Margaret Neale: Negotiation: Getting What You Want

Summary

The video script emphasizes the importance of negotiation in professional and personal contexts. It challenges the traditional adversarial view of negotiation and instead promotes a collaborative problem-solving approach. The speaker outlines a four-step strategy for effective negotiation: assess the situation, prepare by understanding your interests and those of your counterpart, engage in the negotiation by leveraging unique information, and package issues to create opportunities for trade-offs. The script also addresses unique challenges faced by women in negotiations, such as social expectations and biases, and offers insights into how women can negotiate more effectively by aligning their requests with communal goals and seeking representational opportunities. The speaker encourages viewers to practice negotiation skills in low-risk environments and to approach every negotiation as a chance to create value for all parties involved.

Takeaways

• 💼 **Negotiation Importance**: Not negotiating when you have the opportunity can lead to significant financial disparities over time.
• 👩‍🍳 **Negotiation as Problem Solving**: Shift your mindset from viewing negotiation as adversarial to a collaborative problem-solving process.
• 🎯 **Goal Clarity**: The goal of negotiation isn't just to reach an agreement, but to secure a good deal that satisfies your interests.
• 🤔 **Understanding Your Position**: Know your alternatives, reservation price, and aspirations to effectively assess your negotiation position.
• 📈 **Alternatives Matter**: Having better alternatives can put you in a stronger negotiation position.
• 💡 **Preparation is Key**: Assess the situation, understand your interests, and prepare to understand the interests of your counterpart.
• 🗣️ **Effective Asking**: Engage with your counterpart by highlighting the unique value you bring to the table.
• 📦 **Package Deals**: Consider packaging issues together to create a more collaborative and less adversarial negotiation dynamic.
• 👥 **Representational Negotiation**: Women tend to be more successful when negotiating for others, which can be a strategic advantage.
• 💰 **Market Research**: Knowing your market value is crucial in preparing for compensation negotiations.
• 🚫 **Capacity to Decline**: Recognize that every bad deal you've accepted was agreed upon, and you should always be ready to say no.
• 🤝 **Relationship Consideration**: Be mindful of maintaining relationships during negotiations, especially when enthusiasm for the opportunity is at stake.
• 📈 **Strategic Asking**: Be strategic and tie your negotiation to the results and goals that you are confident you can meet.
• 👣 **Baby Steps**: Start practicing negotiation skills in low-risk environments to build confidence and experience.
• 🏃 **Walking Away**: Be willing to walk away from a deal that isn't economically rational for you to maintain your standards and value.

Q & A

What is the potential long-term financial impact of not negotiating a job offer?

If you don't negotiate a job offer and someone with the same offer does, getting a $7,000 increase could lead to you making $100,000 less per year over a 30-year period.

What is the main goal of a negotiation according to the speaker?

The main goal of a negotiation is not just to get an agreement, but to get a good deal. This involves understanding one's alternatives, reservation price, and aspirations.

How does the speaker propose to change the typical adversarial view of negotiation?

The speaker suggests shifting the view from an adversarial process to a collaborative problem-solving approach, where both parties work together to find a solution that benefits everyone.

What are the three key pieces of information needed to evaluate a negotiation?

The three key pieces of information are: your alternative (what you have if the negotiation fails), your reservation price (the point at which you are indifferent between accepting the deal or taking your alternative), and your aspiration (an optimistic assessment of what you can achieve in the negotiation).

What are the four steps suggested to help negotiators be more effective?

The four steps are: assess the situation, prepare by understanding your interests and those of your counterpart, ask by engaging with your counterpart and using unique information, and package by bundling issues together to create a solution that benefits both parties.

Why is it important to consider the interests and preferences of the counterpart in a negotiation?

Understanding the interests and preferences of your counterpart is crucial because it allows you to tailor your negotiation strategy to find a solution that meets both parties' needs, thereby increasing the chances of a successful negotiation.

What is communal problem solving and how does it relate to negotiation?

