DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro or Osmo Pocket 3? The Pros & Cons (& which one I chose)

Summary

In this video, the creator compares the DJI Osmo Action 5 and Osmo Pocket 3, ultimately choosing the latter for its narrower field of view and superior stabilization. Despite the Action 5's impressive features like a wide 155° field of view, 4K video at 100 Mbps, and robust waterproofing, the Pocket 3's 92° field of view and 3-axis mechanical gimbal won him over for everyday filming. He also appreciates the Pocket 3's hyperlapse function and subject tracking, though acknowledges its fragility compared to the rugged Action 5 Pro.

Takeaways

• 🎥 The speaker waited to see the specs and features of the Osmo Action 5 before deciding on a new camera.
• 🤔 They were dissatisfied with the performance of the Sony ZV-1 and the original Osmo Pocket, mainly due to stabilization and audio issues.
• 📦 After the release of the Osmo Action 5, the speaker chose to buy the DJI Pocket 3 Creator Combo instead.
• 🔋 The Creator Combo includes an extra battery handle that boosts battery life by 60-70%, and the DJI Mic 2 for wireless audio recording.
• 👁️‍🗨️ The speaker values the DJI Pocket 3's 92-degree field of view, which is more suited for everyday filming compared to the Osmo Action 5's 155-degree wide angle, designed for dynamic action shots.
• 🎮 The 3-axis mechanical gimbal of the Pocket 3 offers superior stabilization without cropping, allowing for more controlled, smooth shots.
• 🎬 The Pocket 3 has a larger 1-inch sensor than the Action 5 and delivers higher bit-rate 4K video (130 Mbps vs. 100 Mbps).
• ⏱️ Features like hyperlapse with preset camera movements and subject tracking are key advantages of the Pocket 3 over the Osmo Action 5.
• ⚠️ Despite its benefits, the Pocket 3 is delicate, not waterproof, and unsuitable for rough or tough outdoor filming, unlike the rugged Action 5.
• 📊 The speaker emphasizes that both cameras are excellent in different ways, and the choice depends on the type of filming (action-focused vs. more controlled settings).

Q & A

What were the main reasons for the speaker to consider a new camera?

The speaker was not satisfied with the Sony ZV1's performance, particularly its microphone and narrow field of view, and the original Osmo Pocket's tiny screen annoyed him.

Why did the speaker choose the Osmo Pocket 3 over the Osmo Action 5?

The speaker chose the Osmo Pocket 3 because it offered a narrower field of view, which is better for everyday filming, and it has a mechanical gimbal for superior stabilization compared to electronic image stabilization.

What additional accessories did the speaker get with the Creator Combo package?

The Creator Combo package included an additional battery handle for extended battery life and the DJI Mic 2 for improved audio recording.

What are the key features of the DJI Mic 2 that the speaker appreciates?

The DJI Mic 2 has Bluetooth connectivity, allowing the speaker to clip it on and film without the need for additional cables or receivers.

What is the field of view of the Osmo Pocket 3 and how does it compare to the Osmo Action 5 Pro?

The Osmo Pocket 3 has a 92-degree field of view, which is narrower than the 155° field of view of the Osmo Action 5 Pro, making it more suitable for everyday filming where the speaker wants a more lifelike and natural perspective.

What is the main advantage of the mechanical gimbal on the Osmo Pocket 3?

The mechanical gimbal on the Osmo Pocket 3 offers better stabilization without cropping the picture, unlike electronic image stabilization which may crop the image to stabilize footage.

What are the key specifications of the Osmo Pocket 3's camera?

The Osmo Pocket 3 has a 1/1.7-inch sensor, capable of shooting 4K video at 100 Mbps, with slow-motion capabilities at 120 fps for 4K and 240 fps at 1080p.

What unique feature does the Osmo Pocket 3 have that the Osmo Action series lacks?

The Osmo Pocket 3 has a hyperlapse function that allows for preset camera movement while filming a time lapse, creating sweeping, moving time lapses.

How does the Osmo Pocket 3's subject tracking compare to the Osmo Action 5 Pro's?

The Osmo Pocket 3's gimbal has full free movement, allowing it to track subjects more naturally without cropping the sensor, unlike the Osmo Action 5 Pro which tracks subjects by cropping some of the sensor.

What are the limitations of the Osmo Pocket 3 as mentioned by the speaker?

The Osmo Pocket 3's mechanical gimbal is delicate and not waterproof, windproof, or dustproof, making it unsuitable for rough, tough, or wet conditions.

What is the speaker's final recommendation for viewers based on the video script?

The speaker recommends that viewers be informed by his experience but ultimately choose the camera that best suits their specific filming needs and conditions.