Putin Humiliated as Nuclear Missile Explodes in RUSSIA!

Summary

The video discusses a failed Russian nuclear missile test, the RS28 Sarmat, which was intended as a show of force but exploded on the ground. It highlights Russia's repeated warnings to NATO and the West about using nuclear weapons, and analyzes the credibility of these threats. The script also touches on the potential consequences if NATO were to allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia with Western weapons, and includes a response from a British official reminding Russia of Britain's nuclear capabilities.

Takeaways

• 🚀 Russia experienced a nuclear missile explosion during a test meant to demonstrate its military strength.
• 😅 The incident occurred at the intended launch site, highlighting operational issues within Russia's military.
• 📡 The test was a strategic move to assert Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons, particularly in response to NATO's potential support for Ukraine.
• 🌍 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned the West about Russia's nuclear capabilities in an interview, setting the stage for the failed missile test.
• 💥 The missile, an RS-28 Sarmat or 'Satan 2', failed before launch, causing significant destruction to the silo and launch site.
• 📸 Satellite imagery provided evidence of the explosion, as Russia did not admit to the failure publicly.
• 🔍 The incident raised questions about the reliability of Russia's nuclear arsenal and its military hardware in general.
• 🇺🇦 Russia's use of nuclear threats is seen as a bluff to deter Western support for Ukraine, with some experts suggesting they are unlikely to use nuclear weapons.
• 💬 The situation has led to a war of words, with Russian officials making bold statements about potential nuclear retaliation if NATO supports Ukraine.
• 📢 The video script suggests that Russia's threats are not being taken seriously by Western powers, who are aware of Russia's internal corruption and military shortcomings.

Q & A

What was the main purpose of Russia's nuclear missile test?

The main purpose of Russia's nuclear missile test was to demonstrate their military strength and signal to the West, NATO, and Ukraine that Russia is not afraid to use its nuclear capabilities.

What happened during the missile test that was supposed to showcase Russia's strength?

The missile test failed catastrophically as the missile exploded on the ground during the fueling process, destroying the silo and much of the launch site.

How did the failure of the missile test impact Russia's intended message?

The failure of the missile test undermined Russia's intended message of strength and deterrence, instead becoming a source of ridicule and questioning of Russia's military capabilities.

What was the significance of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's interview with Sky News?

Sergey Lavrov's interview was significant as it was meant to build up anticipation for the missile test and serve as a warning to the West about Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons.

What was the context behind Putin's fake press conference mentioned in the script?

The context was the possibility of NATO giving Ukraine permission to strike inside Russia using Western weapons, to which Putin warned that it would mean NATO is at war with Russia.

What was the reaction of the United States to Dmitry Medvedev's statement about a potential nuclear response?

The U.S. Department of State responded by saying they know not to take Medvedev seriously, dismissing his statement as standard Kremlin nonsense.

What does the script suggest about the reliability of Russia's military equipment?

The script suggests that Russia's military equipment, including its nuclear arsenal, may be unreliable and outdated, as evidenced by the failure of the new missile test and the examination of recovered weapons by Ukraine.

How does the script describe the role of corruption in Russia's military and border fortifications?

The script describes corruption as a significant issue, suggesting that funds allocated for border fortifications were embezzled, leading to inadequate defenses that contributed to Ukraine's ability to invade.

What was the response of a close adviser to Putin when discussing the potential use of missiles by Ukraine?

The adviser threatened that if Ukraine were to use missiles from the UK, Putin would be forced to attack Britain, indicating a potential escalation in response to NATO's involvement.

How did Michael Clark respond to Russia's threats of nuclear use against Britain?

Michael Clark reminded Russia that Britain has an independent nuclear deterrent, with submarines ready to respond to any threats, effectively neutralizing Russia's threats.

Outlines

00:00

🚀 Russian Nuclear Missile Fiasco

This paragraph discusses a failed Russian nuclear missile test that was intended to serve as a show of force. The missile, which was supposed to demonstrate Russia's military might, exploded on the test site before it could launch. The incident is particularly embarrassing for Russia as it occurred during a period when the country was already facing setbacks, such as losing territory under Putin's leadership since World War II. The failure was highlighted by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's prior warnings to the West and NATO, asserting that Russia's nuclear arsenal was ready for use. The paragraph also addresses the potential for Russian bots to suppress videos critical of Russia and calls for viewers to support the content by liking and sharing.

