BREAKDOWN: Is TikTok Bill PATRIOT ACT 2.0?

Summary

This episode covers a range of significant topics including the potential U.S. ban or forced sale of TikTok following new legislation passed by the House, implicating national security concerns with parent company ByteDance. Discussions extend to charges in Georgia against Donald Trump and RFK Jr.'s vice presidential candidate announcement. The show also tackles Ben Shapiro's controversial views on Social Security and retirement, Don Lemon's abrupt firing by Elon Musk, and an insightful interview with Dan Foote, former envoy to Haiti. The debate encompasses the balance between national security and free speech, the impact of foreign ownership on American sovereignty, and the potential repercussions for TikTok users and American democracy.

Takeaways

• 🙂 The show covers a variety of topics, including the potential TikTok ban, charges against Donald Trump in Georgia, RFK Jr.'s vice presidential candidate announcement, Ben Shapiro's stance on Social Security, and an interview with Dan Foote regarding Haiti.
• 🔔 The House passed legislation that could lead to a TikTok ban or force a sale if ByteDance does not comply.
• 📝 The bill has bipartisan support but faces opposition mainly from Freedom Caucus and libertarian members.
• 🛸 Critics argue the bill might grant excessive power to the president and could be a threat to free speech and access to information.
• 📲 Proponents claim TikTok poses a national security threat due to its ties to the Chinese Communist Party and seek to limit foreign adversary control over American information channels.
• 🛠 The debate touches on issues of national sovereignty, reciprocal trade, and the balance between security and freedom.
• 📸 Concerns are raised about the bill's broad scope, potentially impacting other apps and setting a precedent for government control over internet platforms.
• 💰 The potential TikTok sale could be a significant financial event, with implications for US-China relations and global tech business dynamics.
• 💬 The conversation highlights a broader critique of US tech policy, monopolistic practices, and the role of government in regulating the digital space.
• 📚 The discussion underscores the importance of democratic processes and public engagement in shaping policies that impact the digital landscape and personal freedoms.

Q & A

What was the main reason the House passed a piece of legislation related to TikTok?

The House passed legislation aimed at either forcing a sale of TikTok or banning it if ByteDance, its parent company, does not agree to sell it, due to national security concerns.

How did the House vote on the TikTok legislation?

The vote was overwhelmingly in favor, with 352 supporting and 65 opposing the legislation.

What were some of the charges thrown out in the state of Georgia regarding Donald Trump?

The state of Georgia threw out critical charges related to Donald Trump's case, specifically connected to a phone call with Brad Raffensperger.

Who is RFK Jr. considering for his vice presidential candidate?

RFK Jr. is considering announcing his vice presidential candidate next week, with interesting names on the list such as Aaron Rodgers and Jesse Ventura.

What controversial stance did Ben Shapiro take regarding Social Security and retirement age?

Ben Shapiro sparked controversy by coming out against Social Security and advocating for an increase in the retirement age.

What happened to Don Lemon after interviewing Elon Musk?

Don Lemon conducted an interview with Elon Musk and was unceremoniously fired by Elon in relation to his new partnership on Twitter before it even began.

Who was the guest discussed in the script and what was his significance?

The guest was Dan Foote, a former envoy to Haiti who resigned in protest a few years ago. His resignation letter predicted the consequences of Biden's policy towards Haiti, which have unfolded over the last couple of years.

What argument did Congressman Mike Gallagher present in favor of the TikTok legislation?

Congressman Gallagher argued that TikTok is a threat to national security because it's owned by ByteDance, which he claims does the bidding of the Chinese Communist Party. The bill aims to force TikTok to disassociate from CCP control.

What were Congressman Thomas Massie's objections to the TikTok bill?

Congressman Massie raised First Amendment concerns, stating Americans have the right to view information and criticized the bill for potentially giving the president the power to decide which apps or websites Americans can access.

What was the broader concern about the bill's potential impact beyond TikTok mentioned in the script?

