AŞPA Almaniya və Fransadan əmr aldı, özünü biabır etdi: Bakıdan rüsvayçı quruma sərt təpki

AZTV Xəbər

28 Jan 202407:55

Summary

TLDRThe script discusses significant concerns raised in the European Council's Parliamentary Assembly winter session. Key issues included the conflict between Israel and Hamas, the situation in Ukraine, and labor conditions worldwide. The Azerbaijani delegation faced baseless accusations, likening them to perpetrators of genocide, sparking a proposal to investigate their integrity. This led to the formation of an anti-Azerbaijan group by members from France, Armenia, and Germany. The Azerbaijani delegation, feeling misrepresented and facing double standards, suspended their activities in the Assembly, highlighting a serious blow to the organization's credibility. The script emphasizes the importance of Azerbaijan in peace processes, particularly with Armenia, and criticizes the Assembly's lack of recognition of Azerbaijan's efforts. It concludes with a call for an end to biased approaches within the Assembly and stresses Azerbaijan's continued commitment to peace and dialogue.

Takeaways

🌍 The session of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe addressed global concerns, not just European issues.
📣 The initial discussions were overshadowed by baseless accusations against Azerbaijan, alleging involvement in genocidal acts similar to the Armenian genocide.
📃 At least 30 parliament members supported a proposal accusing Azerbaijan, led by a 30-member anti-Azerbaijan group from France, Armenia, and Germany.
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan's delegation responded by temporarily halting their activity in the assembly, citing this as a significant blow to the credibility and prestige of the Council of Europe.
🚫 The Azerbaijani delegation's decision was a protest against perceived double standards and unjust treatment in the assembly.
💬 Despite the tension, there were calls for peace and recognition of Azerbaijan's role in the region, stressing the importance of peaceful relations with Armenia.
⚖️ Criticism was raised about the lack of impartiality and the prevalence of double standards within the assembly, diminishing its credibility.
🗳️ The assembly's handling of the situation was viewed as a reflection of a broader disregard for Azerbaijan, challenging the organization's relevance and legitimacy.
👥 The departure of the Azerbaijani delegation was seen as a significant loss for the assembly, indicating a need for change in the assembly's approach and policies.
🕊️ The report concluded with a call for the Council of Europe to adhere to its fundamental principles and to address the concerns of member states fairly and transparently.

Q & A

What major concerns were expected to be discussed during the winter session of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly?
-The winter session was expected to discuss issues causing widespread concern globally, including the humanitarian crisis created by the conflict between Israel and Hamas, the situation in Ukraine, and the plight of diplomatic workers, among other topics.
What controversial topic was immediately raised by a member at the beginning of the session?
-At the beginning of the session, a member unexpectedly raised absurd accusations against Azerbaijan, nearly accusing it of committing a second genocide, which sparked significant controversy.
How did the Azerbaijan delegation respond to the accusations and proposals made against it?
-The Azerbaijani delegation proposed a vote of no confidence in response to the accusations and the harmful proposal, highlighting internal division as at least 30 parliament members supported this counteraction.
Who formed the 30-member anti-Azerbaijan group within the assembly?
-The anti-Azerbaijan group was formed by members from France, Armenia, and Germany.
What steps were taken by Azerbaijan after restoring its territorial integrity?
-After restoring its territorial integrity, Azerbaijan aimed to reinstate its full sovereignty, implement the rule of law, and organize democratic elections within a short period.
What was the reaction of the Azerbaijani delegation to perceived biases and double standards?
-The Azerbaijani delegation criticized the Council of Europe for its inability to name the 30-year occupation explicitly, viewing the organization as having lost its credibility and influence, thus deciding to suspend its activities within the Parliamentary Assembly.
How did the Azerbaijani delegation perceive the impact of their suspension of activities on the Council of Europe?
-The Azerbaijani delegation believed that their suspension of activities dealt a serious and incomprehensible blow to the prestige and overall influence of the Council of Europe and its Parliamentary Assembly.
What was the outcome of the vote regarding the controversial proposal against Azerbaijan?
-Despite orders from Paris and Berlin to support the covert operation against Azerbaijan, the proposal was not adopted due to insufficient support, with only 76 out of 306 members voting in favor, highlighting internal division within the assembly.
What is the stance of Azerbaijan regarding peace with Armenia?
-Azerbaijan is committed to restoring its territorial integrity and believes in the importance of achieving peace with Armenia for the stability of the region and the world, emphasizing the need to avoid actions that could jeopardize the peace process.
Why does the Azerbaijani delegation believe the Council of Europe has lost its relevance?
-The Azerbaijani delegation considers the Council of Europe as irrelevant and ineffective, criticized for its double standards and lack of impartiality, and believes that its absence, along with Turkey's, would diminish the pluralistic essence of the European Union.

Outlines

00:00

🌍 Azerbaijan's Representation at the Council of Europe

This paragraph addresses the challenges and controversies Azerbaijan faced during the winter session of the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly. It highlights the accusations against Azerbaijan related to human rights and territorial disputes, notably the absurd claims of genocide and occupation raised by some members against Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani delegation faced a significant setback when a proposal, seemingly undermining Azerbaijan's sovereignty and misrepresenting its actions post-conflict restoration, was pushed forward by an anti-Azerbaijan faction comprising members from France, Armenia, and Germany. This incident sparked a critical reaction from the Azerbaijani representatives, who decided to suspend their activities within the Assembly, viewing it as a biased institution that fails to recognize Azerbaijan's efforts towards peace and democracy. The paragraph underscores the delegation's view that this move sends a strong message to those within the Council who prefer confrontational tactics over dialogue, and emphasizes Azerbaijan's commitment to peace and democratic processes despite facing double standards and bias within international forums.

