It's not only about the American Revolution, Leutze's Washington Crossing the Delaware
Summary
TLDRThis video script explores an in-depth analysis of the iconic painting 'Washington Crossing the Delaware.' Guided by Sarah Alvarez, the discussion focuses on observing the painting closely, raising questions about its creation, scale, and historical context. The group reflects on the composition, symbolism, and artist Emanuel Leutze's intent, emphasizing the painting's relevance to both 1776 and 1851. Through a detailed exploration of figures, colors, and brushstrokes, the script uncovers how the artwork inspired hope for unity during the American Revolution and in a divided pre-Civil War America.
Takeaways
- 🎨 The discussion revolves around the painting 'Washington Crossing the Delaware' by Emanuel Leutze.
- 👀 The method of analysis focuses on close observation and questioning rather than assumptions.
- ❄️ The painting depicts a historical event during a cold, wintery scene.
- 🖼️ The large size of the painting is a striking feature, suggesting it was not meant for a private home.
- 🚢 The composition shows a multitude of figures in boats, all moving in the same direction, indicating a collective action.
- 👤 A central figure stands out, determined and seemingly immune to the cold, drawing attention and symbolizing leadership.
- 🧥 The figures are distinct, wrapped in their own worlds, wearing different clothing, suggesting diversity within the group.
- 🌌 The use of light and color creates a contrast between the natural world and the man-made elements.
- 🖌️ The painting's brushstrokes and details are precise, yet there is a sense of animation and tension.
- 🗓️ The painting was created much later than the event it depicts, reflecting the artist's contemporary context.
- 🌟 The artwork was intended to inspire and provide hope during a time of political unrest and division.
Q & A
What is the significance of taking time to look closely at a painting, as suggested by Sarah Alvarez?
-Sarah Alvarez emphasizes the importance of close observation to understand the details and ask questions about the artist's choices, materials, and intentions, which helps deepen our appreciation of the artwork.
What is the initial reaction of the speakers to the painting, and what strikes them most?
-Beth initially empathizes with the cold weather depicted, while Steven is struck by the large size of the canvas and the amount of time it must have taken to create it.
Why do the speakers wonder about the size and setting of the painting?
-The size of the painting leads Steven to ask where it was intended to be displayed, as it seems too large for a home, suggesting that it was meant for a public or monumental setting.
What details in the painting suggest that the figures are moving in a particular direction?
-The figures are all packed into boats, facing the same direction, and their actions—such as rowing—indicate they are moving across a body of water.
How do the speakers interpret the central figure in the painting?
-The central figure is seen as a determined leader, standing tall and distinct from the other figures. His face is the only one in full profile, and the surrounding lines emphasize his importance.
What role do the warm and cool colors play in the painting, according to the speakers?
-The cooler colors represent the natural elements (sky, water), while the warmer colors are used for the manmade elements, such as the clothing and the boat, creating a contrast that adds to the painting's tension.
What historical context do the speakers provide for the subject of the painting?
-The painting depicts George Washington crossing the Delaware River in 1776, a turning point in the American Revolution that boosted the morale of his troops after several defeats.
Why did Emanuel Leutze paint this in Germany, and how does it relate to the revolutions of 1848?
-Leutze painted it in Dusseldorf, Germany, and the painting reflects his sympathy for the failed European revolutions of 1848. It was meant to inspire hope for revolutionaries seeking to overthrow old regimes.
How does the painting address themes of unity and revolution?
-The diverse figures in the painting suggest that revolutions are made possible by the unity of people from different backgrounds, and the painting promotes the idea that unity is crucial for revolutionary success.
What was the public reception of the painting in 1851, and why was it significant at that time?
-The painting was extremely popular, drawing large crowds. It resonated with Americans because it symbolized unity during a time of growing sectionalism, particularly around the issue of slavery, offering hope for the nation.
Outlines
🎨 Reflecting on the Painting Process
Beth and Steven are in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, observing a well-known painting. They introduce Sarah Alvarez, Director of School Programs at the Art Institute of Chicago, who helps guide a reflective process on the artwork. Rather than relying on assumptions, the group emphasizes close observation, prompting a discussion about how the painting was made, what materials were used, and why the canvas is so large. These questions lead to further inquiry about the painting's composition and the possible reasons for its size.
🚤 Observing the Figures and Their Context
The group notices the arrangement of figures in the painting, especially a tall, determined figure in the foreground leading others across a body of water. The figures appear disconnected, wrapped in their own worlds, while wearing different clothing. The setting seems cold and frozen, with cloudy skies. Steven points out that some figures, like the flag-bearer, seem unaffected by the cold, maintaining focus and determination despite the harsh environment. This contrast between chaos and stillness sparks questions about the relationships among the figures and their leader.
