Alen Faljic on Soft Data and Design Thinking (Full Interview)
Summary
TLDRIn this insightful discussion, Alan, an expert in design thinking from a business perspective, shares his knowledge on how to blend qualitative and quantitative data to better understand customers. He emphasizes the importance of empathy and starting with ill-defined problems to innovate effectively. Alan's experience with IDEA, a company that specializes in design thinking, highlights the value of customer-centric approaches and the power of soft data in crafting impactful solutions. He offers practical advice on conducting interviews, synthesizing findings, and creating actionable prototypes to validate ideas before full-scale development.
Takeaways
- π Design Thinking is a methodology that starts with an ill-defined problem and works inductively to find solutions, focusing on customer empathy and qualitative data.
- π Empathy in business is crucial for understanding customers' emotional and functional needs, providing a competitive advantage through better product and marketing strategy design.
- π‘ Soft data, or qualitative data, is less academic and more about understanding the 'why' behind customer actions, which is often missed in hard data analytics.
- π£οΈ Engaging with customers through interviews is essential for gathering insights that cannot be obtained through quantitative data alone.
- π Defining customer profiles and conducting 10-12 interviews helps in understanding the target audience and their perspectives on problems and potential solutions.
- π Offering compensation for interview participants can increase response rates and willingness to share insights, even if it's non-monetary like a gift or discount.
- π When targeting a specific market, it's vital to conduct interviews with local people to understand cultural nuances and context.
- π Keeping detailed notes from interviews is critical for later analysis and identifying patterns in customer feedback.
- π Using prototypes to test assumptions and validate ideas with potential customers before fully developing a product or service is a cost-effective approach.
- π Both qualitative and quantitative testing methods have their place; qualitative for initial insights and quantitative for validating larger trends and assumptions.
- π Learning from customer feedback should lead to actionable insights that guide product development, marketing strategies, and business decisions.
Q & A
What is the core concept of Design Thinking?
-Design Thinking is a way of thinking that focuses on solving business challenges through empathy and understanding the end-user's perspective. It starts with an ill-defined problem and works inductively to find solutions, always putting the customer at the center.
How does Alan define 'soft data' in the context of Design Thinking?
-Alan refers to 'soft data' as qualitative data that comes from understanding customers on a deeper level. It involves gathering insights through conversations and interviews, which help in grasping the emotional and functional needs of the customers.
What is the significance of empathy in Design Thinking?
-Empathy in Design Thinking is crucial as it allows one to understand another person's feelings and thoughts. It moves beyond analytics to a human level, focusing on the customer's experience and needs, which ultimately leads to designing better products and services.
How does Alan suggest overcoming the fear of rejection or embarrassment when talking to potential customers?
-Alan suggests framing the interaction as a conversation rather than an interview. He advises starting with casual questions to make the person feel comfortable, and emphasizing that the goal is not to sell anything but to have a discussion.
What is the importance of local research when targeting a new market?
-Local research is vital because culture varies greatly from one place to another. Understanding the local culture and community is essential to gain insights into the target market's needs and behaviors, which can significantly influence the success of a product or service.
How does Alan recommend conducting interviews to gather qualitative data?
-Alan recommends defining the questions to be answered and the profiles of people to be interviewed. He suggests setting up 6 to 12 interviews, compensating participants for their time, and using both online platforms and in-person meetings to gather diverse perspectives.
What should one do with the learnings gathered from Design Thinking interviews?
-The learnings should be actionable, meaning they should direct changes in the product or marketing strategy. They can be used to create prototypes, which can then be tested and refined based on feedback from the interviews.
How does Alan approach the challenge of potential bias in qualitative research?
-Alan acknowledges that qualitative research can be subjective and biased. To mitigate this, he advises not discussing the solution until the end of the interview, using extreme examples to test reactions, and focusing on understanding the 'why' behind customer needs rather than their responses to a specific idea.
What is the role of online communities and reviews in gathering customer insights?
-Online communities and reviews can provide valuable insights into customer preferences and pain points. By observing discussions and reading reviews of competitors' products, one can learn about what customers like and dislike, which can inform product development and marketing strategies.
How does Alan suggest using the insights from customer interviews?
-Alan suggests using the insights to create and test prototypes. These prototypes can be presented to interviewees or a wider audience to gather feedback. The goal is to validate assumptions and ensure that the product or service aligns with customer needs and desires.
What are the next steps after conducting Design Thinking interviews?
-After conducting interviews, one should synthesize the data to identify patterns and insights. These learnings should then be used to create actionable design principles that guide the development of prototypes, which can be further tested and refined based on feedback.
Outlines
π€ Introduction to Design Thinking and Soft Data
The conversation begins with an introduction to Alan, an expert in design thinking from a business perspective. Alan explains that design thinking involves using a design methodology to solve business challenges, focusing on soft data or qualitative data. This approach starts with an ill-defined problem and works inductively to find solutions, emphasizing customer-centricity and empathy. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding customers' emotional and functional needs to design better products and strategies.
