Arthur C. Clarke & Roger Ebert Chat About Artificial Intelligence
Summary
TLDRIn this engaging interview transcript, the renowned author discusses the discrepancies between the book and movie versions of 2001: A Space Odyssey, particularly focusing on the character HAL 9000's birth year. The conversation delves into the creative process behind the development of HAL, the author's thoughts on the future of artificial intelligence, and his reflections on the evolution and impact of the science fiction genre. The author also shares his experiences with UFO sightings and his speculations on space travel and the potential for time probes.
Takeaways
- ๐ The character Hal from '2001: A Space Odyssey' has two different birth years in the book and the movie, causing some confusion.
- ๐ฌ Stanley Kubrick insisted on changing Hal's birth year from 1997 in the book to 1992 in the movie for reasons that remain unclear.
- ๐ The author expresses pride in the upcoming release of '3001: The Final Odyssey', which he believes is the best of the series.
- ๐ The author discusses the concept of a space elevator, a permanently orbiting ring above Earth, which could revolutionize space travel.
- ๐ค The author's views on artificial intelligence have evolved, and he acknowledges that AI has not developed as quickly as anticipated in the timeline suggested by '2001'.
- ๐ The idea of a 'soul catcher' is explored, a device that could store and recreate a person's physical, emotional, and spiritual essence.
- ๐ The author reflects on the unexpected miniaturization of computer chips and its profound impact on society, leading to the term 'cyberclasm'.
- ๐ The author's experiences with UFOs are shared, dismissing them as misinterpretations of natural phenomena after investigation.
- ๐ฅ The author's thoughts on the science fiction genre's evolution from disrespectability to mainstream acceptance and its current status.
- ๐ '2001: A Space Odyssey' is considered one of the greatest films of all time, but its visionary approach has not been widely followed in the genre.
- ๐ The 'star child' at the end of '2001' symbolizes an open future and the question of human destiny is left to the audience's interpretation.
Q & A
What is the main topic of discussion regarding Hal's birthday?
-The main topic of discussion is the discrepancy in Hal's birth year between the book and the movie. In the book, Hal was born in 1997, while in the movie, he was born in 1992.
How did the conversation about Hal's birthday lead to a discussion on the release of '2001: A Space Odyssey'?
-The conversation about Hal's birthday led to the discussion of the release of '2001: A Space Odyssey' because the birthday is related to the timeline of the story, and the release of the movie in 1968 is a significant event that has been celebrated many years after the fact.
What was Stanley Kubrick's stance on the birth year of Hal?
-Stanley Kubrick was insistent that Hal's birth year in the movie would not be the same as in the book, which was 1997, and chose 1992 as the new birth year.
What is the significance of the release date of '3001: The Final Odyssey'?
-The release date of '3001: The Final Odyssey' is significant because it continues the story from '2001: A Space Odyssey' and is mentioned as being released in the early part of the year, specifically around February or March.
How does the author feel about the development of artificial intelligence as depicted in '2001: A Space Odyssey'?
-The author acknowledges that artificial intelligence has not developed according to the timeline suggested in '2001: A Space Odyssey', and that we seem to be as far away from achieving a HAL-like AI today as we were then.
What was the original inspiration for the story of '2001: A Space Odyssey'?
-The original inspiration for the story came from a short story called 'The Sentinel' written by the author, which was about the discovery of an artifact on the moon.
How did the idea of Hal emerge during the creation of '2001: A Space Odyssey'?
-The idea of Hal began to emerge during brainstorming sessions between the author and Stanley Kubrick, where they went through several of the author's stories and discussed basic ideas.
What is the author's opinion on the problems Hal experiences at the end of the movie?
-The author believes that the problems Hal experiences could be due to a programming error or a result of Hal's 'jealousy' over humans wanting to usurp his role in the mission, but it's left open-ended as the books and movies exist in parallel universes with differing details.
How does the author view the concept of a space elevator?
-The author is intrigued by the concept of a space elevator, a permanently orbiting ring above Earth, and has developed the idea further in his novel 'The Fountains of Paradise'. He believes it could significantly reduce the cost of space travel.