The concern was that the bill, due to its broad definition of 'application', could potentially allow future presidents to ban or restrict other applications or companies, not just TikTok, thus impacting more than initially intended.

Outlines

00:00

📰 Episode Introduction and Array of Topics

The hosts introduce the show with enthusiasm, mentioning Crystal's absence and outlining an array of diverse topics to be discussed. They dive into legislative actions on TikTok, critical charges in Georgia against Donald Trump, potential vice presidential candidates for RFK Jr., Ben Shapiro's controversial stance on Social Security, and an intriguing interview scenario involving Don Lemon and Elon Musk. Additionally, there's a guest spotlight on Dan Foty, an envoy to Haiti, providing insights into the implications of Biden's policy on Haiti.

05:01

🚫 Debating the TikTok Legislation

The narrative shifts to a deep dive into the TikTok legislation passed by the House, aiming to force a sale or ban TikTok if ByteDance doesn't comply. The hosts analyze the bill's content, discuss its bipartisan support, and present arguments for and against it, highlighting concerns about First Amendment implications and presidential powers. They also touch on the broader context of US tech policy, its failures, and the impact of empowering tech oligarchs, setting the stage for a nuanced debate on the bill's implications.

10:03

🔍 Examining the TikTok Bill's Implications

The discussion further scrutinizes the TikTok bill, exploring its potential reach beyond TikTok to other applications, and the precise mechanisms through which the bill could impact national security. The hosts dissect various arguments, including those by FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr and journalist Michael Tracy, to shed light on the bill's scope, its limitations, and the safeguards against misuse. They also consider the bill's implications for reciprocal trade and its potential geopolitical consequences.

15:04

📱 The Geopolitical and Corporate Dynamics of the TikTok Sale

The dialogue delves into the complexities of enforcing the TikTok bill, the possible sale of TikTok, and the geopolitical interplay involving China. The hosts discuss the bill's enforcement mechanisms, ByteDance's stance, potential buyers, and the challenges posed by Chinese regulatory approval. They examine the broader geopolitical tensions, the inconsistency of market fairness, and the strategic maneuvers of both the US and China in the context of global tech dominance.

20:04

🤔 Reflecting on Government Trust and the Power of Public Opinion

The conversation concludes with a reflective debate on the trust in government, public opinion's power, and the democratic process. The hosts ponder the implications of banning TikTok, the potential public backlash, and the importance of reciprocal trade principles. They also touch on the ability of the public to influence policy through democratic means, encouraging viewer engagement and subscription support for their platform, emphasizing the importance of independent media.

Keywords

💡TikTok

TikTok is a social media platform owned by the Chinese company ByteDance. The video script discusses legislation passed by the House of Representatives that could either force a sale of TikTok to a company not under foreign adversary control or lead to its ban in the United States. This topic is central to the video's theme, highlighting concerns over national security, data privacy, and the influence of foreign-owned platforms on American users.

💡ByteDance

ByteDance is the Chinese parent company of TikTok, mentioned in the script as being under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The potential requirement for ByteDance to sell TikTok or face a ban in the U.S. is a significant part of the discussion, raising questions about the relationship between tech companies and national governments, as well as issues of market access and reciprocity.

💡Legislation

Legislation, in this context, refers to a piece of law passed by the House of Representatives aiming to address national security concerns related to TikTok. The script details the bipartisan support for the bill, its intentions to protect U.S. national security by limiting foreign adversary control over social media platforms, and the debates surrounding its implications for free speech and governmental power.

💡National Security

National security is a key theme in the video, particularly concerning TikTok's potential to be used by foreign adversaries to influence or gather data on American citizens. The legislation aims to mitigate these risks by forcing TikTok's sale to a non-adversarial owner or banning it, emphasizing the significance of safeguarding national interests in the digital age.

💡Foreign Adversary

The term 'foreign adversary' is crucial to understanding the legislation's targeting criteria, referring to countries like China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, which are identified by the U.S. as posing national security threats. The script explains that only companies controlled by these governments would be affected by the proposed TikTok restrictions, highlighting the geopolitical tensions underlying the issue.

