6 Health & Aging Supplements (and What I Avoid)
Summary
TLDRThe video discusses the efficacy of six popular supplements based on scientific research. Creatine shows cognitive benefits for those over 60, while collagen aids skin health. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and NMN have limited utility for younger, healthy individuals. Fish oil slightly improves memory, and curcumin is potent for preventing diabetes in pre-diabetics. The host emphasizes the importance of a balanced diet and exercise over supplements for optimal health.
Takeaways
- π§ Creatine has shown benefits for brain health and cognition, particularly in individuals over 60, but also aids in muscle strength for all ages.
- π Collagen supplementation is beneficial for skin health, with the speaker taking it daily and rating it 2.5 out of 5 based on the evidence.
- π΅ GlacΓ© (Glacial Protein) has been shown to improve health markers in older adults, but its effectiveness in younger, healthy individuals is questionable.
- π Fish oil has a small but positive effect on cognitive function, particularly memory, with the speaker rating it 3.5 out of 5.
- π¬ NMN (Nicotinamide Mononucleotide) is popular for its potential anti-aging effects, but its benefits are unclear for young, healthy individuals, leading to a low rating of 2 out of 10.
- π Curcumin is potent for preventing diabetes in pre-diabetic individuals but may not be beneficial for those with normal blood sugar levels.
- ποΈββοΈ The speaker avoids curcumin due to its potential to reduce muscle building, despite its other health benefits.
- π Supplements can be beneficial, but the speaker emphasizes that following a healthy lifestyle, including diet and exercise, is more important for overall health.
- π The speaker's ratings for each supplement are based on the quality and quantity of scientific evidence, with creatine receiving the highest rating.
- π¨βπ¬ The speaker's personal supplement choices are influenced by their age, health status, and specific health goals, highlighting the importance of individualized approaches to supplementation.
Q & A
What is the speaker's general stance on supplements?
-The speaker is not a huge fan of supplements but has a better understanding of their efficacy after analyzing scientific literature.
What is the speaker's rating system for supplements based on certainty of evidence?
-The speaker uses a rating system where one is low certainty and five is the highest certainty based on the evidence.
What is the speaker's opinion on creatine for brain health and cognition?
-Creatine seems to provide benefits for individuals over 60 years old, but not for younger individuals. The speaker still takes it for its muscle benefits.
How much creatine does the speaker take daily and what is their rating for it?
-The speaker takes 5 grams of creatine daily and rates it 5 out of 5.
What is the speaker's view on collagen supplements for skin health?
-The speaker believes collagen is beneficial for skin health, but acknowledges more data is needed. They take it daily in the form of collagen peptides.
What is the speaker's daily dosage and rating for collagen?
-The speaker takes 10 to 20 grams of collagen daily and rates it 2.5 out of 5.
Why doesn't the speaker take NMN supplements?
-The speaker believes NMN is likely useless for young healthy individuals and has mixed results in studies, leading to a low rating.
What is the speaker's rating for NMN and why is it so low?
-The speaker rates NMN a 2 out of 10 because the studies show mixed results and the speaker remains unimpressed for most people's potential benefits.
What is the speaker's stance on fish oil for brain function?
-Fish oil has a small but positive effect on brain function, particularly memory, according to the speaker.
How much fish oil does the speaker take and what is their rating for it?
-The speaker takes about a gram of fish oil daily and rates it 3.5 out of 5.
What is the speaker's opinion on curcumin for diabetes prevention?
-Curcumin is potent for helping pre-diabetic individuals prevent diabetes, but the speaker does not take it due to its potential to reduce muscle building.
What is the speaker's rating for curcumin and why?
-The speaker rates curcumin 4 out of 5 due to the good amount of research and relatively consistent results, despite not taking it personally.
What are the 'five rules' the speaker mentions for greater health benefits?
-The speaker refers to a video where they outline five foundational rules for health, suggesting these are more beneficial than supplements.
Outlines
π§ Brain Health Supplements: What Works?
The speaker begins by expressing a cautious stance on supplements but shares insights from a comprehensive analysis of scientific literature on six specific supplements. They discuss creatine, which has been extensively studied and shown to benefit cognitive health, particularly in individuals over 60. Despite not being in that age group, the speaker takes creatine for its muscle-enhancing effects, which are beneficial across all ages. The speaker rates creatine with a high certainty of 5 out of 5. They also touch on collagen's potential benefits for skin health, backed by some good-quality studies, and rate it 2.5 out of 5, acknowledging the need for more data. The speaker humorously dismisses NMN and GLAC due to their unsuitability for younger individuals and the high doses required for GLAC, which they deem impractical and potentially a waste of money for those not in their 70s.
π Fish Oil and NMN: A Closer Look
The speaker delves into the effects of fish oil on cognitive function, focusing on its impact on memory. They note that while fish oil has a small but positive effect on brain function, as indicated by the hedges G measure, it's not substantial. The speaker rates fish oil 3.5 out of 5, recognizing its minor benefits. They then discuss NMN, a popular supplement touted for its potential to reverse aging by increasing NAD levels. After reviewing 13 human studies, the speaker concludes that NMN's effects are mixed and likely insignificant for young, healthy individuals. They suggest that NMN might be beneficial for older individuals or those with poor dietary and lifestyle habits, but the speaker remains unimpressed and rates NMN a 2 out of 10 due to the lack of granular data and the need for more comprehensive studies.
