Finland's foreign minister: No easy way back to relations with Russia | Conflict Zone

Summary

In an interview on Conflict Zone, Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen discusses Finland's support for Ukraine, emphasizing the importance of adhering to international law and the UN Charter. She addresses the potential for escalating tensions with Russia, hybrid threats, and the Arctic's growing strategic importance. Valtonen stresses the need for a united NATO stance and the challenges of balancing immediate border security with upholding democratic values, particularly in the context of Russia's aggression and China's increasing influence in the region.

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.

Q & A

What is Finland's stance on sending troops to support Ukraine?

Finland has not changed its stance on sending troops to Ukraine, as they are not currently considering it. However, they have been supportive by providing military equipment, defense material, and ammunition without setting constraints on their usage, except for adhering to international law and the UN Charter.

How does Finland view the potential for escalation in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine?

Finland is concerned about the potential for escalation but emphasizes that it is Russia that has been responsible for the escalation thus far. Finland, along with other NATO allies, is committed to helping Ukraine defend itself while also striving to avoid further escalation.

What is Finland's position on the use of donated weapons by Ukraine within Russian territory?

Finland has not set any constraints on the use of the military equipment and ammunition it has sent to Ukraine, beyond the requirements of international law and the UN Charter. They believe that as long as actions are within these legal frameworks, there should be no 'red lines' to fear.

How does Finland respond to the idea of NATO allies lifting bans on the use of donated weapons inside Russia?

While Finland itself has not set any constraints on the use of donated weapons, they acknowledge that some allies have concerns. Finland cannot speak for other countries but maintains that their own support for Ukraine is within the realms of international law.

What measures is Finland taking to address the threat of hybrid warfare from Russia?

Finland is aware of the increasing threat of hybrid warfare and is taking the situation very seriously. They are investing in their defense and deterrence capabilities and are working closely with NATO and other allies to address these threats collectively.

What is Finland's approach to the situation in the Arctic as it relates to Russia and China's increased activities?

Finland views the Arctic as an area of increasing importance due to climate change and recognizes the growing military and trade activities there. They are concerned about Russia and China's increased cooperation and call on China to use its influence to encourage Russia to end the war in Ukraine.

How does Finland justify its new law allowing border guards to potentially send migrants back to Russia?

Finland has implemented this law as a response to Russia's instrumentalization of migration. They emphasize that the law is limited in scope, geographically constrained, and has a high threshold for use. Finland maintains its commitment to international law and its values, and the law is intended to counter a specific threat.

What is the Finnish Foreign Minister's perspective on the long-term support for Ukraine by NATO allies?

The Finnish Foreign Minister expresses concern about the potential for waning support, especially given political changes and economic challenges in some countries. However, she emphasizes the importance of understanding that security and the protection of democratic values are paramount and should not be compromised.

How does Finland's historical experience with Russia influence its current foreign policy?

Finland's history, including past invasions by Russia, has shaped its current foreign policy, leading to a strong emphasis on defense and deterrence. This history also fosters a deep sympathy for Ukraine's situation and a commitment to supporting their path towards independence.