How is that not a GOAL?

Man United Chants

16 Oct 202200:49

Summary

TLDRThe script discusses a controversial moment in a soccer match where Ronaldo's goal is disallowed despite the game being on, as indicated by the referee's whistle. The commentator expresses their belief that the decision was incorrect and that the team was unfairly denied both a penalty and a goal, suggesting a growing frustration with the refereeing decisions.

Takeaways

🔊 The referee's whistle is heard before the ball is touched, indicating the game is in play.
⚽ Ronaldo's action of taking the ball on seems justified and in accordance with the game being on.
🤔 The speaker personally believes it should have been a goal, suggesting a disagreement with the decision made.
❌ The decision to disallow the goal is criticized as being incorrect by the speaker.
🚨 The team is described as being 'robbed' of a clear penalty, indicating perceived injustice by the referee's decisions.
😤 The speaker expresses frustration that the situation is not amusing anymore, hinting at a serious concern about the refereeing.
🏟️ The context implies a high-stakes game where decisions have significant impacts on the outcome.
🤨 There may be a broader issue with refereeing decisions that the speaker is alluding to, beyond just this specific incident.
📉 The speaker's dissatisfaction could reflect a larger sentiment among fans or observers of the game.
📝 The script raises questions about the consistency and fairness of officiating in the sport.

Q & A

What event is indicated by the ref's whistle in the script?
-The ref's whistle indicates the start of the game or the resumption of play after a stoppage.
Why did Ronaldo act the way he did according to the script?
-Ronaldo acted as he did because he was aware that the game was on after hearing the ref's whistle, and he was right to continue playing.
What is the speaker's opinion on Ronaldo's action in the script?
-The speaker believes Ronaldo's action was justified and that he should have been allowed to take the ball.
What was the speaker's personal view on the goal that was disallowed?
-The speaker personally thinks the goal should have been allowed and that the decision to disallow it was incorrect.
What does the speaker imply about the referee's decisions in the script?
-The speaker implies that the referee's decisions were unjust, as they involved both a missed penalty and a wrongly disallowed goal.
What is the tone of the speaker regarding the referee's decisions?
-The speaker's tone is critical and frustrated, suggesting that the referee's decisions are not amusing and are affecting the game negatively.
What specific incident is mentioned as being 'robbed' in the script?
-The incident mentioned as being 'robbed' is a clear penalty that was not awarded.
What does the speaker mean by 'this isn’t funny anymore'?
-The speaker means that the repeated unfair decisions by the referee are no longer tolerable and are causing serious discontent.
What is the implication of the phrase 'denied a clear goal' in the script?
-The implication is that a goal was scored by Ronaldo's team, but it was wrongly disallowed by the referee, which the speaker views as an injustice.
What is the overall sentiment of the script regarding the game's officiating?
-The overall sentiment is one of dissatisfaction and frustration with the officiating, suggesting that it is biased or incompetent.