π Curcumin for Diabetes Prevention
The speaker concludes the discussion with curcumin, focusing on its potential to prevent diabetes, especially for those at risk. They highlight a study where curcumin significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes in pre-diabetic individuals. However, for those with well-regulated blood sugar, curcumin offers little benefit. The speaker also mentions curcumin's antioxidant properties, which, while beneficial, could potentially hinder muscle building, conflicting with their personal fitness goals. They rate curcumin 4 out of 5, appreciating its research-backed potential but choosing not to take it personally. The speaker emphasizes that while supplements can offer certain health benefits, adhering to foundational health principles, as outlined in another video, is crucial for overall well-being.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Creatine
π‘Collagen
π‘Glutathione (GLAC)
π‘Fish Oil
π‘NMN (Nicotinamide Mononucleotide)
π‘Curcumin
π‘Supplements
π‘Cognition
π‘Health Markers
π‘Diabetes Prevention
π‘Muscle Building
Highlights
Creatine has been extensively researched and shows benefits for brain health and cognition, especially in individuals over 60.
Creatine does not seem to improve memory in people younger than 60 but does show benefits for those 60 and older.
The speaker has been taking creatine for over a decade and rates it 5 out of 5 for certainty.
Collagen has been investigated for skin health, with mixed but overall positive results from 11 studies.
The speaker takes collagen peptides daily and rates collagen 2.5 out of 5 for certainty.
Glacialuconate (GLAC) has shown impressive health improvements in studies, particularly in older populations.
The speaker does not take GLAC due to the studies being conducted on older individuals and the high doses required.
Fish oil has been studied for cognitive benefits, with small but positive effects on brain function.
The speaker rates fish oil 3.5 out of 5 for certainty, acknowledging the need for more data.
NMN is popular as an 'age-reversing' molecule, but studies show mixed results with small effects.
The speaker believes NMN is likely useless for young healthy individuals and rates it 2 out of 5 for certainty.
Curcumin has been found to be potent for preventing diabetes, especially in pre-diabetic individuals.
Curcumin may not be beneficial for those with well-regulated blood sugar, but it has other health benefits.
The speaker does not take curcumin due to its potential to reduce muscle building and rates it 4 out of 5 for certainty.
Supplements can be beneficial, but following the five health rules outlined in the Cornerstone video is of greater importance.
Transcripts
ah supplements I tend not to be a huge
fan but after analyzing 49 studies on
these six I have a better grasp on what
has been shown to work in the scientific
literature and what hasn't so I'm going
to show you what works and why I avoid
certain common supplements like glac and
nmn and give you a rating for my
certainty behind each supplement with
one being low certainty based on the
evidence and five being the highest
certainty the first one is one that I've
been fond of for over a decade creatine
creatine is a pretty remarkable molecule
that has had a tremendous amount of
research done on it my investigation was
focused on brain health and cognition
and while the results were not as
evident as I'd thought that they might
be in areas like uh memory aid there
were still some benefits for example
while creatine did not seem to provide
any memory benefit to people who are
younger than 60 it did seem to provide a
benefit for those 60 and older if the
Black Diamond there moves to the right
that means that there is a benefit of
creatine as you can see in the first
group of younger individuals there's no
benefit but in the second group there is
a benefit now that said I'll still take
it although I'm not 60 years old and
I've been taking it now since I was 19
or so so
why because while the memory benefits of
creatine may not apply to me although
side note there is some data it helps in
other brain measures aside from memory
it certainly helps with the musculature
so while one tissue may get minor to no
benefits another tissue reaps
significant benefit especially when
resistance training and that applies to
all ages I Take 5 G of a day my rating
for creatine is 5 out of
five next up is collagen I've only
investigated collagen in respect to the
skin so I'm limiting the scope of my
point to that until I get a chance to
pour over the data on collagen in other
areas so I went over 11 studies on
collagen and while some of them weren't
the greatest quality some were good
ultimately I decided that collagen is a
benefit and although I do still think
that we need more data unlike Crea
it was good enough to convince me of its
Merit I take it daily in collagen
peptide form and I take 10 to 20 G my
rating for collagen is a 2.5 out of
five what about glac well I had an
incredibly popular video that went over
three of the major studies on glac two
of which were in humans and the results
were really astonishing with massive
improvements and a series of Health
markers from mitochondrial Health to
muscle strength to blood pressure and
the list goes on really impressive stuff
so you might be wondering why I don't
take it then well that's because it
causes instant death by brain
melting n I'm just josing you uh it's
because the studies were performed in
people in their 70s and again I don't
know if we've been over this but I'm not
60 and I'm also not 70 I firmly believe
that glac will be of little to no use to
anyone in their 20s 30s and maybe even
in their 40s if you take care of
yourself so it's still useful and still
impressive but probably a waste of your
money if you're on the younger side and
healthy now the doses that they used in
the studies were really high which leads
