How should we measure intelligence? | Mary-Helen Immordino Yang
Summary
TLDRThe speaker critiques the cultural obsession with measuring intelligence, arguing that the current education system's focus on standardized testing fails to capture a student's true potential. They advocate for recognizing a more dynamic, ecologically valid form of intelligence that involves real-time problem-solving and adaptability in complex contexts, suggesting this is essential for societal advancement.
Takeaways
- 🤔 Intelligence doesn't always need to be measured in traditional ways.
- 📏 Our culture emphasizes quantifying and measuring everything, including intelligence.
- 🧠 The current education system evaluates intelligence based on performance in pre-designed assessments.
- 📚 These assessments only show what students can do under specific conditions but don't reveal their full potential.
- 🚫 Measuring achievement and intelligence this way can undermine students' sense of agency.
- 🔍 Students are trained to focus narrowly on pre-existing problem spaces designed by others.
- 🤨 While some structured learning is useful, it shouldn't be the only way to gauge intelligence.
- 🌍 There's a need for a more dynamic, adaptive way to understand intelligence in real-world contexts.
- 🌱 Intelligence should also be seen as the ability to navigate complex environments and think on the fly.
- 🌟 Society should better support and cultivate this more ecologically valid, emergent form of intelligence.
Q & A
What is the speaker's view on the necessity of measuring intelligence?
-The speaker questions the need to measure intelligence, suggesting that our culture's drive to measure everything might not be necessary for intelligence.
How does the current education system measure intelligence according to the speaker?
-The speaker believes the current education system measures intelligence by a young person's ability to perform on a predetermined assessment and provide expected answers.
What does the speaker think is missing from the current measurement of intelligence?
-The speaker argues that the current system does not measure a person's potential and focuses too narrowly on pre-defined problem spaces.
What broader issue does the speaker identify with the current approach to measuring achievement and intelligence?
-The speaker identifies that the current approach undermines agency and teaches kids to focus narrowly on predefined problem spaces, which can limit their broader understanding and creativity.
What alternative form of intelligence does the speaker propose?
-The speaker proposes a more dynamic, ecologically valid form of intelligence that involves managing oneself in complex contexts, making sense of things, and inventing in real-time.
Why is the alternative form of intelligence important according to the speaker?
-The speaker believes this form of intelligence is more adaptive and essential for society because it allows individuals to navigate and respond to complex, real-world situations effectively.
How does the speaker suggest we should support this alternative form of intelligence?
-The speaker suggests that society should do more to support this form of intelligence by looking beyond traditional assessments and encouraging real-time problem-solving and creativity.
What is the speaker's concern about the privileged status of traditional intelligence measurements?
-The speaker is concerned that traditional measurements become the only way to understand a child's knowledge and intelligence, overshadowing other forms of intelligence that are equally important.
What does the speaker mean by 'emergent kind of intelligence'?
-The speaker refers to 'emergent intelligence' as the ability to adapt and respond to new and complex situations as they arise, which is a critical skill in dynamic environments.
How does the speaker view the role of education in developing intelligence?
-The speaker views education as having a role in supporting a broader and more adaptive form of intelligence, rather than just focusing on standardized assessments.
What does the speaker suggest is the impact of the current educational approach on children's learning?
-The speaker suggests that the current approach may limit children's learning by teaching them to focus on predefined problems rather than encouraging them to explore and invent solutions in a broader context.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
Cognitive Intelligence Vs Emotional Intelligence vs. Cultural Intelligence
Student Vs. Teacher (2023)
Sir Ken Robinson - RSA Animate - Changing Education Paradigms VOST FRENCH
I Took an Official Mensa Intelligence Test | An Honest Conversation About Intelligence
Calls to Action: Noam Chomsky on the dangers of standardized testing
Exploratory Testing - James Bach
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)