461739550 8481923515232863 2554090603683787224 n

Summary

The transcript highlights serious structural issues in a government building, including uneven flooring, cracks in pillars, and signs of subsidence. Engineers have raised concerns about the building's safety, noting that it may no longer be structurally sound. There are mentions of past retrofitting efforts that failed due to inadequate studies. Despite these warnings, 14,000 people use the building daily. The conversation also touches on violations of fire and building codes. The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of plans or blueprints, making future repair efforts difficult.

Takeaways

• ⚠️ The building is experiencing structural issues, with the floors no longer even and some parts tilting.
• 🏗️ Engineers have identified red flags in the building's structure, indicating that it has moved and is unsafe.
• 🚪 There are concerns about doors not functioning properly due to the shifting structure, creating a safety risk.
• 📉 The building is considered structurally unsound due to liquefaction and past construction problems.
• 🔨 Jet grouting was previously attempted but did not work because there was no proper underground study.
• 👷 Engineers and architects have agreed that retrofitting is not advisable due to the building's current condition.
• 🌍 An earthquake monitoring system detected a false alarm, yet the building still shook, adding to safety concerns.
• 🏢 The city hall is split into two buildings, which are now uneven due to structural movement.
• 👥 Around 14,000 people visit the city hall daily, including 4,000 employees, highlighting the critical need for safety.
• 📝 The building lacks as-built plans and blueprints, making it difficult to create a proper restoration or retrofitting plan.

Q & A

What are the main structural concerns mentioned in the transcript?

The transcript highlights several structural issues, including uneven flooring, tilted posts, large cracks, and overall building subsidence. Engineers also noted red flags like liquefaction and seismic instability, making the building unsafe.

Why is the building considered unsafe despite retrofitting attempts?

The building is considered unsafe due to its significant structural problems, and previous retrofitting attempts did not resolve the issues. There was no underground study, and the jet grouting project was unsuccessful, treating the symptoms rather than addressing the core issues.

What is the significance of the earthquake monitor mentioned in the transcript?

The earthquake monitor detected an intensity one earthquake reading, but there was no actual earthquake according to other offices and external checks. This suggests that the building is unstable and prone to movement, even without external seismic activity.

How does the state of the building affect daily operations at the City Hall?

The unsafe conditions of the building affect approximately 14,000 people daily, including 4,000 employees and 10,000 visitors. Despite the risks, employees still have to report to work, making it a critical safety concern.

What does the lack of an 'as-built' plan mean for future retrofitting or repairs?

Without an 'as-built' plan or blueprints, it is extremely difficult to make informed decisions regarding repairs or retrofitting. This lack of documentation adds complexity to addressing the building's structural problems.

What are the engineers' and architects' recommendations regarding the building’s future?

The engineers and architects consulted advised against retrofitting the building due to its current state. They emphasized that it would be more challenging and potentially dangerous to retrofit without proper plans or studies.

What caused the cracks and subsidence in the building?

The cracks and subsidence are likely due to liquefaction and other structural infirmities. Over time, the building has become uneven, with sections sinking and causing instability.

Why was a 'makeshift ramp' created in the building?

A makeshift ramp was created to adjust for the difference in levels between parts of the building, which are no longer aligned due to subsidence and structural shifting.

What are the possible consequences of an earthquake hitting the building?

Engineers warned that even at certain intensity levels of an earthquake, the buildings could collide or collapse due to their proximity and the structural issues. This poses a severe risk to occupants.

What was the motivation behind developing the City Hall campus?

The idea of developing the City Hall campus stemmed from recognizing the danger posed by the structurally unsound building. With thousands of people relying on City Hall services, ensuring a safe environment became a priority.