AŞPA Almaniya və Fransadan əmr aldı, özünü biabır etdi: Bakıdan rüsvayçı quruma sərt təpki

Summary

The script discusses significant concerns raised in the European Council's Parliamentary Assembly winter session. Key issues included the conflict between Israel and Hamas, the situation in Ukraine, and labor conditions worldwide. The Azerbaijani delegation faced baseless accusations, likening them to perpetrators of genocide, sparking a proposal to investigate their integrity. This led to the formation of an anti-Azerbaijan group by members from France, Armenia, and Germany. The Azerbaijani delegation, feeling misrepresented and facing double standards, suspended their activities in the Assembly, highlighting a serious blow to the organization's credibility. The script emphasizes the importance of Azerbaijan in peace processes, particularly with Armenia, and criticizes the Assembly's lack of recognition of Azerbaijan's efforts. It concludes with a call for an end to biased approaches within the Assembly and stresses Azerbaijan's continued commitment to peace and dialogue.

Takeaways

• 🌍 The session of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe addressed global concerns, not just European issues.
• 📣 The initial discussions were overshadowed by baseless accusations against Azerbaijan, alleging involvement in genocidal acts similar to the Armenian genocide.
• 📃 At least 30 parliament members supported a proposal accusing Azerbaijan, led by a 30-member anti-Azerbaijan group from France, Armenia, and Germany.
• 🇦🇿 Azerbaijan's delegation responded by temporarily halting their activity in the assembly, citing this as a significant blow to the credibility and prestige of the Council of Europe.
• 🚫 The Azerbaijani delegation's decision was a protest against perceived double standards and unjust treatment in the assembly.
• 💬 Despite the tension, there were calls for peace and recognition of Azerbaijan's role in the region, stressing the importance of peaceful relations with Armenia.
• ⚖️ Criticism was raised about the lack of impartiality and the prevalence of double standards within the assembly, diminishing its credibility.
• 🗳️ The assembly's handling of the situation was viewed as a reflection of a broader disregard for Azerbaijan, challenging the organization's relevance and legitimacy.
• 👥 The departure of the Azerbaijani delegation was seen as a significant loss for the assembly, indicating a need for change in the assembly's approach and policies.
• 🕊️ The report concluded with a call for the Council of Europe to adhere to its fundamental principles and to address the concerns of member states fairly and transparently.

Q & A

What major concerns were expected to be discussed during the winter session of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly?

The winter session was expected to discuss issues causing widespread concern globally, including the humanitarian crisis created by the conflict between Israel and Hamas, the situation in Ukraine, and the plight of diplomatic workers, among other topics.

What controversial topic was immediately raised by a member at the beginning of the session?

At the beginning of the session, a member unexpectedly raised absurd accusations against Azerbaijan, nearly accusing it of committing a second genocide, which sparked significant controversy.

How did the Azerbaijan delegation respond to the accusations and proposals made against it?

The Azerbaijani delegation proposed a vote of no confidence in response to the accusations and the harmful proposal, highlighting internal division as at least 30 parliament members supported this counteraction.

Who formed the 30-member anti-Azerbaijan group within the assembly?

The anti-Azerbaijan group was formed by members from France, Armenia, and Germany.

What steps were taken by Azerbaijan after restoring its territorial integrity?

After restoring its territorial integrity, Azerbaijan aimed to reinstate its full sovereignty, implement the rule of law, and organize democratic elections within a short period.

What was the reaction of the Azerbaijani delegation to perceived biases and double standards?

The Azerbaijani delegation criticized the Council of Europe for its inability to name the 30-year occupation explicitly, viewing the organization as having lost its credibility and influence, thus deciding to suspend its activities within the Parliamentary Assembly.

How did the Azerbaijani delegation perceive the impact of their suspension of activities on the Council of Europe?

The Azerbaijani delegation believed that their suspension of activities dealt a serious and incomprehensible blow to the prestige and overall influence of the Council of Europe and its Parliamentary Assembly.

What was the outcome of the vote regarding the controversial proposal against Azerbaijan?

Despite orders from Paris and Berlin to support the covert operation against Azerbaijan, the proposal was not adopted due to insufficient support, with only 76 out of 306 members voting in favor, highlighting internal division within the assembly.

What is the stance of Azerbaijan regarding peace with Armenia?

Azerbaijan is committed to restoring its territorial integrity and believes in the importance of achieving peace with Armenia for the stability of the region and the world, emphasizing the need to avoid actions that could jeopardize the peace process.

Why does the Azerbaijani delegation believe the Council of Europe has lost its relevance?

The Azerbaijani delegation considers the Council of Europe as irrelevant and ineffective, criticized for its double standards and lack of impartiality, and believes that its absence, along with Turkey's, would diminish the pluralistic essence of the European Union.