Pagtatag ng Dept. of Disaster Resilience, tinalakay sa Senado

Summary

The transcript discusses a public hearing on disaster risk reduction, involving experts, non-governmental organizations, and local government officials. It highlights the Philippine government's efforts, led by the Department of Science and Technology and the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council, to improve disaster response and coordination. Mention is made of recent successful disaster management under the current administration, with a focus on the importance of collaboration and preparedness.

Takeaways

• 🔒 A discussion on disaster risk management involving government officials, disaster reduction experts, and NGOs took place.
• 🏛️ Senator Ping Lacson emphasized the importance of proactive disaster management measures.
• 🔧 There was mention of the mechanical and technical aspects of disaster risk management in collaboration with various organizations.
• 🧑‍🔬 The Department of Science and Technology, led by Secretary Fortunato de la Peña, was highlighted in terms of its role in disaster management.
• 👥 The coordination between different agencies and local governments was discussed as an essential element of disaster response.
• 📜 Senator Francis Tolentino referenced Republic Act 10121, which pertains to the Disaster Risk Reduction and Management System.
• 🔄 The effectiveness of the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) was brought up, with some indicating its positive impact in recent events.
• 🗣️ Public hearings focused on amendments or improvements to current disaster management systems were held.
• 🌍 Non-governmental organizations were mentioned as critical partners in disaster preparedness and management efforts.
• 🏗️ Rehabilitation and recovery efforts in disaster-stricken areas were identified as a key focus for future actions.

Q & A

What was the main topic of the public hearing mentioned in the transcript?

The main topic of the public hearing was disaster risk management, involving discussions among senators, experts, non-governmental organizations, and local government officials.

Who were some of the key participants in the hearing?

Key participants included Senator Ping Lacson, Senator Francis Tolentino, disaster reduction experts, non-governmental organizations, local government officials, and the Department of Science and Technology Secretary Fortunato de la Peña.

What was Senator Ping Lacson's stance on disaster risk management?

Senator Ping Lacson emphasized the need for a proactive approach to disaster risk management.

What department was highlighted in the discussion, and why?

The Department of Disaster Resilience was highlighted, with discussions on how it could enhance disaster preparedness and response.

What was mentioned about the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC)?

It was mentioned that the NDRRMC had been in place for only a few years, but there was satisfaction with its coordination and disaster response, as noted by the President.

What law regarding disaster risk management was referenced during the hearing?

Republic Act 10121, which covers the Disaster Risk Reduction and Management System, was referenced during the hearing.

What was Senator Francis Tolentino's viewpoint on the law related to disaster risk management?

Senator Francis Tolentino pointed out that Republic Act 10121 should not be repealed but rather strengthened through better implementation, especially at the local level.

What challenges were discussed concerning local disaster risk reduction efforts?

Challenges regarding local implementation of disaster risk reduction efforts were discussed, highlighting the need for better local coordination and rehabilitation efforts.

What role did the Department of Science and Technology play in the discussion?

The Department of Science and Technology, represented by Secretary Fortunato de la Peña, played a role in providing scientific insights and support for disaster risk reduction.

What was the overall tone regarding the state of disaster management in the country?

The tone was one of cautious optimism, with recognition of progress in disaster management but a call for further improvements, especially in local implementation and preparedness.