💡Free Speech

Free speech concerns are raised in the script in opposition to the legislation, with some arguing that banning TikTok could infringe on Americans' First Amendment rights. The debate touches on the balance between national security interests and maintaining open access to information and platforms, reflecting broader discussions about government regulation of digital spaces.

💡Data Privacy

Data privacy is an underlying issue in the TikTok debate, with concerns that user data could be accessed by ByteDance and potentially shared with the Chinese government. The video script addresses these fears in the context of national security and the importance of protecting American users' personal information from foreign surveillance.

💡Bipartisan Support

Bipartisan support, as mentioned in the script, refers to the wide-ranging political agreement across both major parties in the U.S. for the legislation concerning TikTok. This demonstrates a shared concern for national security issues related to foreign control of social media, despite differing opinions on the specifics of the solution.

💡Reciprocal Trade

Reciprocal trade is discussed in the context of fairness in market access between countries. The script mentions U.S. companies' inability to operate freely in China as a justification for the legislation against TikTok, highlighting concerns over the balance of economic and technological exchanges between nations.

💡Critical Infrastructure

Critical infrastructure refers to essential systems and assets crucial to a country's security and economic well-being. In the script, the comparison between TikTok and other cases like Huawei and US Steel underscores the importance of controlling foreign influence over key industries and technologies for national security.

Highlights

Good morning and introduction to the show with an array of topics.

Discussion on legislation passed by the House that could either force a sale or ban TikTok.

Analysis of state of Georgia throwing out critical charges on the Donald Trump case.

RFK Jr potentially announcing his vice presidential candidate with interesting names on the list.

Ben Shapiro's controversial stance on Social Security and retirement age.

Don Lemon's interview with Elon Musk and subsequent firing before a partnership on Twitter began.

Introduction of guest Dan Foty, the envoy to Haiti who resigned in protest.

Detailed breakdown of the House vote on the bill to potentially ban TikTok.

Discussion on the bipartisan nature of the support and opposition to the TikTok bill.

Congressman Mike Gallagher's case for the bill, emphasizing national security concerns.

Congressman Thomas Massie's case against the bill, highlighting First Amendment implications.

Debate on the potential overreach and implications of the legislation beyond TikTok.

Discussion on the sovereignty and reciprocal trade principles related to the TikTok bill.

Analysis of the specific conditions and exceptions within the TikTok bill legislation.

Conclusion and reflections on the role of government, democracy, and the potential impact of the TikTok bill.

