Masyarakat Menjadi Korban Pembangunan Proyek Strategis Nasional Kaltara | DOKUMENTER

Summary

This video captures the voices of a community in Tanjung Palas Timur, North Kalimantan, whose lives are being disrupted by the rise of a so-called 'green industrial zone.' As industrialization encroaches on their ancestral lands, residents face land displacement, loss of livelihood, and environmental degradation. The project, which claims to be 'green' while relying on coal power, threatens the local fishermen and their families. Despite efforts to seek justice through legal channels, the community remains unheard and powerless, highlighting the ongoing struggle for land rights, fair compensation, and the preservation of their way of life.

Takeaways

• 😀 The local community in Bulungan, particularly in Tanjung Palas Timur, has lived on the land for generations, and the arrival of the industrial development threatens their rights to the land.
• 😀 The construction of a so-called 'green industrial zone' uses coal-fired power plants (PLTU), which contradicts Indonesia's commitment to reduce emissions and phase out coal.
• 😀 The shift to industrialization in the area is causing significant economic harm, especially to local fishermen, with potential losses amounting to 3.9 trillion IDR, affecting around 66,000 workers.
• 😀 Local residents, particularly fishermen, are being forced to give up their land without fair compensation or respect for their long-standing ownership, as their land is transferred to corporate interests.
• 😀 Despite the government’s promise of compensation, local residents claim the offers are insufficient, with some being offered as little as 5 million IDR per hectare, far below the value of their land.
• 😀 Many local people oppose selling their land, fearing they will lose their livelihoods, as they rely on farming and fishing for survival.
• 😀 The existence of a 'green' industrial zone is contested due to administrative issues and alleged land rights violations, with overlapping land ownership between communities and corporations.
• 😀 The introduction of industrial development is leading to environmental and economic degradation, with fish stocks diminishing due to pollution and disruption from industrial activities, particularly from ships and construction.
• 😀 The construction of the industrial zone has led to drastic increases in living costs, with essential goods becoming much more expensive, further straining the local community.
• 😀 Local residents, despite suffering from the negative impacts of industrialization, are determined to resist losing their homes and livelihoods, with some seeking legal redress from authorities and organizations like Komnas HAM.

Q & A

What is the main issue raised by the local community in the transcript?

The main issue raised is the impact of industrial development, specifically the construction of a 'green industrial area', on the local community, particularly regarding land rights, environmental degradation, and loss of livelihoods for fishermen and other residents.

How do the residents feel about the compensation for their land taken by industrial development?

The residents express dissatisfaction with the compensation offered for their land, which they feel is inadequate. They mention that the compensation is often too low, and the process lacks transparency and fairness.

What are the economic impacts of the green industrial project on the local community?

The economic impacts are severe, with a loss of income for fishermen and other local workers. The transcript highlights that the local economy could lose up to 3.9 trillion IDR, and around 66,000 people may lose their jobs due to the displacement caused by the industrial project.

What contradiction is highlighted regarding the 'green' industrial project?

The project is labeled as 'green', but it uses a coal-fired power plant (PLTU), which contradicts Indonesia's commitment to reducing emissions and phasing out coal power. This contradiction is emphasized as a key concern in the development.

How do the local people view the process of land acquisition by the companies?

The local people feel that the process of land acquisition is unfair and done without proper consultation or agreement. They express frustration at being pressured to sell their land for insufficient compensation and at not being consulted about the changes affecting their land.

What legal issues are mentioned in relation to the land acquisition?

There are legal concerns about the legitimacy of the land acquisitions, including possible administrative errors and land ownership disputes. The residents argue that the land was originally theirs and that the government or companies are violating their rights by issuing land use permits without proper documentation.

What environmental concerns are associated with the green industrial project?

The environmental concerns include pollution from the coal-fired power plants, damage to marine ecosystems, and a decline in fish populations, which directly affects the livelihoods of local fishermen.

How has the presence of the industrial development affected fishing activities?

The fishing activities have significantly declined due to the presence of the industrial project. The local fishermen report a sharp reduction in fish catches, with some species becoming scarce. This has made it increasingly difficult for them to sustain their livelihoods.

What challenges do the local people face in terms of legal recourse or support?

The local people feel there is a lack of support from the authorities, including the village government and legal institutions. Despite seeking help from lawyers and even filing complaints, they express a sense of powerlessness, with no real action taken to address their grievances.

Why are the local residents determined to resist the industrial project, despite the challenges they face?

The local residents are determined to resist because they have deep historical and cultural ties to their land. They do not want to lose their homes and livelihoods, and they believe the value of their heritage and community cannot be measured in money alone.