💡 Visual and Symbolic Details
Beth highlights the importance of diagonal lines pointing to the right, despite the boat moving left. These lines and the placement of oars and flagpoles frame the central figure, emphasizing his significance. Sarah and Beth discuss how the leader's profile resembles a figure on a coin and how the lighting evokes religious imagery, deepening the sense of importance and symbolism. They then move to explore more fundamental elements, like color and brushstrokes, where natural elements appear in cool tones while human-made objects and clothing use warmer colors, creating tension within the composition.
🖌️ Artistic Choices and Their Effects
The group continues to analyze the painting's details, noting the contrast between the stillness of individual brushstrokes and the animated feeling of the scene. The meticulous attention to elements like clothing, such as fur caps and bags, helps differentiate the figures and draw viewers into the painting. The conversation explores how the painting holds attention over time, initially making a powerful impression, but then encouraging viewers to discover smaller, intricate details. These observations lead to reflections on the artist's choices and the potential messages embedded in the painting.
📜 Historical Context and Artist's Intentions
Beth introduces the painting's title, *Washington Crossing the Delaware*, and corrects the assumption that it was created in 1776, noting instead that it was made 75 years later. The group discusses the historical significance of Washington's crossing and its pivotal role in the Revolutionary War. They then turn to the artist, Emanuel Leutze, a German-born painter who created this work in Düsseldorf. This discussion prompts questions about the broader context of the time in which Leutze painted, particularly the revolutions of 1848 and the desire for democratic change in Europe, which likely influenced his choice of subject.
🌍 A Painting Rooted in Revolutionary Spirit
Beth and Sarah consider how the failed European revolutions of 1848 influenced Leutze, who sympathized with the revolutionary cause. The painting, with its focus on Washington and the diverse figures surrounding him, serves as a symbol of unity in the face of adversity. This unity is especially poignant given the fractured nature of America in the 1850s, particularly around the issue of slavery. Sarah reflects on how the painting provides a message of hope for unifying diverse voices, drawing parallels between the Revolutionary War and the political challenges of Leutze’s own time.
🎟️ Popular Reception and Cultural Impact
The group reflects on the painting’s powerful reception, with enormous crowds flocking to see it. Reports from the press hailed its unifying power, with some claiming that it would do more for the country’s unity than any political speech. This leads to a discussion of how the Revolutionary War and George Washington became defining symbols of American identity in the mid-19th century. Artists such as Robert Colescott and Jacob Lawrence later reinterpreted this iconic image to tell new stories about American history, reminding viewers that art is always a reflection of its time and a valuable historical source.
🎨 Art as a Gateway to Deeper Historical Understanding
Sarah concludes by highlighting the emotional and sensory impact of art, which captivates viewers and drives curiosity. Through its emotional power, art encourages deeper exploration of historical events, offering a gateway to ask more profound questions about history. In this way, paintings like *Washington Crossing the Delaware* not only reflect the artist’s time but also engage the viewer in a richer understanding of the past. The video ends with gentle music, reinforcing the reflective nature of the discussion.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Washington Crossing the Delaware
💡American Revolution
💡Unity and Diversity
💡Symbolism
💡Artist’s Intentions
💡Historical Context
💡Art as a Primary Source
💡Public Reception
💡Scale and Composition
💡Sectionalism
💡Visual Analysis
Highlights
The discussion takes place in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, focusing on a famous painting.
The approach is to look closely at the painting without making assumptions.
Sarah Alvarez, Director of School Programs at the Art Institute of Chicago, guides the conversation.
Initial observations include feelings and specific details noticed in the painting.
The painting's cold, windy weather is relatable on a cold January day.
The size of the canvas and the effort to paint it are striking.
Questions about the painting's creation process are posed.
The painting's large number of figures and their movement across water are noted.
A tall, determined figure in the foreground is speculated to be a leader.
The figures are wrapped up in their own worlds, yet distinct from each other.
The setting is a frozen, cold place with cloudy skies.
The standing figure and the figure holding the flag seem immune to the cold.
There's a sense of chaos around the central figure amidst frenetic energy and stillness.
The central figure's face is illuminated, drawing attention.
Diagonal lines in the painting create a sense of movement to the right, contrary to the boat's leftward movement.
The painting's colors and brushstrokes are discussed for their emotional impact.
