Kingdom of Maharlika Belonging to the Royal Family of Tagean-Tallano

Summary

The video script discusses the controversial claim that the entire Philippine archipelago is owned by a single Italian family, the Tagean-Tano dynasty. It explores historical documents, including court decisions and titles, suggesting the family's ownership dates back to the Maharlika era. The narrative also touches on the Spanish and British colonial periods, leading to a royal decree that recognized the family's claim. Despite the passage of time and changes in governance, the family's legal claim remains unchallenged, sparking debates on land ownership and historical injustices.

Takeaways

• 🏰 The entire Philippine archipelago is claimed to be owned by a single family, which seems unbelievable but is supported by historical documents.
• 📜 The claim is backed by titles, court decisions, and notarized documents that assert the authenticity of the ownership.
• 👥 Prominent figures, including former Solicitor Generals and Supreme Court Justices, have defended the family's claim, lending credibility to the narrative.
• 🏛 The story suggests that the archipelago was part of the Maharlika kingdom under the Italian royal family, the Tagalans, until the Spanish conquest.
• 🛡 During the Spanish rule, high taxes were imposed, leading Italian administrators to appeal to the Spanish Queen against the Spanish abuses.
• 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 The British issued a royal decree recognizing the Italian royal family's claim to the archipelago, which was later confirmed by the Treaty of Paris.
• 💵 The United States purchased the Philippines from Spain for 20 million US dollars, with Don Esteban Benitez paying on behalf of Prince Julian Morden.
• 🏦 Under American governance, the ownership claim was further solidified by Act number 496, which transformed the purchase title into a Torrens title.
• 📝 The Torrens title is considered inalienable and cannot be cancelled, ensuring the owner's rights over the land against any encroachment.
• 🌱 The land is portrayed as more than wealth; it is life, and the story of the Italian family's claim is intertwined with the struggle of Filipinos for their land rights.

Q & A

What is the claim made about the ownership of the Philippines in the script?

The script claims that the entire archipelago of the Philippines is owned by a single family, which is considered unbelievable but is supported by certain historical documents and legal decisions.

What historical evidence is mentioned in the script to support the ownership claim?

The script mentions titles, decisions of the court, execution of sheriff's returns, and annotations on titles as evidence. It also refers to the Dal volume of documentary evidence and the Supreme Court's validation of the story.

Who are some of the notable figures mentioned as defenders of the family's claim in the Philippines?

The script mentions former Solicitor Generals and Supreme Court Justices such as Felix Maasar, Antonio Barredo, and Hugo Gutierrez, as well as prominent lawyers like Ferdinand V. Marcos, Lorenzo Tanada, Claro M. Recto, Jose Diokno, Emmanuel Pelaez, and Jose Yulo.

What is the historical context of the term 'Maharlika' mentioned in the script?

Maharlika refers to a kingdom under the Angkan of Tajean, an Italian lineage, from the 14th to the 15th century. The lands of the Maharlika were passed down through generations of the Angkan family.

How did the Spanish colonization affect the ownership of the land in the Philippines according to the script?

The script suggests that during Spanish colonization, the archipelago was expanded, and high taxes were imposed. The Italian administrators appealed to the Spanish Queen against the oppression of the Spanish, leading to a royal decree that returned the ownership of the archipelago to the Angkan of Tajean.

What is the significance of the Royal Decree Protocol 01-4 mentioned in the script?

The Royal Decree Protocol 01-4 is significant as it recognized the ownership of the archipelago by the Angkan of Tajean and was later transformed into a Torrens title, which cannot be cancelled and solidifies the ownership rights.

Who is Prince Julian Morden Tano and what is his connection to the ownership claim?

Prince Julian Morden Tano is a descendant of Don Esteban Benitez, who is mentioned as the one who paid for the Philippines through US gold coins, and is recognized as the holder of the original certificate of title or OCT 01-4.

What is the Act number 496 and its relevance to the ownership claim?

Act number 496 is a law passed under the American government that transformed the title de compra into a Torrens title, further solidifying the Italian family's ownership claim over the land.

How does the script describe the importance of land to the people?

The script emphasizes that land is not just wealth but life itself, and the story of the Italian family's claim is intertwined with the story of the Filipino people who have lost their rights to the land in their own country.

What is the goal of the Italian family's defense of their claim according to the script?

The script suggests that the Italian family's defense of their claim is not for their own interest but aims to return the land to the Filipino people for their benefit.