Transcripts

good morning everybody happy Thursday we

have an amazing show for everybody today

extra amazing bro show people live for

the pound there it's good to see you

Ryan it's going to be amazing that's

right it's going to be amazing it's

Crystal is off today but we still have

an amazing array of topics I got to do

the tough part I actually got to set up

this damn show so what are we covering

today Tik Tok so the house passed a

piece of legislation that would either

force a sale or ban Tik Tok if their

parent company bik dance does not agree

to sell it we're going to talk about

that what exactly is in the bill who is

for it who against it we're going to

present all sides maybe we'll have a

little bit of a debate here state of

Georgia also throwing out some very

critical charges on the Donald Trump

case down there specifically actually

related to that quote perfect phone call

with Brad raffensberger so excited to

break some of that down RFK Jr uh Making

Waves possibly announcing his vice well

definitely announcing his vice

presidential candidate next week some

interesting names there on the list

Aaron Rogers Jessie Ventura all kinds of

different folks Ben Shapiro uh by his

admission lighting the internet on Fire

coming out against Social Security and

the retirement age let's just say

interesting to say the least Ryan in

particular is going to break that one

down and then Don Lemon uh dropping an

interview or doing an interview with

Elon Musk and unceremoniously being

fired by Elon with his new partnership

on Twitter before it even began so hilar

hilarity ensued for every party involved

and then Ryan you've got a great guest

for us today his name is Dan fot yeah he

was the envoy to Haiti who resigned

protest a couple years ago if you read

his resignation letter what he said

would happen as a result of Biden's

policy towards Haiti it's precisely what

has unfolded for the last couple years

well I'm excited to talk to him you in

particular have been such a fantastic

resource on Haiti so I'm really really

glad that we could have you in the chair

today so all right let's go ahead and

start with Tik oh before I get to that

of course if you want to be a premium

subscriber breakingpoints oncom support

our work we've got all that extra

special stuff that is coming down the

pipeline just had a meeting about it

yesterday I can't give away too much

can't give away too much but big things

you become a premium subscriber it's not

going to happen that's right and that's

right unless you become a premium

subscriber and you're going to be the

first to know about it as always so

let's go ahead and start with Tik Tok so

there was a major legislation uh passed

the House of Representatives yesterday

let's go and put this up there on the

screen how each House member voted on

the bill that could ban Tik Tok overall

it was a pretty overwhelming majority

that went ahead and pass you had 352 uh

votes that supported you had 65 votes

that opposed in terms of the breakdown

155 Democrats voted yes uh GOP 197 50

Democrats voted no 15 Republicans voted

no there were 14 overall who did not

vote and only one person who voted

present uh that one person is yasine

Crockett I wonder what her objection or

not objection to the bill was but anyway

so that's the overall breakdown in terms

of the people who voted no and who are

Republicans I think this is pretty

noteworthy a lot of them were Freedom

caucus more libertarian types we have

Andy bigs Dan Bishop Warren Davidson

Matt Gates margorie Taylor green clay

Higgins and uh let's see Nancy mace

Thomas Massie Tom mclin talk Alex Mooney

Barry Moore Scott Perry David schwier

and Greg stuie so

disproportionately uh kind of the

dissident right more Maga libertarian

Freedom caucus exactly a pretty

bipartisan I would say in terms of the

support now there's been a lot of

discussion on what the hell is in this

bill or not we're going to break that

down but I thought it would be useful

for everyone to present the cases for

and against by kind of the two major

legislative Champions uh on either side

first is going to be Congressman Mike

Gallagher who co-sponsored and authored

the legislation here's what he had to

say in his case for the bill Tik Tok is

a threat to our national security

because it is owned by bite Dan which

does the bidding of the Chinese

Communist party we know this because

bite Dan leadership says so and because

Chinese Law requires it this bill

therefore forces Tik Tock to break up

with the Chinese Communist party it does

not

apply to American companies it only

applies to companies subject to the

control of foreign adversaries defined

by Congress it says nothing about

election interference and cannot be

turned against any American social media

platform it does not impact websites in

general the only impacted sites are

those associated with foreign adversary

apps such as Tik tock.com it can never

be used to penalize individuals the text

explicitly prohibits that that and it

cannot cannot be used to censor speech

it takes no position at all on the

content of speech only foreign adversary

control foreign adversary control of

what is becoming the dominant news

platform for Americans under 30 hang on

to that foreign adversary that's going

to be a line of contention let's hear

from Congressman Thomas Massie who laid

out the case against the bill let's take