π Empathy in Business and Technology
The conversation delves into the role of empathy in business and technology, contrasting traditional business and technology-oriented management approaches. It discusses how empathy provides a competitive advantage by understanding customers' needs better. The discussion includes examples of how companies like Apple have used design thinking and empathy to develop superior products. Alan also shares a story about a startup called PillPack that used empathy to identify the needs of older patients managing multiple prescriptions.
π‘ Conducting Interviews and Overcoming Resistance
Alan shares strategies for conducting interviews to gather qualitative data, emphasizing the importance of talking to customers to understand their problems and perspectives. He discusses how to approach potential interviewees, compensate them for their time, and the benefits of in-person interviews. Alan also addresses the challenges of overcoming natural human resistance to talking with strangers and shares his experiences of live testing in Brussels.
π Understanding Geographic and Cultural Differences
The discussion highlights the importance of understanding local culture when entering new markets. It emphasizes the need to conduct local research and interact with people from the target market, whether through direct interviews or observing online communities. The conversation also touches on the value of reading reviews and feedback on competitive products to gain insights into customer preferences and pain points.
π Crafting Effective Interview Questions
Alan provides advice on creating discussion guides for interviews, focusing on open-ended questions that avoid leading the interviewee. He emphasizes the importance of framing interviews as conversations rather than interrogations, and the value of allowing interviewees to express their thoughts freely. The discussion also covers how to avoid bias and confirmatory questions, ensuring that the interview process remains open and exploratory.
π Analyzing Interview Findings and Patterns
The conversation discusses the process of analyzing qualitative data from interviews, looking for patterns and insights. Alan explains how to organize and categorize notes and quotes, and the importance of avoiding recency bias. He also talks about the role of intuition in identifying exciting points and the need to validate findings across multiple interviews to establish patterns and learnings.
π― Applying Learnings to Product Development
Alan talks about the importance of making learnings from interviews actionable, guiding changes to products or campaigns. He explains how to use learnings to create and test prototypes, allowing for validation of assumptions before fully developing a product. The discussion includes strategies for both qualitative and quantitative testing of prototypes, emphasizing the value of testing different aspects of a product independently.
π Transitioning from Design Thinking to Entrepreneurship
Alan shares his personal journey from focusing on design thinking to entrepreneurship, where he now aims to teach designers business thinking. He discusses his current work, which includes a podcast where he interviews business designers and explores their paths to becoming business-minded. Alan also mentions his recent venture, launching a product with ten students, and encourages those interested in business thinking to learn more through his podcast and other resources.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Design Thinking
π‘Qualitative Data
π‘Empathy
π‘Business Challenges
π‘Inductive Reasoning
π‘Prototypes
π‘Customer Feedback
π‘Interviews
π‘Soft Data
π‘End-User Focus
Highlights
Alan introduces the concept of Design Thinking as a way of thinking, emphasizing its inductive approach to solving business challenges.
Design Thinking is contrasted with traditional business school methodologies, focusing on empathy and understanding the customer's perspective.
The importance of 'soft data' and qualitative methods is discussed, highlighting their value in complementing quantitative data.
Alan shares his experience with live testing and the challenges of overcoming natural human resistance to engage with strangers.
The process of conducting interviews is detailed, including defining questions, selecting participants, and compensating for their time.
The significance of observing online communities and leveraging customer feedback from reviews is emphasized for market research.
Alan discusses the value of framing interviews as conversations rather than interrogations, and the importance of listening over selling.
The concept of 'proxity bias' is introduced, highlighting the tendency to give more weight to recent data.
The methodology for synthesizing interview data is outlined, stressing the importance of identifying patterns and learnings.
Alan explains how to use insights from interviews to create and test prototypes, emphasizing the iterative nature of the process.
The role of empathy in understanding customer needs is discussed, with examples from Apple and other Silicon Valley companies.
The importance of local research and understanding cultural differences when entering new markets is highlighted.
Alan shares his personal journey from being an introvert to becoming comfortable with conducting interviews.
The concept of 'extreme examples' is introduced as a tool for steering interviews and uncovering unbiased insights.
The value of second-layer validation questions in interviews is discussed to better understand the magnitude of the problem.
Alan's current work on teaching designers business thinking is mentioned, along with his podcast 'Beyond Users'.
The importance of testing assumptions independently through prototypes is emphasized for effective product development.
