Introduction to Morality, Legality, and Justice - US History for Teens!
Summary
TLDRThis lesson explores the complexities of morality, justice, and legality in a democratic society. It delves into how different perspectives can lead to disagreements on what is right or fair, using examples like pizza sharing and tax systems. The lesson defines morality as subjective principles guiding right and wrong, justice as fair treatment and distribution, and legality as law-permitted actions. It also discusses the challenges in reconciling these concepts, emphasizing the need for decision-making despite differing views.
Takeaways
- š **Moral Complexity**: Deciding what is right and fair can be difficult, even in simple situations like sharing pizza.
- š **Democratic Challenges**: In a democratic society with diverse perspectives, it's challenging to find universally agreed-upon answers to moral, legal, and justice questions.
- š¤ **Defining Morality**: Morality is subjective and influenced by personal feelings, values, opinions, experiences, education, upbringing, and beliefs.
- š **Philosophical Views**: Different philosophers have offered various definitions of morality, emphasizing reason, logic, compassion, and the greatest good for the greatest number.
- š§ **Neuroscientific Insights**: The brain, particularly areas like the amygdala, plays a crucial role in moral judgment and behavior, influencing our gut feelings about right and wrong.
- šļø **Justice Concepts**: Justice involves fair and equal treatment and encompasses types like distributive, retributive, procedural, and social justice.
- š¼ **Distributive Justice**: It's about the fair distribution of social benefits, privileges, and costs, such as taxes or shared resources.
- š **Retributive Justice**: This type of justice focuses on the appropriate consequences and punishments for crimes or wrongdoings.
- š **Procedural Justice**: It ensures fairness in processes that resolve disputes and make decisions, like following due process in legal matters.
- š **Social Justice**: A broad concept dealing with equality, human rights, and fairness in all societal aspects, often a subject of controversy.
- š **Legal Clarity**: Something is legal if it's permitted by law, but laws can be complicated and controversial, reflecting the diversity of moral and justice views in society.
Q & A
What is the main dilemma presented in the lesson preview about dividing a pizza?
-The main dilemma is deciding how to fairly divide a pizza to share with friends, which illustrates the difficulty of agreeing on what is right and fair, even in seemingly simple situations.
What is the unit essential question discussed in the transcript?
-The unit essential question is: 'What happens when morality, the law, and justice are at odds?'
What are the three guiding questions for the lesson?
-The three guiding questions are: 'What does morality mean?', 'What does legal mean?', and 'What does justice mean?'
According to Emanuel Kant, what should we use to create moral rules and principles?
-Emanuel Kant believed that we should use reason and logic to create moral rules and principles.
What is John Stuart Mill's view on morality?
-John Stuart Mill believed that actions are moral if they lead to the greatest good or happiness for the greatest number of people.
How do Confucius and Rumi view morality?
-Confucius and Rumi saw morality as a way of life, emphasizing living with compassion, generosity, respect, and kindness.
What role does the amygdala play in moral judgment according to neuroscientists?
-The amygdala is responsible for regulating emotions, which can influence our views of morality.
What does the term 'subjective' mean in the context of morality?
-In the context of morality, 'subjective' means that something is based on or influenced by personal feelings, values, or opinions.
What is an example of a situation where morality can be complex and subjective?
-An example is the morality of killing another person, which can be seen as immoral, but might be considered moral in self-defense or to protect another person.
What are the four types of justice discussed in the transcript?
-The four types of justice are distributive justice, retributive justice, procedural justice, and social justice.
What is the difference between retributive justice and distributive justice?
-Retributive justice is concerned with the consequences and punishments for crimes or wrongdoings, while distributive justice refers to the fair distribution of social benefits, privileges, and costs.
What does it mean for something to be legal?
-Something is legal if it is permitted by law.
How do personal views of justice and morality influence the creation of laws?
-Personal views of justice and morality can influence which representatives people choose to elect and which laws those representatives choose to support.
