[FULL] - Anies & Ganjar KOMPAK! Mencecar Prabowo dalam Debat Capres 2024

Summary

The debate features three Indonesian presidential candidates—Anies Baswedan, Ganjar Pranowo, and Prabowo Subianto—discussing defense, military readiness, and national security. Anies questions the adequacy of defense spending and the welfare of soldiers, while Ganjar emphasizes a future-oriented, bottom-up approach to military planning. Prabowo defends the current defense policies, citing challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic and global crises. Disagreements over military data and rankings further highlight the candidates' differing approaches to strengthening Indonesia's defense. The debate revolves around issues of military spending, modernization, and the well-being of the armed forces.

Takeaways

• 😀 The candidates discussed Indonesia's defense and military readiness, with a focus on military spending and the welfare of soldiers.
• 😀 Ganjar Pranowo emphasized the importance of improving the welfare of military personnel, including better salaries, housing, and equipment.
• 😀 Anis Baswedan criticized the government for neglecting military welfare, pointing out the lack of salary increases and poor military resources.
• 😀 Prabowo Subianto defended his record as Minister of Defense, explaining that budget constraints during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted defense spending.
• 😀 The candidates debated the appropriateness of using older military equipment, with Prabowo defending the use of second-hand assets, citing historical precedents.
• 😀 There was a focus on the importance of military preparedness to address both traditional and emerging threats, including cybercrime and terrorism.
• 😀 Anis Baswedan questioned the government's commitment to defense spending, citing low salary increases for military personnel and outdated equipment.
• 😀 Ganjar Pranowo suggested that defense planning should be more inclusive, taking input from all branches of the military to ensure better preparedness and efficiency.
• 😀 The debate highlighted the need for transparency and clear data when discussing national defense policies and military budgets.
• 😀 The candidates stressed the importance of strategic international relations, emphasizing Indonesia's role in global security and economic influence.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the debate discussed in the transcript?

The main focus of the debate is on Indonesia's defense, security policies, and the candidates' views on national defense systems, as well as the performance of the Ministry of Defense and related agencies.

How did the candidates assess the performance of Indonesia's defense policies?

The candidates expressed differing views. Pak Ganjar acknowledged the need for consistency in defense planning and emphasized the importance of a strong, capable military. Pak Anies critiqued the performance of the Ministry of Defense, specifically pointing out issues with military salaries and welfare. Pak Prabowo defended his record, explaining challenges faced during his tenure, including budget restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

What was Pak Anies' perspective on Indonesia's defense budget?

Pak Anies advocated for a defense budget that reflects the nation's real needs and future threats. He emphasized that the defense budget should not be based on past preferences but should instead address current and future security challenges.

What did Pak Ganjar say about the condition of Indonesia's military personnel?

Pak Ganjar acknowledged the hard work of Indonesia’s military personnel but criticized the lack of sufficient welfare, particularly pointing out the insufficient increase in salaries and the lack of adequate housing for soldiers.

How did Pak Prabowo respond to the criticism about military welfare and defense preparedness?

Pak Prabowo defended the situation by referring to Indonesia's historical context, stating that even during President Sukarno's era, the military used many second-hand military assets. He attributed current challenges to external factors like the COVID-19 pandemic and emphasized loyalty to the country's broader goals.

What did Pak Anies argue regarding the condition of Indonesia's TNI personnel?

Pak Anies pointed out that many soldiers do not have proper housing and suggested that addressing this issue, along with ensuring regular salary increases, is crucial to improving the welfare of military personnel.

What was discussed regarding Indonesia's Global Peace Index and military capabilities?

Pak Ganjar brought up data showing a decline in Indonesia’s Global Peace Index and other military readiness indicators, such as the Global Militarization Index. He suggested that these declines are concerning and need to be addressed for better national security.

What specific criticisms did Pak Anies make about the Ministry of Defense?

Pak Anies criticized the Ministry of Defense for poor performance in terms of military welfare, highlighting issues such as inadequate salary increases and poor equipment for the military. He also questioned the efficiency of military procurement and budgeting.

How did Pak Prabowo justify the procurement of second-hand military equipment?

Pak Prabowo justified the use of second-hand military equipment by referencing Indonesia's historical context, where even during Sukarno’s administration, the country relied on second-hand military assets. He argued that military strength is not only about new equipment but also about how effectively it is used.

What did Pak Anies propose as solutions for improving military welfare?

Pak Anies proposed regular salary increases for military personnel, ensuring that TNI members have proper housing so that they do not need to rent or live in substandard conditions. He emphasized the importance of improving the welfare of soldiers to ensure their effectiveness in defending the nation.