05:02

📉 The Impact of Double Standards on Azerbaijan's Diplomacy

This paragraph elaborates on the Azerbaijani delegation's suspension of activity in the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly, framing it as a protest against the double standards and diminished credibility of the institution. It critiques the Assembly's failure to engage constructively with Azerbaijan, pointing out the broader issues of bias and ineffectiveness that plague the organization. Despite these challenges, the summary mentions Azerbaijan's continued commitment to peace negotiations with Armenia, emphasizing the importance of such efforts for regional stability and international relations. The narrative criticizes the lack of recognition and support from European bodies for Azerbaijan's stance, highlighting a systemic issue with double standards and bias that undermines the Council's integrity and mission. It concludes by stressing the necessity for the Council to return to its foundational principles of fairness and respect to regain trust and effectiveness.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE)

The Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) is a key institution for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law in Europe. In the script, it is mentioned as the venue for discussions on critical global and regional issues, highlighting its role as a platform for addressing concerns of member states, including debates on conflict zones, humanitarian crises, and political disputes. The reference to PACE sessions indicates the assembly's function in fostering dialogue among European countries and beyond, aiming to solve pressing problems through parliamentary diplomacy.

💡Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan is mentioned in the context of facing 'absurd claims' during the PACE sessions, reflecting geopolitical tensions and disputes within the Council of Europe's dialogue forums. The narrative illustrates Azerbaijan's defensive position against accusations and its efforts to clarify its stance on sovereignty, territorial integrity, and its commitment to peace and democratic processes after regaining control over its territories. Azerbaijan's active engagement and eventual suspension of its participation in PACE activities underscore the country's complex relations with European institutions and its emphasis on national dignity and fair treatment.

💡Israel-Hamas conflict

The Israel-Hamas conflict is cited as one of the critical issues expected to be discussed at the PACE session, illustrating the assembly's engagement with international and regional conflicts. This mention underscores the assembly's role in addressing global humanitarian crises and conflicts, aiming to foster peace and stability through dialogue. The conflict represents one of the many geopolitical tensions that PACE seeks to mediate, highlighting the assembly's broad mandate beyond European borders.

💡Ukraine

Ukraine is referenced in relation to the humanitarian and political challenges faced by the country, likely pointing to the ongoing conflict and its repercussions. This inclusion in the PACE session agenda reflects the Council of Europe's concern with European security, territorial integrity, and human rights issues. Ukraine's situation exemplifies the type of regional crises that PACE addresses, emphasizing the assembly's role in promoting dialogue and resolutions to conflicts affecting its member states.

💡absurd claims

The term 'absurd claims' refers to accusations made against Azerbaijan in the PACE session, highlighting the contentious and often politicized debates within international forums. This phrase signifies the subjective nature of international diplomacy and the disputes that can arise from historical, territorial, and political disagreements. It illustrates how member states like Azerbaijan perceive themselves as targets of unfounded or exaggerated accusations in multilateral settings.

💡sovereignty restoration

Sovereignty restoration in the context of Azerbaijan refers to the country's efforts to reassert control over its territory and to normalize relations following conflicts. This concept is central to Azerbaijan's narrative within the script, emphasizing its commitment to peace, territorial integrity, and the rule of law. The mention of sovereignty restoration relates to broader themes of self-determination and national dignity in international relations, showcasing how countries navigate post-conflict recovery and governance.

💡democratic elections

Democratic elections are highlighted as a commitment by Azerbaijan following the restoration of its territorial integrity, showcasing the country's dedication to democratic norms and processes. This mention underscores the importance of electoral democracy in legitimizing governments and ensuring public participation in governance. It reflects the broader theme of democracy promotion within the Council of Europe's mandate and member states' obligations to uphold democratic standards.

💡double standards

The accusation of 'double standards' reflects a critique of perceived hypocrisy or inconsistent criteria applied by international bodies or states in similar situations. In the script, Azerbaijan accuses certain PACE members or groups of applying such double standards, particularly in the context of conflicts and diplomatic disputes. This concept highlights the challenges of maintaining impartiality and fairness in international relations and the tensions that arise from perceived injustices in diplomatic practices.

💡boycott

The boycott by the Azerbaijani delegation, as mentioned in the script, signifies a protest or withdrawal from participation in PACE activities. This action is taken in response to grievances over treatment and accusations within the assembly, illustrating a method of diplomatic dissent. The boycott underscores the dynamics of power and protest within international institutions, where member states may suspend their activities as a signal of disapproval or to demand changes in approach or recognition of their concerns.

💡pluralism

Pluralism in the context of the script refers to the diversity of views and the inclusion of different member states within the Council of Europe and its Parliamentary Assembly. The narrative stresses the importance of Azerbaijan and Turkey's presence in ensuring a pluralistic and comprehensive dialogue within PACE. This concept underscores the value of inclusivity and representation in international forums, highlighting how the participation of diverse states contributes to a richer and more balanced discourse on global and regional issues.

Highlights

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.