SIDANG PERKARA PERDATA NOMOR 118/PDT/2021/PT KDI

Pengadilan Tinggi Sulawesi Tenggara

29 Dec 202127:17

Summary

TLDRThe transcripts detail court proceedings regarding case number 118/2016 at PT KDI, culminating in a ruling delivered by the presiding judge on November 29, 2017. The session was open to the public, yet neither party involved attended, raising concerns about their engagement with the judicial process. The formal closure of the case emphasizes the judicial system's structure and the significance of courtroom decorum. Overall, the proceedings highlight the importance of transparency and adherence to legal protocols within Indonesia's legal framework.

Takeaways

😀 The case number discussed is 118/2016 from PT KDI.
📅 The ruling was pronounced on November 29, 2017.
⚖️ The session was presided over by a chief judge along with other panel members.
🔍 The decision was made public during an open court session.
👥 Neither party nor their legal representatives were present at the time of the ruling.
📜 The case was declared finished and closed at the end of the session.
🙇‍♂️ Attendees were asked to stand when leaving the courtroom.
🎶 Background music was played during the conclusion of the session.
🔒 The legal process emphasizes the importance of public access to court rulings.
📝 The transcript reflects a formal judicial environment and procedure.

Q & A

What is the primary subject of the hearing discussed in the transcript?
-The primary subject of the hearing revolves around a legal decision made by PT KDI regarding case number 118/2016.
When was the decision pronounced?
-The decision was pronounced on Wednesday, November 29, 2017.
Who presided over the hearing?
-The hearing was presided over by the Chief Judge of the assembly, along with other members and court officials.
Were the parties involved in the case present during the decision?
-No, both parties and their legal representatives were absent during the pronouncement of the decision.
What was the outcome of case number 118/2016?
-The outcome of case number 118/2016 was that it was declared complete and closed.
What does the phrase 'attendees are requested to stand' signify?
-The phrase signifies a formal conclusion to the hearing, indicating respect for the judicial process.
Is there any indication of the nature of the case in the transcript?
-The transcript does not provide specific details about the nature of the case, focusing instead on the procedural aspects of the decision.
What role did the deputy clerk play in the hearing?
-The deputy clerk assisted the Chief Judge and the other members during the hearing.
What does the term 'public hearing' imply in this context?
-The term 'public hearing' implies that the proceedings were open for public observation, promoting transparency in the judicial process.
What was the significance of the date mentioned in the transcript?
-The date, November 29, 2017, is significant as it marks the official date of the court's decision in this legal matter.