What is the 'soul catcher' concept mentioned in the script?
-The 'soul catcher' is a concept where a computer or computer-like device, with enough complexity and memory, could store and recreate a person's physical, emotional, and spiritual essence.
How does the author feel about the impact of cyber culture on society?
-The author is concerned about the dramatic changes that cyber culture has brought to society and is worried about potential future developments, even coining the term 'cyberclasm' to describe the potential societal upheaval.
What was the author's experience with UFO sightings?
-The author has seen multiple UFOs but does not take them seriously, as all sightings he's experienced have had simple and often absurd explanations, such as satellites or seagulls.
What is the author's perspective on the genre of science fiction?
-The author has seen science fiction evolve from a less respectable genre to one with bestsellers, academic research, and critical acclaim. Despite its rise in popularity, he reminisces about the fun of the genre when it was considered more of a 'gutter' genre.
Outlines
๐ Celebrating Hal's Birthday and the Discrepancy in Dates
The conversation begins with a discussion on the celebration of Hal's birthday, highlighting the discrepancy between the birth years mentioned in the book (1997) and the movie (1992). The speaker expresses confusion over the change and inquires about the reason behind it. The mention of Kubrick's insistence on the 1997 date is noted, but the exact cause of the discrepancy remains unknown. The speaker also discusses the release of '3001: The Final Odyssey' and shares their anticipation for its publication. The conversation touches on the idea that the four-book series represents the best of the trilogy and that there will not be a fifth volume.
๐ค The Evolution and Future of Artificial Intelligence
The discussion shifts to the topic of artificial intelligence, with the speaker reflecting on the progress made since the creation of HAL 9000 in '2001: A Space Odyssey'. The speaker acknowledges that AI has come a long way and is advancing rapidly, contrary to some current pessimistic views. The conversation includes a mention of a symposium on intelligent autonomous systems for space, indicating that the ideas presented in '2001' are becoming more relevant. The speaker also contemplates the nature of HAL's issues at the end of the movie, whether they stem from programming errors or emotional jealousy, and notes the differences between the book and movie universes.
๐ Space Elevators and the Future of Space Travel
The speaker delves into the concept of a space elevator, a revolutionary idea that would allow for cost-effective travel from Earth to space. The idea is explored in the speaker's novel 'The Fountains of Paradise' and has gained traction with advancements in material science, specifically the discovery of Buckminster fullerenes. The conversation also touches on the potential for space tourism and the impact of such technology on the future of space exploration. The speaker shares a personal anecdote of an astronaut holding his book in space, emphasizing the close connection between science fiction and real-world achievements.
๐ The Possibility of Life Beyond Earth and the Impact of Scientific Discoveries
The conversation turns to the possibility of extraterrestrial life, with the speaker expressing interest in the evidence suggesting past life on Mars. While acknowledging that the evidence is not conclusive, the speaker advocates for further exploration, particularly of Europa and Ganymede. The discussion also covers the ethical implications of scientific discoveries, such as the potential dangers of a time probe that could reveal past events. The speaker reflects on the responsibility that comes with scientific advancement and the potential consequences of creating such powerful tools.
๐ The Legacy and Future of Science Fiction
The speaker reflects on the evolution of the science fiction genre, from its pulp magazine roots to its current status as a respected form of literature. The conversation touches on the impact of '2001: A Space Odyssey' on the genre and the lack of films with similar ambition since its release. The speaker also discusses the challenges of adapting science fiction to film, particularly the unconventional ending of '2001', and shares his thoughts on the future of space travel and the potential for humanity to explore the universe.
๐ Speculations on Instantaneous Travel and the Growth of the Science Fiction Genre
The speaker engages in a discussion about the theoretical possibility of instantaneous travel, or 'universal acceleration', as presented in his book '3001'. He draws parallels with the gravity fields of black holes or neutron stars, where immense acceleration is experienced without the sensation of gravity. The conversation then shifts to the development of the science fiction genre, with the speaker reminiscing about its early days and the transition from pulp magazines to a more respected literary form. He expresses a fondness for the genre's earlier, less formal days and the sense of fun and creativity that characterized it.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กHal's Birthday
๐ก2001: A Space Odyssey
๐กArthur C. Clarke
๐กStanley Kubrick
๐กArtificial Intelligence
๐กSpace Elevator
๐กCyberculture
๐กTime Probe
๐กScience Fiction
๐กStar Child
๐กUFOs
Highlights
Discussion of the discrepancy between Hal's birth year in the book (1997) and the movie (1992).
