美国为什么要不断立法，坚持封杀TikTok?｜字节跳动｜TikTok｜周受资｜bytedance｜中美｜川普｜拜登｜王局拍案20240319

Summary

美国TikTok用户突收到一个弹窗，标题为“阻止TikTok被禁”，引发了广泛讨论。美国国会计划通过一项旨在彻底禁止TikTok的法案，引起了170万TikTok用户的关注。该法案旨在防止受敌对外国政府控制的应用程序对美国造成伤害，特别针对TikTok。尽管TikTok发起了公众动员运动，但美国众议院以压倒性多数通过了该法案，表明了双党对于TikTok的共识。此外，法案背后的推手是一个专门对抗中国共产党竞争的特别委员会。视频深入探讨了美国尝试禁止TikTok的原因，包括操纵舆论、收集公共信息和个人信息泄露的风险，同时也反映出美国在面对中国政府可能通过TikTok施加影响时的担忧和防御措施。

Takeaways

• 🇺🇸 TikTok在美国用户中发起了一场运动，鼓励他们联系国会议员，反对禁止TikTok的议案。
• 📱 TikTok拥有1.7亿美国用户，这一数字在美国人口中占有相当大的比例。
• 🚫 美国众议院通过了一项可能会禁止TikTok的法案，除非TikTok在四个月内卖给美国公司。
• 👩‍⚖️ 美国的立法过程包括议案在委员会中的投票，之后是众议院和参议院的投票，最后是总统的签字。
• 🔍 TikTok反对的原因包括可能的言论自由限制、数据隐私担忧以及与中国政府的关系。
• 📊 TikTok的影响力包括潜在的公共舆论操纵，以及其算法推荐系统的影响。
• 🗳️ 对禁止TikTok的法案在众议院的投票显示了跨党派的支持。
• 🇨🇳 TikTok面临的主要挑战之一是其与中国字节跳动的关系，以及美国对此的安全担忧。
• 🏛️ TikTok可能会基于言论自由的原则对禁令提起诉讼，挑战这项法案。
• 🔒 TikTok努力通过建立独立的数据中心和隐私保护措施来缓解美国的担忧。