Outlines
š Morality in a Democratic Society
This paragraph introduces the complexity of determining what is moral, legal, and just in a democratic society. It starts with a simple scenario of dividing a pizza and moves on to more complex issues like education funding and drug rehabilitation. The paragraph explores different philosophical perspectives on morality, including Kant's emphasis on reason and logic, Mill's focus on the greatest good for the greatest number, and Eastern philosophies that view morality as a compassionate way of life. It also touches on the biological and neurological aspects of morality, explaining how emotions and brain functions like the amygdala influence moral judgments. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing the subjectivity of morality and the difficulty in establishing universal moral principles.
š Types of Justice
This paragraph delves into the concept of justice, explaining it as the fair and equal treatment of individuals in society. It outlines four types of justice: distributive justice, which is about the fair distribution of resources; retributive justice, concerning the consequences for crimes; procedural justice, ensuring fair processes in dispute resolution; and social justice, encompassing broader issues of equality and human rights. The paragraph uses the analogy of a foot race with participants of different ages and conditions to illustrate the complexities and disagreements surrounding what constitutes fair treatment. It also discusses the role of laws, created by elected representatives, in reflecting individual views of morality and justice, and how these views can lead to different legal outcomes.
š The Challenge of Defining Morality and Justice
The final paragraph of the script addresses the difficulty of reconciling differing views on morality and justice. It acknowledges that while these questions are challenging, they cannot be left unanswered. Using the pizza-sharing scenario as a metaphor, it suggests that decisions must be made, even if they do not satisfy everyone. The paragraph concludes by encouraging viewers to continue engaging with these complex issues, implying that finding solutions is an ongoing process.
Mindmap
Keywords
š”Morality
š”Justice
š”Legal
š”Democracy
š”Emanuel Kant
š”John Stuart Mill
š”Confucius
š”Rumi
š”Evolutionary Biology
š”Neuroscience
š”Distributive Justice
š”Retributive Justice
Highlights
Discussing the difficulty of agreeing on what is right and fair, even in simple scenarios like sharing pizza.
Exploring the complexity of morality, law, and justice in a democratic society with diverse perspectives.
Defining the unit essential question: What happens when morality, the law, and justice are at odds?
Examining the lesson essential question: Why is it hard to agree on morality, legality, and justice in a democracy?
Exploring different philosophical views on morality, including Kant, Mill, Confucius, and Rumi.
Discussing the evolutionary perspective on morality as a tool for survival.
Highlighting the role of neuroscience and psychology in understanding moral judgment and behavior.
Describing morality as a set of subjective principles influenced by personal experiences and beliefs.
Questioning the existence of universal moral principles and the complexities surrounding them.
Defining justice as the fair and equal treatment of individuals in society.
Explaining different types of justice: distributive, retributive, procedural, and social.
Discussing the fairness of tax systems and the debate over how they should be structured.
Examining the debate on penalties for drug use and the argument for treatment over punishment.
Exploring the concept of procedural justice through examples like waiting in line and due process.
Discussing social justice, equality, human rights, and the role of government in ensuring fair treatment.
Presenting an analogy of a foot race to illustrate the complexities of fairness and equality.
Defining legality as being permitted by law and discussing the influence of individual views on law creation.
Encouraging consideration of how personal views of morality and justice affect attitudes towards laws.
Emphasizing the importance of addressing challenging questions of morality, law, and justice.
Transcripts
In the lesson preview, you were tasked withĀ deciding how Mia should divide up a pizza toĀ Ā
share with friends. This is a pretty low-stakesĀ dilemma, but it demonstrates how difficult itĀ Ā
can be to agree on what is right and fair, even ifĀ we're just talking about pizza. But what if we'reĀ Ā
talking about bigger issues, like how to allocateĀ funding for education, parks, and roadways,Ā Ā
or whether people convicted of drug use should beĀ sent to a prison or a rehabilitation facility?Ā Ā
In a democratic society that includes multipleĀ perspectives, values, and ideologies, it is oftenĀ Ā
difficult, if not impossible, to come up withĀ answers to these questions that all people agreeĀ Ā
on. In this unit, we'll tackle the unit essentialĀ question: What happens when morality, the law,Ā Ā
and justice are at odds? In today's lesson, we'llĀ focus on the lesson essential question: Why is itĀ Ā
so hard to agree on what is moral, legal, and justĀ in a democratic society? The guiding questions forĀ Ā
this lesson are: What does morality mean? WhatĀ does legal mean? And what does justice mean?
