Recent breakthroughs in AI: A brief overview | Aravind Srinivas and Lex Fridman
Summary
TLDRThe transcript discusses the evolution of AI, focusing on the pivotal role of self-attention and the Transformer model in advancing natural language processing. It highlights how innovations like parallel computation and efficient hardware utilization have been crucial. The conversation also touches on the importance of unsupervised pre-training with large datasets and the refinement of models through post-training phases. The discussion suggests future breakthroughs may lie in decoupling reasoning from memorization and the potential of small, specialized models for efficient reasoning.
Takeaways
- ๐ The concept of self-attention was pivotal in the development of the Transformer model, leading to significant advancements in AI.
- ๐ง Attention mechanisms allowed for more efficient computation compared to RNNs, enabling models to learn higher-order dependencies.
- ๐ก Masking in convolutional models was a key innovation that allowed for parallel training, vastly improving computational efficiency.
- ๐ Transformers combined the strengths of attention mechanisms and parallel processing, becoming a cornerstone of modern AI architectures.
- ๐ Unsupervised pre-training with large datasets has been fundamental in training language models like GPT, leading to models with impressive natural language understanding.
- ๐ The importance of data quality and quantity in training AI models cannot be overstated, with larger and higher-quality datasets leading to better model performance.
- ๐ The iterative process of pre-training and post-training, including reinforcement learning and fine-tuning, is crucial for developing controllable and effective AI systems.
- ๐ง The post-training phase, including data formatting and tool usage, is essential for creating user-friendly AI products and services.
- ๐ก The idea of training smaller models (SLMs) on specific reasoning-focused data sets is an emerging research direction that could revolutionize AI efficiency.
- ๐ Open-source models provide a valuable foundation for experimentation and innovation in the post-training phase, potentially leading to more specialized and efficient AI systems.
Q & A
What was the significance of the paper 'Soft Attention' in the development of AI models?
-The paper 'Soft Attention' was significant as it introduced the concept of attention mechanisms, which were first applied in the paper 'Align and Translate'. This concept of attention was pivotal in the development of models that could better handle dependencies in data, leading to improvements in machine translation systems.
How did the idea of using simple RNN models scale up and influence AI development?
-The idea of scaling up simple RNN models was initially brute force, requiring significant computational resources. However, it demonstrated that by increasing model size and training data, performance could be improved, which was a precursor to the development of more efficient models like the Transformer.
What was the key innovation in the paper 'Pixel RNNs' that influenced subsequent AI models?
-The key innovation in 'Pixel RNNs' was the realization that an entirely convolutional model could perform autoregressive modeling with masked convolutions. This allowed for parallel training instead of sequential backpropagation, significantly improving computational efficiency.
How did the Transformer model combine the best elements of previous models to create a breakthrough?
-The Transformer model combined the power of attention mechanisms, which could handle higher-order dependencies, with the efficiency of fully convolutional models that allowed for parallel processing. This combination led to a significant leap in performance and efficiency in handling sequential data.
What was the importance of the insight that led to the development of the Transformer model?
-The insight that led to the Transformer model was recognizing the value of parallel computation during training to efficiently utilize hardware. This was a significant departure from sequential processing in RNNs, allowing for faster training times and better scalability.
How did the concept of unsupervised learning contribute to the evolution of large language models (LLMs)?
-Unsupervised learning allowed for the training of large language models on vast amounts of text data without the need for labeled examples. This approach enabled models to learn natural language and common sense, which was a significant step towards more human-like AI.
What was the impact of scaling up the size of language models on their capabilities?
-Scaling up the size of language models, as seen with models like GPT-2 and GPT-3, allowed them to process more complex language tasks and generate more coherent and contextually relevant text. It also enabled them to handle longer dependencies in text.
How did the approach to data and tokenization evolve as language models became more sophisticated?
-As language models became more sophisticated, the focus shifted to the quality and quantity of the data they were trained on. There was an increased emphasis on using larger datasets and ensuring the tokens used were of high quality, which contributed to the models' improved performance.
What is the role of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in refining AI models?
-Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) plays a crucial role in making AI models more controllable and well-behaved. It allows for fine-tuning the models to better align with human values and expectations, which is essential for creating usable and reliable AI products.
How does the concept of pre-training and post-training relate to the development of AI models?
