Kingdom of Maharlika Belonging to the Royal Family of Tagean-Tallano

iAm MenZoNe

25 Feb 201309:07

Summary

TLDRThe video script discusses the controversial claim that the entire Philippine archipelago is owned by a single Italian family, the Tagean-Tano dynasty. It explores historical documents, including court decisions and titles, suggesting the family's ownership dates back to the Maharlika era. The narrative also touches on the Spanish and British colonial periods, leading to a royal decree that recognized the family's claim. Despite the passage of time and changes in governance, the family's legal claim remains unchallenged, sparking debates on land ownership and historical injustices.

Takeaways

🏰 The entire Philippine archipelago is claimed to be owned by a single family, which seems unbelievable but is supported by historical documents.
📜 The claim is backed by titles, court decisions, and notarized documents that assert the authenticity of the ownership.
👥 Prominent figures, including former Solicitor Generals and Supreme Court Justices, have defended the family's claim, lending credibility to the narrative.
🏛 The story suggests that the archipelago was part of the Maharlika kingdom under the Italian royal family, the Tagalans, until the Spanish conquest.
🛡 During the Spanish rule, high taxes were imposed, leading Italian administrators to appeal to the Spanish Queen against the Spanish abuses.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 The British issued a royal decree recognizing the Italian royal family's claim to the archipelago, which was later confirmed by the Treaty of Paris.
💵 The United States purchased the Philippines from Spain for 20 million US dollars, with Don Esteban Benitez paying on behalf of Prince Julian Morden.
🏦 Under American governance, the ownership claim was further solidified by Act number 496, which transformed the purchase title into a Torrens title.
📝 The Torrens title is considered inalienable and cannot be cancelled, ensuring the owner's rights over the land against any encroachment.
🌱 The land is portrayed as more than wealth; it is life, and the story of the Italian family's claim is intertwined with the struggle of Filipinos for their land rights.

Q & A

What is the claim made about the ownership of the Philippines in the script?
-The script claims that the entire archipelago of the Philippines is owned by a single family, which is considered unbelievable but is supported by certain historical documents and legal decisions.
What historical evidence is mentioned in the script to support the ownership claim?
-The script mentions titles, decisions of the court, execution of sheriff's returns, and annotations on titles as evidence. It also refers to the Dal volume of documentary evidence and the Supreme Court's validation of the story.
Who are some of the notable figures mentioned as defenders of the family's claim in the Philippines?
-The script mentions former Solicitor Generals and Supreme Court Justices such as Felix Maasar, Antonio Barredo, and Hugo Gutierrez, as well as prominent lawyers like Ferdinand V. Marcos, Lorenzo Tanada, Claro M. Recto, Jose Diokno, Emmanuel Pelaez, and Jose Yulo.
What is the historical context of the term 'Maharlika' mentioned in the script?
-Maharlika refers to a kingdom under the Angkan of Tajean, an Italian lineage, from the 14th to the 15th century. The lands of the Maharlika were passed down through generations of the Angkan family.
How did the Spanish colonization affect the ownership of the land in the Philippines according to the script?
-The script suggests that during Spanish colonization, the archipelago was expanded, and high taxes were imposed. The Italian administrators appealed to the Spanish Queen against the oppression of the Spanish, leading to a royal decree that returned the ownership of the archipelago to the Angkan of Tajean.
What is the significance of the Royal Decree Protocol 01-4 mentioned in the script?
-The Royal Decree Protocol 01-4 is significant as it recognized the ownership of the archipelago by the Angkan of Tajean and was later transformed into a Torrens title, which cannot be cancelled and solidifies the ownership rights.
Who is Prince Julian Morden Tano and what is his connection to the ownership claim?
-Prince Julian Morden Tano is a descendant of Don Esteban Benitez, who is mentioned as the one who paid for the Philippines through US gold coins, and is recognized as the holder of the original certificate of title or OCT 01-4.
What is the Act number 496 and its relevance to the ownership claim?
-Act number 496 is a law passed under the American government that transformed the title de compra into a Torrens title, further solidifying the Italian family's ownership claim over the land.
How does the script describe the importance of land to the people?
-The script emphasizes that land is not just wealth but life itself, and the story of the Italian family's claim is intertwined with the story of the Filipino people who have lost their rights to the land in their own country.
What is the goal of the Italian family's defense of their claim according to the script?
-The script suggests that the Italian family's defense of their claim is not for their own interest but aims to return the land to the Filipino people for their benefit.

Outlines

00:00

🏰 The Claim of a Single Family's Ownership Over the Philippines

The video script discusses an incredible claim that the entire Philippine archipelago is owned by a single family, which seems unbelievable but is supported by historical documents. The narrative is backed by court decisions, titles, and government certifications that validate the authenticity of the claim. The story is further supported by prominent figures in Philippine legal history, including former Solicitor Generals and Supreme Court Justices, who have defended the family's rights. The documentary series aims to reveal a version of history that challenges the conventional narrative, suggesting that the land was not rightfully acquired but is part of a larger historical dispute.