Transcripts
[Music]
we are doing something very special now
let me introduce you my colleague Alan
hi Alan hello everyone hi so Alan is in
Berlin and the reason why we are calling
him is because he used to work for idea
and he's a great expert in design
thinking from business perspective so
you know that we came into this very
special situation when we on the one
side had a bunch of data from Google
Analytics and Facebook audience insights
but for some of you it might be more
interesting to also figure out how to
find customers with more qualitative
methods meaning soft data in our jargon
and I couldn't think of a better person
to resolve that than Alan Alan what did
I miss I mean you do so many stuff that
you should emphasize something for
students go ahead no I mean that's I
think that's what's the most relevant
for the students is yeah I'm a business
designer which basically means I use
design thinking or design methodology to
solve business challenges so as you
mentioned my I work for idea which is a
company that popularized and also
developed this method and basically what
we do is we use design thinking to solve
business challenges and I think I guess
this is what we're going to talk about
and at the core of this thing is what
you say soft data and what we call
qualitative data yep you know soft data
it's a little bit less academic but yeah
I'm dying to know what is this idea
methodology design thinking I mean could
you walk as role model yeah so first of
all Design Thinking is a way of thinking
I know when I first heard about this I'm
thinking I thought it has more to do
with aesthetics but what I realized it's
actually a way of thinking and the best
way I put it is that when you usually go
to any business school the way they
teach you to think is deductively you
know you start with 10 options and then
you
to work your way to the first and the
best one and the way the design
methodology work is that you start with
something that's really inherently
ill-defined and you work your way out of
it
I think it's called inductively and then
you go back right so it's a great way a
great methodology especially for cases
where you don't have enough data and
where it's a big hairy problem that you
don't know how to deal with so what you
can do there is actually have one
ill-defined question and work your way
through with basically talking to
customers and then if you're going out
what to do next at the heart of this
methodology this is the last thing I
have to mention is that and this is at
the core is a customer right so this is
what makes this methodology special and
different from different business
methodologies is that it always puts the
customer the end-user into the focus and
it uses empathy instead of question
there's analytics you know it's really
very much just you as a person trying to
understand another person cool that's
really interesting and I won't go a
little bit off stream script here
because I just had this idea this notion
of Steve Jobs you know everybody thinks
that he was this wacko crazy genius that
just like invented iPod because I don't
know he was sleeping on the couch and
suddenly had this amazing idea but what
people fail to realize is that there is
a lot of empathy at the heart of
everything was being designed in Silicon
Valley and elsewhere so when we say
empathy I mean it sounds so fuzzy he's
so warm and fuzzy could you define
empathy further it's just like what it
means to be empathetic some examples
just don't send me darling yeah so maybe
just to build on your Apple story is
actually Apple has worked with I do this
is also the heritage of the company to
develop for example the first Apple
Mouse and so a lot of these products
that we see at Apple and other big
company
especially from the Silicon Valley
because the methodology is originating
from the Silicon Valley are using this
methodology to actually have this
superior advantage of customers and this
is what empathy is right so empathy is
it means if you think about it
traditionally you know you have managers
who are very much business oriented then
you have some managers who are very much
technologically oriented and most of
these managers or leaders they when they
make decisions they're making making
these decisions from out of these two
origins or perspectives right so what's
best for your business or how do we make
the best technology and that has worked
quite well for the last I don't know how
many years but with the let's say with
more and more countries and companies
and people mastering these two aspects
the business and the technology you have
the inflow and a lot of competition in
these two levels so empathy actually
gives you the superior advantage because
you understand your customers better you
understand their emotional and
functional needs and through that you
can design better products right because
sometimes to design a good product and
to design a good marketing strategy you
don't need to know you do need to have a
better technological business knowledge
but you need to have a better knowledge
of your customers for example there is a
really nice story of a startup that
actually worked with the ideal called
pill pack a pill pack came to idea five
years ago with an idea we want to
disrupt the pharmacist and basically
what we did in the first phase which is
the empathy right we went out and with
it interviews with users or potential
users and we figure out actually that
the space where these pharmacy should
play in is basically in the management
of older patients or basically
prescriptions for all the patients
because they have the biggest pain right
because they're the ones who have 10 15
different pills that have to take per
day so by doing these interviews we
actually realized in what setting they
are thinking about their problems so the
patients and what the potential what the
potential solution could be right so in
a nutshell empathy is really
looking from the perspective of your
end-users talking to them not just
looking at the numbers but really
talking to them to realize what do they
feel and what are they thinking about
and how important is the problem trying
to solve to them beautiful nice is that
and we have so many light learnings for
students here you know because when you
are searching for your ultimate target
audience here is how you would do it you
would sit in your living room or in your
office depends how well you're doing in
life second step would be to go and like
do a little hypothesis based on some
data that you somehow caught in Google
Analytics and I loved your example
because for example with elderly people
you could never get this nugget out of