So, what does morality mean? Well, people haveĀ been trying to figure that out for thousands ofĀ Ā
years. Enlightenment philosopher Emanuel Kant wasĀ of the opinion that we should use reason and logicĀ Ā
to create moral rules and principles. Then, ifĀ our actions abide by these rules and principles,Ā Ā
we know the action is morally justified.Ā English politician and economist John StuartĀ
Mill believed that actions are moral if theyĀ lead to the greatest good or happiness for theĀ Ā
greatest number of people. In other words, theĀ morality of an action depends on how many peopleĀ Ā
it benefits. Chinese philosopher Confucius andĀ Islamic philosopher and poet Rumi saw moralityĀ Ā
as a way of life. Essentially, they believed thatĀ living a moral life means acting with compassion,Ā Ā
generosity, respect, and kindness.Ā Some evolutionary biologists argueĀ Ā
that morality evolved as a tool for survival.Ā Basically, because humans are social creatures,Ā Ā
we exhibit moral behavior so that we will beĀ accepted within our communities. NeuroscientistsĀ Ā
who study the brain and psychologists whoĀ study human behavior have found that certainĀ Ā
areas of the brain play crucial roles inĀ moral judgment and behavior. For example,Ā Ā
the amygdala is responsible for regulatingĀ emotions. Some emotions, like anger, fear,Ā Ā
guilt, and disgust, have been found to influenceĀ our views of morality. This is why we have thatĀ Ā
gut feeling when something feels morally wrong.Ā It's part of our brain's natural response. All ofĀ Ā
this is to say that morality is very complicatedĀ and difficult to define. For our purposes, we willĀ Ā
define morality as a set of subjective principlesĀ and values that help us decide what actions andĀ Ā
behaviors are right and wrong. Subjective meansĀ something is based on or influenced by personalĀ Ā
feelings, values, or opinions. Ultimately, manyĀ factors, including our personal experiences,Ā Ā
education, upbringing, and beliefs, influence whatĀ we determine is or isn't moral. But can you thinkĀ Ā
of any universal moral principles that everyone, orĀ almost everyone, can agree on? Generally speaking,Ā Ā
it's safe to say that murder or killingĀ another person is immoral. But what ifĀ Ā
it's in self-defense or to protect another person?Ā What if someone is engaged in an armed conflict,Ā Ā
like a soldier serving in wartime? What if itĀ was an accident? What if the accident was theĀ Ā
result of someone's careless or irresponsibleĀ behavior? You might find yourself saying, "Well,Ā Ā
it depends," or "I don't know." And that'sĀ why determining what is or isn't moral isĀ Ā
so challenging. It's hard enough for people toĀ individually decide what is or isn't moral, butĀ Ā
when a whole nation has to come together to defineĀ morality, there will always be plenty of room forĀ Ā
disagreement. Pause here and complete the activityĀ for the first guiding question in your PDF.