05:00

🔍 Analyzing Russia's Nuclear Red Lines

The second paragraph delves into Russia's nuclear strategy and the concept of 'red lines' in the context of nuclear weapons. It references statements made by Russian officials, including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who emphasized that Russia's nuclear weapons are on high alert and ready for use if necessary. The paragraph also discusses the failed test of the RS-28 Sarmat, a new Russian missile, which was a significant embarrassment given its intended role as a display of Russia's military capabilities. The incident raised questions about the reliability of Russia's nuclear arsenal and the country's overall military preparedness, especially considering the missile's failure during the fueling process that led to the destruction of the launch site.

10:02

🌐 Geopolitical Ramifications of Nuclear Threats

The final paragraph addresses the geopolitical implications of Russia's nuclear threats, particularly in relation to the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. It discusses the potential for NATO countries to become directly involved in the conflict if they provide Ukraine with advanced weaponry. The paragraph includes a statement from a close advisor to Putin, suggesting that if Ukraine were to receive permission to strike inside Russia using Western weapons, it would lead to a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO. The response from Michael Clark, reminding Russia of Britain's own nuclear capabilities, is also highlighted. The paragraph concludes with a call to action for viewers to sign up for a geopolitical newsletter to stay informed about current events.

Keywords

💡Nuclear Missile

A nuclear missile is a type of missile that carries a nuclear weapon. In the video, the failure of a Russian nuclear missile test is highlighted, emphasizing Russia's attempt to demonstrate its military strength and the subsequent embarrassment when the missile exploded during the fueling process, destroying the launch site.

💡Show of Force

A show of force refers to the demonstration of military power intended to deter aggression or to assert dominance. The video discusses how Russia's nuclear missile test was intended as a show of force to the West and NATO, signaling that Russia is not afraid to use its nuclear capabilities. However, the test's failure undermined this intended message.

💡Red Line

In international relations, a 'red line' is a limit or boundary that, if crossed, could lead to significant consequences or retaliation. The video mentions Russia setting numerous red lines during the conflict, indicating a threat level that, if breached, would supposedly trigger a severe response, such as the use of nuclear weapons.

💡Corruption

Corruption refers to dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, often for personal gain. The video script implies that corruption within Russia's military and government may have contributed to the failure of the missile test and the poor state of Russia's military equipment, suggesting that funds were misappropriated and maintenance was neglected.

💡NATO

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is an intergovernmental military alliance between North American and European countries. The video discusses the potential for NATO countries to become directly involved in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and the implications of such involvement, including the possibility of escalating the conflict to a larger scale.

💡Ukraine

Ukraine is the sovereign state at the center of the conflict discussed in the video. It is depicted as being supported by Western countries against Russian aggression. The video mentions the possibility of Ukraine receiving permission to strike inside Russia using Western weapons, which could significantly change the dynamics of the conflict.

💡Geopolitical Event

A geopolitical event is a significant occurrence that has implications for the politics and power dynamics between different countries or regions. The video script uses this term to describe the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, emphasizing the complexity and rapid changes in the situation that make it challenging to keep up with the latest developments.

💡Bluff

A bluff is a tactic involving a false show of strength or intention to intimidate or manipulate others. The video suggests that Russia's threats of using nuclear weapons may be a bluff intended to prevent Western countries from increasing their support for Ukraine.

💡Satan 2

The RS-28 Sarmat, nicknamed 'Satan 2,' is a Russian super-heavy thermonuclear armed intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). The video highlights the failed test of this missile as a significant event, indicating potential issues with Russia's nuclear arsenal and military capabilities.

💡Nuclear Arsenal

A nuclear arsenal refers to a collection of nuclear weapons held by a nation. The video raises questions about the state of Russia's nuclear arsenal, suggesting that it may not be as formidable as claimed, given the failure of the Satan 2 missile test and other issues with Russia's military equipment.

💡Open Source Intelligence

Open source intelligence (OSINT) is information gathered from publicly available sources. The video mentions OSINT as a way to verify the failure of the Russian missile test, since Russia would not admit to the failure, highlighting the importance of alternative methods to gather information in situations where official narratives may be unreliable.

Highlights

Russian nuclear missile explodes during a test meant to demonstrate Russia's military strength.