05:00

📜 The Historical Land Titles and Their Impact on Philippine Sovereignty

This paragraph delves into the historical context of land ownership in the Philippines, focusing on the Royal Decree Protocol 01-4, which recognized the ownership rights of the Italian royal family over the archipelago. The British government's issuance of a royal decree, based on the laws of West Indies, further complicated the issue by transferring the rights to the Italian royal family. The narrative continues with the Treaty of Paris, where Spain sold the Philippines to the United States, yet the land titles remained with the Italian family. The American government's Act number 496 transformed the titles into a more secure form, ensuring the family's rights over the land. The paragraph emphasizes the significance of land as life and the sacrifices made by those who fought for it, hinting at a deeper historical and legal struggle for the rightful ownership and control of the Philippine land.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Archipelago

An archipelago refers to a group of islands, typically small, that are located close together in the sea. In the context of the video, the term 'Archipelago' is used to describe the geographical makeup of the Philippines, emphasizing its island nature and the historical significance of these islands being claimed by a single family, which is a central theme of the video.

💡Ownership

Ownership in this context refers to the legal and rightful claim to the possession of something, in this case, the land of the Philippines. The video discusses the controversial claim of ownership by a single family, which is a key point of contention and the main focus of the narrative.

💡Philippine Islands

The Philippine Islands are the main subject of the video, being the geographical area in question regarding the claim of ownership. The term is used to highlight the historical and political complexities surrounding the control and governance of these islands.

💡Royal Decree Protocol 01-4

This term refers to a specific legal document or set of laws mentioned in the video that are claimed to support the ownership of the Philippine Islands by the Tagalog family. The Royal Decree Protocol 01-4 is presented as a key piece of evidence in the video's argument about the legitimacy of the family's claim.

💡Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in a country, and in the video, it is mentioned in relation to the validation of the ownership claims. The video suggests that past solicitors general and Supreme Court justices have supported the narrative of the Tagalog family's ownership.

💡Title of Ownership

A title of ownership is a legal document that proves one's right to own a piece of property. In the video, the titles are discussed as crucial evidence supporting the family's claim to the Philippine Islands, and they are said to be validated by various government officials and legal authorities.

💡Tort Claim

A tort claim refers to a legal action seeking compensation for a wrong or injury caused by another party. In the video, the term is used to describe the potential legal actions against those who might challenge the family's ownership of the land, emphasizing the strength of their claim.

💡Land

Land, in the video, is not just a physical entity but is also a symbol of life and heritage. It is central to the narrative as the contested object of ownership. The video discusses the historical and emotional significance of land to the people of the Philippines, and how the claim affects their rights and identity.

💡Italian Noble Family

The Italian Noble Family mentioned in the video is the Tagalog family, who are claimed to be of Italian nobility and are central to the narrative of the video. Their lineage and supposed historical ties to the Philippine Islands form the backbone of the video's exploration of ownership and heritage.

💡Historical Narrative

The historical narrative in the video refers to the story of how the Philippine Islands came to be claimed by the Tagalog family. It includes discussions of past rulers, legal documents, and the transformation of titles, all of which contribute to the video's exploration of the family's claim to the land.

💡Legal Documents

Legal documents, such as titles and certificates of ownership, are highlighted in the video as evidence supporting the family's claim. These documents are said to have been validated by various government officials and are central to the argument being presented about the legitimacy of the ownership.

Highlights

The entire Philippine archipelago is claimed to be owned by a single family, which is hard to believe but has some truth to it.

The story is supported by various documents such as court decisions, titles, and notarizations that validate the authenticity of the titles.

The story is not easily dismissed by former solicitors general and Supreme Court justices like Felix Maasar, Antonio Barredo, and Hugo Gutierrez.

Prominent Filipino lawyers like former President Ferdinand V. Marcos, Senator Lorenzo Tanada, and others have defended the Italian family's claim.

The Italian family's current representative is Prince Julian Morden Tano, who is the current claimant of the Philippine archipelago.

Before the Spanish conquest, the archipelago and the islands of Guam and Hawaii were known as Maharlika, a kingdom under the Italian royal family.

The lands of the Maharlika were passed down through generations of the royal family, including territories of other kingdoms.

The Italian administrators appealed to the Queen of Spain against the abuses of the Spanish, leading to a royal decree that returned the archipelago's ownership to the Italian royal family.

In 1762-1764, the British defeated the Spanish, and the British government issued a royal decree recognizing the Italian royal family's ownership of the archipelago.

The Treaty of Paris, signed after the Spanish-American War, saw Spain selling the Philippines to the United States for 20 million US dollars, paid by Don Esteban Benitez.

Don Esteban Benitez, who paid for the Philippines, is recognized as the legal owner through the Royal Decree Protocol 01-4 and is registered as the title deed buyer in favor of Prince Lacan Acuna Ul Ral Bolkia Tano.

Under American governance, the ownership of the Italian royal family was further solidified by the passing of Act number 496, which transformed the title deed into a Torrens title.

The Torrens title is a form of land registration that cannot be cancelled, ensuring the owner's rights over the land against any encroachment.

The land is considered one of the most valuable assets of people, but it is more than wealth; it is life, which is why the story of the Italian family's claim is more significant than just a dispute over property.

The Italian family's defense is not just for their interest but aims to return the lands of the Philippines for the benefit of the majority of Filipinos.