The painting's natural elements are cool-toned, while manmade elements are warmer.
The painting's tension between stillness and animation is noted.
The painting's details, like clothing, are used to differentiate figures and draw the viewer in.
The painting's ability to hold attention and its design for impact are discussed.
Questions about the artist's intentions, the painting's scale, composition, and reception are gathered.
The painting's title and date are revealed to be 'Washington Crossing the Delaware', made 75 years after the event.
The historical context of the American Revolution and the painting's subject are discussed.
The painting was created in 1851, during a time of European revolutions and a desire for change.
The painting suggests that unity among diverse voices is possible, relevant to the sectionalism in the U.S. at the time.
The painting was reported to have drawn enormous crowds, offering an image of unity.
The painting is seen as a defining moment of American character and unity.
The painting is recognized as a product of its time and a primary source for understanding history.
Artworks are noted for their ability to evoke emotions and好奇心, prompting deeper historical inquiry.
Transcripts
(gentle music)
- [Beth] We're standing in a lovely skylit room
in the Metropolitan Museum of Art,
looking at a very famous painting,
but we're actually gonna try a different method today.
We're gonna not talk about our assumptions
about what we're seeing,
but we're gonna take the time to look closely.
- [Steven] We're standing with Sarah Alvarez,
who's Director of School Programs
at the Art Institute of Chicago.
She's gonna help us with this process.
- [Sarah] I'd like for us to talk about some of the things
that caught our attention when we first looked at this.
It might be a feeling we had.
It might be a particular detail in the painting.
- [Beth] Well, given that it's a cold January day,
I immediately empathized with the very cold, windy weather.
- [Steven] What strikes me first
is just the sheer size of this canvas.
This was painted with a paintbrush.
It must have taken forever.
- [Sarah] We might want to take your observation
and pose it as a question to ourselves:
How was this made?
What were the materials that were used?
How long did it take?
Those are all questions that we can continue to explore,
and we should make an inventory
as we're talking about some of those things
we're wondering about.
- [Steven] And asking those questions
prompted me to ask another question,
which is why it's so big.
This could never fit in my house.
Where was this intended to be?
- [Sarah] We see a large number of figures
packed into boats.
Based on the way that they're all faced
and other actions that we can see them making,
they all seem to be moving in the same direction
across a body of water.
There's a tall figure in the boat that's in the foreground
that is very determined-looking.
Is the leader, is he the most important,
and how is he related to all of these other figures?
- [Beth] I also notice that the figures seem wrapped up
in their own worlds.
- [Steven] I'm noticing how distinct each one is
from the other.
They're wearing different clothing.
They're not only in their own worlds,
but they seem to come out of different worlds.
- [Sarah] And I'm wondering,
where is this frozen, cold place?
There's these cloudy skies.
Maybe that's a star, maybe that's the sun,
that is poking through the clouds.
- [Steven] I'm struck that the standing figure
and the figure holding the flag seem immune to that cold.
They seem so focused, so determined, so resolute,
looking towards that far shore,
the cold seems to pass over them.
- [Beth] There is also a sense of chaos around them.
- [Steven] It is really interesting
how there is simultaneously both a frenetic energy
and a sense of stillness and quiet.
My eye keeps going back to that central figure.
That's the only face that's not obscured
that's in profile,
and it's illuminated by the sky behind it.
- [Beth] And around him are all of these diagonal lines,
and all of those diagonal lines point to the right,
and yet we know the boat is moving to the left.
- [Steven] And at the same time,
those oars and that flagpole mark a kind of area
that that central figure can inhabit
and emphasize his importance even more.
- [Sarah] One question is,
are there other images in our mind,
in our visual reference bank,
that tell us that this is a person of importance?
- [Beth] He looks like a profile of a figure on a coin.
- [Steven] And the lighting reminds me of religious images.
It reminds me of images
where biblical events were unfolding.
- [Sarah] We've talked a lot about the choices
the artist has made to position the figures, the boat,
the land, but there are some other
even more fundamental characteristics of this painting,
like the colors and the brushstrokes
that might be helpful for us to explore
in order to generate some additional questions.
- [Steven] The things that are part of the natural world
are cool, blues and whites and greens, and the boat,
the things that are manmade
and the people and their clothing, tend to be warmer colors.
- [Sarah] It's almost as if there are layers
of different kinds of tension that the artist has chosen
to use in this painting.
- [Beth] This event is unfolding before us.
Everyone except for that central figure
is in the middle of moving.
