MISTERI KEJAHATAN MULYONO 28 SEPTEMBER 2024 KEMANG! GOLKAR BERI PERINTAH LANGSUNG?! - Mardigu Wowiek

Summary

The transcript highlights a political controversy in Indonesia involving a violent disruption of an academic forum by a group allegedly linked to the ruling political party, Golkar. The incident, which occurred on September 28, 2024, is described as a mix of political manipulation and physical intimidation. A figure named 'Fek' is identified as a key suspect, with connections to both criminal activity and political manipulation. The video questions the involvement of Golkar leaders, including Bahlil, and suggests a potential connection to President Jokowi’s influence. The piece calls for clarification from the party to protect its reputation amidst public outrage and speculation.

Takeaways

• 😀 The country has faced a decade of government image-building and large-scale, debt-financed mega-projects that future generations may struggle to repay.
• 😀 Behind the scenes, governance has been marked by pressures from law enforcement and intimidation tactics, including the use of thugs to suppress dissent.
• 😀 A recent incident involved a group of individuals using physical force to disrupt an academic forum, questioning the government's inability to engage in academic debate.
• 😀 The disruption of the academic event highlights a troubling trend where violence is used to silence opposition, while academic dialogue is the pinnacle of democratic culture.
• 😀 A video surfaced showing a man resembling a suspect involved in the disruption, raising questions about his involvement with the political party Golkar and his role in the incident.
• 😀 The suspect, identified as 'Fek', is allegedly seen in a leadership position during the chaotic event and has become a symbol of the political violence linked to the regime.
• 😀 Despite threats and intimidation, the academic figures targeted by the thugs refused to back down, continuing with their discussions and press conference.
• 😀 Following the incident, 'Fek' was seen with police officers, leading to suspicions about possible ties between thugs and the police.
• 😀 The lack of clear communication from the Golkar party about its connection to the event raises concerns about potential protection for those involved in the violence.
• 😀 The incident, which took place at a hotel in Kemang, has led to widespread public outrage, with many questioning the integrity of both the government and the police involved.

Q & A

What is the central issue discussed in the transcript?

The central issue revolves around an alleged act of political violence during a forum discussion in Indonesia, where a group of individuals, possibly associated with Party Golkar, disrupted an academic event with threats and intimidation. The transcript explores the potential involvement of certain political figures and questions the integrity of the political establishment in Indonesia.

Who is 'fek' and what role does he play in the incident?

'Fek' is a person believed to be involved in leading the disruption at the Forum Tanah Air (FTA) event in Kemang on September 28, 2024. He is alleged to be part of a group of individuals who used violence and intimidation to force the participants to leave. There are also questions regarding his connection to Party Golkar and his involvement in the incident as a political pawn.

How does the speaker describe the current political climate in Indonesia?

The speaker describes the current political climate as being marked by manipulation and coercion, where debates and academic discussions are overshadowed by physical intimidation and 'premanisme' (thuggery). The speaker also criticizes the lack of genuine democratic dialogue and the increasing use of violence to suppress opposition.

What is the significance of Party Golkar in the transcript?

Party Golkar is central to the narrative as it is suggested that individuals involved in the disturbance may have ties to the party. The speaker calls for clarification from Party Golkar regarding the involvement of 'fek' and questions whether the party, particularly its leader Bahlil, played a role in orchestrating the events.

What is meant by 'premanisme' in this context?

'Premanisme' refers to the use of thug-like tactics, such as intimidation, violence, and coercion, often employed by individuals or groups aligned with political power to suppress dissent or opposition. The speaker criticizes the use of such methods to disrupt democratic processes and discussions.

Why is the speaker concerned about the police's involvement in the incident?

The speaker is concerned that the police may have been complicit in the violence or may have even been involved in orchestrating it. There is speculation about the involvement of both police officers and 'preman' (thugs) working together, which raises doubts about the credibility of the authorities in handling the situation.

How does the speaker view the role of public figures like President Jokowi in this incident?

The speaker suggests that President Jokowi and his administration may have indirectly sanctioned or orchestrated the violence. They imply that political figures like Jokowi, through their control over Party Golkar, may have given orders for such actions, although this is framed as speculation and a call for clarity.

What is the broader implication of this incident for Indonesia's democracy?

The broader implication is that the use of violence and intimidation to suppress academic and political discourse threatens the foundations of Indonesia’s democracy. The speaker suggests that the erosion of democratic norms, such as open dialogue and peaceful debate, signals a decline in the country's political integrity and governance.

Why does the speaker demand clarification from Party Golkar?

The speaker demands clarification from Party Golkar to ascertain the truth behind the involvement of 'fek' in the incident, especially whether he has ties to the party and if his actions were sanctioned by the party leadership. This clarification is seen as essential for maintaining the party’s credibility and to avoid accusations of complicity in political violence.

What does the speaker mean by 'komando lapangan' (field commander)?

'Komando lapangan' refers to the individual who led the group of individuals that carried out the disruption at the forum. In the transcript, it is used to describe 'fek,' who is said to have given direct orders during the incident, organizing the violence and intimidation at the venue.