NCCMT - URE - Effectiveness of Interventions - Understanding the Number Needed to Treat

NCCMT | CCNMO
4 Jul 201610:43

Summary

TLDRThe video script discusses the complexities of decision-making in public health, especially when selecting interventions with limited resources. It introduces the model of evidence-informed decision-making and emphasizes the importance of considering the magnitude of the problem, available resources, and societal preferences. The script also explains how to calculate and interpret the Number Needed to Treat (NNT), a measure that helps public health decision-makers understand the impact of interventions on a population level. It provides examples of calculating NNT for interventions like social media-based pregnancy prevention and car seat installation clinics, highlighting the balance between benefits and potential harms.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ’ก Public health decision-making can be complex due to finite budgets and multiple effective interventions.
  • ๐Ÿ” The National collaborating Center for methods and tools suggests using evidence-informed decision-making models in public health.
  • ๐Ÿ“Š Decision-makers should consider the magnitude of the problem, available resources, and societal preferences when choosing interventions.
  • ๐Ÿงฎ Number Needed to Treat (NNT) is a useful measure to calculate how many people need an intervention for one to benefit, aiding in decision-making.
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ NNT is calculated by dividing 1 by the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR), which is the difference in outcome rates between control and intervention groups.
  • ๐Ÿค” Calculating NNT helps interpret research results, showing how likely and impactful an intervention is on a population level.
  • ๐Ÿšซ NNTs are not always reported in studies, so public health professionals may need to calculate them using provided data.
  • ๐Ÿ‘ถ The script provides an example of calculating NNT for a social media-based teenage pregnancy prevention campaign.
  • ๐Ÿš— Another example is given for a car seat installation clinic, demonstrating how NNT can be calculated and interpreted for different interventions.
  • โš ๏ธ Number Needed to Harm (NNH) is also introduced to consider potential negative outcomes of interventions, balancing benefits and risks.
  • ๐Ÿ’‰ Number Needed to Immunize (NNI) is mentioned as a related concept, important for immunization programs to prevent diseases.

Q & A

  • What is the primary challenge faced by health departments when choosing interventions?

    -The primary challenge is deciding which intervention to implement among many effective ones due to a finite budget.

  • How does the model of evidence-informed decision-making assist in public health decisions?

    -It assists by considering not only research evidence but also the magnitude of the problem, resources needed, and societal and political preferences.

  • What additional factors do decision-makers need to consider when making decisions across the spectrum of public health services?

    -They need to compare the benefits and resources required for different interventions to determine which delivers the greatest impact for the investment.

  • What are the three valuable concepts that can help in decision-making but do not tell you everything about an intervention's effectiveness?

    -Relative risks, odds ratios, and confidence intervals help estimate the likelihood and size of an effect but do not indicate who the intervention worked for or how many people experienced the desired outcome.

  • What is the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and how is it calculated?

    -NNT is the number of people who need to receive an intervention for one person to experience a positive outcome. It is calculated as 1 divided by the absolute risk reduction (ARR).

  • Why is it important to calculate the NNT for public health interventions?

    -Calculating NNT provides a clear understanding of how many people need to be exposed to an intervention to achieve a single positive outcome, aiding in resource allocation and program decision-making.

  • In the example of teenage pregnancy prevention using social media, what was the calculated NNT?

    -The calculated NNT was 67, meaning 67 teenagers need to receive the intervention to prevent one pregnancy over a one-year period.

  • What is the significance of a smaller NNT in public health interventions?

    -A smaller NNT indicates that fewer people need to be exposed to the intervention for one positive outcome, suggesting a greater potential impact at a population level.

  • What is the Number Needed to Harm (NNH) and how does it differ from NNT?

    -NNH is the number of people who need to be exposed to an intervention for one person to experience an unintended negative outcome. It differs from NNT by focusing on harm rather than benefit.

  • How can the concept of NNT be applied to immunization programs?

    -The Number Needed to Immunize (NNI) is calculated similarly to NNT and tells us how many people need to be immunized to avoid one negative outcome, such as death from an infection.

  • Why are NNTs, NNHs, and NNIs considered powerful tools for public health decision-makers?

    -These measures provide clear, quantifiable information on the impact and potential harm of interventions, aiding decision-makers in making informed choices about public health programs.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Public HealthDecision MakingHealth InterventionsResource AllocationEvidence-BasedHealth PoliciesCommunity HealthPrevention StrategiesHealth CampaignsRisk Assessment