The explosion occurred at the test site from where the missile was supposed to launch.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned the West about Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons.

The failed test was intended as a signal to the West and NATO of Russia's resolve.

Putin held a press conference to address the possibility of NATO allowing Ukraine to strike inside Russia.

The incident highlights potential issues with Russia's military capabilities.

Experts suggest that Russia's nuclear arsenal may be in a similar state of disrepair as its conventional forces.

The missile that exploded was the RS-28 Sarmat, also known as Satan 2, a relatively new Russian weapon.

The test failure was so catastrophic that it destroyed the entire silo and launch site.

Satellite imagery confirms the extent of the destruction caused by the missile explosion.

The missile had enough fuel to travel 18,000 km, which contributed to the scale of the explosion.

Russia's corruption issues may have compromised the integrity of its military equipment.

The incident follows a pattern of Russian military failures, including outdated and unreliable weapons.

Despite the failure, Russia continues to issue nuclear threats to maintain its geopolitical stance.

Putin's advisor suggests that if Ukraine uses British missiles, Russia will retaliate against Britain.

Michael Clark, a British official, reminds Russia of Britain's independent nuclear deterrent capabilities.

The geopolitical newsletter 'Global Recap' offers a daily summary of significant world events.

Transcripts

Russian nuclear missile explodes in

Russia for everyone that loves to laugh

Russia is a gift that just keeps on

giving first Russia became the first

country in the world to have nukes and

still get invaded then Putin became the

first Russian leader to lose territory

since World War II and now Russian

nuclear missiles are exploding in Russia

in fact it exploded in the test site

where it was supposed to launch from

what makes this situation even more

laughable was the fact that this was not

just a normal test that Russia was

running to see if their missiles work or

not this was a show of force and it was

a kind of show of force that they built

up a lot of excitement for the foreign

minister Sergey lavro went on a big

interview with Sky News where he

basically gave a warning that Russia's

nukes are locked and loaded and then the

plan was to show off this test as a

signal to the world as a signal to the

west and NATO that Russia is not afraid

to use its nukes but unfortunately

the missile never took off and the

pictures and the videos that are coming

out from the area are just truly comical

so let's get into all that in today's

video and more but first I have a quick

request for you guys sometimes our

videos get downloed heavily by Russian

Bots who just want to kill the reach of

any video that criticizes Russia and

Putin so if you can just take a second

to hit the like button below and share

the video on your social media that

helps us out tremendously in the

algorithm now let's start Putin recently

did this fake press conference where he

answered just one question and the

question was what would Russia do if

NATO gives Ukraine permission to strike

inside Russia using Western weapons the

big reason he did this was there was a

lot of news at least last week that NATO

more specifically the US was leaning

heavily towards giving Ukraine

permission to strike inside Russia using

Western weapons now clearly this is

something Putin cannot afford in a war

that's already going so horribly for

Russia so he did a press conference to

send out a message to Nato saying that

if NATO gives permission that would mean

NATO is at war with Russia and just a

reminder again Russia is not afraid to

use its nukes so I guess after this

interview the world had a new red line

which would be the 100th one in this war

that Russia has given now a lot of

experts a lot of people a lot smarter

than me clearly saw this as what it was

it was a bluff that Russia was using to

stop the west from helping Ukraine even

more just hear from Ben Hodes yourself

but the thing is they're not going to

use it because there is zero benefit for

them to use it nowhere on the

battlefield nowhere on the planet where

Russia uses a nuclear weapon of any type

does it make the situation better for

them it only makes their situation worse

their only benefit with nuclear weapons

is the threat that they might use one

because they see so far the United

States and therefore many allies

continue to hesitate

to do what needs to be done to help

Ukraine actually defeat Russia clearly

people didn't take it as seriously so

Russia had to up the stakes go a step

further in their bluff if you know what

I mean first we had Dimitri meddev the

former Russian president who said this

in a telegram post Russia has been

patient it is obvious that a nuclear

response is a hugely complex decision

with irreversible consequences what

arrogant Anglo-Saxon and dewitz failed

to admit though is that you can only

test someone's patience for so long it

will turn out in the end that certain

moderate Western analysts were right

when they warned true the Russians are

not likely to use this response although

it's still a possibility besides they

may use new delivery vehicles with

conventional payloads and then it's over

a giant blot of molten gray mass in the

place where the mother of Russian cities