Communal problem solving is a negotiation approach where the negotiator demonstrates concern for the other party's needs and interests. It is particularly effective for women negotiators as it aligns with societal expectations and can lead to better outcomes.

How does the speaker suggest women can overcome the social risks associated with negotiation?

The speaker suggests that women can overcome social risks by framing their negotiation as a communal problem-solving exercise, focusing on how their skills and contributions can benefit the organization or counterparty, and by negotiating for others.

What is the significance of 'reservation price' in a negotiation?

The reservation price is the minimum acceptable outcome for a negotiator. It is the point at which they are indifferent between accepting the deal or walking away. Knowing your reservation price is critical as it guides your decision-making during the negotiation.

Why is it important to package issues during a negotiation rather than negotiate them individually?

Packaging issues allows for more flexibility and creativity in the negotiation process. It enables the negotiator to trade off between different issues and create a package of outcomes that can be more acceptable to both parties, rather than getting stuck on a single issue.

How does the speaker use the example of the US Tennis Open to illustrate a point about negotiation?

The speaker uses the example of the US Tennis Open to highlight the difference in the willingness to challenge between men and women, suggesting that women may be less likely to ask or challenge due to social expectations or fear of negative judgment.

What advice does the speaker give for someone who is not comfortable with negotiation?

The speaker advises starting with low-stakes negotiations, such as bargaining for a pair of shoes in a store, to build confidence and skills. They also emphasize the importance of preparation, understanding the other party's perspective, and practicing negotiation as a skill that improves with experience.

Outlines

00:00

💼 The Importance of Negotiation and Its Structure

This paragraph emphasizes the significance of negotiation in securing better job offers and the potential long-term financial implications of not negotiating. It introduces the concept of learning the structure of negotiation rather than a fixed recipe, and the importance of changing the perception of negotiation from adversarial to collaborative problem-solving. The speaker outlines a new approach to negotiation, focusing on achieving a good deal by understanding one's alternatives, reservation price, and aspirations. They also present a four-step method to enhance negotiation effectiveness: assessing the situation, preparing by understanding interests, asking strategically, and packaging issues to create value and find mutually beneficial solutions.

05:02

🎾 Negotiation Tactics and Gender Differences

The second paragraph discusses negotiation tactics, particularly in the context of gender differences. It highlights a disparity in challenge rates between male and female tennis players as an example of how women may be less inclined to negotiate. The text explores how societal expectations can influence behavior in negotiations and the importance of communal orientation for women negotiators. It also touches on the effectiveness of women in representational negotiations and the strategic use of packaging issues to achieve better outcomes. An example is provided where the speaker negotiates their course load with a dean by offering a solution that benefits both parties.

10:04

👥 Expectations and Behavior in Negotiations

This paragraph delves into how expectations shape behavior in negotiations. It presents research findings on how women's negotiation performance is affected by their preconceived notions of their abilities. The text advises women to be aware of their reasons for negotiating, the approach they take, and for whom they are negotiating. It also discusses the penalties women face in negotiations and the benefits of negotiating as a representative rather than for oneself. The speaker shares personal experiences and strategies for successful negotiation, emphasizing the importance of communal problem-solving and packaging negotiation issues.

15:08

💼 Insights on Negotiation from Business School and Personal Experiences

The fourth paragraph consists of various individuals sharing their perspectives on negotiation. They discuss the importance of preparation, understanding market value, and the significance of negotiating not just salary but also other aspects of the job that contribute to personal and professional growth. They highlight the need for strategic asking and the interdependent nature of negotiation, where one must be willing to walk away if necessary. The anecdotes include experiences of renegotiating a job offer after discovering pay disparities and learning to ask for what one is worth based on performance and contributions.

20:09

📈 Negotiating for Business Goals and Starting with Small Steps

The final paragraph focuses on the importance of aligning negotiation with business goals and the enthusiasm for the job opportunity. It advises maintaining enthusiasm and hunger for the job during the negotiation process. The text also encourages starting with small-scale negotiations to build confidence and skills, using a personal anecdote about negotiating a discount on shoes. It concludes with an assignment for the audience to practice negotiation in a low-risk environment and emphasizes the need for practice and learning from experiences to become proficient in negotiation.

