The Bronze Age Collapse - The Wheel and the Rod - Extra History - Part 2
Summary
TLDRThis script explores the advanced yet fragile nature of late Bronze Age societies, which relied heavily on bronze for trade and warfare. The script discusses the economic and social structures that thrived due to this trade, including the importance of chariots and the hereditary warrior class. It also touches on the centralized governments and command economies that oversaw everything from agriculture to irrigation. The script suggests that the very sophistication of these societies, including their dependence on writing and record-keeping, may have contributed to their eventual collapse, as the interdependent systems made them vulnerable to cascading failures.
Takeaways
- 🔄 The Bronze Age was a period of significant advancement and sophistication in technology, social policies, and political structures.
- 🌐 Bronze was a crucial material that necessitated extensive trade networks, similar to modern-day reliance on petroleum.
- 🏰 The prosperity of Bronze Age societies was linked to their complex trade systems, which also made them vulnerable to collapse if trade was disrupted.
- 🛡️ Chariots were the dominant military technology, but their high cost and maintenance requirements could strain kingdoms' resources.
- 👥 The loss of a significant portion of the warrior class due to war or other catastrophes could destabilize societies that relied on them.
- 🏛️ Centralized governments in the Bronze Age had an unprecedented level of control, organizing economies and resources from the top down.
- 🌾 Advanced irrigation systems supported high crop yields and large populations, but their maintenance required centralized planning and could lead to overpopulation and soil degradation.
- 📜 Writing was vital for record-keeping and diplomacy, but the reliance on scribes made societies vulnerable if the scribe class was disrupted.
- 💔 The interconnectedness of trade, agriculture, education, and bureaucracy made Bronze Age societies both advanced and fragile, with the potential for a cascading collapse.
- 🔍 The script suggests that the very factors that made Bronze Age societies impressive may have also contributed to their eventual downfall.
Q & A
What was the significance of bronze in the Bronze Age societies?
-Bronze, an alloy of tin and copper, was crucial as it was used extensively in various aspects of society, from farming to warfare. The scarcity of tin and copper in many regions necessitated extensive trade networks, making bronze a cornerstone of the Bronze Age economy and military strength.
How did the Bronze Age trade system compare to modern trade systems?
-The Bronze Age trade system was akin to modern-day trade in terms of its importance for societal functioning. It was a globalized and internationalized system, with bronze at its core, facilitating trade in a wide range of goods and services.
What was the role of chariots in the military strategies of the Bronze Age?
-Chariots were central to the military forces of the Bronze Age civilizations. They were expensive, required specialized training, and were maintained by a hereditary warrior class, making them a symbol of power and a decisive factor in warfare.
Why were chariots a potential liability for Bronze Age societies?
-Chariots were a liability because they were difficult and costly to maintain. If a society faced economic collapse or lost a significant portion of its warrior class, it could not easily replace the chariots or the skilled personnel required to operate them, leaving it vulnerable.
How did centralized governments in the Bronze Age impact the economy?
-Centralized governments in the Bronze Age controlled economies through command structures, dictating agricultural practices and resource allocation. This central planning led to efficient use of resources but also made societies vulnerable if the central authority failed.
What were the advantages and disadvantages of the irrigation systems used in Bronze Age societies?
-The sophisticated irrigation systems of the Bronze Age allowed for high crop yields, supporting large populations and complex societies. However, they required maintenance and centralized planning, and their failure could lead to decreased agricultural output and societal collapse.
How did the reliance on writing in the Bronze Age create potential vulnerabilities?
-The Bronze Age societies relied heavily on writing for record-keeping and diplomacy. However, this created a vulnerability as the loss of scribes or the disruption of record-keeping could destabilize societies that depended on these written records for their functioning.
What were the consequences of overpopulation in Bronze Age societies?
-Overpopulation in Bronze Age societies led to health and sanitation issues, strained employment opportunities, and the potential for social unrest. It also put pressure on the agricultural system, exacerbating problems like soil degradation.
How did soil degradation affect the sustainability of Bronze Age societies?
-Soil degradation due to intensive farming practices reduced crop yields over time. This decline in agricultural output, combined with the growing population, threatened the ability of Bronze Age societies to sustain their complex structures and populations.
What factors contributed to the fragility of advanced Bronze Age societies?
-The complexity and advanced nature of Bronze Age societies made them fragile due to their interdependence on trade, agriculture, education, and bureaucracy. The removal of any link in these chains could cause significant damage, leading to potential societal collapse.
Outlines
🔩 The Interconnectedness and Fragility of Late Bronze Age Societies
This paragraph discusses the advanced nature of societies during the late Bronze Age, which was marked by a highly interconnected global trade system centered around bronze. The reliance on bronze for various aspects of life, from farming to warfare, necessitated extensive trade networks. The wealth generated by this trade was unparalleled, yet it also made these societies vulnerable, as they were akin to a Jenga tower—stable only as long as the components remained in place. The paragraph highlights the potential role of this trade system in the eventual collapse of the Bronze Age, as it created a dependency that could not withstand significant disruptions.
