[XII-MIPA 2] Film Pendek PPKN tentang Perlindungan dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia

kia
3 Mar 202206:51

Summary

TLDRA school-based confrontation unfolds as students discuss various rumors and accusations. The dialogue centers around a student named Raihan, who is allegedly being bullied by two classmates, Rafi and Ilyas. Tensions rise when allegations of alcohol consumption near the school surface, but there is no solid evidence to back up the claims. A teacher is called into the situation, and it is revealed that violence may have occurred, prompting a legal discussion regarding potential criminal charges. The story highlights themes of justice, peer pressure, and the search for truth.

Takeaways

  • πŸ˜€ A student named Rafi is accused of drinking alcohol near the school campus.
  • πŸ˜€ A witness claims to have seen another student, Ilyas, physically assault Raihan.
  • πŸ˜€ The witness reports that there is video evidence supporting the claim of violence against Raihan.
  • πŸ˜€ The conversation includes an informal chat between students, but the tone shifts to a serious matter involving allegations of alcohol consumption and assault.
  • πŸ˜€ The incident involving Rafi drinking alcohol is questioned due to the lack of concrete proof at first.
  • πŸ˜€ A parent or teacher (likely Raihan's mother) is informed about the violence and decides to report the matter to the authorities.
  • πŸ˜€ The legal implications of the violence are discussed, referencing Article 170 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), which addresses physical assault.
  • πŸ˜€ The alleged assault by Rafi and Ilyas could result in up to six months in prison according to the law.
  • πŸ˜€ Emotional tensions rise as various individuals react to the situation, with some expressing concern for the well-being of the students involved.
  • πŸ˜€ The script presents a mix of casual conversations and serious legal matters, showing the escalation from informal gossip to formal legal proceedings.

Q & A

  • What is the initial setting of the script?

    -The script begins with a casual interaction where several people are discussing meeting up near a school, and a reference is made to 'BeautyPlus', likely referring to an app or a conversation about appearance.

  • What is the first accusation made in the script?

    -The first accusation involves a person named Raffi being accused of consuming alcohol near a school. However, the person questioning the situation is unsure about the validity of the claim, as no proof is presented.

  • What does the person asking about Raffi want to know?

    -The person is inquiring whether there is any evidence to support the claim that Raffi was drinking alcohol near the school. They express skepticism and seem to want proof before making any judgments.

  • What happens when no evidence is provided for the alcohol accusation?

    -When no evidence is presented, the conversation moves on, and the speaker advises the person to leave. The lack of proof causes the matter to be dismissed for the moment.

  • What later accusation emerges in the conversation?

    -Later in the script, there is an accusation of violence. The speaker claims to have witnessed a person named Raihan being beaten by Raffi, and there is a request for justice and consequences for the action.

  • What type of proof is mentioned regarding the violence incident?

    -The speaker mentions having video evidence of the incident, which could be used as proof to support the claim of violence.

  • What legal implications are discussed in the script?

    -The script touches on legal issues, specifically referencing a violation of Article 170 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) concerning the use of force. It is suggested that Raffi and another person, Ilyas, could face imprisonment for six months for their actions.

  • What is the consequence mentioned for those involved in the violence?

    -Raffi and Ilyas are stated to have violated the law and could be sentenced to six months in prison for committing acts of violence against Raihan, as per Article 170 KUHP.

  • What is the role of the teacher in the conversation?

    -A teacher is mentioned briefly as a figure of authority who is believed to have believed the report about the alcohol consumption. The teacher's trust in the report seems to lend some legitimacy to the claim.

  • How does the conversation conclude?

    -The conversation concludes with a sense of tension, with warnings issued about further reporting to the teacher. The characters seem to be dealing with both accusations of alcohol consumption and violence, leaving unresolved issues to be addressed later.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
School DramaBullyingAlcohol AbuseLegal ActionTeen ConflictJusticeSchool ViolencePeer PressureTeen IssuesAuthorityTrust