this
issue about imas clots what really is in
it what am I focused on why do I keep on
doing
it well a few months ago after I had
done the original interview with regards
to embance clots where I had done with
Tom havland and his survey um
outcomes um a few months later I was
contacted by somebody who worked in a
cath lab in the us and this individual
confirmed that not only were these clots
occurring with the Embers but they were
occurring with the living now this was a
whistleblower message meaning that he
didn't give his identity away and
therefore what that means is that he put
his job at risk I feel a tremendous
sense of responsibility with that and
that's part of the reason why I keep
talking about it I feel as to have been
given that responsibility to raise
awareness about this this is really the
substack the link is in the description
this is where we had the interview with
the Whistleblower myself and Dr Shetty
and he shared with us a number of images
that were quite stunning um for everyone
to see so if you want to see the full
video you need to go at the description
I'll not show you any more simply
because some people are squeamish and
they don't necessarily want to see the
clots but it was a very very important
interview because it highlighted that
this was occurring in the
living now when I saw that that changed
my perspective completely because I
realized that we have to therefore
understand the mechanisms the
pathophysiology in order to try and see
if we can mitigate what could be quite
significant occurrences
now when they looked at the analysis
they took into consideration that it had
been done as well previously so there
was a Mike Adams who did some work early
on and this was after the died suddenly
presentation and he was looking at the
clot analysis at that time and it shows
you the details of the things that he
had seen in the blood and he had
compared it with regards to BAS line his
own blood his own blood clot to see what
was the difference between them and so
this analysis had been done early in
2021 but since then nothing else had
been done so these scientists
went got more ous clots and they then
did further more detailed analysis to
try and figure out what in the world was
going on I'm not doing the analysis here
now because that will take some real
indepth discussion and talk and my hope
is to try and get a number of scientists
who are expert in the field of clotting
for them to go through the analysis and
try and see if they can make sense of
what it is that they are finding the
important thing to note is that they
have observed that the characteristics
of these ous clots are very different
from normal standard clots
and here is some of the just to give you
a little bit of a taste of what is in
this document here they were looking at
four embus clots and they were showing
some of the characteristic abnormalities
or the proteins that were involved in
them fibrinogen beta gamma Alpha and the
ratios this was very important and
helped them to formulate a theory as to
what they thought was going on and they
showed a breakdown of the main
constituents for each of the four
samples this one here was a young
teenage female this one here was a 25y
old male this one here was a 40-year-old
they don't know the gender and this one
here was a 70-year old male what I've
realized is that there does seem to be
some difference in the constituents the
main constituents so it suggests that
the mechanism that is associated with
these clots is partially about the main
constituents but there are going to be
minor constituencies um constituents in
the clot that give it that
characteristic very fibrous elastic feel
that is very unusual and as I said I'm
not going to give you the main breakdown
at the moment but one of the things that
they had noted is that one of the
important clotting proteins as a whole
gets incorporated into these clots it's
not just in the pieces as would normally
happen in a normal clot there is
something very unusual about them that's
the reality and to ignore the fact that
they are occurring is extremely
unscientific I genuinely can't
understand anyone who is not curious
about what could be the cause it's one
thing to say that you don't believe that
the eners are seeing it and some people
genuinely think that they think they've
just made it up and maybe they've got
some put or something and they've put
these clots just to get attention that
could be one small possibility but this
is not a oneoff and they have collected
hundreds of samples from across the
world there is something very strange
happening and it needs to be
delineated even more worryingly this
pattern seems to be also occurring in
people we therefore really have to
understand why is it happening the
outcomes of not doing that are going to
be that we're going to see a transition
in the type of presentation that we
would normally see people always get
clots with a pulmonary embolus or even a
stroke um or an embolic phenomenon
blocking an outra to a
leg if this is continuing to occur in
the living what you will then see is
that your standard methods of treatment
are no longer as effective
you will find that thrombolysis will not
work effectively you will find that when
they try to break up these clots by you
know using local measures it still
doesn't work additionally if this
information is correct it will indicate
that quite likely even the blood
thinness that people are on will not be
as
effective so if you are noticing
patterns that say for instance people
who are on blood thinners for clotting
problems and they are still clotting on
a regular basis that's a red flag that
indicates that something has changed in
the human physiology that is not as easy
to address even with
medication so the implications of not
looking at this are very serious it will
mean that people have higher risk events
in the near future if they are not
already happening and so there is a
responsibility on the medical community
if they hear about this to first check
and see whether or not there has been a
transition in the way that disease is
presenting that's the responsibility
clinically and doctors should know this
nurses will probably know this as well
are they seeing the same type of disease
is it the same way is there a concern
concern with the way how patients are
presenting these are the kinds of
questions that need to be answered quite
urgently and without those answers we're
putting everyone at risk fundamentally I
think that what is happening is that
there is a general
anxiety about dealing with what we call
the elephant in the room now without
actually reflecting carefully it is
concerning and I can understand that but
there is an elephant that is sitting
around and that elephant is not being
acknowledged and without acknowledgment
of the elephant there is no chance to
mitigate against the impact it has on
the couch or the room that's the
situation that we have
today what is happening is that people
are afraid to ask the questions because
of the implications if the answers are
correct I understand that but at the end
of the day the people who should be most
concerned are not clinicians because
they have just followed the rules and
the system they have a responsibility
now to make sure that if there is an
elephant it is observed acknowledged and
addressed we're going to start and
continue this process of asking these
hard questions remember as I said this
is no longer just
Theory we have now got clear evidence
that something is abnormal with regards
to these clots this is quite a
comprehensive view of what they have
done and they have looked in a lot of
detail as to the potential mechanism
this is a picture of one of the clots
that they had it was 19 in long this is
definitely not a normal pattern and what
they have done in this document is that
they have broken down the science as to
what they think could be happening as I
said that's a conversation for another
period of time and certainly something
that we have to check with regards to
Scientific experts as to their own
thoughts on it but the point is this
don't let anyone tell you that this is a
conspiracy theory this is real this is
having an impact and we need to
understand as quickly as we can how this
can be
mitigated so there is still a lot of
work ahead of us but we appreciate your
support and as usual remember to
subscribe look in the description we are
coming towards the final stages of our
Kickstarter program about disease X
we're about halfway there in terms of
our funding targets and please join us
in this process at to getting this out
there all of this is relevant to what is
happening at the moment moment if we
understand the science and prepare for
the science and try and mitigate it with
everything that we have around us we
have the best chance of making a
difference for ourselves and our loved
ones so thank you again and look out for
more information about these embus clots
and I tell you if you haven't seen The
Whistleblower video you must click on
the description and see exactly what he
said about what was going going on have
a great evening
[Music]
Browse More Related Video
Vaccines may be revamped to avoid blood clots, German scientists claim | COVID-19 | Coronavirus
Brain Stroke, Types of, Causes, Pathology, Symptoms, Treatment and Prevention, Animation.
Tym usuniesz skrzepy i oczyΕcisz TΔTNICE.
Friday Favorites: The Effects of Marijuana on Car Accidents
The Difference Between Cardiac Arrest, Heart Attack, and Heart Failure - 3D Animation
What the heck happened to the Claude 3 OPUS????
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)