- [Sarah] If you look very closely,
every single line and brushstroke is so precise,
and they feel so still;
yet there's so much animation to a lot of the details,
again, another point of tension.
- [Beth] And it's like the artist wants us
to notice those little details to the bag.
It looks like a bag that I've seen in galleries
of Native American art, or the fur caps,
these details of clothing
that seem to differentiate the figures
and draw us in to look at them.
- [Steven] It is remarkable how long this painting
holds my attention.
It does make me wonder whether or not it was designed
to make a large, powerful impact initially,
but then to draw me in to these little details.
- [Sarah] Let's gather together the questions
that we've posed.
We've asked about the artist's intentions,
the choices that the artist made,
whether it be in the scale of the painting,
the composition.
We've asked a lot of questions about what's happening here,
who is meant to see this, where was it meant to go?
We have a lot of questions about the making of the painting
and the initial reception of the painting.
We might also ask questions about when it was made,
and how people have thought about it
or experienced it since then.
One of the important steps in our process
is to think about what sources we use.
We have documentation from the popular press
that tells us about how people were engaging
with the painting, what they saw, what they thought.
We also have other kinds of materials, like prints,
or keepsakes that were produced in vast quantities
and distributed all over the country.
All of these primary sources give us further information
about this moment in time and the meaning of this painting.
Let's just simply start with the title and date.
- [Beth] "Washington Crossing the Delaware."
It's so tempting to say this was 1776,
which is the date of the Declaration of Independence
and the year that Washington crossed the Delware,
but this was actually made 75 years later.
- [Sarah] And what do we know about the subject?
- [Beth] Well, we know that this was
an important turning point in the Revolution,
that Washington and his troops had lost
several major battles to the British,
the troops were disheartened, they were tired,
there was a sense of hopelessness, and that this battle,
and the victory that followed,
changed the outlook of the revolutionaries
and gave them hope for the future.
- [Steven] Washington's troops were crossing the Delaware
in order to mount a sneak attack in the middle of the night
against Hessian soldiers fighting on behalf of the British,
that is, Germans.
And Leutze had been born in Germany.
He had grown up in the United States,
but he had gone back, and he painted this in
the German city of Dusseldorf.
- [Sarah] So what was happening in 1851
that might help us understand
why Leutze decided to portray this subject at this time?
- [Beth] We know that there was series of revolutions
in Europe in 1848.
There was a desire to overturn an old order
of kinds and emperors and create a new order
where people had more say in their government.
- [Sarah] And all of the different places
where revolutions were happening essentially failed.
There were many different groups of revolutionaries
who could not unify to succeed in their efforts.
And we know that Emmanuel Leutze was sympathetic
to this revolutionary cause,
and a painting like this would provide hope.
- [Beth] We have George Washington leading the troops.
But the time the artist has spent
on all the other individual figures
and their clear differences
makes me think about how revolutions are made up of
people of different backgrounds coming together
to fight for a single cause.
- [Sarah] And it also suggests that a revolution is tenuous,
that the success of the revolution is contingent upon
the unity of diverse voices.
This is the 50th anniversary of the death
of George Washington, in 1851.
People are celebrating him as the great unifier
of this young nation.
There's also a moment in the United States at this time
that even though unity exists,
there's still a fractured nation.
There's sectionalism,
especially around the issue of slavery,
and an image like this suggests that unity is possible.
- [Steven] And the reports are that the crowds
are enormous, that people flocked to see this painting.
- [Beth] It offered them an image of unity
in the face of incredible sectionalism
in the United States in the 1850s.
- [Sarah] And in December 12th of 1851,
a notice in the New York Daily Times
said that over 20,000 people had visited the exhibition.
Quote, "The sight of such a splendid work of art
"will do more for the union of this country
"than a thousand union speeches."
And another notice in the Albion said that quote,
"We defy anyone possessed of one grain of sensibility
"to look upon it, unmoved,"
referencing the emotional power of this painting.
- [Beth] For Americans in the mid-19th century,
Washington himself, but also the Revolutionary War,
was this defining moment of American character,
that we together defeated the British.
- [Sarah] Artists like Robert Colescott, Jacob Lawrence,
and others have reproduced this image
and told very different stories of American history.
- [Steven] And that's a reminder that a work of art
is always a product of its own time
and is itself a primary source.
- [Sarah] And works of art do something really wonderful,
which is that they play on our emotions,
they pull at our senses, and they captivate us in a way
that drives our sense of curiosity
and gets us to ask questions
that allow us to approach history in deeper and richer ways.
(gentle music)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)