-Pre-training involves scaling up models on large amounts of compute to acquire general intelligence and common sense. Post-training, which includes RLHF and supervised fine-tuning, refines these models to perform specific tasks. Both stages are essential for creating AI models that are both generally intelligent and task-specifically effective.
What are the potential benefits of training smaller models on specific data sets that require reasoning?
-Training smaller models on specific reasoning-focused data sets could lead to more efficient and potentially more effective models. It could reduce the computational resources required for training and allow for more rapid iteration and improvement, potentially leading to breakthroughs in AI reasoning capabilities.
Outlines
๐ค Evolution of Attention Mechanisms and Transformers
The speaker reflects on the surprising effectiveness of self-attention, which led to the development of the Transformer model and a surge in AI capabilities. They discuss the pivotal paper by Yoshua Bengio and others on soft attention, which was first applied in 'Align and Translate'. They also mention the RNN model by Iask that outperformed phrase-based machine translation systems without attention, but at a high computational cost. A graduate student's work on attention mechanisms significantly reduced the computational requirements. The speaker then discusses the importance of the masking technique in convolutional models, which allowed for parallel training and efficient use of GPU resources. They conclude by highlighting the Transformer's combination of attention and parallel processing as a significant breakthrough in AI, with minor improvements continuing since its introduction in 2017.
๐ Scaling Language Models and the Role of Data
The speaker delves into the history of large language models (LLMs), starting with the training of simple models on children's books, which showed promise. Google's BERT model improved upon this by training on Wikipedia and books, and OpenAI's GPT models further scaled up with more parameters and data. The speaker emphasizes the importance of data quality and quantity, as well as the right evaluations on reasoning benchmarks. They discuss the significance of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in making systems controllable and well-behaved, and how post-training steps are crucial for creating usable products. The speaker also touches on the concept of pre-train/post-train and the importance of pre-training in providing a foundation of common sense for post-training to build upon.
๐ Towards Efficient Reasoning with Small Language Models
The speaker ponders the efficiency of pre-training large models to acquire general common sense versus training smaller models on specific data sets that enhance reasoning abilities. They mention Microsoft's work on small language models (SLMs) trained on tokens important for reasoning, distilled from the knowledge of larger models like GPT-4. The speaker suggests that if a small model with good reasoning skills can be developed, it could disrupt the current model training paradigms by reducing the need for massive computational resources. They also propose the idea of using larger models to help filter data that is useful for reasoning, and advocate for open-source models as a base for experimenting with post-training phases to improve reasoning capabilities.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กSelf-attention
๐กTransformer
๐กParallel computation
๐กUnsupervised learning
๐กPre-training
๐กFine-tuning
๐กScaling
๐กCommonsense reasoning
๐กMixture of Experts
๐กData quality
๐กFlywheel effect
Highlights
The introduction of self-attention led to the development of the Transformer model.
Attention mechanisms were first applied in the 'Align and Translate' paper.
Simple RNN models were scaled up to beat phrase-based machine translation systems.
Attention was identified as a key idea that could beat the performance of brute-force RNN models with less compute.
Pixel RNNs showed that convolutional models could do autoregressive modeling with masked convolutions.
The Transformer combined the strengths of attention and convolutional models for efficient parallel processing.
The core Transformer architecture has remained largely unchanged since 2017.
Masking allows for parallel computation during training, which is more efficient than sequential backpropagation.
Self-attention in Transformers does not have parameters but performs a lot of computations.
Unsupervised pre-training with large language models has been crucial for learning common sense.
GPT models demonstrated that training on a massive scale could lead to models with impressive capabilities.
The importance of data quality and quantity in training large language models.
The evolution of models from GPT-1 to GPT-3 showed the impact of scaling up parameters and data.
The role of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in making AI systems controllable and well-behaved.
The significance of post-training processes in creating products that users can interact with.
The potential of retrieval-augmented generative models for more efficient AI training.
The idea of training smaller models on specific data sets for better reasoning skills.
The possibility of decoupling reasoning from memorization of facts for more efficient AI learning.
The importance of open-source models for experimentation and innovation in AI.