Keywords

💡Negotiation

Negotiation is a process where two or more parties discuss and resolve their differences to reach an agreement. In the video, it is emphasized that negotiation is not just about reaching an agreement, but about securing a good deal. The video suggests a shift from viewing negotiation as adversarial to a collaborative problem-solving approach.

💡Alternative

An alternative refers to the option available if a negotiation fails. The video stresses the importance of knowing one's alternative as it influences the negotiation outcome. A better alternative often leads to a stronger position in negotiations, as illustrated by the scenario where the speaker contemplates the provost's and Dean's interests.

💡Reservation Price

The reservation price is the minimum acceptable outcome in a negotiation; the point at which a party is indifferent between accepting the deal or walking away. The video explains that understanding one's reservation price is critical, as it defines the baseline for acceptable negotiation results.

💡Aspiration

Aspiration in the context of negotiation refers to an optimistic assessment of what can be achieved. The video encourages negotiators to think about their aspirations to set a target for the negotiation that is ambitious yet attainable, which helps in aiming higher than the reservation price.

💡Assess

To assess in a negotiation context means to evaluate the situation and one's leverage before entering into talks. The video outlines this as the first step, where the potential benefits and costs of negotiating are weighed to determine if it's worth pursuing.

💡Prepare

Preparation is key in successful negotiation. The video emphasizes understanding one's interests and those of the counterpart. It involves gathering information and planning strategies to achieve a favorable outcome, as demonstrated by the speaker's approach to negotiating their course load with the Dean.

💡Ask

Asking is the act of initiating the negotiation process by presenting one's case or proposal. The video suggests that this step should be informed by thorough preparation and an understanding of the unique information and perspective that the negotiator brings to the table.

💡Package

Packaging in negotiation involves bundling multiple issues together to create a more comprehensive proposal. The video argues against negotiating issue by issue, as it can lead to a zero-sum game. Instead, it promotes the idea of creating packages that allow for trade-offs and mutual benefits, as shown in the example of the speaker's negotiation over course credits and contact hours.

💡Communal Orientation

A communal orientation in negotiation refers to demonstrating concern for the other party's interests alongside one's own. The video suggests that women can be more effective negotiators when they show how their skills and contributions can benefit the organization or the other party.

💡Representational Negotiation

Representational negotiation is when one party negotiates on behalf of another. The video highlights research showing that women outperform men in such negotiations, suggesting that women are more effective advocates for others than for themselves in certain contexts.

💡Market Value

Market value refers to the worth of an individual's skills, experience, and role in the current job market. The video advises doing research to understand one's market value before entering into a compensation negotiation, which can provide a strong basis for asking for a raise or better terms.

Highlights

The importance of negotiation in securing better job offers and the potential long-term financial implications of not negotiating.

Chefs use the structure of a sauce to create great flavors regardless of ingredients, analogous to having a negotiation structure for success.

A shift in perspective is proposed from viewing negotiation as adversarial to collaborative problem solving.

The true goal of a negotiation is not just to make a deal, but to make a good deal, which requires understanding alternatives, reservation price, and aspirations.

Four steps for effective negotiation: assess, prepare, ask, and package.

The need to understand one's interests and those of the counterpart in a negotiation.

The concept of 'communal packaging' where issues are bundled to create trade-offs and mutual benefits.

An illustrative example of successfully negotiating a teaching load by focusing on unique class types and proposing a solution beneficial to both parties.

The unique challenges women face in negotiations, including societal expectations and the perception of being demanding.

The effectiveness of women in negotiations when they combine competence with a communal orientation, showing concern for the organization.

The penalty women face in single-issue negotiations and the strategy of communal packaging to mitigate this.

Statistical evidence that women outperform men in representational negotiations by 14 to 23%.

The importance of researching market value and understanding one's worth before entering a compensation negotiation.

A personal story of successfully renegotiating a promotion offer by aligning expectations with performance goals.

