How to write the Review of Related Literature (part 2)

Summary

The video continues a series on how to write a Review of Related Literature (RRL). It recaps previous discussions about the SSAP method—Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation. The focus in this part is on the third and fourth elements: Analysis and Presentation. Analysis involves identifying research gaps, addressing controversies, and suggesting further studies. Presentation focuses on organizing references from general to specific, ensuring coherence and relevance. The speaker emphasizes the importance of presenting the literature in a structured, logical manner to support the research topic.

Takeaways

• 📚 The video is part of a series discussing how to write a review of related literature and studies (RRL).
• 📝 The first two elements of the review writing process, survey and synthesis, were covered in the previous video.
• 🔍 The current focus is on the third element: analysis, which is crucial for identifying gaps in the literature.
• 🧐 Analysis involves pinpointing limitations in existing studies that your research could address.
• 📊 If gaps can't be filled by your research, mention them as potential topics for future studies.
• ❓ Analysis also includes reviewing areas of controversy, where prior studies may have had inconclusive results.
• 📖 The final element is presentation, which involves organizing references and ideas coherently.
• 🗂️ Organization means moving from general information to specific details related to your research problem.
• ✍️ Good paragraph development in the presentation should progress from broad context to specific insights.
• 👍 The video ends by encouraging viewers to stay tuned for more research writing tips and to support the channel.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the discussion in the video?

The video discusses how to write a review of related literature and studies (RRL) in research, focusing on the steps and elements involved.

What are the four key elements in writing the review of related literature and studies?

The four key elements are Survey, Synthesis, Analysis, and Presentation, which follow the acronym SSAP.

What was discussed in the previous part of the video?

The previous part of the video discussed the first two elements of the review process: Survey and Synthesis.

What is the third element in writing the review of related literature and what does it involve?

The third element is Analysis. It involves identifying gaps, limitations, or controversial areas in the previous studies and discussing how these gaps can be addressed in the current research.

How does analysis build on the previous element, synthesis?

After synthesizing the references, analysis focuses on identifying what has not been covered, highlighting gaps or limitations in the studies reviewed, and exploring areas for further investigation.

What should be done if the gaps identified in the analysis cannot be addressed in the current research?

If the gaps cannot be filled, the researcher should present these as areas for further studies, noting that they were not covered by the current or previous research.

What role do controversial areas play in the analysis?

Controversial areas, where the results of studies are inconclusive, provide opportunities for further investigation and can be explored in the analysis to address unresolved issues.

What is meant by 'presentation' in the review of related literature?

Presentation refers to the organization of references and ideas in the review. It involves structuring the literature from general to specific, ensuring coherence, and leading the reader toward the specific research problem.

How should the references be organized in the presentation stage?

References should be organized by starting with general information, including background and history, and gradually narrowing down to the specific focus of the research problem being addressed.

What is the purpose of paragraph development in the presentation?

Paragraph development helps in logically organizing ideas, starting from broad concepts and moving toward the specific research problem, ensuring a clear and coherent progression of information.