Mention of the release of 2001: A Space Odyssey and its impact on the perception of artificial intelligence.
The author's uncertainty about the change in Hal's birth year and the influence of Stanley Kubrick.
The author's anticipation of the release of 3001: The Final Odyssey and his belief it's the best of the series.
Reflection on the development of artificial intelligence and its current state compared to the predictions in 2001.
The author's recollection of the initial brainstorming sessions with Kubrick that led to the creation of 2001.
The origin of the idea for 2001, starting with the short story 'The Sentinel'.
The author's optimistic view on the future of space exploration and the concept of a space elevator.
The concept of the soul catcher, a device that could store and recreate a person's physical, emotional, and spiritual essence.
The author's thoughts on the rapid advancement of technology and its societal impact, termed 'cyberclasm'.
The author's connection to Urbana and the University of Illinois, and its influence on his work.
The author's speculation on the possibility of life on Mars and the importance of further exploration.
Discussion on the concept of a time probe, its potential implications, and why it might be terrifying.
The author's views on the potential for a science fiction story to be adapted into a movie and his unfilmed projects.
Reflection on the ending of 2001 and the visionary leap it represents, contrasting with modern studio preferences.
The significance of the star child in 2001 and the question it poses to the audience about humanity's destiny.
The author's personal experiences with UFO sightings and his skepticism towards the UFO phenomenon.
The author's thoughts on the development and respectability of the science fiction genre over time.
Transcripts
foreign
t video phone
[Music]
Mr Clark
good morning oh good afternoon as the
case may be
interested in for you it's evening for
us how are you I am fine looking forward
to
talking to you well you know every
parent is proud on the birthday of a
child and you must be very proud now
that Hal's birthday is finally coming up
so many years after 2001 was released
well it causes the problem here because
he has two birthdays one in the book and
one in the movie and I'm never quite
sure which is which or why we changed I
wanted to ask you about that because in
the book he was born in 1997 and in the
movie he was born in 1992 and uh Kubrick
of course was uh very insistent on that
that he he wasn't going to be fooled for
a second that the birthday was in 1997.
how did that happen I have no idea it
could have been a Fluff of the actor I
just had any ideas whatsoever and um
but obviously
um we've missed 92 so let's make the
most of 97 absolutely and 97 is of
course what you wrote In the book and
you also mention it uh in the notes at
the end of 3001 the final Odyssey which
is coming out um
this
early next year I believe
I think in February March yes February
March I got the typescript of it in the
mail today oh excellent um I am really
happy about it I I really think it's the
best of the
the the best of the trilogy and I don't
think any Trilogy should have more than
four volumes so there won't be another
one
I thought you were a little better at
math than that
let me ask you
how uh you originally created how we
know of course the famous story of how
Kubrick approached you and you uh
remember this short story that you had
written called The Sentinel but uh there
were many many steps between that first
meeting and the screenplay and novel of
2001 and at what point did the idea of
Hal begin to emerge
well you're trying you're asked me to
dredge up memories that are overlaid by
many other stratas of books and movies
and things but it's all began in in
64. I can't really believe the date when
I was actually Moonlighting at time life
and then say by not coincidence the
issue of times just arrived today it's
got a letter in about 2001 how did it
how it anticipated the future
and Sandy contacted me in fact he
contacted me before I went to New York
to work on the time life man and Space
Project
and we sort of brainstormed together for
quite a few days and what I did I went
through my
the stories I'd written and I made a
list of about six and said to hear some
basic ideas and
um a solar motor Stanley all six and the
only element He used really was from The
Sentinel over a short story
about the discovery of an artifact on
the moon and then I bought back the ones
he didn't use from Stanley and I hope
one day I will resell them to somebody
else now who invented what after all
this length of time I have no idea we
were sort of bouncing ideas back and
forth in like a table tennis match
certainly at that time you were much
more optimistic about the possibilities
of artificial intelligence than people
are today
oh I don't think so artificial
intelligence is roaring along and in
fact I've just got a fact some jet