Q & A

为什么TikTok呼吁美国用户联系他们的国会议员？

因为美国众议院下属的商业和能源委员会计划于3月7日对一项旨在禁止受敌对外国政府控制的应用程序造成伤害的法案进行投票，该法案实际上是专门针对TikTok制定的。

TikTok在美国有多少用户？

TikTok在美国有1.7亿用户。

TikTok对美国的影响有哪些争议？

TikTok面临的争议包括可能干预美国政治、收集公共信息以及暴露个人信息和追踪定位。

2024年美国能源和商业委员会针对TikTok提出了什么新法案？

该新法案要求TikTok完全剥离其资产，即从中国的字节跳动公司完全分离出去。如果不出售，TikTok将被从美国的应用商店中移除。

美国众议院对于禁止TikTok的投票结果如何？

在投票中，有352票支持，62票反对，显示出在禁止TikTok问题上，民主党和共和党大致达成了共识。

美中战略竞争特别委员会是什么？

美中战略竞争特别委员会是美国众议院一个不是永久性机构的特别委员会，成立目的是针对美中之间的紧张关系进行讨论和应对，包括台湾问题、中国的经济侵入和维吾尔问题等。

TikTok在美国数据独立性方面采取了哪些措施？

TikTok花费了15亿美元在美国建立了一个独立的数据库，并实施了数据删除计划，以确保美国用户的数据与中国完全隔离。

TikTok为什么可能无法出售其资产？

因为几年前，中国政府已将所谓的算法列为中国的出口管制项目之一，认为这些算法涉及国家安全，因此不允许TikTok出售。

TikTok可能基于哪些法律原则对美国政府提起诉讼？

TikTok可能会基于第一修正案（言论自由）、比例原则（即政府行为需要与其目的成比例）和平等保护原则（禁止基于国籍的歧视）对美国政府提起诉讼。

美国试图禁止TikTok的主要原因是什么？

主要原因包括可能的公众舆论操纵、公共信息收集和个人信息暴露及追踪定位，以及担忧TikTok可能被中国政府用于获取美国情报或影响美国公共政策和舆论。

Outlines

00:00

😲 TikTok呼吁美国用户反对禁令

2023年3月6日，美国TikTok用户收到弹窗通知，标题为“阻止TikTok被禁”。通知内容指出美国国会计划通过一项旨在完全禁止TikTok的法案，这对1.7亿TikTok用户的言论自由权利构成威胁。TikTok鼓励用户拨打电话给国会议员，表达他们对TikTok的重视，并请求他们投票反对该法案。随后，美国众议院下属的商业和能源委员会即将对这一法案进行投票。尽管TikTok发起了大规模的公众压力活动，但该法案在3月7日以压倒性票数通过了委员会投票。

05:01

🔍 TikTok在美发展及法律挑战

TikTok在美国拥有1.7亿用户，是美国应用商店中下载量最多的应用。然而，其在美发展受到质疑，特别是在政治干预方面。例如，在2020年，TikTok用户参与了一场旨在减少特朗普集会出席人数的活动。此外，近年来美国各州逐渐限制联邦雇员使用TikTok。到2024年，反对声音愈发高涨，导致美国能源和商业委员会提出新法案要求TikTok剥离资产。在此背景下，众议院以大多数票通过了禁止TikTok的法案。

10:01

🎯 美国对TikTok的审查和立法原因

美国重复试图禁止TikTok的三个主要原因是：1) 担心其通过算法推荐操纵公众意见；2) 对收集公共信息的普遍实践表示担忧；3) 对个人信息泄露和追踪定位的可能性表示担忧。然而，这些指控被视为无实质证据支持。TikTok代表辩称，其数据中心与中国隔离，并已投资15亿美元建立美国独立数据库，以此反驳美国情报机构的担忧。

15:05

🇺🇸 美国立法对抗TikTok的深层次变化

美国尝试立法禁止TikTok反映了对其可能影响的担忧，这标志着美国对外国实体的态度变化。尽管美国历来信赖其自由言论体制能对抗外来威胁，TikTok的大规模影响力和潜在的中国政府控制引发了实质性担忧。这种预防性的立法措施显示了美国对中国经济和政治模式构成的威胁感到的紧迫性。

20:05

🤔 TikTok在美国的未来及法律挑战

尽管法案可能在参议院获得通过并由拜登签署成为法律，但TikTok可能会基于美国宪法第一修正案（言论自由）对此提起诉讼。TikTok面临的挑战包括如何证明其操作与中国政府无关，以及如何应对美国政府的严格监管。讨论中提到，即便是对TikTok的数据中心在美国的监管加强，也可能无法完全消除担忧。

25:07

📢 TikTok鼓励美国用户维权

TikTok鼓励美国用户利用其言论自由权，通过分享故事、与亲友及地方代表沟通来维护他们的宪法权利。这种动员表明TikTok希望借助公众力量反对可能的禁令，体现了其在面临重大政策挑战时的应对策略。

Keywords

💡TikTok禁令

TikTok禁令指的是美国议会考虑通过的一项法案，旨在禁止在美国使用中国拥有的应用程序，特别是TikTok。这一举措源于对国家安全的担忧，认为TikTok可能被用作外国政府的工具，影响美国公众舆论和收集用户数据。在视频中，提到了美国众议院通过了这一禁令，并要求TikTok在四个月内卖给美国公司，以保持其在美国的运营。

💡言论自由

言论自由是美国宪法第一修正案保护的权利，保障个人表达思想的自由，不受政府干预。视频中提到TikTok禁令威胁了170万用户的言论自由权利，暗示这一措施可能与美国长久以来所倡导的自由价值观相违背。