exactly impossible and I mean it could
have ten or twelve iteration to come up
with something like that that you could
simply follow up by figure out if you
just went there and talked to a couple
of users and easy at it sound it's not
easy when you do it and I know that
because I was doing live testing on the
streets of Brussels and people thought
that I'm collecting money for drugs so
tell me how do you get through this
aversion for this like natural human
resistance to talk with people that you
don't know you know being shy away I
don't know it's actually pretty simple
so what we do in the beginning of every
project is we set up it could be
everything from six to twelve interviews
usually so you well define so first of
all you define the questions that you
want to answer right so this is so it
could even be who are my customers you
know and then you define twelve
different people you want to talk to you
maybe have six different profiles you
say okay I want to talk to two people
who are just 20 and they're just
starting their career maybe two who just
got their first child or a dog maybe
somebody who just moved abroad whatever
right and then you define your profiles
and then you start looking for these
kind of people if you are working in a
company that already has some customers
you can just basically try to
to your customers and you what we like
to do is just say okay I send an email
to a certain segment as people or a
hundred people whatever and just say hey
we're doing this research we want to see
if anyone we basically want to develop
better products for you basically the
pitch for the research and then you say
if you have time if you want to join
with us appreciate it and we can give
you 50 euro as a gift or $50 I'm missing
it forever and you ask a few questions
to see if they're the right profile and
then you just set up the call or you
meet in person right so I've done both
I've done a Skype interviews where you
just talk to a person for 60 minutes and
I've done in-person interviews it's
important to know that in-person
interviews are always better because you
can go to a person's office or home and
you can see some things that you
wouldn't realize through just talking on
a Skype and as I mentioned before this
is super important because what the data
with a hard day that doesn't tell you is
the why or it doesn't tell you the
context of the person right and when we
designing the best strategy or the best
approach for marketing or even just the
product itself it's really important to
understand these whys and the context
we're designing for so to go back to the
main topic is we do the interviews ten
to twelve of them you basically need to
find the right people and the way you go
beyond this you know I'm afraid or I'm
shy you basically just try to compensate
for their time we always did that we
always more or less paid for people's
time to participate and that worked fine
so the only reason or the only situation
where that doesn't work is if you're
trying to do b2b interviews and you know
what I've offend somebody
but in that for my experience in that
situations most of the time you don't
even have to compensate you just say hey
we want to create a better experience
for you and you can do these interviews
like that cool and compensation can also
be like informal discount maybe just
like visit an office I'll give you a
t-shirt we'll buy your lunch it doesn't
necessarily have to be money for the
startup people who are bootstrapping and
don't imagine how to pay for this yeah
no exactly so
for those of you who are more in the
startup situation the way I also like to
think about it is that if you can't find
ten people who would be your potential
customers it's also uh one step where
you should ask yourself am I even doing
the right idea you know if you can't
really think of ten friend it doesn't
have to be friends you know but if
you're not in that community where you
can gather people who are even eager to
talk to you then the question is oh well
maybe I should just change what I'm
working on you know the good exists
right yeah yeah the same thing was
discussed the other time at a startup
school at Y Combinator so I'm listening
to their lecture and guy said like
exactly the same thing who are you to be
fixing the problem people don't know how
likely it is if you're not part of the
community the whole idea becomes really
shaky tell me something else for all the
international students so you know that
a lot of people like Rami Europe want to
target their products to the US or
people from Asia want it to enter
Australian markets typical situation
like that can you do interviews in your
local surroundings or you have to find
people who are geographically on your
target market what's up with that that's
a very very important question yeah you
definitely have to talk to the local
people that's super important because
culture is a living thing and we had the
biggest insights when we went and we try
to go into a new market because you in
your community have certain rules
certain culture and if you go elsewhere
it's completely different so you always
have to do the local research so if
you're new you're just I mean one thing
you can do is just go and read it find
the right community and maybe just find
some people you can talk with there or
certain slags slack channels so yeah the
geographic component is really important
fantastic and I loved how you also
mention online communities of course
like going and talking
to them with per iron person would be
ideal but if idea is like still very
gentle and you don't feel that you want
to invest as much resources to that you
can just like go and observe them first
how do they behave in online
you're gonna tease that's that's that's
a big one right so if you just read when
they are writing about you can learn a
lot and also if a competitive product is
on Amazon or if a competitor has face
book reviews or Google reviews just take
one evening and just read everything and
just take your notes you know you can
learn a lot what do people like what are
they complaining about and just have a
list of to do's and not to do that
that's that's even easier but never I
would say never just rely on the
secondary data always try to really talk
to people and really get the sense for
them because what happens a lot is if
you just if I just send you a
questionnaire with let's say I'm working
on the new book and what I do I send you
a question about that book what should
be in the table of contents so you're
gonna give me feedback on that the table
of contents but if I just give you that
questioner what I'm not gonna learn is