propulsion laboratory and this is rather
interesting other to tell you what
they're up to I'm just reading from the
letter from Dr Richard Doyle who is the
head of the autonomy technology program
and listen to this
um we are holding in January 1997 a
symposium on the topic of intelligent
autonomous systems for space intelligent
autonomous systems well that's exactly
what how it was
but it
hasn't really developed Artificial
Intelligence on the timetable it was
suggested by 2001 we seem to be about as
far away today don't you think from Hal
as we were then or not yes um artificial
intelligence is always used about 20
years in the future
when I saw you in 1958 you were speaking
at the University of Illinois in Urbana
did that visit have anything to do with
friends you had there and did it lead to
how being born in Urbana
oh very much so because my
math professor at King's College London
was George mcvitty Who later went to
University of Illinois and my
placing house birthday there was a
rarely attribute to George and uh who is
indeed now for many years he was a
leading cosmologist incident as well as
a mathematician and um
by an odd coincidence the super computer
center now is it Urbana now whether
that's a coincidence I don't know
let me ask you some questions about how
that um
I'm really interested in your opinion on
do you believe
that the problems that Hal experiences
at the end of the movie are a
programming error
or is he jealous of the fact that humans
want to usurp his role in the mission
another says he had a human emotion or
has he had a programming mistake
IPL pause on that one but um remember
there are the four books are not exactly
sequels they're in parallel universes
now and I may have changed quite a few
ideas some I've forgotten some were not
relevant anymore and some in fact Clash
related developments obviously the time
scale has gone completely wrong a 2001
storyline can't happen before at the
earliest maybe 2030
and you know because the whole Space
Program sort of on hold now it is hard
to remember that when we worked on 2001
in from 1964 to
1968 roughly
NASA was seriously planning to put men
on Mars in the 1980s well now we haven't
put men back on the moon yet
one of the things that intrigues me in
3001 your new book is your idea of the
sort of
space elevator a a permanently orbiting
ring
above the Earth connected to Earth by a
fabric made out of Buckminster
fullerenes
which would allow a person to be
lifted from the surface of the Earth up
to this space station at a cost of only
about a hundred dollars worth of
electricity
that's true and in fact ten dollars for
the round trip because you get most of
the energy back when you return the
nearest gravity to it no this is an idea
I developed much further in another
novel called The Fountains of paradise
where I describe the building of the
space elevator instantly from a mountain
in Sri Lanka now that book was recently
carried up in the space shuttle by the
crew of Atlantis uh when they did the
tether experiment and I have a wonderful
photograph of Jeff Hoffman holding The
Fountains of paradise floating in
because in space inside him with the
Earth in the background now that is a a
a story I'd love to see film one day
another interesting fact
um Buckminster fullering the material
that will make this possible was of
course named after Bucky Fuller who I
last saw In This Very Room and a couple
of weeks ago the chemist who when the
co-discovers of this material got the
Nobel Prize so all these things are you
know 20 in the Direction one day we may
be able to make the space elevator and
then the universe will open up another
idea that you've come up with recently
that I found fascinating is the soul
catcher
the idea that a apparently a computer or
computer-like device could have enough
complexity and memory that it could
store and recreate a person physically
emotionally and spiritually and you say
in the notes at the end of 3001 that the
memory that it would take to do this is
less than you originally thought well
it's about 10 to the 15th or so but it
is a thought we saw that one day we may
be stored in something about this size
not only our bodies but our minds our
emotions everything I think it's a
pretty scary idea but I have developed
it in the uh
n3001 is not really original I mean the
idea of storing personalities goes back
into science fiction and a number of
people you know in the business now are
taking it seriously and working on the
idea
uh today we live in a time when um
the Cyber culture
uh has changed our lives so dramatically
could you have foreseen that at the time
that you uh were writing about HAL 9000
did you think that computers of of the
power for example of the one on my
desktop or on your desktop would be in
the hands of private citizens by 1996
97. no I don't think anybody did the
chip Revolution is the most remarkable
in the human history I mean no one could
ever have dreamed that something the