a listen they've described the Tik Tock

application as a Rojan horse but there's

some of us who feel that either

intentionally or unintentionally this

legislation to ban Tik Tok is actually a

trojan horse some of us are concerned

that there are First Amendment

implications here Americans have the

right to view information we don't need

to be protected by the government from

information some of us just don't want

the president picking which apps we can

put on our phones or which websites that

we can visit we don't think that's

appropriate we also think it's dangerous

to give the president that kind of power

to give him the power to decide what

Americans can see on their phones and

their computers to give him that sort of

discretion we also think is dangerous

now people say that this Tik Tock ban

will only apply to Tik Tock or maybe

another company that pops up just like

Tik Tock but the bill is written so

broadly that the president could abuse

that discretion and include other

companies that aren't just social media

companies okay so that's where it is

Ryan I've talked a lot here so give us

your reaction what do you think I mean

I've got a couple different reactions

one I think you can't even respond to

which is that uh okay I can understand

why no country would want a different

country controlling its news environment

like f like you wouldn't want kind of

Russia owning NBC news or whatever take

Russia out of it let's just say any any

China Japan country fine even in neutral

Brazil all right I love Brazil like from

the perspective of US National Security

interests I can see the argument mhm I

don't care like I'm not a part of US

National Security interests and I think

most people who use Tik Tok also don't

care and I think particularly with what

the US has done with its hegemony around

the world since World War II it has not

earned the kind of moral credit among a

lot of Americans to say you know what so

you say you need these extraordinary

powers to crack down on on my social

media apps so that you can continue to

uh do what you been doing for the last

50 to 70 years around the world no no

thanks let let chairman she have a shot

uh so here's what I would say in

response Ryan is that take National

Security out of it I believe very

strongly in US markets and in our

principle of sovereignty and reciprocal

trade so for example President Biden

yesterday came out against the

acquisition of us Steel by neone Steel

well Japan is our one of our great

allies I mean unlike the Europeans they

actually produce things and you know are

important to the global economy uh and

they you know also are willing to defend

ourselves if we ever give them the

ability so there's a lot going on for

Japan I love Japan I don't see any

forese any problem in the future from a

national security perspective that said

we can't allow a Japanese company to own

us steel us steel we recognize 100% as

critical infrastructure and I wonder

where you draw the line so for example

Huawei Huawei uh which was banned by the

Trump Administration from critical

access to Telecom so in that scenario

like I mean seems to make sense to me we

have critical infrastructure the wirings

literally of us Communications well

there doesn't seem to be all that much

of a substantive difference between the

two and really when it comes down to

again even taking National Security out

of it Baseline fairness level American

companies can't do business in China

even if you want to do business in China

you have to have a Chinese subsidiary

that owns 51% our tech companies are

completely banned over there you may not

like the tech companies I don't uh but

they're at least under our jurisdiction

they're US citizens they're subject to

US law Tik Tok is and bike dance are not

subject to any of that uh I will give

the counter case and I would like for

you to expound on some of this uh

Michael Tracy I think has done the best

job of uh overlaying some of the biggest

concerns within the bill let's go put

this up there on the screen he says here

are some of the extensive points I have

raised about this bill itself the bill

goes well beyond Banning Tik Tok

targeting any quote website desktop

application mobile application or

augmented or immersive technology

application claimed to be a quote

foreign adversary controlled that

includes China China Russia North Korea

and Iran he says I agree with

Congressman Warren Davidson who pointed

out in his floor speech that the wide

ranging definition of application could

be attempt future attempts to prohibit W

other widely used apps like telegram the

bill authorizes the future expulsion

actions to be taken unilaterally by the

president provided that he determines

that an application preventing a

significant threat to National Security

of the US he says talks specifically

about the president possibly making

unilateral determination I quibble

actually with Michael's definition here

and he says I don't support hand radical

new speech of bridging powers to either

Biden or to Donald Trump go ahead Ryan

so the broader point that Michael is

making is one that you need to take you

know into serious consideration which is

be careful what power you give to the

United States government as you should I

agree when whenever Congress uh you know

says like look I promise this is this is

all we care about just this just this