are you even reading books should I even
write a book you miss the whole context
I already reading books already
listening to books you know you become
too phonological tunnel-visioned by just
asking very specific questions if you
don't open up in the beginning well you
should definitely write a book because
it will look great on your bio and you
have so much knowledge so this you've
got it covered for it but yeah totally
appreciated how you really bring in
these concrete examples from life you
know because this is how students
progress and get like actionable ideas
to test as well as some tools some
structure because like talking to people
it's deep it's difficult for the
majority of people a part if you are
very extrovert you know there is fear of
rejection fear of looking stupid in
front of audience like that you are
going to make a fool of yourself
mental crap like that have you ever been
facing this or not really yeah I have
I'm actually an introvert to a certain
degree and so when I join I do that's a
very extroverted culture and I was
actually an extreme introvert at that
culture and basically when we did the
first interviews I was really feeling
comfortable you know talking to someone
for 60 minutes taking notes trying to
keep the conversation flowing and making
them feel okay isn't easy but I think
the easiest thing you can do is actually
frame it in your mind as a conversation
it's not an interview it's almost like
going with somebody for a coffee and
actually that's much better interview
because you if you frame it as a
conversation and I always do in the
beginning of the interview say hey I'm
not here to sell you anything I'm not
here to to ask you these 20 questions I
have it's it's a moral discussion right
and then you just start off like a maybe
can you just introduce yourself like
what do you do what are your hobbies and
then you start talking so if you frame
it in a way because all of us are more
or less if you're thinking about
marketing or starting a business you are
enough extroverted that at least you can
go for a coffee I would say right and
that's what it is just frame it as a
going for a coffee no not an interview I
love it
these are actionable tips because like
also like tell me about yourself is such
a powerful question because everybody
likes to talk about it's their favorite
subject III if you're like right through
emails and stuff like that ya do wanna
like put an outer mental note here and I
actually learned that when I was
analyzing how to sell you know and
somebody said that the best sales
pitches are the ones that you spend
eighty percent listening or something
like that so I don't know if it is like
a stereotype but at least like when I am
sometimes interviewed you cannot shake
the feeling that you are believing so
because like people are talking about
their solution and you don't really care
about their solution
you don't want to be rude so you just
let it go exactly that's a big point and
thanks for bringing this up so basically
the first thing I say is also I'm not
selling anything but then I follow up
with not selling anything it means when
I go into interview I'm put it this way
the interviewee should know what your
idea is about that's your goal if they
don't know what your idea is about
they're gonna give you an honest answer
if you tell them hey I'm working on this
and this and this and actually the hair
is of red the wireframe okay now let's
talk about you
you already frame the conversation a way
that they're gonna try to please you
willingly or unwillingly and that's not
a good place to be so that's why you're
not talking about the solution you're
talking about the problems there is a
small caveat here at the end of the
interview once you get all the more or
less subjective data then you can still
not pitch your idea but at least say hey
we're thinking about doing this and the
reason why we're thinking about doing
this is because we think we'd solve this
problem and then you give an opportunity
to the person to say oh actually I don't
have this problem or I do have this
problem so you always frame it in a way
of thinking talking about problems not
solutions and that's why having the
right questions is super important and
we can also talk about questions if that
will be like a qualification for the
interview so if I say to you I don't
have this problem you wouldn't be
inviting me on interview wouldn't you it
depends on what stage of the project is
in because sometimes you're looking for
the main problem because sometimes even
the problem itself is an assumption
you're trying to solve right so I'm most
of the time not looking for specific
people who have specific problem but
more like a general interest for example
if I am designing and you I don't know a
new insurance policy not policy but yeah
new insurance package for youngsters I'm
not gonna just try to invite so I'm
basically what I'm gonna try to do is
think what kind
what what are all the different problems
they might have and not just focus on
one to see which of these problem is the
biggest one so one one one could be
maybe young people who are very very
interested in sports
it may be some who travel a lot and
maybe some who just got their first
child so you're looking for different
live situations and then you basically
talk to each of these to see which of
these has the biggest problem and then
you can focus in just one so if you're
in that stage we're just focus on one
problem yeah then that would be a
qualifications but it really depends on
the stage of the project cool
that sounds very intelligent it really
does I was they were thinking about this
subject so much I mean I did interviews
but they were made with like a script
from the internet you know of course
like naturally you would go and ask some
follow-up questions but ethically yeah I
want to like usability lab or something
like that and I just commit like b2b
interview script because this is how I
tackle this problem I mean I have the
knowledge what's the better way to do it
yeah the best tip in terms of the
creating a discussion guide is two
things first of all think about can I
answer this question a lot of the times
I see questions they're really like hey
how do you feel about how you feel about
taking vacations yes awesome and then
you're done basically or do you like
taking vacations so a much better
question I mean this this is a really
bad example but just to kind of yeah
yeah but if I ask you hey what was the
last vacation you took and then you tell
me oh I went there okay and then ask
okay so let's start in the beginning so
when did you first get idea to go there
and then oh cuckoo go so okay how did