historical name of Kiev once stood holy

it's impossible but it happened the

problem is no one takes medev seriously

and here's the proof this is what the US

Department of State said after the medev

statement quote we know by now not to

take medev seriously this is standard

Kremlin nonsense end quote so Russia had

to pull out the big guns and by that

what I mean they were going to test a

nuclear missile and show the world that

Russia is capable of what is saying

Russia can use nukes if the West does

not take it seriously so the whole plan

was the foreign Ministry of Russia which

is Sergey La he's going to go give this

big speech where he's going to warn the

West warn NATO and then right after the

meeting Russia is going to conduct this

big test that's going to be show of

force to everyone who thinks Russia is

not

serious but it didn't exactly go as

planned so first let's go over the

statement that Sergey lavv did and then

we'll look at the test and how it went

there is a question in the context of

references to Russia's use of nuclear

weapons we know about the Russian

federation's Doctrine in this sphere

each time the red lines are crossed the

question arises as to where they really

lie in the context of nuclear weapons we

talk about the red lines in the hope

that our assessments and statements will

be heard by clever decision makers it is

silly to say that we will push the red

button if tomorrow you fail to do as I

demand I am confident that the decision

makers are aware of what we mean in

these situ uations no one wants a

nuclear war we said this time and again

let me assure you that we have weapons

whose use will involve grave

consequences for the masters of the

Ukrainian regime these weapons are

available and on full alert status all

right so after this the plan was to use

the new Russian missile in a test flight

as a show of force to the world the

missile to be used was rs28 sarmat or

it's commonly known as Satan 2 I would

like to point out that this is not a

Soviet era missile so it's not an old

one this is actually a relatively new

Russian weapon that was unveiled in

March 2018 and the first test flight

took place in April 2022 right after the

invasion started now we already know all

the old Soviet style weapons are

breaking down on the front line for

Russia but this is a brand new missile

that Russia has been boasting about as a

huge accomplishment for their defense

industry and as you'll soon see the

failure was massive as you can see from

the tweet on your screen Russians

prepared a test launch of one of their

rs28 sarmat ballistic missiles however

the test failed before it even started

apparently the missile exploded on the

ground during the fueling process

destroying the whole Silo and most of

the laun site here you can see the image

of The Silo which is pretty much

destroyed and soon I'll show you the

before and after so you can see how it

looked like before but some people may

question how a missile was able to

destroy the whole testing site before

even taking off well that's because the

missile had fuel enough to travel around

18,000 km or roughly 11,000 Mi so when

things went wrong all that fuel went

boom here you can see the before and

after of the launch site which clearly

shows there was an explosion and the

site was destroyed the big reason we

have to use satellite maps and satellite

imagery is because of course Russia is

never going to admit this went horribly

wrong and the reason we know that this

this went horribly long is because of

Open Source intelligence by the way

important note before moving on these

missile tests don't actually have a

nuclear warhead attached to them cuz

after all they are just test so they

just have a fake Warhead for data taking

purposes but anyways Peter zehan does

bring up a good point here we already

know that Russia's Soviet era weapons

are falling apart the big reason we know

this is because at the start of the war

Ukrainian forces carefully examined

Russian weapons recovered from the

Battlefield hoping to learn any insights

that could give them an edge maybe they

could tweak and improve their own gear

to turn the tables on Russians and give

them a taste of their own medicine but

after a thorough inspection the

ukrainians quickly realized that most of

Russian weapons were outdated and

unreliable in fact they were so bad that

compared to Modern Western weapons the

ukrainians outright called them and I

quote ineffective and obsolete on top of

that it's important to note that this

was not a Soviet era missile in fact

this was a relatively new missile which

took its first test flight in April 2022

unfortunately that was the one and only

successful test flight it ever had since

then the missile has failed four times

maybe it's time we consider that Russian

nuke Arsenal may be in as pure of a

shape as everything else in the Russian

military after all the nuclear weapons

do require a very high maintenance to

keep them in ready form recently we

learned that because because of

corruption the Chinese missiles were

filled with water instead of fuel

because soldiers were just taking out

the fuel and selling it for personal

profit now Russia is no better when it

comes to corruption in fact K invasion

was made possible because of corruption

in Russia I think the Russian government

spent hundreds of millions of dollars

fortifying the Border but when Ukrainian

forces came across the border Putin