size of a in a house like the first
computers using tens of kilowatts of
energy it would be compressed into a
thing you know about the size of your
your thumbnail
that is
totally unexpected and that's changed
Society you know a will change society
you know beyond recognition and I'm
rather worried about summer developments
that may happen recently I had a essay
in the Asia Week Magazine and I've
invented a new word the coming
cyberclasm
or the subtitle this the coming cyber
criticism or who will change the light
bulbs well when we're all plugged into
entertainment uh you know who's going to
run the world let me ask you uh
something that
is an obvious question I think for any
science fiction writer including the
greatest of them all what were your
thoughts uh when you read about that
rudimentary evidence that they might
have been able to prove that there have
been Life on Mars
well of course I was very interested I
think it'd been rather overblown because
we're
it's not proof it's I'd say 80 or so
evidence but it does mean we should
follow this up and look for a similar
evidence perhaps from Europa in fact
Freeman Dyson wrote to me the other day
and said that we should look for
meteorites that have been splashed off
Europa because the oceans of Europe as I
said in in 3001 and 3000 and 2010 you
know maybe the other place where there's
a lot of life in the solar system
and what about these cities that you
found on Ganymede
well the one I describe in Ganymede if
you look at the images from the Galileo
spacecraft and there's some
extraordinary formations there and the
one I mentioned specifically it does
look like a city it doesn't require much
imagination to see that these are city
streets the fact that there are five
kilometers or so wide is a minor detail
do you think that there is any
scientific invention or discovery that
the man or woman who
came up with it would be so alarmed by
that they would feel it was necessary to
suppress it or would all knowledge be
useful and
worth communicating in one way or
another there is one invention
which
I have discussed I think many years ago
supposed to be in profiles of the future
okay
and that is a Time probe if we could
ever invent something that would reveal
the past so we could see anything that
never happened
when you think of the implication of
that they're pretty appalling and would
human civilization
survive such a thing I just don't know I
don't think it's possible but I kind of
wrote it out and if a Time probe was
could be created then all the Mysteries
all the secrets that ever happens all be
revealed total transparency and I think
that's the most terrifying invention I
can think of
so if you were to invent the time probe
you might want to seal up your notes or
even burn them
hey I love it
one of the problems of course would be
that if you did have a Time probe there
would be so much time to probe that you
would never live long enough to do it
'd be a bit like the web
[Laughter]
you've written a lot of great science
fiction stories and novels do you think
that there is one you've written that
would make a great movie and you haven't
been able to convince a producer or
director of that
what would be your favorite
unfilmed project to film
oh that's an easy one to answer that's I
think my best novel is the songs of
distant Earth and then sending Mike
Oldfield is just on a beautiful Suite
based on it and it's already sold over a
hundred thousand copies
well the songs of distant Earth was in
fact I think yes um Michael Phillips
optioned at one time but the option is
lapsed meanwhile I've got several of my
stories on option
my meter impact story The Hammer Of God
Steven Spielberg has just renewed the
option on that so I hope that will go
ahead
um there's work on Fallen Moon dust uh
childhood Zen has been sitting at
Universal for about 40 years and I'm a
bit upset because the opening of
Independence Day which I've not yet seen
is identical with that of a childhood's
end
and you sent me an email saying that
oddly enough the ending of Independence
Day
was an example of anticipatory
plagiarism in which they stole the
ending from your forthcoming novel
before it was published before it even
got around to thinking it
[Laughter]
it's really synchronicity I suppose yes
it's a in fact I could come to think of
it HD Wells beat us both you know it was
a virus that killed the invading
martians well you know 2001 is
certainly the best science fiction movie
ever made and as you probably know it
was voted
um one of the greatest 10 films of all
time in that poll that's taken every 10
years of the world's film critics
directors producers archivists and so
forth by Sight and Sound magazine in
London it's considered one of the the
top 10 films of all time but so many
other science fiction films have not
followed that lead there has not been a
film since 2001 with the same kind of
vision or ambition in the science
fiction genre no perhaps not of course