💡立法过程

立法过程是指法案从提出、讨论到最终成为法律的一系列步骤。视频中详细描述了美国的立法过程，包括法案在委员会的投票、众议院和参议院的表决，以及总统的签署或否决。这个过程展示了美国政府中执行与立法分支之间的权力平衡。

💡公众压力

公众压力指的是TikTok利用其平台，号召美国用户联系他们的国会代表，反对禁令的行动。这表明了公众意见如何可能影响政治决策过程，尤其是在选举区域内代表受到来自选民的直接压力时。

💡中美战略竞争

中美战略竞争指的是美国与中国之间在政治、经济和技术等多个领域的竞争。视频提到了一个专门的委员会，即美中战略竞争特别委员会，负责处理与中国有关的议题，包括TikTok法案，反映了两国之间日益紧张的关系。

💡数据隐私

数据隐私关注个人信息的保护和不被未经授权的使用或访问。视频中讨论了关于TikTok可能收集用户数据并将其提供给中国政府的担忧，这关系到用户个人信息的安全以及国家安全。

💡社会影响

社会影响指的是TikTok作为一个社交媒体平台，对美国社会习惯、公众舆论乃至政治过程可能产生的影响。例如，视频提到了年轻人使用TikTok影响美国总统选举的情况，反映了社交媒体在现代政治中的作用。

💡算法推荐

算法推荐是指使用算法来决定向用户展示哪些内容的技术。视频中提到了担忧，即TikTok的算法推荐可能被用来操纵舆论或传播与中国政府立场一致的信息，突出了社交媒体如何通过算法影响信息传播。

💡资产剥离

资产剥离是指企业出售其某部分资产的过程。在TikTok的情境中，指的是要求TikTok将其美国业务卖给美国公司，以解决关于数据安全和国家安全的担忧。视频中讨论了这一要求及其对TikTok未来在美国运营的潜在影响。

💡用户基数

用户基数指的是一个平台或应用程序的总用户数。视频中提到TikTok在美国有170万用户，占美国人口的相当一部分，这显示了TikTok在美国社会中的普及程度及其对公众舆论潜在的巨大影响力。

Highlights

美国TikTok用户突然收到一条弹窗消息，标题为“阻止TikTok被禁止”。

美国国会计划通过一项旨在完全禁止TikTok的法案，威胁到170万TikTok用户的言论自由权利。

TikTok呼吁用户致电国会代表，表达对TikTok的支持。

美国众议院下属的商业与能源委员会计划对一项针对TikTok的法案进行投票。

该法案旨在防止受敌对外国政府控制的应用程序对美国造成伤害。

美国立法过程详述，包括法案的起草、投票、通过及总统签字过程。

TikTok在美国的用户数量达到1.7亿，几乎占美国成年人口的60-70%。

TikTok面临的法律挑战及其在美国政治中的影响，如“占位运动”对特朗普集会的影响。

美国已有37个州禁止联邦雇员使用个人手机和办公电脑下载TikTok。

美国能源与商务委员会引入一项新法律，要求TikTok完全剥离其资产。

众议院以352票赞成，62票反对的压倒性多数通过了禁止TikTok的法案。

美国-中国战略竞争特别委员会是该法案的幕后推手。

该特别委员会由24名美国众议院成员组成，他们对TikTok的法案进行了密切的讨论和推动。

美国反对TikTok的主要原因包括操纵舆论、收集公众信息和暴露个人信息。

TikTok对其数据独立性的声明，及其在美国建立独立数据库以保护美国用户数据的努力。

关于TikTok可能违反美国宪法第一修正案的讨论，以及其对言论自由的潜在影响。

Transcripts

On March 6,

American TikTok users

suddenly received a pop-up

The pop-up's title read "Stop TikTok from Being Banned"

Below it said the US Congress

is now planning to pass a bill

that aims to completely ban TikTok

The right to freedom of speech protected by the Constitution for 170 million TIKTOK users is being threatened

Hurry and speak out

Call your congressional representatives

Tell them

what TIKTOK means to you

Ask them to vote against it

Below, there was even a considerate red button

The red button below read

"Call now"

If you pressed it

it would automatically link to the office of the congressional representative in the TikTok user's district

How considerate

So think about it

TikTok has 170 million users in the United States

So, on that day

many US congress members' phones

were overwhelmed with calls

When many people called

they even asked what Congress is

What does a congress member mean?