them to be pretty expensive and a pain
to consume but here they are 100 Mig per
kilogram of body weight of each so if
you weigh 100 kg you'd be consuming 10 g
a day of each that's a ton I was having
a conversation with one of the physionic
Insiders about dosing and I think it's
likely a smaller dose that's going to be
just as effective my rating for glac is
a 1.5 out of five why so low not because
I don't believe the science that I just
presented but because it only came from
one laboratory and while that lab may be
reputable I'd like to see the results
confirmed by independent
teams next up is fish oil fish oil has
been studied in many contexts but I
limited my investigation to cognition
brain function now if we look at this
summary of the data we can see a few
different measures and then a bunch of
numbers I'm not going to burden you with
all these numbers except this column
called the hedges G this signifies I
what is considered an adjusted effect
size so it tells us the magnitude of the
effect or the amount of impact that
Omega-3s have on these indices of brain
function anything 0.2 and under is
minuscule so as you can see while there
is an effect the effect is small even in
the largest measure memory still it
doesn't mean it doesn't work it's just a
small effect better to have a little
than nothing except cyanide I prefer
nothing when it comes to cyanide so the
researchers mentioned the median dose is
around 800 MGR and some studies went a
bit higher I take about a gram my rating
for fish oil is a 3.5 out of 5 I still
think that there's some need for added
data but the data that is there is
relatively consistent at least in
measures of memory the other supplement
that I don't take is nmn nmn has been
really popular lately because it's been
inhaled as this age reversing molecule
that can replenish our Cellular stores
of NAD and give us everlasting
life okay that last part is a bit of an
exaggeration on my part well I read 13
studies on nmn in humans and I think
it's all the studies in humans up to
this point and the results were mixed
some studies showed an effect others
didn't however the studies that showed
an effect only two of them showed a
noticeable effect and the rest of them
indicated tiny effects remember when we
discussed the hedges G they didn't
quantify it like that but it would be
equivalent to a minuscule effect in
those studies so what gives well my
current interpretation is that nmn is
likely useless for young healthy
individuals so if you're in your 40s and
younger and you take care of yourself
defined by a diet that keeps you trim
and you exercise it's unlikely that nmn
will have any noticeable effect
however maybe if you're older or have
a less than desirable diet and lifestyle
like smoking and taking strolls through
radiation Fields then nmn might offer
some benefit the exact strength of that
benefit is up in the air studies used
between 200 migr and 2 g a day now
people will often argue that 200 or 250
Mig is too little yet those same studies
showed increases in NAD the molecule
that MN is converted to and some of
those studies also showed physiological
improvements so clearly that low dose is
enough to elit an effect I remain
unimpressed for most people I'll add an
amendment to this video if that changes
but I won't be using it my rating is a
two out of 10 because there are double
digigit randomized Placebo control
trials on the topic but clearly we need
much more granularity so we need many
any more studies to reach that
granularity what's next curcumin again
this is an area where I focused my
attention in one General Camp diabetes
risk I did run across a few other
ancillary measures like body weight
triglycerides and so on but by and large
I was focused on blood glucose and
insulin resistance what I discovered is
that ultimately it was determined that
cumin is remarkably potent for helping
someone keep diabetes at Bay it acts as
a potent protector to keep a person who
is pre-diabetic from becoming diabetic
of course it'll only hold off for so
long but if you are borderline adding
curcumin into the mix can be a
lifechanging decision as one example
look at this data this is the comparison
of people who went on to develop
diabetes so on the right are the people
who took curcumin and on the left are
the people who didn't By the 12month
Mark 16% of those
that did not take cumin developed
diabetes and not a single person in the
cumin group developed diabetes those are
wonderful results unfortunately on
measures of blood sugar if you have
normal well-regulated blood sugar cumin
is of little use to you that said there
are other benefits of cumin that extend
beyond blood sugar and insulin
resistance so it may be still worth your
while to consume but I choose not to
because it is a potent antioxidant and
antioxidants have been shown to reduce
muscle building potential which is
antithetic to my goals I'm also healthy
enough now the studies used Range in
dose between 200 and 1,500 milligram a
day but I'd opt for anything over 500
milligram I'd rate curcumin a four out
of five there's a good amount of
research on it and it's relatively
consistent too but you know while
supplements can be a benefit clearly
there's much greater health benefit by
following the five rules that I outlined
in this Cornerstone video right here I
think that you'd be doing your health a
disservice by not watching it but if
that's not your cup of nmn I can always
encourage another one of my videos
you'll learn regardless if I can
cheekily say thanks for watching
[Music]
bye
Browse More Related Video
Eight Supplements That *Actually* Work
The ONLY Supplements That ACTUALLY Work
Plastic Surgeon Reveals 5 Surprising Facts About Collagen Supplements!
Supplements I take - Timing and Dosage
Why is The FDA BANNING It - Use It to Lower Creatinine level by 50%
This Is What Happens When You Take Creatine + Whey Protein (15 studies)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)