Transcripts
how surprising was it to you because you
were in the middle of it how effective
attention was how how self attention
self attention the thing that led to the
Transformer and everything else like
this explosion of intelligence that came
from this yeah idea maybe you can kind
of try to describe which ideas are
important here was it just as simple as
self
attention so uh I think I think first of
all I attention like like yosua Benjo
wrote this paper with Dimitri Bano
called Soft attention which was first
applied in this paper called align and
translate iask wrote the first paper
that said you can just train a simple
RNN model uh scale it up and it'll beat
all the phas based machine translation
systems uh but that was Brute Force
there's no attention in it and spent a
lot of Google compute like I think
probably like 400 million parameter
models something even back in those days
and then this grad student Bano uh in
beno's lab identifies
attention and beats his numbers with
Veil as compute mhm so clearly a great
idea and then people at Deep mine
figured that like this paper called
pixel
rnn's um figured that uh you don't even
need RNN even though the title is called
pixel RNN uh I guess it's the actual
architecture that became popular was
wave net and and they figured out that a
completely convolutional model can do
aut regressive modeling as long as you
do mask convolutions the masking was the
key idea so you can train in parallel
instead of back propagating through time
you can back propagate through every
input token in parallel so that way you
can utilize the GPU computer a lot more
efficiently because you're just doing
mat
Ms uh and so they just said threw away
the RNN that was
powerful um and so then Google brain
like wasani ATL that the Transformer
paper identified that okay let's let's
take the good elements of both let's
take attention it's more powerful than
cons it learns more higher order
dependencies because it applies more
multiplicative compute and uh let's take
the inside in wet that you can just have
a all convolutional model that fully
parallel Matrix multiplies and combine
the two together and they built a
Transformer and that is
the I would say it's almost like the
last answer that like nothing has
changed since 2017 except maybe a few
changes on what the nonlinearities are
and like how the square root descaling
should be done like some of that has
changed but and then people have tried
mixture of experts having more
parameters per in uh for the same flop
and things like that but the core
Transformer architecture has not changed
isn't it crazy to you that masking as as
simple as something like that works so
damn well yeah it's a very clever
Insight that look you want to learn
causal dependencies but you don't want
to waste your Hardware your compute and
keep doing the back propagation
sequentially you want to do as much
parallel computer as possible during
training that way whatever job was
earlier running in eight days would run
like in a single day I think that was
the most important insight and like
whether it's cons or attention I guess
attention and and Transformers make even
better use of Hardware than cons uh
because they apply more uh compute per
flop because in a Transformer the self
attention operator doesn't even have
parameters the qk transpose softmax
times V has no parameter but it's doing
a lot of flops and that's powerful it
learns Multi Auto dependencies I think
the inside then opening I took from that
is hey like Ilia s was been saying like
unsupervised learning is important right
like they wrote this paper called
sentiment neuron and then Alec Ratford
and him worked on this paper called gpt1
it's not it wasn't even called gpt1 was
just called GPT little did they know
that it would go on to be this big but
just said hey like let's revisit the
idea that you can just train a giant
language model and it will learn common
natural language common sense that was
not scalable earlier because you were
scaling up rnns but now you got this new
Transformer model that's 100x more
efficient at getting to the same
performance which means if you run the
same job you would get something that's
way better if you apply the same amount
of compute and so they just train
transformer like uh all the book
like story books children's story books
and that that got like really good and
then Google took that inside and did BT
except they did bidirectional but they
trained on Wikipedia and books and that
got a lot better and then open I
followed up and said okay great so it
looks like the secret sauce that we were
missing was data and throwing more
parameters so we'll get gpt2 which is
like a billion parameter model and like
trained on like a lot of links from
Reddit and then that became amazing like
you know produce all these stories about
a unicorn and things like that if you
remember yeah yeah um and then like the
gpt3 happened which is like you just
scale up even more data you take common
crawl and instead of 1 billion go all
the way to 175 billion but that was done
through analysis called the scaling loss
which is for a bigger model you need to
keep scaling the amount of tokens and
you train on 300 billion tokens now it
feels small these models are being
trained on like tens of trillions of
tokens and like trillions of parameters
but like this is literally the evolution
it's not like then the focus went more
into like part pieces outside the
architecture on like data what data
you're training on what are the tokens
how DD they are uh and then the shinilla