🌾 The Impact of Advanced Agriculture and Bureaucracy on Late Bronze Age Civilizations
The second paragraph delves into the agricultural and bureaucratic complexities of late Bronze Age societies. It emphasizes the high crop yields made possible by sophisticated irrigation systems, which supported large, specialized urban populations. However, it also points out the risks associated with over-reliance on these systems, such as the potential for collapse if the irrigation failed or if the population outgrew the agricultural capacity. The paragraph further discusses the challenges of overpopulation, soil degradation due to intensive farming, and the societal implications of a highly centralized government and economy. It concludes by reflecting on the paradoxical nature of writing and record-keeping as both an asset and a liability, suggesting that the very advancements that marked the Bronze Age's prosperity also sowed the seeds of its fragility.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Bronze Age
💡Trade
💡Chariot
💡Hereditary Warrior Class
💡Centralized Government
💡Command Economy
💡Irrigation
💡Overpopulation
💡Soil Degradation
💡Writing
Highlights
The Bronze Age societies were highly advanced and connected, yet their complexity may have led to their downfall.
Bronze, an alloy of tin and copper, was central to the Bronze Age civilizations due to its necessity in various aspects of life.
Trade was essential for Bronze Age societies, as it was required for the functioning of their societies, similar to modern-day dependence on petroleum.
The Bronze Age saw a material standard of wealth for the nobility that was unrivaled until the Classical Age.
The interconnected system of trade, while beneficial, may have been a factor leading to the Bronze Age's collapse due to its fragility.
Chariots were the dominant military technology, but their high cost and maintenance requirements made them a liability during economic downturns.
The loss of a hereditary warrior class due to war or economic collapse could lead to the inability to maintain a sophisticated military structure.
Centralized governments in the Bronze Age had an unprecedented level of control, organizing economies and resources.
Command economies in the late Bronze Age were highly organized but vulnerable to the collapse of central authority.
Sophisticated irrigation systems supported high crop yields and large populations, but their maintenance required centralized planning.
Overpopulation and soil degradation were long-term issues that could have contributed to the decline of Bronze Age societies.
The reliance on writing for record-keeping and diplomacy made societies vulnerable when scribes were no longer available.
The complexity of Bronze Age society, with its interwoven systems, made it more fragile as the potential for damage increased with each link removed.
The very advancements that made late Bronze Age society impressive also made it more susceptible to collapse.
The upcoming discussion will explore the potential causes that led to the snapping of the complex chains of Bronze Age society.
Transcripts
The wheel turns,
ages pass,
society becomes more advanced.
Advancement leads to stability,
to connection, to peace.
But what happens, when that's not true?
Often, when we think of the ancient past,
the times before the Greeks and the Romans,
we think of a barbaric, or a primitive age.
But that age of barbarism we think of,
actually followed the late Bronze Age collapse.
Before the collapse, there were societies that wouldn't be rivaled again for half a millennium.
So today, let's look at the technology,
social policies and political structures
that made these kingdoms so impressive,
so advanced.
And that may in the end
have lead to their downfall.
First, we have to talk about bronze itself.
As we touched on last time,
bronze is an alloy of tin and copper.
And most of the Bronze Age world
was missing at least one those components.
This meant that Bronze Age civilisations
had to trade.
And I'm not just talking about small time exchanging of shinies.
We're talking a full on, modern day
"our society requires trade to function" type of trade.
Everything from farmng to war
depended on bronze.
Much in the same way it depends on petroleum today.
So a globalised, internationalised system of trade
sprung up around bronze.
And with it came trade in almost every other good.
This was a positive thing.
It allowed a material standard of wealth,
especially for the nobility that was
unrivaled anywhere in the world,
except maybe for China.
This level of wealth wouldn't be seen again, until the Classical Age.
But it also meant that the kingdoms of the period
were sort of like a Jenga tower.
They stood tall, but if too many pieces got pulled out,
that whole thing would come crashing down.
So, this interconnected system of trade
while enormously beneficial,
may perhaps have also been one of the factors
leading to the Bronze Age's collapse.
Next, let's talk war. Because in this period,
the chariot was king.
Almost all the major powers of the time
built their armies around a chariot core of one type or another.
And here's the thing about chariots:
they're really expensive and they're difficult to use.
You can sort of think of them like medieval knights.
It takes a lifetime of training to use these weapons,
and maintaining them costs a small fortune.
This meant that, like medieval knights,
Many kingdoms had a hereditary warrior class
that was dedicated to doing just this.
But what happens if you lose a ton of those guys at once?
You can't just replace them. It takes years
to train a guy up to the point where
he can be proficient with a chariot.
And what happens if your economy collapses?
You no longer have the spare resources
to maintain a caste whose singular role
is to train to use some complex weapon.
Much less to pay artisans to build that weapon,
and technicians to maintain it.
And so,
while this particular engine of war
was highly effective in a time when we
hadn't really bred horses big enough
to carry a man in full armor,
It was also a liability.