one little thing because what you're

saying is is reasonable like every

country should you know be able to have

sovereignty over its critical

infrastructure if if you don't you don't

really have democracy because you don't

have a country yeah you wouldn't have a

country because you know as a democratic

public you elect representatives who

then are going to execute the expression

of the will of that public but if they

can't actually do that if they don't

have the levers because some other

country has the levers yeah then you

don't have a then you don't have a

country anymore so fine I get Now

setting aside whether I support the us

being a country and like given

everything it's done around the world

okay yeah okay fine that makes sense

from a kind of basic level but as

Michael is saying what else does this

allow the government to do uh and do we

trust the government to stay within the

lines so for instance is telegram next

telegram founded by a Russian uh who now

has I think he fled Russia in

2014 I think he now has dual French and

emirati citizenship so Emirates are

currently our friends so or the French

right so would qualify under the bill

he's Russian he's he's got a Russian

name well he is about to IPO his company

and so that means he would be publicly

traded which means it actually wouldn't

even be subject to this but and that's

kind of what it gets so if Tik Tok goes

public then it's then it's cool okay

well okay that's up to bite dance you

know bite dance hey if you're you are

welcome to actually publicly trade here

on the New York Stock Exchange and bring

your company into full compliance with

us law guess what they will never do

that because they are controlled again

and owned by the Chinese and I don't

even care about that you you you run

your country the way you want I'm not

saying we should democratize China or

whatever I don't care what the Chinese

want to do in their own country my point

is only that if you look at this from

Bas basic level and even with the bill I

completely understand look I came out

for example restrict act do you remember

that one the restrict act this the

previous iteration this the previous

iteration of the Tik Tok band it would

have given broad authority to the US

government to basically designate the

president solely to unilaterally declare

any application as a threat to uh US

National Security absolutely no way

however I have read this bill it's only

12 pages long and actually I'm going to

ask my team we're going to put a link to

the bill in the description I want

everybody to go and read it for

themselves 12 Pages tiny because they

only use third of the page it's really

not big like it's it's not long triple

space only you know what maybe a

thousand words or something my

monologues are longer than St bill it's

not hard to understand friend of mine

Brendan Carr he's an FCC commissioner he

put together kind of a rebuttal to some

of these arguments let's put this up

there I'm going to read from some of

them he says quote if you are an

individual user this bill confers zero

Authority I think that's very important

because you're not going after Tik Tok

users specifically second this bill

applies only to Applications controlled

by one of four foreign adversary

governments previously codified into law

by Congress China Iran North Korea or

Russia the bill is clear that it is not

enough to Simply wave operations there

or to do business there it must be

controlled by one of those four

governments I want to really spend a lot

of time on this because this is where I

think Michael gets it completely wrong

one of four foreign adversary

governments as again codified into law

by Congress the bill does not say so for

example if President Biden Wanted let's

make up a country uh Zimbabwe if

President Biden wanted to just say

Zimbabwe is now a threat to National

Security it would require Congress to

actually codify into law that Zimbabwe

is now a foreign aders foreign adversary

control government now do I trust

Congress 100% no I don't trust Congress

do I trust the president Trump Biden

other absolutely not my point though is

that it is not unilateral in the way

that the restrict Act was and it would

require at least theoretically

Democratic agreement to confer foreign

adversary status this is where I've seen

a lot of people who who are like well

Rumble and uh Twitter are next it's like

hey guys no they're not first of all

Rumble is a publicly traded company you

can go and look who owns their shares or

not I actually looked it up right before

we went guess what it's not 20%

controlled which is the threshold for

foreign uh ownership that's number one

number two uh Saudi Arabia for example

owns I forget some small stake in elon's

Twitter well first Saudi Arabia is not

on that list second even if they were

it's not up to 20% and my other take

here would be well any any company that

I think is even remotely important I

don't really think a 20% ownership

should be had by a foreign government

period I'm kind of a radical on that but

you can argue with me if you would like

I'm just coming back to the fact that

look I understand the concerns about

overreach and I understand people are

like oh Patriot Act 2.0 the Patriot Act

was what 350 Pages this is not the

Patriot Act it's not it's not even

remotely the same there are a lot of

things in here that which have a lot