The concept of being willing to walk away from a bad deal and the potential for the other side to return with better terms.

The advice for understanding one's feelings and desires to effectively negotiate for them.

Strategies for negotiating total compensation packages that align with career goals and personal development.

Observations on gender differences in negotiation approaches and the importance of being prepared and persuasive.

Encouragement to frame negotiation asks in terms of how they help the company meet its business goals.

The reminder to maintain enthusiasm and hunger for the job during the negotiation process to avoid losing the employer's interest.

Advice for practicing negotiation skills in low-risk environments before tackling high-stakes negotiations.

The suggestion to view social situations as opportunities for negotiation practice and value creation.

Transcripts

You've got a job offer, and now you have a choice, negotiate or not.

If you decide not to, and your buddy who got the same offer,

negotiates and gets a $7,000 increase.

By the end of 30 years, your buddy will be making $100,000 more a year than you.

Think about that.

[MUSIC]

My husband's a trained chef.

Do you know that chefs don't have recipes for all those sauces?

They know the structure of a sauce, and so

regardless of the ingredients they have, they can make a great sauce.

And that's what I want for you.

I'm not gonna give you a recipe for a particular negotiation.

Rather, what I wanna do is give you the structure of a negotiation so

that you can be successful regardless of what you face.

I wanna propose a new way of thinking about negotiation and

what you're trying to achieve in that negotiation.

And then what I wanna do,

is give you four steps to help you be more effective in getting what you want.

Folks typically see negotiation as an adversarial process, and

are uncomfortable.

Because they are concerned that other folks will think of them as too demanding,

too greedy, not nice, or socially awkward.

What I wanna do today,

is get you to change the frame of how you think about negotiation.

Moving it from an adversarial process to one that is problem solving.

And problem solving is collaborative.

I wanna solve our problem, in a way that's good for you but

also gives me more of what it is I want.

[MUSIC]

When we negotiate,

most of us view the goal of a negotiation is to get an agreement.

This is wrong.

The goal of a negotiation is not to get a deal.

The goal of a negotiation is to get a good deal.

We need to be able to separate what a good deal is, from what a bad deal is.

So, that means we need at least three pieces of information.

The first thing we need to know is, what is our alternative?

What happens to us if this negotiation fails?

What are we left with?

What's the status quo or what alternatives exist for us?

And the research is very clear.

He or she with a better alternative, does better.

Secondly, we need to know what our reservation price is.

What's the point at which we are indifferent between saying yes, and

invoking our alternative.

And when you negotiate,

it's critical that you understand where that reservation price is.

Because that's the point at which you are indifferent.

Where a no looks as good as a yes.

And the third point, which is really important, and one that

people often overlook, is that not only do we have to think about our alternative and

our reservation price, we also need to think about our aspiration.

What is an optimistic assessment of what it is we can achieve in this negotiation?

[MUSIC]

So how do you get more of what you want?

Let me suggest that four steps will help you.

The first step, is to assess the situation.

Is this a situation where I can have influence on the outcome?

To change that outcome in a way that makes me better off.

And I need to weigh the potential benefits from negotiating with the potential

costs for negotiating.

And will the benefits outweight the costs?

The second step is, I need to prepare.

And there are really two aspects of this step.

Number one, I need to understand what my interests are,

what I'm really trying to achieve in this negotiation.

And the second component is, I need to understand the interests and

preferences of my counterpart.

Many of us may understand what our interests are,

but few of us actually understand at a deep level what the preferences and

interests are of our counterparts.

Third, now comes the ask.

Engage with your counterpart.

Look at these disputed social situations as opportunities to negotiate.

You have information that your counterparts don't have.

And this is what you bring to the table.

If they knew all your information,

if they knew your perspective, they don't need you.

Because you have unique information and

because they have unique information, that's where the value is created.

Fourth, you need to package.

Now what do I mean by that?

Most of us, when we negotiate, negotiate issue by issue.

This is a really bad strategy because when you negotiate issue by issue,

every issue is adversarial.