2001 Kim films for about a decade until
the technology caught up with it and
then we had you know Star Wars and
and so forth which are um you know I
guess space westerns great fun I enjoy
them but you're perhaps right in saying
that no one's ever attempted to follow
the leads created by 2001. the
whole third Act of 2001 is such a
Visionary leap into the unknown the
the the feeling that
that the astronaut has arrived at a
place totally Beyond imagining and
although his physical environment seems
to be a room the room has apparently
been created by some
um other race for its own purposes
that's a
the kind of ending that today a studio
wouldn't allow the studios today would
say the audience will be confused they
won't understand it it doesn't have a
satisfactory Revolution resolution uh it
will be frustrating how did you get away
with that you and Kubrick in in in
making a a film with an ending that is
so poetic and and provocative and
unconventional well again you must
credit entirely as Stanley deserves all
the credit for that I just gave him some
ideas and inputs and the credit was
still standing and his amazing special
effects team led by Douglas Trumbull and
Wally Weavers and they deserve the
credit but then so the notion of putting
him in the in the bedroom that must have
you must have contributed to that
and again I can't remember
exact details you see there was feedback
in both directions I would write
something give it to Stanley and he say
that's Splendid but but you know I'd go
back and rewrite it and then sometimes I
had the extraordinary experience of
rewriting in peace after I'd seen the um
Sandy's version of it you know in the
rushes and so it was there was feedback
in both directions
the star child the last shot in the film
as the star child or at least 2001 fans
Now call it the star child I I don't
know if that was really
what you called it but the star child
turns and looks at the audience as if to
put the ball back in our court to ask us
what we think our destiny is and what do
you think that question was and what do
you think the answer is what is the star
child asking is and what can we how can
we respond
well
I would say that the implication is that
the future is wide open it's up to us
what we do about it our destiny is at
least to some extent under our own
control
but of course at the time
a lot of people didn't get it and one of
the remarks I remember hearing after the
premiere was from a
senior MGM executive saying despairingly
well that's the end of Stanley Kubrick
that
in your uh original short story The
Sentinel you
you talk very
dramatically of the impact on the uh
mines and on the very identities of the
people who see an artifact that is
obviously uh the creation of a race
other than the human race
why is it do you think that we still
haven't gotten any definite proof of
intelligence from anywhere else wouldn't
you
think or hope that there might be some
way that another race could make itself
known or is the universe simply too
large and is there too much time
involved well of course this is a
subject which has been debated endlessly
and we don't know the answers there's so
many possibilities
um some scientists are coming around to
the Viewpoint that we are maybe unique
or that intelligence is very very rare
although perhaps life of some kind maybe
fairly common that we have the other
dichotomy that I think about 50 percent
of the of the population in the United
States believe that aliens are already
here and have made contact with us
there's an extraordinary situation I
think it's part of the madness which
occurs at the end of all millennia
you are not one of the people who
believes in the UFOs are Among Us Theory
I've seen too many UFOs to take them
seriously I've seen about six including
the best on all with Stanley Kubrick
it's all on record and they all they all
turned out to have very simple and often
absurdly simple explanations
the one that you saw with Kubrick how
did you explain it
okay well we're this is really
incredible you think you might think I'm
making this up but the very night we
agreed to make 2001. we went on the roof
of Sandy's Penthouse and coming up from
the West Was a brilliant star rose
you know we're getting right up the sky
and apparently stopped overhead
well our first reaction was of course it
was an artificial satellite but
artificial satellites can't it's not
motionless and then it continued on down
down to the east well we actually got
checked with the New York Times to see
if there was a satellite then
um and we got onto the Pentagon and the
explanation was absurd really absurdly
simple it was a satellite it was the
echo satellite but there was a full moon
at the time and it's very hard to judge
the movement of something it vertically
overhead
if it's stationed you may think it's
moving if it's moving you may think it's
stationary it was the echo satellite but
by some extraordinary coincidence the
New York Times was gave satellite