Actually, the United States is quite interesting

On one hand, its entire system framework was established by elites

and is governed by elites

But many ordinary people

actually don't understand the operation of this elite-governed national system

They only hear that, oh no

TikTok might be banned, that's not good

When scrolling through short videos every day

Watching beauties and animals

It's so enjoyable

How can it be banned?

So they would call their congress members

In the process of calling

they actually don't know

what this really means

Speaking of TikTok

Why did it call on US users

to call their congress members?

Actually, the reason is quite simple

Because on March 7,

a committee under the US House of Representatives

named the Committee on Commerce and Energy

was about to vote on a bill

The name of the bill

is to prevent

the harm of applications controlled by

hostile foreign governments to the US

This bill

is actually tailor-made for TikTok

According to the US legislative process

this legislative process first starts with the US

Congress, both the House of Representatives and the Senate

through their committees

drafting a bill

This bill

has to be voted on in the committee

After passing the vote

then it can be submitted

to either the House or Senate for a vote

After the House votes

it goes to the Senate

After the Senate votes

it returns to the House

Both houses of Congress must pass the bill

before it can be submitted to the President of the United States for signature.

At this point, the President

can either agree or disagree.

If agreed upon,

the bill is considered passed

and becomes an enforceable legal document in the United States.

If the President disagrees,

then the bill goes back to both houses of Congress.

At this point, there are two choices:

One choice is to just drop it,

since the President vetoed it.

The other option is to vote again,

but this time the requirements are higher.

Originally, passing a bill required

a 50% majority.

Now, if a 2/3 majority is reached,

and both houses achieve this 2/3 majority,

they can override the President's veto

and forcibly pass it into law.

But if it's just a simple majority,

then it cannot become law.

So this is a delicate balance

between the executive and legislative branches.

It's a very delicate balance.

So, on March 7, this bill,

voted on by a specific committee,

officially took its first step towards legislation.

So TikTok got anxious,

launching a campaign in the US,

urging the public to pressure US congress members.

Think about it, these congress members

are elected by voters in their own districts.

So the opinions of their constituents

usually exert significant pressure on them.

So TikTok was really going all out,

but unexpectedly, on March 7,

this bill was passed by the Committee on Commerce and Energy

with a striking margin of 50:0.

Meaning

TikTok's all-out effort

At least on March 7th,

no effect was shown.

Breaking News: The House of Representatives on Capitol Hill has just passed a bill that could ban TikTok.

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a bill to ban the use of Chinese-owned applications within the United States.

Unless TikTok is sold to a U.S. company within four months.

Our intention is to keep TikTok operational.

But not under the control of the CCP.

So today, let's talk about

TikTok and the U.S. legislature,

in the past few years,

regarding TikTok's development in the U.S.,

how it should evolve,

whether it should be restricted,

all sorts of legal battles have been fought.

As we just mentioned about TikTok,

it currently has 170 million users in the U.S.,

which is quite significant.

Considering the population of the U.S. is not even 400 million,

and if you subtract minors and

many who are illiterate,

who don't quite understand, right?

It means that among adults,

actually, the majority,

about sixty to seventy percent,

have downloaded TikTok on their phones.

Over the past many years,

it has always been the app with the most users

in the U.S. app store.

But as TikTok developed in the U.S.,

it also faced some skepticism domestically.