You either win or loose.

When you're packaging issues, you now have the opportunity to trade among the issues.

So, think about proposing solutions,

alternative solutions to your counterpart in packages and to help you out

because your counterpart will probably want to negotiate issue by issue.

Think about using if then language, if I give you this, then I get that.

What you're doing is you're yoking various issues together into a package.

To get more of what you want, there are four

steps: assess, prepare, ask, package.

To give you an example, my Dean recently sent me an email indicating that I

would have to going from five courses a year to six courses a year.

Because he had received information from the provost that we needed to

be consistent in the amount of contact hours and course credit.

I was not happy about that e-mail.

So my response was, I think I need to talk to my Dean.

Let's negotiate.

But before I started the negotiation, I thought hard about why was he doing this?

What was in his interest?

His interest was probably to make sure the provost was happy.

What was my interest?

Not to move from five classes to six classes.

And it turns out I teach two different types of classes, MBA electives, and

then some specialty classes.

There are lots of folks that teach MBA electives,

there are very few folks who teach specialty classes.

So I thought, I should focus on the specialty classes.

So then I went for the ask.

I set up a meeting, and part of that meeting was to

verify the information that I had gathered in my planning session.

And it did turn out to be true.

He was interested in making the provost happy.

So then came the proposal that packaged our interests.

He said he wanted consistency between contact hours and credit.

So what he did, is he changed the credit to match the contact hours.

I suggested, why not change the contact hours to match the credit?

Because it turns out that in my courses,

in my specialty courses, we always went over.

So while they were three hours, it was common that we went, go for three and

a half to four hours.

So, let's make them four hours.

And keep me at five, rather than move me into six.

He said to me, I never even thought of that.

And why didn't he?

It wasn't that weird.

Because he didn't have the information that I had.

That my classes routinely ran over.

And so when I gave him that information, it created a solution,

that made him as well off as he was, and made me a whole lot better.

By the way, I was the only faculty member to get an exception.

And why did I get an exception?

Because everybody else had the same email.

For two reasons.

One, I decided to negotiate.

And number two, I provided him with a solution that made us both better off.

[MUSIC]

So what are the unique opportunities and

challenges that women face when they negotiate?

Let's start off with an example,

that's pretty far away from what most of us think about as negotiations.

In 2006, the US Tennis Open's Grand Slam tournament got some new technology.

And for the first time, they were able to replay the calls.

And so they allow the players to challenge the calls of the referees.

Now it turns out, that over the course of the entire tournament,

about one third of the challenged calls were given to the player.

But interestingly, if you divided up the number of challenges by gender,

it turns out the men challenged 73 calls, while the women challenged 28.

Now we can come up with all sorts of stories about why men's tennis is

different from women's tennis.

Men's tennis is faster.

Maybe the judges make more mistakes.

Maybe the judges are paying more attention to the women.

Maybe.

But three times' difference in the number of challenges.

Women are simply uncomfortable with asking.

Expectations drive behavior.

If we expect to do poorly.

We will behave in ways that ensure a poor performance.

This was demonstrated in a piece of research, that I think is very telling.

When women were told that people who are like them negotiate poorly, they did

significantly worse in their negotiation performance than their male colleagues.

When they were told that people like them negotiate well,

they did significantly better than their male colleagues.

Expectations drive behavior.

If you change your expectations, you will change your outcomes.

As women, we need to be very cognizant of three aspects of negotiation.

Why am I asking, how am I asking, and for whom am I asking?

Let's first talk about why you are asking.

It turns out, that women are much more effective in

negotiations when they pair their competence with a communal orientation.

Women need to demonstrate their concern for the other.

So how will my skills help you the organization, my employer,

my team, to do better.

So let me give you an example.

A colleague of mine had gotten a wonderful job offer from an east coast university.

So, she came to me and said, can you help me figure out how to leverage this offer?

I really don't wanna move.

I said, no problem.

[LAUGH] We can do this.

So I said, make an appointment with the Dean.

And take the offer with you.

