How is that not a GOAL?

Man United Chants

16 Oct 202200:49

Summary

TLDRThe script discusses a controversial moment in a soccer match where Ronaldo's goal is disallowed despite the game being on, as indicated by the referee's whistle. The commentator expresses their belief that the decision was incorrect and that the team was unfairly denied both a penalty and a goal, suggesting a growing frustration with the refereeing decisions.

Takeaways

🔊 The referee's whistle is heard before the ball is touched, indicating the game is in play.
⚽ Ronaldo's action of taking the ball on seems justified and in accordance with the game being on.
🤔 The speaker personally believes it should have been a goal, suggesting a disagreement with the decision made.
❌ The decision to disallow the goal is criticized as being incorrect by the speaker.
🚨 The team is described as being 'robbed' of a clear penalty, indicating perceived injustice by the referee's decisions.
😤 The speaker expresses frustration that the situation is not amusing anymore, hinting at a serious concern about the refereeing.
🏟️ The context implies a high-stakes game where decisions have significant impacts on the outcome.
🤨 There may be a broader issue with refereeing decisions that the speaker is alluding to, beyond just this specific incident.
📉 The speaker's dissatisfaction could reflect a larger sentiment among fans or observers of the game.
📝 The script raises questions about the consistency and fairness of officiating in the sport.

Q & A

What event is indicated by the ref's whistle in the script?
-The ref's whistle indicates the start of the game or the resumption of play after a stoppage.
Why did Ronaldo act the way he did according to the script?
-Ronaldo acted as he did because he was aware that the game was on after hearing the ref's whistle, and he was right to continue playing.
What is the speaker's opinion on Ronaldo's action in the script?
-The speaker believes Ronaldo's action was justified and that he should have been allowed to take the ball.
What was the speaker's personal view on the goal that was disallowed?
-The speaker personally thinks the goal should have been allowed and that the decision to disallow it was incorrect.
What does the speaker imply about the referee's decisions in the script?
-The speaker implies that the referee's decisions were unjust, as they involved both a missed penalty and a wrongly disallowed goal.
What is the tone of the speaker regarding the referee's decisions?
-The speaker's tone is critical and frustrated, suggesting that the referee's decisions are not amusing and are affecting the game negatively.
What specific incident is mentioned as being 'robbed' in the script?
-The incident mentioned as being 'robbed' is a clear penalty that was not awarded.
What does the speaker mean by 'this isn’t funny anymore'?
-The speaker means that the repeated unfair decisions by the referee are no longer tolerable and are causing serious discontent.
What is the implication of the phrase 'denied a clear goal' in the script?
-The implication is that a goal was scored by Ronaldo's team, but it was wrongly disallowed by the referee, which the speaker views as an injustice.
What is the overall sentiment of the script regarding the game's officiating?
-The overall sentiment is one of dissatisfaction and frustration with the officiating, suggesting that it is biased or incompetent.

Outlines

00:00

😤 Disputed Goal Decision

The paragraph discusses a controversial moment in a football match where Ronaldo's action to take the ball after the referee's whistle is questioned. The speaker believes that Ronaldo was correct in his actions and that the goal should have been allowed, expressing their personal opinion that the decision to disallow it was wrong. The speaker also mentions feeling robbed of a clear penalty, adding to the frustration of the situation.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡ref

The term 'ref' is short for 'referee,' which refers to the official responsible for enforcing the rules and maintaining order during a sports game, particularly in football. In the context of the video, the referee's action of blowing the whistle signifies the start or continuation of play, which is a critical moment as it affects the players' actions and the game's outcome. The script mentions the ref's whistle being blown before the ball is touched, indicating the game is on, and this decision is central to the discussion about whether a goal should have been allowed.

💡whistle

A 'whistle' in sports, especially football, is a device used by the referee to signal various events such as the start of play, stoppages, fouls, or the end of a match. The sound of the whistle is a universal signal that commands attention and obedience from the players. In the script, the whistle's blow is a pivotal moment, as it precedes Ronaldo's action, suggesting that play was active and his subsequent move to take the ball was within the rules.

💡Ronaldo

Ronaldo, referring to the famous football player Cristiano Ronaldo, is central to the video's narrative. His actions and decisions on the field are the subject of the discussion. The script suggests that Ronaldo was right to take the ball, indicating that his actions were in accordance with his understanding of the game's state, which was ongoing as signaled by the referee's whistle.

💡goal

A 'goal' in football is the act of scoring by getting the ball into the opposing team's net, which results in a point for the scoring team. The script expresses a personal opinion that a goal should have been awarded, suggesting that there was a play where the ball was put into the net but was not counted by the officials, which is a point of contention in the video.

💡wrong decision

The phrase 'wrong decision' implies that an official judgment made during the game was incorrect according to the speaker's perspective. In the context of the video, it refers to the disallowance of a goal that the speaker believes should have been counted. This decision is a focal point of the video's critique, as it directly impacts the game's fairness and outcome.

💡penalty

A 'penalty' in football is a sanction given against a team that commits a foul, usually resulting in a free kick for the opposing team from a specific spot on the field. The script mentions being 'robbed of a clear penalty,' suggesting that the speaker believes a foul was committed that should have resulted in a penalty kick but was not awarded by the officials, adding to the perceived injustice in the game.

💡denied

To be 'denied' something in the context of sports often means that a team or player was prevented from achieving a legitimate opportunity, such as scoring a goal. The script uses this term to express the speaker's belief that the team was unfairly prevented from a goal, which is a significant emotional point in the video, indicating frustration and a sense of being wronged.

💡clear

The term 'clear' in this context suggests something that is unmistakable or obvious. It is used to emphasize the speaker's conviction that the instances of a penalty and a goal were evident and should have been recognized by the officials. The use of 'clear' serves to underscore the perceived errors in officiating and the video's argument for a more accurate decision-making process.

💡funny

In the script, 'this isn’t funny anymore' is an idiomatic expression that conveys the speaker's serious frustration or annoyance with the situation. It implies that the repeated perceived injustices in the game have crossed a line from being tolerable or amusing to being genuinely upsetting. This phrase is a key emotional indicator in the video, showing the gravity of the speaker's dissatisfaction.

💡decision

A 'decision' in the context of sports refers to a choice made by officials, coaches, or players that can affect the outcome of the game. The script discusses a 'wrong decision' regarding the disallowance of a goal, highlighting the critical nature of decisions in sports and their potential to influence the game's fairness and the players' morale.

Highlights

The referee's whistle is clearly audible before the ball is touched, indicating the game is underway.

Ronaldo's awareness of the game being on is highlighted.

Ronaldo's decision to take the ball on is justified.

A personal opinion is expressed that the disallowed goal should have been counted.

The decision to disallow the goal is critiqued as incorrect.

A clear penalty is mentioned as being unjustly overlooked.

The denial of a clear goal is emphasized as a significant issue.

The situation is described as not being amusing anymore, implying a serious concern.

The transcript suggests a possible bias or error in the referee's decisions.

The importance of correct officiating in the game is underscored.

The transcript conveys a sense of frustration with the game's outcome.

The impact of the referee's decisions on the game's result is discussed.

The transcript raises questions about the fairness of the game.

The transcript captures a moment of controversy in the game.

The transcript reflects on the emotional response to the game's events.

The transcript suggests a need for a review of the referee's decisions.

The transcript serves as a critique of the game's officiating.