Many people questioned,

suggesting TikTok could interfere with U.S. politics.

For example, four years ago,

during the U.S. presidential election,

some young people really disliked Trump,

so they posted on TikTok,

or made videos calling for a "seat-filling" movement.

What is a "seat-filling" movement?

Because, you know,

Trump was going to give a speech,

and you had to reserve a spot at the venue, right?

This venue had 20,000 seats.

They went ahead and reserved seats,

but then didn't show up.

So when Trump arrived,

out of 20,000 seats, only 3,000 were filled.

Right?

This made his influence seem lesser.

So you see, this is the influence

on the U.S. presidential election.

So in 2020,

there was a round of discussions in Congress,

discussing,

demanding TikTok

to sell its assets.

Otherwise, it would be delisted.

The process in 2020,

after all the discussions,

did not turn into an official bill.

Later, after Biden took office,

he did not support this bill,

and so the bill was stalled.

By 2022,

another round of questioning emerged,

and TikTok's CEO in the U.S., Zhou Shouzi,

even went to Congress for a hearing,

and made a statement.

At that time, it was said

that

federal government employees in the U.S.,

on their phones and office computers,

cannot download TikTok.

The main topic of discussion is

Up to this point

The United States has had a total of 37 states successively introduce laws

Prohibiting federal employees from using their personal cell phones

And office computers to download TikTok

But by the time 2024 arrived,

It equates to TikTok's opposition opinions

Becoming even louder

The United States' Energy and Commerce Committee

Specifically introduced a new law

This new law is pretty much the same as it was four years ago

It requires TikTok

To completely divest its assets

What does asset divestiture mean?

It means TikTok

Must complete total asset separation from China's ByteDance

That is, you have to sell it off

If you don't sell it

TikTok will be removed from the app stores in the United States

So, Apple and Google

Won't be able to keep the TikTok app

Available on there anymore

For TikTok, this could be

A disaster of epic proportions

This is the ins and outs of the whole incident

So,

On March 7th,

After the United States Energy and Commerce Committee voted in favor,

On March 13th,

The United States House of Representatives also voted

In this vote,

There were 352 votes in favor,

62 votes against,

It was a landslide majority

You should know, in the United States House of Representatives

The seats of the Democratic and Republican parties are about the same

With 352 votes in favor,

It means that the Democrats and Republicans

On the issue of banning TikTok,

a consensus was largely reached.

There were only 62 votes against,

among these 62 votes against,

about a dozen came from the Republican Party,

and around 50 came from the Democratic Party.

But after all, it's an absolute minority.

Of course, some people said the reason for

the more than 60 votes against

was also because TikTok

let go and mobilized the masses.

So, I took a look,

it's about this whole bill,

don't be fooled by this bill,

it was initiated by the U.S. Energy and Commerce Committee,

but actually, its behind-the-scenes operator is someone else.

This operator,

is a so-called U.S.-China Strategic Competition Special Committee.

This special committee

is not an American

permanent organization within the House of Representatives

It's a special committee

As the name suggests, it's established for a specific purpose

It was founded in January last year

How was it established?

Its inception actually dates back to 4 years ago

when a Republican congressman named McCarthy

considering the tense relations between the US and China over the years

established a special China Task Force

consisting of 14

Republican congressmen

discussing issues like the Taiwan issue

Chinese economic incursion

and the Uyghur issue

By 2022

the Republican Party became the majority

in the House of Representatives

Therefore

they upgraded this China Task Force

to a committee called the U.S.-China Competition over the Chinese Communist Party