Insight that it's not just about making
the model bigger but you want to also
make the data set bigger you want to
make sure the tokens are also big enough
in quantity and high quality and do the
right evals on like lot of reasoning
benchmarks so I think that that ended up
being the Breakthrough right like this
it's not like attention alone was
important attention parall computation
Transformer uh scaling it up to do
unsupervised pre-training write data and
then constant improvements well let's
take it to the end because you just gave
an epic history of llms in the
breakthroughs of the
past 10 years plus uh so you mentioned
gpt3 so 35 how important to you uh is r
lhf that aspect of it it's really
important it's even though you you call
it as a cherry on the cake this this
cake has a lot of cherries by the way
it's not easy to make these systems
controllable and well behaved without
the rhf step by way there's this
terminology for this uh it's not very
used in papers but like people talk
about it as pre-train post-train mhm and
RF and supervised fine tuning are all in
posttraining phasee and the pre-training
phase is the raw scaling on compute and
without good post-training you're not
going to have a good
product but at the same time without
good pre-training there's not enough
common sense to like actually have you
know have the post training have any
effect like you can only teach
a generally intelligent person lot of
skills
and uh that's where the pre-training is
important that's why like you make the
model bigger the same RF on the bigger
model ends up like gbd4 ends up making
chat gbt much better than 3.5 but that
data like oh for this coding query make
sure the answer is formatted with these
uh markdown and like syntax highlighting
uh tool use it knows when to use what
tools you can decompose the query into
pieces these are all like stuff you do
in the post training phase and that's
what allows you to like build products
that users can interact with collect
more data create a flywheel go and look
at all the cases where it's failing uh
collect more human annotation on that I
think that's where like a lot more
breakthroughs will be made on the Post
train side yeah Post train plus plus so
like not just the training part of Post
train but like a bunch of other details
around that also yeah and and the rag
architecture the retrieval augmented
architecture uh I think there's an
interesting thought experiment here that
um we been spending a lot of computer in
the
pre-training uh to acquire General
common sense but that's seems brute
force and inefficient what you want is a
system that can learn like an open book
exam if you've written exams in like
like in undergrad or grad school where
people allowed you to like come with
your notes to the exam versus no notes
allowed I think not the same set of
people end up scoring number one on
both you're saying like pre-train is no
notes allowed kind of it it memorizes
everything like right you can you can
ask the question why do you need to
memorize every single fact to be good to
be good at reasoning but somehow that
seems like the more more comput and data
you throw at these models they get
better at reasoning but is there a way
to decouple reasoning from facts and
there are some interesting research
directions here like like Microsoft has
been working on this F models
uh where they're training small language
mods they call it slms but they're only
training it on tokens that are important
for reasoning and they're distilling the
intelligence from gp4 on it to see how
far you can get if you just take the
tokens of gp4 on data sets that require
you to reason and you train the model
only on that you don't need to train on
all of like regular internet Pages just
train it on like like basic Common Sense
stuff but it's hard to know what tokens
are needed for that it's hard to know if
there's an exhaustive set for that but
if we do manage to somehow get to a
right data set mix that gives good
reasoning skills for a small model then
that's like a breakthrough that disrupts
the whole uh Foundation model players
because you no longer
need uh that giant of cluster for
training and if this small model which
has good level of Common Sense can be
applied iteratively it bootstraps its
own
reasoning and doesn't necessarily come
up with one output answer but things for
a while bootstraps come things for a
while I think that can be like truly
transformational man there's a lot of
questions there is there is it possible
to form that slm you can use an llm to
help with the filtering which pieces of
data are likely to be useful for
reasoning
absolutely and these are the kind of
architectures we should Explore More uh
where um small model and this is also
why I believe open source is important
because at least it gives you like a
good base model to start with uh and and
try different experiments in the post
training phase uh to see if you can just
specifically shape these models for
being good reasoners
Browse More Related Video
LLM Foundations (LLM Bootcamp)
Can LLMs reason? | Yann LeCun and Lex Fridman
NVIDIA Reveals STUNNING Breakthroughs: Blackwell, Intelligence Factory, Foundation Agents [SUPERCUT]
ใไบบๅทฅๆบ่ฝใOpenAI o1ๆจกๅ่ๅ็ๆๆฏ | ๅ่ฎญ็ป้ถๆฎต็็ผฉๆพๆณๅ | ๆต่ฏๆถ่ฎก็ฎ | ๆ ขๆ่ | ้ๅผๆ็ปด้พCoT | STaR | Criticๆจกๅ | ๅคง่ฏญ่จๆจกๅ็ๅคฉ่ฑๆฟๅจๅช้
Andrew Ng - Why Data Engineering is Critical to Data-Centric AI
Transformers, explained: Understand the model behind GPT, BERT, and T5
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)