Justice refers to the fair and equal treatmentĀ of individuals in society. There are severalĀ Ā
different types of justice that we'll examineĀ in this unit. The first is distributive justice,Ā Ā
which refers to the fair distribution of socialĀ benefits, privileges, and costs, like how pizzasĀ Ā
are shared amongst friends. Another example isĀ taxes. People have been arguing about how toĀ Ā
create a fair tax system basically forever. Is itĀ more fair for everyone to pay the same amount ofĀ Ā
taxes, or should some people pay more than others?Ā Should taxation be based on income or the value ofĀ Ā
someone's property? Not sure? You're not alone.Ā Next is retributive justice, which is concernedĀ Ā
with the consequences and punishments imposedĀ on people who commit crimes or wrongdoings.Ā Ā
One example of a retributive justice issue isĀ penalties for drug use. Historically, drug use hasĀ Ā
been penalized like most other crimes. But manyĀ argue that legal punishments do little to stopĀ Ā
drug use. Instead, some suggest that the focusĀ should be on treatment for addiction instead ofĀ Ā
punishing people for their addictions. But othersĀ believe that crimes are crimes, and people shouldĀ Ā
be punished for breaking the law. ProceduralĀ justice refers to the fairness in the processesĀ Ā
that resolve disputes and make decisions. The goalĀ is to ensure that people experience fair and equalĀ Ā
access and treatment. Probably the most commonĀ and basic example of procedural justice is waitingĀ Ā
in line. If someone cuts in front of you, thatĀ wouldn't be just. Another example is due process,Ā Ā
which ensures that all legal matters are resolvedĀ according to established rules and principles.Ā Ā
Among other things, due process ensures that theĀ police have to follow certain procedures, likeĀ Ā
obtaining a warrant in order to arrest someone orĀ search their personal property. Finally, socialĀ Ā
justice is a broad concept that involves issues ofĀ equality and human rights and encompasses fairnessĀ Ā
in all aspects of society. There is a lot ofĀ controversy around social justice. Why? Well,Ā Ā
because there is a lot of disagreement aboutĀ what constitutes fairness and equality,Ā Ā
as well as what role the government shouldĀ play in ensuring fair and equal treatment.Ā Ā
Here's an analogy: Imagine four people areĀ competing in a foot race. All runners willĀ Ā
start at the same starting line and race toĀ the same finish line. That's fair and equal,Ā Ā
right? But let's imagine that the runners' agesĀ are 5, 25, 45, and 75. Is it still a fair race?Ā Ā
Some might say yes because that's literally howĀ races work, but others might find this unfairĀ Ā
and pretty absurd. What if they all had to runĀ the same distance, but the 5- and 75-year-oldĀ Ā
run on a track while the others have to runĀ through thick, goopy mud? Would the differentĀ Ā
conditions of the race make it more fair orĀ less fair? What if the 75-year-old routinelyĀ Ā
runs marathons and is a former Olympic athlete?Ā Would that make the race more fair? Less fair? Neither?
Both? Pause here to complete the activityĀ for the second guiding question in your PDF.
Okay, those were two pretty big and abstractĀ concepts that we just tackled. Fortunately,Ā Ā
this definition is pretty straightforward:Ā Something is legal if it is permitted byĀ Ā
law. However, just because the definition isĀ straightforward doesn't mean that laws aren'tĀ Ā
complicated or controversial. In democraticĀ societies, laws are created by the peopleĀ Ā
through their elected representatives. WhichĀ representatives people choose to elect and whichĀ Ā
laws those representatives choose to supportĀ are influenced by a wide range of individualĀ Ā
views of justice and morality. Think back toĀ the example of murder. How could someone'sĀ Ā
personal views of justice and morality affectĀ their attitudes towards laws related to theĀ Ā
killing of others? A person might believe that theĀ morality of murder depends on the circumstances,Ā Ā
which might lead them to support laws thatĀ impose harsher penalties in some cases andĀ Ā
lighter penalties in others. But anotherĀ person might argue that would be unjust toĀ Ā
the victims' families. Others might think thatĀ the feelings of the victims' families shouldn'tĀ Ā
matter because the law should be treatingĀ everyone equally, regardless of how peopleĀ Ā
feel. Pause here to complete the activityĀ for the third guiding question in your PDF.
Ultimately, differing views of morality andĀ justice make it difficult to answer these kinds ofĀ Ā
questions. But just because they are challengingĀ doesn't mean they can go unanswered. At someĀ Ā
point, someone has to decide how to divide up thatĀ pizza. Maybe not everyone will be happy about howĀ Ā
it's divided, but the alternative is that no oneĀ gets to eat. Until next time, keep making history.
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)