If things went really wrong,
you could no longer maintain
this highly sophisticated military machine.
And then what happens
if you need to defend yourself?
What happens if you face some outside threat?
What happens if you have to fight,
but your whole conception of what an army is
is no longer viable?
And so again, this very weapon that
made many of these states so dominant
is perhaps one of the dominoes
that sets us up for the Bronze Age Collapse.
And, since we're talking about armies,
let's talk about the governments they fought for.
Because these were incredibly organized, incredibly centralized
governments.
The level of central control
in the late Bronze Age state is
almost mind-boggling.
Far, far beyond the monarchies of the Middle Ages,
perhaps even more than many modern states.
Which is important because
due to this centralized control,
many of the late Bronze Age kingdoms
were structured as command economies.
Every piece of grain,
every dram of olive oil,
every bar of bronze
was tallied by the central government.
Farmers were told what to plant,
where to plant, and when.
Mines were state-run operations.
And,
clearly this varies a bit
from nation to nation,
but from Egypt to Mycenae,
you had top-down economies
organized by the central authority.
But what happens to a top-down economy
when the top
goes missing?
If you're a laborer,
and, every year
an official comes
and gives you the seeds
you were supposed to plant,
and tells you when and where
to plant them,
What happens if that official
just stops showing up?
And this issue is compounded by
two other pieces of technology:
the first is irrigation.
Bronze Age societies had very sophisticated
irrigation systems.
These were massive public works projects
that took effort to maintain.
And it took some element
of centralized planning
to build them efficiently, to
maximize crop yield.
After all, having every farmer dig
their own irrigation
is gonna get way messier than simply
laying out a thousand plots at once.
This was great,
as it meant high crop yields
which in turn meant
that you could support big cities
filled with artisans, priests,
warrior-nobles and bureaucrats.
And being able to support
so many specialized positions
in turn means more material wealth,
a stronger government,
and more opportunities for innovation.
But what happens when that irrigation system gets destroyed?
Or simply,
stops functioning as efficiently?
Well,
then you've got a whole mess of people
in your society
who don't make food.
And, even ignoring the potential problems
that arise from the fact that
some of these people are *very well-armed*,
what happens when you
can't support the non-food producers,
but *they're* the planners who make this system run?
The problem just compounds
until you have a runaway collapse.
And that's not the only problem
cause by using advanced irrigation
to support an ever-growing population.
First,
there's the obvious issue of overpopulation.
Even if your food supply
can support a large number of people,
can the rest of your infrastructure?
There are health and sewage concerns.
There's a question as to whether
your economy can really employ
all of these people.
And of course,
there's the question of
whether you can keep these people from revolting.
But there's also a less obvious problem with
this type of intense agriculture.
And that is
soil degradation.
Whenever you heavily farm an area,
you leech out minerals.
You create erosion, and
you disturb the soil biology.
Today,
we do a great deal with
modern farming techniques
to avoid this, but the late Bronze Age
was perhaps the first time that
humans had farmed on this scale.
And,
as we mentioned last time,
while the Nile did bring with it
rich silt that helped to restore
the soil whenever it flooded,
This just wasn't true of
many of the other kingdoms.
And so, silently,
year after year,
perhaps too slowly
for anyone to really notice,
crop yields decreased.
And with them,
the ability to support the ever-growing population
of the late Bronze Age states.
And lastly,
we have to talk about writing.
Because
the Bronze Age world had come to rely
on writing, for everything from
highly advanced record-keeping,
to international diplomacy.
But a scribe is sort of like a knight
of letters.
They're amazingly powerful
but they're also expensive,
and they require training from a young age.
And,
though history shows that having the written word
propels civilizations forward,
and
that every small increase in literacy
ends up rippling out into
large increases in the wellbeing
of a society over time,
even this idea
that we usually think of as a
purely positive, beneficial technology,
creates a potential liability.
After all,
if your whole society
depends on written records and on record-keeping,
what do you do when there's no one left
to write the records?
And so,
piece by piece,
the very complexity,
the very advanced-ness (?)
that made late Bronze Age society
so impressive,
so much better to live in than
anything that followed for hundreds of years,
also made them more fragile.
As societies became complex,
interweaving chains of
trade, agriculture, education and bureaucracy,
the potential damage that could be caused
by removing any link from those chains
grew and grew.
So join us next time,
as we look at
what might have caused those chains to snap.
Browse More Related Video
Did the Bronze Age Really Collapse? Ancient History DOCUMENTARY
HISTÓRIA GERAL #1 MESOPOTÂMIA: (FORMAÇÃO, POLÍTICA E ECONOMIA)
The Minoans: The First Great European Civilization (The legend of Atlantis) - See U in History
Corak Kehidupan Masyarakat Pra aksara (Sejarah Indonesia Kelas X) MAN Kota Cimahi
The Bronze Age Collapse - Systems Collapse - Extra History - Part 4
The Bronze Age Collapse - Before the Storm - Extra History - Part 1
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)