Special Committee

This special committee

comprises 24

members of the U.S. House of Representatives

13 from the Republican Party

and 11 from the Democratic Party

These 24 congress members are quite notable

including 3 from the Appropriations Committee

8 from the Armed Services Committee

and 4 from

the Intelligence Committee

So, despite being small in number, their influence is significant

Especially the chairman

who is 39 years old this year

named Gallagher

Gallagher is quite young, only 39 years old

having served in the U.S. military for 7 years, he is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives

and has long been a hawkish figure towards China

After he took over the China Special Committee

you can see

that the committee's discussions are public

You can see that the top issue is TikTok

followed by the Taiwan issue, then the Uyghur issue

among seven or eight topics

So, after this special committee was established

the first thing they tackled was the TikTok bill

According to them, they took some confidential measures when working on this bill

Because if it wasn't discussed quietly

then due to the House of Representatives

and Senate being surrounded by various lobbying groups

they were worried that lobbying would prevent the bill from passing

They really are using every possible obstacle to oppose legislative actions

spending over half a million dollars

Just last quarter, there were seven different lobbying firms

involving disgusting former congress members

lobbying on behalf of TikTok

By the way, that should be illegal; congress members usually shouldn't be allowed to engage in lobbying activities.

So, after this special committee

brought out the TikTok bill

Since the special committee doesn't have the right to propose bills

they passed the bill to the Energy and Commerce Committee for a vote

That's roughly the whole story

Let's continue to analyze

the contents or reasons during the bill process

Why the US repeatedly seeks to ban TikTok

Here are mainly three reasons

The first reason is it might influence and manipulate public opinion

所谓操纵舆论是什么意思

What does manipulating public opinion mean?

Because everyone knows that TikTok is driven by algorithmic recommendations.

These algorithmic recommendations are based on the algorithm's understanding of human nature.

It thinks you might be interested in something and pushes that information to you.

So, what information gets pushed decides what content you see.

What content you see, and its click-through rate,

becomes a very important reference number

for the news or video itself.

This is a characteristic of new media dissemination.

So they say manipulating public opinion

means that TikTok actually intervenes manually through algorithm recommendations

manipulating what information a person can ultimately see

Then it decides the impact of this information on American public opinion

For example, they cited an example

saying that during this Israeli war

a lot of pro-Palestine comments suddenly appeared on TikTok

This is related to the Chinese government's stance

Your Chinese government supports Pakistan, not Israel, right?

So, there are also people in the US specifically studying

saying the characteristics of TikTok's public opinion

align with the Chinese government's speeches or stance, exactly the same

Basically consistent, so it proves it's controlling public opinion

That's the first point

The second point is collecting public information

Collecting public information is actually a common practice among internet companies now

Think about it, Google collects, so does Facebook

Because if you don't collect customer information, it's hard to do the current algorithm recommendations

Because the current algorithm recommendations are not just done by TikTok, others do it too

The third aspect is exposing personal information and tracking and positioning

This was discussed for a long time during the Federal Employee Bill two years ago

It was discussed for a long time

These are roughly the three reasons, so how to view these three reasons

I personally think these three reasons are somewhat far-fetched

Including the US intelligence agencies also accused TikTok

It could become a platform manipulated or utilized by the CCP

In this process, the US intelligence agencies have never presented concrete evidence

Proving the CCP indeed utilized TikTok to obtain US intelligence

Then what conclusion did they come to

It's not about what the Chinese government did

but about what the Chinese government could possibly do

Meaning they believe TikTok now in the US

constitutes such a large social influence

It provides a possibility for the Chinese government, even though it hasn't done so now

Why say it provides a possibility

Because although TikTok is a public company, the Chinese government

has this 1% golden share in the board

What does this 1% golden share mean

It means the Chinese government can intervene at will

TikTok's own internal algorithms

or content dissemination

Everyone knows Douyin is completely controlled in China

Because the Chinese government reviews its backend data at any time

Then the key is whether the Chinese government can control TikTok in the US

Then TikTok itself thinks it cannot

Because TikTok spent $1.5 billion, building an independent database in the US

Their representative said in the US Congress

Our database is completely isolated from China, you don't need to worry

In the past three years

We have spent billions of dollars building our Texas project

This project aims to build a firewall that will protect our American data and isolate it from our "other stuff"