Be very clear, Dean, we have a problem.

I love Stanford, but I just received this offer.

And it's an attractive offer.

I need some help.

Can you help me figure out how to stay here?

She wasn't making a demand, she wasn't giving an ultimatum.

She was saying, can you help me?

Communal problem solving.

How are you asking?

Male evaluators penalize female negotiators.

In a single-issue distributive negotiation, when I asked for

more money, in ways they do not penalize her male counterparts.

Female evaluators penalize both males and females for asking for more.

Why the women were penalized,

was because they were perceived as being too demanding and not nice.

Now note I said a single issue.

They were negotiating issue by issue.

So, how can I help you?

With this pool of resources that I need to do my job more effectively to

make you better off and packaging.

Communal packaging.

Next, for whom are you asking?

It turns out, that if we distill the research and

negotiation, we have two big findings.

Number one, you're better off negotiating for yourself if you're a man.

Number two, if you're negotiating for me, I am much better off if you are a woman.

Women, out perform men in representational negotiations between 14 and 23%.

This is huge.

So I use this all the time.

When I negotiate, I don't negotiate for myself.

I negotiate for my husband, my 4 dogs, my 7 horses, and my 14 chickens.

That's a lot of mouths to feed [LAUGH]

[MUSIC]

And it works.

>> A client came to me asking for one of our top consultants, who was busy working

on another project full time, so I wanted to staff it with a different consultant.

But, the consultant that the client wanted really wanted that project as well.

So she came up with the idea,

what if we hired a junior consultant to work underneath her, and

give her the opportunity to work on both projects with that leverage.

It worked for the client, it made the consultant really happy.

And it really solved my problem.

>> Before coming to business school, for

me a negotiation was about preparing to beat a price.

Or aim for a higher number.

Now I realize that preparation for a negotiation is much more than that.

It's about identifying the issues that are important to me, but

also the issues that are important to the other parties that I'm interacting with.

And I think that allows us to be much more creative and actually solve the problem.

>> One of the most important things you can do in preparing for your compensation

negotiation, is to do your research and find out your market value.

Sometimes people will go to websites and enter in their current field and

title in order to find out what their salary range is.

But I find that those websites aren't all that accurate, and

they often compile an average salary.

It's safe to assume that if you've performed strongly and

you're asking for a raise, you're above average.

One of the other things you can do, is to survey a membership group or

an association, either online or offline.

And ask those members what their salary range is.

You can do so anonymously if that feels more comfortable to you.

>> I worked for a fortune 50 company, I got the promotion of my dreams,

best day of my life.

Went out to dinner with a mentor that night to celebrate, learned that I

was getting paid substantially less than my six males counter parts.

He said you have gotta go back in there and renegotiate.

Had a lot of fear that I might lose that job, but I did.

Showed up the next morning, and I renegotiated.

The concern of my boss was, I was younger and

had far less experience than all my counterparts.

Yet I pointed out to him, that his expectation of me was that I would

make the same goals as my six counterparts for equally as large accounts.

We discussed it and he agreed and

at the end of the day, I got the raise that I really deserved.

>> When you're considering negotiating, you need to be very honest with yourself.

How much are you willing to pay to avoid the discomfort of negotiating?

And if you decide that you're going to negotiate,

you need to be strategic in how you ask.

And finally, negotiation is an interdependent process.

Every bad deal you have gotten, you've agreed to.

So you need to have the capacity to say no.

And sometimes when you say no, the other side comes back and

says don't go, let's talk.

How about this, is it good for you?

But you'll never know that, unless you're willing to walk away.

>> Recently, I had a client enter negotiation where the terms really

didn't work for me.

And so I told them, it's just not economically rational for

me to take the deal.

And, it kept it objective and not personal, which really worked for

me and allowed me to walk away from deal but keep the door open.

>> When I got my first job, I didn't even negotiate for salary.

I had no idea how to set a goal, had no idea how to make the ask.

Now it's a little bit different.

I understand how to set an aspirational goal,

and in that preparation, I get to the point where I

understand how it benefits all the different parties that are involved.