more onerous control he also Brendan

points out it is only after a public

process and Congress has been reported

to and then codify this new thing could

even this specific national security

threat then come in and then finally

every single one of these hoops must be

cleared and met more so what everybody

is ignoring and if you will see too if

you were happy to read in the bill is

that any company that is subject to any

of this legislation enforcement then has

a 180-day period to actually challenge

this and have their day in court bite

dance Tick Tock and others fully would

be able to bring a challenge in the US

District Court of Appeals in the

District of Columbia and then if they

want to they can kick it up to the

Supreme Court and they can rule on the

constitutionality of this legislation

but having read it and all of that I

don't think it violates the Constitution

from a basic trade reciprocal

perspective and you know given the fact

that you have access to the US court

system you have a pretty honorous

process I mean when's the last time

China uh Congress agreed on anything

other than Ukraine on what is a foreign

adversary or whatever there's look I I

would just I would just ask you to at

least admit this it's not the Patriot

Act 2.0 you can oppose this and say and

at least admit it is not Patriot no it's

definitely not the Patriot Act 2.0 and I

think one thing that annoys me about how

this is unfolded and this doesn't really

undermine your point um but but I think

it's important context is that the US

allowed this to happen um by empowering

our kind of tech oligarchs yes and then

the OB Obama administration then Trump

allowing all sorts of uh mergers and

then allowing this like catch and kill

where where you know anytime there was a

decent app that was about to take off

Facebook or Google or somebody else

would like buy it up and then just kill

it so that our like crappy little uh

apps and social media companies

continued to be the only ones thinking

that the world had no alternative no way

to challenge them because they would

just come in and beat them but then and

then Tik Tok comes along and does

something did that people like more and

it caught our you know protected

industry protect by our kind of Monopoly

anti failure to enforce antitrust policy

caught him caught him sleeping and at

the same time we were working hand and

glove with these tech companies spying

on Americans spying on everybody around

the world and allowing them to just

Hoover up everybody's data so that we

could have a little back door to it and

so it's a failure to take any

responsibility for doing your own

industrial policy for guiding your own

kind of social media policy for

protecting the civil liberties of your

own

population and so when they they then

come crying about Tik talk it just lands

on De ears I get that and and you know

what my response would be you know what

luckily for you and me we live in a

democratic country and we can vote Lina

KH is coming exactly we you know our

government we elected Joe Biden he

appointed lenina con she's currently

sticking it to Big Business and to these

tech companies I would also say Joe bid

has actually had significant number of

executive orders that have impact on

data transfer to China all of that so

look I mean at the for me a lot of this

comes back to it's just like then you

don't believe in the government at all

and if you don't believe it's like but

if you but then just be libertarian like

I don't know what to say you know then

be Ben Shapiro and come out against

income tax like it's like I

believe in the government I believe in

the American I believe in the concept of

government not the current government I

believe in the American people I believe

that representative democracy on a long

enough timeline eventually does deliver

roughly what some people want it's not

always easy and it's not nearly as uh

what actionable as it should be and I

would like to return to that that said

it's not China and like when I look at

this it is very obvious that a force

sale again not a ban a force sale is the

most elegant option you force them to

sell it they get to you know all these

ticktockers and all these content

creators I don't want them to lose it

listen I don't like Tik Tok I don't use

Tik Tok but it's a free country you can

use it you want to rot your brainet 75

uh what is it 75 minutes a day on social

media be it Twitter Tik Tok or everybody

else that's your business you you can do

what you want they're saying they're not

going to sell it do you believe them uh

I don't believe them um well okay we'll

put it two ways to to to to explain to

people that the bill forces a sale

within 180 days by B Dance by bite dance

to an American or I guess they could go

public too um and if they don't do that

then it is banned and so the the head of

Tik Tok is saying we're not going to

sell it it will be banned well I think

that's a negotiating position because

what they want to they want to get all

these ticktockers come out and Lobby

against Congress which by the way is

actually massively backfired hilariously

enough um but I mean at the end of the

day it's really up to bike dance are you

going to say no to I mean the sale price

of Tik Tok is probably going to be

nearly a trillion bucks like it's going

to be 8 900 billion there's already

multiple us investors that have lined up

