PikaOS 4 Why did They Switch from Ubuntu to Debian?

Summary

The video offers an in-depth exploration of P OS, a Linux distribution. It discusses the transition from Ubuntu to Debian, the rationale being the issues with Ubuntu 2.0. The presenter highlights over 200 custom packages, the kernel's advanced features including optimizations and scheduler options, and the use of both Debian and Sid repositories. The video also touches on the challenges faced with package management and the active development to improve the system. Viewers are encouraged to ask questions for a follow-up video.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video discusses the transition of Pop!_OS to a Debian base, moving away from Ubuntu due to issues with Ubuntu 2.
• 🛠️ Pop!_OS now uses a mix of Debian and Sid repositories, with all packages built from scratch and ABI standardized.
• 🔧 The distribution includes over 200 custom packages, including NVIDIA drivers, firmware, PipeWire, Mesa, and more.
• 💻 The kernel in Pop!_OS has optimizations like AVX2, LTO, and the ability to change schedulers, offering flexibility.
• 📈 The video highlights the importance of keeping the system up-to-date with the latest packages for real stability, rather than relying on an LTS base.
• 🔄 The development team is focused on integrating the best features from both Manjaro and Pop!_OS, creating a hybrid experience.
• 🎛️ Pop!_OS now offers kernel management, allowing users to choose between different kernel versions and schedulers.
• 📦 The package manager in Pop!_OS is simple and functional, with the video showing how to update packages and handle potential issues.
• 🖥️ The video mentions the existence of a driver manager and software updates tool, indicating a comprehensive system management approach.
• 🎮 The creator plans to do a gaming video to further test the performance and stability of Pop!_OS after driver updates.

Q & A

What is the significance of the recent update in P OS?

The recent update in P OS is significant because it includes a shift from Ubuntu to Debian as the base, along with optimizations like LTO and AVX2, and the introduction of a new kernel manager with multiple schedulers.

Why did P OS switch from Ubuntu to Debian?

P OS switched from Ubuntu to Debian due to issues with Ubuntu 2, which was described as a disaster and difficult to work with. Debian offers a more stable and up-to-date base for development.

How many packages were updated in the recent P OS update?

The exact number of packages updated is not specified in the script, but it mentions that all packages are built from scratch using a mix of Debian and Sid, with over 200 custom made packages.

What does the term 'ABI standardized' refer to in the context of P OS?

In the context of P OS, 'ABI standardized' likely refers to the Application Binary Interface being standardized, ensuring compatibility between different software components.

What is the role of the kernel in the P OS update?

The kernel in the P OS update is crucial as it includes all the optimizations from Cashios, such as AVX2, LTO, and the ability to change schedulers, enhancing performance and flexibility.

What are the additional features included in the custom made packages for P OS?

The custom made packages for P OS include features like NVIDIA drivers, firmware, PipeWire, Mesa, XDG, Steam, Lutris, and more, going beyond what Debian offers.

How does P OS ensure the stability of the system while updating packages?

P OS ensures stability by thoroughly testing all packages, including working system, GNOME, GTK, KDE, QT, and more, and only freezing them until the next time everything passes testing.

What is the kernel manager in P OS and what does it do?

The kernel manager in P OS allows users to choose between different kernel versions and configurations, including the latest and release candidate versions, providing flexibility and control over system performance.

Why did the video creator mention the importance of the LTS (Long Term Support) version?

The video creator mentioned the importance of the LTS version to highlight the difference between stability in terms of having the least amount of bugs and the idea of being up-to-date with the latest software.

What is the current status of the package manager in P OS as discussed in the script?

As of the script, the package manager in P OS is a work in progress. The video creator encountered a 'permission denied' issue but was able to update packages using pseudo commands.

What is the stance of P OS on including proprietary software?

The video script indicates a preference for less closed-source software in P OS, with a mention of the creator's dislike for APX (AppImage) and a preference for open systems.