>> But you really do have to understand how you feel, in order to understand what

it is that you want, cuz if you don't know what you want, you can't negotiate for it.

>> Earlier in my career, I realized that the types of projects I

was gonna get to work on and the people I was gonna get to work with would be

invaluable experience for me to gain for later on.

So, when I received a promotion,

I took that time not just to negotiate my cash compensation, but my total package.

In this way, I was able to ensure that I was able to focus on a particular industry

and also get to work with team members who I knew would invest in my own development.

>> When I was hiring people, it struck me that men negotiated quite frequently.

And women were not negotiating.

And when they did negotiate,

women would have a number in their mind of what they wanted.

But they wouldn't be able to back into how they got that.

They didn't explain to me that they did a competitive assessment.

They didn't tie it to the results and goals that I was hiring them for.

And why, based on their experience, they were a perfect fit and

they were going to meet those goals for me.

And therefore, they wanted a package that would include x.

They needed to come in prepared.

And just persuade me that they could meet my needs.

>> I've been on both sides of the negotiation.

First, running compensation for

a large organization, and now as I place people in jobs.

And where I've seen women be most successful,

is when they frame their ask in terms of how it reaches the business goals.

So, go ask.

Just always keep in mind how does it help the company as well.

>> What I've noticed before, is candidates negotiate their compensation package,

is that sometimes the negotiation process can get so heated and

both parties can get so focused on what they're looking to get out of it

that the candidates enthusiasm and hunger for the job can get lost.

Therefore, remember when you enter this process,

that you want your future employer and your boss to know that you're not only

excited about the opportunity, but you're hungry to get in there and start the job.

>> Let's start with baby steps.

Don't start off with a negotiation where there's a big relationship risk.

Rather, start a negotiation where the relationship is possibly not

even important.

Where, there's less risk to you to experiment, to try.

So let me give you an example.

Think about going to a department store.

And I don't know about you but I am a shoeaholic.

I love shoes.

Unfortunately with my job, I spend a lot of time in boring black pumps.

But sometimes when I go to shoe sales, there are shoes that sing to me.

You can't wear them.

You can't even walk very far in them.

But when you put them on, you're like, I am good.

So, I go to this department store.

It's the sale.

They have a sale, like, once every six months.

I'm there when the store opens.

And I find the boring pairs of black pumps that I'm gonna have to buy.

And then there's a shoe, that from the rack, was singing to me.

And I found them, and they were in my size.

It was great.

I was so excited.

But then I looked at the price.

It was like, these were really expensive shoes.

And they hadn't discounted them very much, for the sale.

And I said to the guy, I said, I'm gonna buy these shoes here.

These are beautiful.

I want them.

But they're too expensive.

Can you help me?

And he said, no problem ma'am.

Here's what you do.

Buy all four pairs.

But, don't wear these shoes.

And then bring them back in a week.

You return them, we discount 50%, and then you can come and

buy them back immediately.

And I said, it's an hour and a half each way from my home to the store.

It's not gonna happen.

Have you got any other options?

And he said let me go talk to my manager.

But when he came back he said we'll take 75 dollars off those shoes for you.

And I said, that works.

Thank you.

Now here's your assignment.

Go to your favorite department store.

Find something you want.

And then, negotiate for it.

Figure out how to solve a problem.

Here's what I want.

It's too expensive for me.

And ask for help.

Initiate the negotiation.

Not all of you will be successful, every time,

but you will be surprised at how often you are.

>> When I first learned about this research,

it helped me understand why women sometimes don't ask.

There is a social risk.

Women are judged differently.

And with Maggie's work, it gives us tools to negotiate successfully in

a way that works for everyone.

>> Malcolm Gladwell suggests that you read 10,000 hours of practice to

become expert in anything.

Negotiation is the same way, you need to practice.

But you need to learn from what you experience.

You need to see social situations as an opportunity to create value, so

that you and your counterparts can get more of what you want.

[MUSIC]

[BLANK_AUDIO]