and let me head that off too because

Crystal brought this up she's like well

Sam mman and open have said they're

going to buy it I'm like yeah I wouldn't

agree with that and luckily for me I

live in the United States of America

where our court system can block that we

want to yeah exactly Regulators have a

say over who gets to bike it buy it or

not unfortunately the real thing that

could happen is this could become a

geopolitical football and don't forget

because bike dance doesn't get to run

its own business the CEO Jiang ximing

even if he does want to sell it to you

know whoever somebody here in America

some investor conglomerate or something

like that he would still have to get

sign off from Chinese regulator so I

don't think it's actually a matter of

whether Jiang ximing or the bite dance

wants to sell it this is all in the in

shiing Ping's court whether it's really

up to him I mean just yesterday the

Chinese Ministry of Affairs came out and

said uh they came out and said it is

unfair and goes against the principles

of Market fairness and this is what

drives me nuts I'm like okay name one US

tech company that gets to do business in

China One just one the the only one that

comes even remotely close is Tesla and

there's a lot of problems with elon's

relationship right now with that so any

final thoughts before we move on I I

just also find it wild that the American

politicians basically blame Tik Tock for

young people being against genocide in

Gaza I think you right this is a that

seems to be the thing that really pushed

them over the top I think you were right

and that is a fair concern and uh if I

were you I would bring up the exact same

thing what is the impetus action of why

I unfortunately do think that Israel and

all of that did play a significant thing

and if it was a ban I think I would

speak out against it at this point

because I don't think that that's right

but given the fact that what happens if

it does get banned well I mean that's

the thing like let's say they we we're

bluffing in some ways yeah let's say

they call our Bluff and actually just

not like take it down I think it would

be unfortunate but I think that the

principle of reciprocal trade is too

important and I would also say I blame

Trump a huge part of this he should have

finished the job in 2019 I people can go

roll the tape I've been talking

I I appreciate you believing in the idea

of government yeah I mean this thing

just it's just this I do believe that

the government can and has worked in the

past relatively recently it's really

totally gone off the rails you know

since what the post 911 Security State

but you know we've been through very

dark periods that doesn't mean that we

can't reclaim it I believe very much in

democracy in the American project

government yeah I think that's a good

thing and that's why we are very lucky I

think to be able to live in a country

where we actually get to vote as opposed

to a literal dictatorship which is

completely controlled by this this

company and if this brought about

genuine self-government yeah and

actually represented government hey you

know what let's put about it this way

and I would say this is what I would say

to Crystal too as she's like well young

people will rise up good okay if if

people are pissed off and that's the

other thing look this is my opinion this

is my voice if enough young people or

whomever Tik Tok users cuz not just

young people get pissed off about this

you are welcome to have a campaign and

to vote and to extract a promise from

the uh from your legislature and from

Joe Biden or Donald Trump whoever would

be the next president and you can use

luckily you know again your voice to

overturn this you be my guest I would

fight against it but I believe very much

in their ability to try and to campaign

against it so that kind of brings it

kind of to the core principles I think

that are in the debate I you know even

though my I think my opinion is strong

like I wanted to make sure you got your

voice in and also to voice Thomas

massie's opinion Michael Tracy I highly

recommend though mean I have great

respect for those two individuals so you

I'm not going to tarnish them or

anything I think they have a legitimate

point of view and we'll see what happens

what Ben Franklin say we have made a

sticky algorithmic app if you can keep

it I like it I like it I like it a lot

uh in terms of the future I don't know

where this is going to go uh from what I

have heard I'm curious what you think it

at the very least it's going to take a

while in the Senate if it ever does pass

um I'm I'm dubious that it passes it all

personally just because you got

Democrats who control the chamber do

they really want to be on the you know

let's say the app does get banned they

really want to you know get screwed by

something like that I I don't think

they're willing to take that risk

there's not enough weed that you could

legalize to earn back earn back the

numbers that you're going to lose from

Banning Tik Tok well we'll see hey guys

if you like that video go to

breakingpoints outcom become a premium

subscriber and help us build the best

Independent Media organization on the

planet that's right we're subscriber

funded we're building something new we

want to replace these faing mainstream

media organizations so again to

subscribe it's breakingpoints