Viplove Bhojwani - Week Five Feedback from Agency Owner - A Deep Dive (Part 2)

Summary

In this second attempt at recording, the speaker addresses the feedback received regarding their previous performance. The main critique was the overuse of filler sounds like 'M', 'O', and 'S', which gave the impression of a lack of expertise. The speaker expresses a strong desire to improve and prove to themselves, their partner, and their teacher that they can present their ideas without these filler sounds, aiming to come across as more credible and professional.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker is making a second attempt at recording after receiving feedback on their speaking habits.
• 😀 Feedback highlighted the overuse of filler words such as 'um,' 'so,' 'uh,' and certain sounds like 'M' and 'O.'
• 😀 The speaker wants to improve their speech to sound more authoritative and credible in their field.
• 😀 The feedback, particularly from 'vlov,' emphasized that these fillers made the speaker sound less professional.
• 😀 The speaker's goal is to demonstrate improvement by eliminating fillers and sounding more confident.
• 😀 This is a proof of effort to improve communication and address feedback received.
• 😀 The speaker is actively seeking to refine their speaking style to be perceived as an expert.
• 😀 The focus is on making the speech more clear, concise, and without unnecessary sounds or pauses.
• 😀 The speaker is determined to prove their ability to make these improvements to themselves, their partner, and their teacher.
• 😀 The transcript represents a self-awareness of the speaker’s weaknesses and a proactive approach to overcoming them.

Q & A

Why is this the second recording?

This is the second recording because the speaker's partner noticed they were using too many filler words like 'M's and 'O's, which were impacting the professionalism of the presentation.

What was the primary feedback given by 'viav' during the session?

The primary feedback from 'viav' was that the speaker was using too many filler words, such as 'M's, 'O's, and 'S's, which made them come across as less credible and not an expert in their field.

How did the speaker react to the feedback?

The speaker took the feedback seriously and decided to make a second attempt at delivering the message without using these fillers in order to improve their presentation.

Why is the speaker aiming to eliminate 'M's, 'O's, and 'S's?

The speaker aims to eliminate these filler sounds because they make the speaker sound less authoritative and more like a non-expert, which undermines their credibility.

What is the speaker trying to prove with this recording?

The speaker is trying to prove to themselves, their teacher, their partner, and the viewers that they can speak more clearly and professionally without relying on filler words.

What is the importance of reducing filler words in this context?

Reducing filler words is important in this context because it helps the speaker come across as more confident, professional, and knowledgeable, which is crucial for establishing credibility in their field.

How does the speaker plan to show improvement in this recording?

The speaker plans to show improvement by consciously avoiding filler words and speaking more fluidly, thereby demonstrating their ability to deliver the message effectively.

What are the intended benefits of eliminating filler words like 'M's, 'O's, and 'S's?

The intended benefits are to sound more professional and competent, and to communicate the message more clearly and persuasively, without distractions from unnecessary sounds.

Who are the primary audience members the speaker is trying to impress?

The primary audience members the speaker is trying to impress are their teacher, their partner, and the viewers of the recording.

What role does feedback play in the speaker’s improvement process?

Feedback plays a crucial role in the speaker’s improvement process by highlighting areas for improvement and guiding them toward more effective communication strategies, such as reducing filler words.