you booked the tickets who did you
consult to go it I mean it was just you
or did you talk to your husband your
girlfriend boyfriend whatever okay cool
so how far in advance did you book it
okay so where did you book two tickets
where did you stay all that stuff so I
wanna
basically doing is analyzing how they've
made a decision how they went through
the user experience so basically I
always look at the user experience right
so I think okay so what is the first
point of contact or press first time
they realize they have this problem and
then you basically bring them to the
solution or to the current state right
so if this is I've been taking vacation
is the example I just said if it's about
the banking then you think about okay
when is the first time you open the bank
account where where when why if you're
talking about the sports so when did you
get in love with this sport whatever you
know super cool I'm begging you please
send us some links so I can link them
under the source I'll send you a few
links because I would personally like to
try it out now I mean it's so exciting
because yeah I would literally go and
ask people hi how often do you take
vacations or something like that you
know but it makes much more sense to
structure them in a way that you just
present it because it opens up so nicely
it's not like this how to say
interrogation it's a journey
yeah because what you've done in
interviews actually you can what we do
is in the beginning you do the
qualitative data because the qualitative
gives you an option for two things first
you can learn the Y which is usually the
problem with a quality quantitative data
it doesn't tell you why something
happened it tells you that it happened
so the first thing is it tells you the Y
and the second thing is you can learn
something you weren't ready to learn
because you all know the things we know
we know that we know that there are
certain things we don't know but what
usually kills our idea is the things we
don't know we don't know and by opening
the interview in a way where you're
talking to them and they can speak their
mind you actually can and you usually do
get the topics you wouldn't expect to
get to and that's a good thing it's
harder to analyze but it's it's much
better I am a little bit concerned
because I just had this thought that you
know as a business founder or somebody
who's extremely into
their product you might be inclined
towards shaping questions in a way that
they would confirm what you're thinking
about you know this being self biased
because I wouldn't like to learn to
understand that my idea is or
that nobody needs it and that's why it's
so interesting for me to talk to you
because you have been doing this
professionally you know in an agency so
without like probably having those
emotions yeah but our clients had the
emotion so I know what you're talking
about because many clients or certain
members within the client group had
their ideas they were trying to push and
what happened many times in the
interview settings is that sometimes
they were trying to pitch their idea oh
no no they don't get it yeah exactly
exactly that's than the point right so
the client didn't get it the client
wasn't right I mean the interview we
didn't get it the client the interview
wasn't the right profile etc so first of
all qualitative research is I was even
more subjective to your bias so if
you're trying to prove something you can
always prove it but there are certain
things you can do to avoid that so first
of all is like we said don't talk about
your solution until the very last five
minutes of the interview so first really
try to learn what is saying a second of
all when you're validating your solution
try to always ask second layer
validation questions like okay have you
ever tried to solve this problem
differently because if you're just
talking about your product what happens
a lot is people say yeah I have this
problem but they didn't tell you how big
their problem is a lot of the times when
you show them certain solution they're
like oh cool I want to have that but
then you actually realize they have
never invested a single minute or a
single euro or dollar to actually solve
this problem which means this is a bad
problem to have but mostly in terms of
the questions what you can do is the way
you should steer the conversation is
that that the interview does know what
you want to get out of it and the way
you can do this is to always give
extremes right so let's say that you
have an idea X and when you actually try
to pitch the idea X you don't just show
the idea
but you show the why which is maybe
another extreme for example if I was
doing the book right what I could say is
hey actually I'm thinking about doing
this book but I'm also thinking about
doing a workshop so this could be in
this in this example what I'm actually
doing it is testing the format but if I
want also test the content I can also do
I can give extreme examples that are
like really on the opposite sides and I
can see which way the interviewee
gravitates towards because they don't
know what I'm looking for and then I can
stand and mind you that what we're
looking for is not X or Y but I'm
looking more into the why they set X or
Y because this Y's are we gonna tell me
what I actually should do if it makes
sense yeah it does because like I was
thinking how I would answer your
question and for me it was like totally
do the workshop because you have some
experience in helping people in guiding
them through and honestly I started
reading books I do listen to a lot of
audiobooks it's my car but I would
rather commit to your methodology for a
weekend you know to just like having
some pouring commitment then having
another book such as this one it's a
great book though and hope that I will
be able to read it look at this I just
had it here but actually you know what's
interesting to me you you just gave me
an answer right by also you gave me the
set right I just gave you x and y but
you said I am actually also listening to
books and this could be the moment where
you say oh so actually maybe I
don't need even need to write it I can
do the audio and this is this is just an
example of how you open up things yeah
but you should totally do all the things
because like you're developing your
portfolio so nicely and you have this
podcast now for a year more 2 years but
I did I'm actually not seriously
thinking about it this is just an is an
example for little no but I got excited
you should totally
do it come on next time we will talk
I'll ask you what have you been doing
towards this direction cool amazing good
all right so we are progressing very