Let me first ask you about the information collection related content

Yes, Senator, we have initiated a data deletion plan

I mentioned it a year ago

We have completed the first phase of data deletion

Through our data center outside the Oracle cloud infrastructure

Starting the second phase, in this phase, we will not only delete data from the data center

We will hire a third party to verify the work

Then we will proceed, you know, for example

We also deleted related data in our employees' computers

Before the Texas project

Whether all data collected by TikTok was shared with the Chinese government according to China's National Intelligence Law

Senator, we have not received any request from the Chinese government for data

We have also never provided any data to them

But now, US Congress members including many people in the intelligence community

are worried that this complete isolation cannot be fully achieved

For example, there's a very important reason

If you want to sell TikTok, doesn't it require the Chinese government's approval

Definitely needs the Chinese government's approval

If the Chinese government doesn't approve, can TikTok be sold

Then isn't it visible that the Chinese government can still control TikTok

So they believe that although TikTok has done data isolation

Actually, the Chinese government can still control TikTok

This is their most important reason, but saying is saying, doing is doing

I think this is all based on an assumption

Not based on evidence

So what does this mean, what does it imply?

I think this signifies a significant change.

You can see that since the founding of the United States, there has been a constitution,

which includes amendments to the constitution.

The very first amendment stipulates

that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech

or establishing a national religion.

This is a shining provision in the U.S. Constitution.

So, in the more than 200 years since the United States was established,

it has always had a certain institutional confidence, no matter what opponent it faced.

This institutional confidence lies in

the fact that no matter how you try to control,

you actually cannot pose a real competition and threat to the U.S. social system in a strong free speech environment.

Take the United States' past with the Soviet Union, for example.

The Soviet Union had a powerful state propaganda machine, but the U.S. was not afraid.

Because such propaganda institutions and machines

had no competitiveness in a free speech market like the U.S.

Even within the U.S. social system,

there are supporters of Mao Zedong, the Maoists.

They publish books, and the U.S. doesn't care.

Because in a free speech market,

it includes speech that opposes the U.S. social system,

even including manipulative speech by foreign governments.

Because all of the U.S.'s past institutional confidence comes from

the idea that even with such content, promoting it in the U.S.

cannot pose a real threat to the U.S. social system.

But the TikTok incident has brought about a significant change.

It's possibly the first time the U.S. has encountered

a competitive entity that could pose a real threat to U.S. society,

that entity being TikTok.

It already has 170 million users in the U.S. today, and possibly more in the future,

even potentially reaching every American smartphone having TikTok installed.

So, if it were to be controlled by the Chinese government,

the U.S. would see it as a tangible threat.

After all, this bill is a preventive measure.

This preventive measure

is like saying I feel threatened or I haven't even realized

the real, evidence-based threat, but I feel threatened

and I need to enact a law.

It's somewhat similar to

the series of legislation passed by the U.S. after 9/11,

which allowed for the inspection or surveillance of citizens' letters.

But the difference is, 9/11 was a real harm to the U.S.,

but this time with TikTok, the U.S. hasn't had solid evidence

and is already pre-emptively legislating.

So, in a way, this

also shows that such an economic system or political system of China,

the enterprises it produces or the model it exports,

starts to pose a real threat to such a social system of the U.S.

This is my most important view on the TikTok incident.

It's not merely a simple legal matter.

Of course, returning to specifics,

if this bill

finally passes the Senate as well,

now some say it's very likely to pass in the Senate,

but we don't know yet

because there are 100 senators,

and these senators

TikTok will also engage many external lobbying groups,

attempting to persuade them

to lobby them not to pass it.

But even if it passes,

the U.S. president is very likely to sign it

because Biden has already said he would sign it.

Then it really would become a law.

So, after this bill is passed,

according to the provisions of this bill,

it will have 180 days

to allow TikTok to sell its assets,

and then there's 165 days to appeal.