Crossings didn't give that particular
one that particular night now you can
invent all kinds of conspiracy theories
out of this one but we did see the echo
satellite we couldn't identify it we
eventually did
the other five or six that you saw did
any of them look uh any more puzzling
than that one uh not really the most
striking one I guess a lot of brilliant
saucers flipping back and forth over the
over the sunset and again the
explanation turned out to be ridiculous
they were seagulls you wouldn't believe
this but birds at some angles reflects
almost specularly like mirrors and you
can't tell what they are if you're a
long way away
the uh
information at the end of 3001 includes
your speculations about the possibility
of instant Universal acceleration
which would allow someone to move very
quickly to another place without having
to worry about the g-forces and you seem
to feel that that might be theoretically
possible
well we know it is well a gravity field
just does just this if you're falling in
the gravity field of a
a black dwarf or a neutron star you
could be accelerating at a million G and
you wouldn't feel anything
until you got so close that the tidal
forces told you to pieces so you know
Nature has provided a space Drive in a
way if we can ever control gravity and
there's some hints that this might be
possible then we would have a space
Drive
when you started as a science fiction
writer the genre was not very
respectable
there were some good magazines John
Campbell of course at astounding was
trying to do some very high level stuff
but many of the magazines were pulps on
the level of thrilling Wonder Stories
and amazing stories today science
fiction is a genre with best sellers
with professors with PhD
research projects with books of
criticism
conferences symposiums what are your
thoughts about the development of this
genre which you are certainly one of the
small handful of of grand Masters and
and founding fathers of
well science fiction was respectable
before it got a label I mean the wells
is scientific romances or whatever you
like to call them uh you know we're
quite highly regarded and most
mainstream writers seem to have written
some science fiction quite some
surprising names I mean Roderick Kipling
for example who's I think making a bit
of a comeback nowadays you wrote stories
about the future of Aviation
and
um Melville or the robot story that's
not very well known but Bruce Frankton
put together a collection of such
stories
um and so science fiction until Hugo
gernsback came along and launched the
pulp magazines and Sven respectable so
we don't know what the the bless or
curse Hugo for making it uh maybe
popular but less respectable and I
remind of a remark made by one of my
friends in the field said you know
science fiction should go back to the
gutter where it belongs it was fun when
we were in the gutter that was getting
too respectable
yeah
I'm afraid
I'm afraid saying
ATT video phone
foreign
good morning oh good afternoon as the
case may be
good morning or afternoon for you it's
evening for us how are you I am fine
looking forward to
talking to you well you know every
parent is proud on the birthday
of a child and you must be very proud
now that Hal's birthday is finally
coming up so many years after 2001 was
released
well of course there's a problem here
because he has two birthdays one in the
book and one in the movie and I'm never
quite sure which is which or why we
changed I wanted to ask you about that
because in the book he was born in 1997
and in the movie he was born in 1992 and
Kubrick of course was uh very insistent
on that that he he wasn't going to be
fooled for a second that the birthday
was in 1997. how did that happen I have
no idea it could have been a Fluff of
the actor I just had any ideas
whatsoever and um
but obviously
um we've missed 92 so let's make the
most of 97. absolutely yeah
Browse More Related Video
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/W5sPWxFiVZI/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCJADEOABSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLB8Y8q1SOCVIT1u0U6MGxF8Gz1euw)
Edward P. Jones talks about "The Known World" and his Washington, D.C., short stories
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cIB1b_8hqB0/hq720.jpg)
Isaac Asimov's Vision Of The Future | Letterman
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ckNEdxQ0Tc0/hq720.jpg?v=666bfe96)
Nikhil Kamath x Bill Gates | People by WTF | Ep. #1
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YWm8vzMEkg0/hq720.jpg)
Solana, Whatโs Right And Whatโs Wrong
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4nnG1rGK9KQ/hq720.jpg)
Come PENSANO le MACCHINE? Spiegato dallo Scienziato Nello Cristianini
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rb7NddXDdxs/hq720.jpg)
โDeepfakes, destructionโ: Artificial intelligence's โreal dangerโ to humanity
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)