nicely here we did ten or twelve
interviews we selected people that make
sense and are representative to target
market now we talk to them we ask them
the right questions and we came up with
a couple of notes know what so first of
all take good notes the notes is super
important there's I don't know how it's
cool but there is a certain bias
proximity bias I think basically means
that the data we have recently acquired
we put we give it much higher weight
than the data we gave we acquired
earlier what this means is basically
after the first two interviews you're
super excited you know exactly what you
have to do with your product but you
calm down and you say okay I still have
to do eight of them let's do them
quickly but actually even those
interviews are great and then by the
tenth interview the tenth was super
great so basically you forget what you
get got out of the first one taking
those it's super important to prevent
this from happening because at the end
what we have to do is we have to look
what we actually did usually is we would
have basically a war like this full of
post-its and on that war we will have
ten pictures of that ten interviewees
and then ten to fifteen post-its of each
interview basically notes + quotes and
then at the end we will start looking
for the patterns right so this is this
basically means we are looking what have
we learned and this is a process that
it's so easy to overlook and do wrong
because we're not used it we use to just
making quick assumptions like I said
before right and this is a lot about
massaging figuring out what have we
learned and it basically just means
looking at vast quantities of data and
looking for patterns and the different
ways to do it you can just color code
the things you think are connect
you can put them in groups and create
categories and through that you're then
shaping the learnings right and now that
sounds like magic yeah this is the
hardest part I would say the process
because here you basically have to be
willing to promise if you do this
interviews alone you you have a feeling
by the tenth interview that you know
what you have learned but if you really
don't go through and I would usually
take we would usually take one week to
do that right it takes a week to do the
good synthesis I mean if you've done all
the interviews you can be faster two
days but I would never do it faster than
two days it because you need some time
to actually read through again see what
are the patterns what are the what have
I learned
and then reread next day again and see
if still makes sense how do you make
those judgments are you comparing like
frequency of something that was said I
mean what is the original here so this
is where the soft data is very different
from the hard data because here one part
is basically your your intuition is
because you were in the interviews you
first of all have to understand where
people got excited where people who
wanted to talk so if when I set up on
vacation and you told me the yeah I
booked it at that website and web that
website sucked for that and that reason
it could be just one data point because
but because the emotion is not so strong
you have to give it a higher weight but
it's not you know it's not like I'm
putting away there are and this is three
times more important and the next thing
but at the end when I'm reading through
everything I'm trying to create these
buckets of things that I learned so
frequency is definitely important right
so if you just get got one insight from
one person and all nine others haven't
said anything about it you cannot prove
it we would usually say that you would
have to get the same pattern from at
least three persons to conclude it right
and it's not gonna be like all three are
gonna say the same thing but there's
gonna be a pattern one is gonna say
maybe you talked to let's say you talked
to patients about a certain disease and
one of them tells you a I actually
forgot to take my medication for the
last two weeks the second one will tell
you I actually you know I have kids and
that's why I never it's just too many
things happening in my life and the
third one will tell you yeah I also have
another two diseases and this is really
actually not that dangerous to me
what do you good so you get three
different examples but the big learning
here is this disease is not that
important to the customers or patients
in a way that they are not really paying
attention to it because it's it's it's
not that yeah it's lower on their
priorities almost yeah yeah got it got
it I mean it's it's like I mean it's
horrible that one business is less
horrible than the other one but oh yeah
to be completely honest like a lot of
people are a little bit over right or
hate exercising or still smoke even
though it's not good for you because
they are what they are not coming in the
morning or something like that this is
how we are as animals Homo sapiens yeah
and one thing is you know as a
intrapreneur you usually have very
product focused thinking and you see
that product in the phone in the focus
of people's life and when you talk yeah
like also in you know when we are doing
marketing and just like in general
communication I mean maybe not
everybody's thinking about these 20
hours a day such as you you really have
to say it in a nice manner for people
who have not been studying this field
for five years this is how you're
getting new customers okay by saying
something simple yeah super important
point here yeah on other notes do you
think that like an average person could
learn to analyze those findings or that
this is something that requires like
ages of training no it doesn't require
ages of training it's more buer it's a
security
have to develop it you have to go
through it two or three times the first
time they're gonna be mistakes and there
are awesome courses also online for my
idea made by ideal where you can learn
how to do that through with having
mentors because it requires some yeah
guidance but as I mentioned before I'm
gonna send you a few articles over
written by research designers at the
ideal basically explain how they do it
but it takes sometimes it's super
important for every marketing and
entrepreneur person to really make this
sound to really be able to talk to you
to customers
totally totally that's why I called you
like I mean I didn't want to proceed
with my persona which I don't do you
know that you don't like but anyways
totally had the feeling that I had to
call you and I think I was right so far
yeah maybe just a quick point on the
personas actually we almost never
developed personas that idea
I mean the way we the way you would