realized that the person responsible for

fortifying the Border in fact just

pocketed the money and did a very lousy

job that made it possible for Ukraine to

invade Russia but anyways this doesn't

mean that the Bluffs from Russia will

stop just last week we had a close

adviser to Putin come on times radio and

say if Ukraine gets permission to use

storm Shad missiles inside Russia a

missile that's from UK then Putin will

be forced to attack Britain now I know

that might be hard to believe but listen

to it yourself if Russia gets some uh

rocket missiles which by the way Iran

deny uh but nevertheless let's imagine

that we Russia get some rocket missile

from south from North Korea and from

Iran but we're targeting to our Target

ourselves but Ukrainian Army has no

satellite group uh and that why it's you

are Americans and British going to

Target those rocket missiles to Russian

cities is directed woman to war you want

to have War go ahead finally yes uh

finally of course it will be attack

against British territory but from the

beginning but it's depend also on the

Great Britain and but from the beginning

I think the embassy British Embassy will

be closed uh then Russian Embassy will

be closed in Britain then some of the

British drones and Military Aviation

would be crashed down and also because

this uh British uh uh missiles will be

used from F16 but F16 based not in

Ukraine they based on the Romania and

Poland Air Field possibly Russian army

will have uh to give real strike to

those F16 which is on the Romania and

Poland airfields now of course they're

not just going to attack Britain they're

also going to attack Poland and Romania

cuz after all the attack in Ukraine is

going so well for Russia but anyways

Michael Clark had a perfect response to

this just reminding Russia that Britain

has nuclear weapons too before we get

into that though let's listen to the

Putin press conference that everyone is

just repeating from Russia side we are

seeing is an attempt to substitute

Notions because this is not a question

of whether the KF regime is allowed or

not allowed to strike Targets on Russian

territory it is already carrying out

strikes using unmanned aerial vehicles

and other means but using Western made

long-range Precision weapons is a

completely different story the fact is

that I have mentioned this and any

expert both in our country and in the

West will confirm this the Ukrainian

Army is not capable of using Cutting

Edge High Precision longrange systems

supplied by the West they cannot do that

these weapons are impossible to employ

without intelligence data from

satellites which Ukraine does not have

this can only be done using the European

Union satellites or us satellites in

general NATO satellites this is the

first point the second Point perhaps the

most important the key Point even is

that only NATO military personnel can

assign flight missions to these missile

systems Ukrainian servicemen cannot do

this therefore it is not a question of

allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike

Russia with these weapons or not it is

about deciding whether NATO countries

become directly involved in the military

conflict or not if this decision is made

it will mean nothing short of direct

involvement it will mean that NATO

countries the United States and European

countries are parties to the war in

Ukraine this will mean their direct

involvement in the conflict and it will

clearly change the very essence the very

nature of the conflict dramatically this

will mean that NATO countries the United

States and European countries are at war

with Russia and if this is the case then

bearing in mind the change in the

essence of the conflict we will make

appropriate decisions in response to the

threats that will be posed to us now

let's listen to Michael C's response

when people think that um you know that

that somehow we vulnerable remember that

those people in the kreman also know and

this is this may be an inconvenience

fact and I don't like it either but the

fact is you know we have an independent

nuclear deterrent we have a submarine um

always under the North Atlantic 24 hours

a day 365 days of the year if the Prime

Minister gave the order whether it in

Washington or in London or in workington

or in Doncaster or in Sterling if he

gave the order then that that submarine

would fire its missiles 55 minutes after

he gives the order and Moscow will be

destroyed full stop no question that's

the technical reality

now you can argue about whether that's a

good or a bad thing but that is where we

are that is what that is the situation

so those on TV in in Russia who make

lots of blood curling threats about

nuclear use against Britain um need to

think about the fact that we do have an

independent nuclear deterent like it or

not it's there now this Russia Ukraine

war much like any geopolitical event

it's moving very fast and it's pretty

much impossible to keep up with all the

news that's why we launched Global recap

a geopolitical newsletter that covers

the world news in a quick and simple way

every day we send out an email directly

to your inbox that covers the most

important geopolitical news that you can

read in less than 5 minutes trust me cuz

I do it every day best of all it's

completely free and you can sign up now

by using the link in the description or

scanning the QR code sign up now and

become more knowledgeable about the

world you live in