But in my opinion,

the future development of this matter,

if it comes to this point,

TikTok will not sell its assets.

Why?

Because years ago,

the Chinese government already classified so-called algorithms

as part of China's export control items.

Because the Chinese government believes

that the management of big data by TikTok

and the algorithms themselves involve national security

as they are absolutely internationally competitive,

such content will definitely not be sold.

They will not allow TikTok to be sold.

So, TikTok,

even if it wants to sell, it cannot be sold.

So, TikTok only has one way,

which is in the United States

to sue the U.S. Senate and House.

So, if it sues,

does it stand a chance of winning?

Or what clauses of the court must it follow

to file the lawsuit?

In my opinion, there are a few points,

one is what I just mentioned,

the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,

which states that Congress shall not make laws

that limit freedom of speech.

So, the prohibition on TikTok

could possibly violate

the First Amendment.

This lawsuit could last a long time,

possibly even reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.

Secondly, the principle of proportionality,

as I just mentioned,

when Congress is drafting this bill,

actually, there is no concrete information

proving that the Chinese government has used TikTok

to control American public opinion

or even American political operations.

It's all hypothetical.

Just based on a hypothesis, you completely remove an app

used by 170 million people.

Does that comply with the principle of proportionality?

Aren't there other ways?

Like you initially restrict federal employees from using it,

or could you make

the TikTok

data center in the U.S. subject to stronger government regulation

to ensure its isolation from the Chinese government.

Can this be achieved?

If you can do this,

then wouldn't there be no need to ban the app?

Actually, there's a lot of room for discussion here.

In fact,

I think there's quite a bit of room for discussion.

It's about not complying with the principle of proportionality.

The third aspect is equal protection.

So-called equal protection

means TikTok, as a company from China,

if you assume

that every company from China

is controlled by China,

then no Chinese companies can operate in the U.S.

or they would all face some form of discrimination.

Wouldn't this violate equal protection?

According to U.S. constitutional principles,

any production

or business activities conducted in the U.S.

Everyone should be treated equally.

There should be no discrimination.

Then how do you differentiate?

Because theoretically speaking, on TikTok

it's just a public company.

It's just that the Chinese government holds 1% of

this golden voting right.

What about other industries?

Do you also apply this principle to them?

So where exactly is the boundary?

Therefore, I think there's a case to be fought.

Whether we can win it, we don't know,

but there's a case to be fought.

So in my opinion,

this matter, in the future,

TikTok in American society,

its prospects are still filled with uncertainty.

But from my personal point of view,

I think actually the U.S. Congress

does not have sufficient reasons to completely ban TikTok.

From my perspective,

to prevent TikTok

and the Chinese government

from a complete information isolation,

other efforts haven't been made.

From my own point of view,

for instance,

can TikTok

its own data center in the U.S.

be subject to stronger third-party oversight,

to ensure the data center's data

is completely isolated from the Chinese government.

Just like Apple in China,

doing that Cloud in Guizhou thing,

in the U.S. we could do a

Cloud over Las Vegas, right?

This is Las Vegas,

if completely regulated by the U.S. government,

then the independence of the information can be ensured.

So personally, I think

if just for this reason alone,

completely banning TikTok,

the reasons are not as sufficient as many think.

Alright, that's all for today.

Thank you, everyone.

Breaking news: The House of Representatives on Capitol Hill has just passed a bill that could ban TikTok.

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a bill that will ban the use of Chinese-owned apps in the U.S.

unless TikTok is sold to an American company within four months.

Before the Texas project,

whether all the data collected by TikTok is shared with the Chinese government according to China's National Intelligence Law

Congressman, we have not received any requests from the Chinese government for any data, nor have we ever provided them with any.

We believe we can overcome the difficulties together; I encourage you

to share your story,

share it with your friends,

share it with your family,

share it with your local representatives,

protect your constitutional rights,

make sure your voice is heard.