usually develop a persona is sit down
and write a my typical average user is
37 with that much money
lalala but if I talk to ten of them I
don't need to do that because I can just
say hey Shane has this problem or you
know you know who you're talking about
and the whole team knows because you've
shared that learnings and this is one
thing we always also did this share the
insights with the whole team and then
you had this knowledge company-wide
catch'em and makes like fantastic sense
but I would still use them for like
sampling at the very beginning you know
just to frame your life my mind a little
bit
it helps me maybe you're not using this
but like right I've been getting some
how to say edit value' from that sure no
I think it makes sense especially in the
beginning you it's a good starting point
to see to have to have an assumption to
have a starting point it's still better
than no persona but I would say talking
to people on knowing who your customers
are is superior to that
this is a difference between your
succeeding and you like testing
something that's just like was invented
up here in your head and just going like
a hamster and be real cool the very last
question free last question so you got
learnings how do you use the learnings
what are they useful for so the
learnings one of the let's call them
design principles of learnings is that
they need to be actionable if something
is not actionable it means it doesn't
direct you in a certain direction it
doesn't tell you what you need to change
with your product or with your campaign
then it's not a learning so basically
what we're looking for are certain
things we learned and then we basically
create prototypes and we test those
prototypes like you know what yeah so
for for my book which I'm not writing by
the way path so for the book you know
the way you test book is you don't need
to write a whole thing if I really want
to just do the prototype you can just do
the content the basically the table of
contents and I can set it over to ten of
and here's where you can use the ten
interviewees because now with the
prototype I can go back to them and ask
them hey is this actually pretty close
to what you had in mind and they can
give me feedback and with this table of
contents which is much cheaper mind
you're much much cheaper to develop then
write a whole book I can get a quick
feedback if this is something people
want to read about or not or I can just
write one one chapter and again see and
get this feedback or maybe even try to
sell it before it's made exactly yeah
exactly
that's even better so we would basically
what we're trying to do is prototypes
and with these prototypes now we are
there are two ways to think about
prototypes one is you can create a whole
product with the prototype but I would
not suggest you I mean if you're in the
early stage of the project don't do it
but actually with prototypes you can
test your assumptions this means I don't
need a fan testing my product and
testing the whole product and there are
many different assumptions in that
product but
can dissect the product into different
assumptions because one assumption could
be how much people willing to pay for it
how long are people willing to stick
with it etc and I can test those things
independently so you can create those
small prototypes the the really nice
example I like to give is if you have an
app idea what a lot of people did in the
beginning and still do is the first
thing they do is they actually build the
app in this yeah but the reason why it's
terrible is from the experimentation
perspective what you actually have done
is you have test that if you can build
the app you basically test it if you're
if you're able to build the app you
haven't tested if anyone is willing to
use it and most of the times the day the
idea does not fall because you can do
something but because nobody wants it
and you can test that much cheaper than
building that the the very thing and
then terms of the testing you know you
can do it qualitatively or
quantitatively and I like to use both so
what you can do here is go back to the
interviewees or get new interviews and
ask them give them two different
prototypes again you can use the
extremes
one version second version why do you
like this one or that one
and then basically yeah get some
response and this is called directional
response or the lack of direction of
feedback and then if you do it
quantitatively basically let's say I'm
creating a website where people can
already buy and I show this website to
10,000 customers this is already much
more statistically significant and
that's a great I'm not against hard at
another dog but in a certain stage you
just have to use them so when you're
trying to scale or prove something on a
bigger scale you should maybe just
create a website and test it there and
there you can see if if the data goes
the right direction or not now adding
our disciplines like overlap beautifully
I mean we can totally learn from each
other and the mindset is the same so
don't build it before you prove that
somebody's able and willing to pay for
it so this is like a good add-on to the
methodology that we are learning in
course but for your methodology
Design Thinking and your work where can
our students for those of you who are
interested I believe a lot of people are
interested because this is super cool
how can they learn more about you yeah
so the funny thing is I actually am not
talking that much about design thinking
anymore because there are many people
especially from idea who know this even
better than I do
so I actually even I basically tell you
if you really wanna know more about it
go to I do you calm and you can find
some more really awesome educational
stuff there what I'm currently working
on is actually I'm also that's called
enterpreneur right now which means that
when I left I do I decided to pursue
cause like almost the opposite idea
right so design thinking is idea of
teaching business people how to how to
do design and I'm trying to teach
designers how to do business business
thinking basically and I've done this
for the last ten months and I'm
basically using this whole process that
I explained to to to do it and basically
yeah just just launched the first
product bit with ten students and
basically what so if you want to learn
more about the business thinking stuff
where you can do that is beyond users
comm where I have a podcast where I talk
to famous business designers and just
designers in general about their journey
to become our business minded yeah so
that's that's kind of where I am at now
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)