Quem você quer ser na hora da sua morte? | Olavo de Carvalho

Summary

The transcript delves into the complexities of studying personality in psychology, emphasizing that it's not the 'self' but rather the comparisons between 'selves' that are analyzed. It discusses different aspects of the 'self,' including social roles, memories, moral responsibility, and the 'ideal self.' The concept of 'transcendental self' is introduced as the cognitive aspect of identity, which is static and observable only after life's end. The script highlights the difficulty in grasping one's own transcendental identity and the contrast between understanding one's own personality and that of others, with scientific psychology focusing on similarities rather than individuality.

Takeaways

• 😀 The study of personality psychology is not about the personality itself but about comparisons between different personalities.
• 🧠 The concept of 'self' or 'I' has multiple meanings and can refer to one's social role, memories, or moral responsibility.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The 'I' in the sense of a social role does not encompass the whole person but is part of their identity.
• 📚 The 'I' that is based on memories is fed by one's recollections and becomes more intensely existent with greater awareness of one's own history.
• 👤 There is also an 'I' that is associated with being the author of actions and being responsible for them, which is a kind of legal or moral self.
• 🌟 The 'Ideal Self' is what a person would like to be or present to others, distinct from their actual self.
• 🔍 The 'Substantial Self' or 'Transcendental Self' is the cognitive aspect of identity, which includes everything the subject has done, removed from the temporal sequence.
• 🎨 The 'Substantial Self' can be visualized as a static figure or a painting, where all aspects of a person's life are arranged in a spatial order.
• 🏔 The 'Substantial Self' is fully revealed only after death when there is no possibility of further transformation.
• 🔬 Scientific psychology studies personality by focusing on similarities between individuals, which can lead to the loss of the individuality of the subject of study.
• 🤔 The main difference in studying personality is between knowing one's own personality and knowing others', with scientific psychology only examining the latter.

Q & A

What is the main topic discussed in the script?

The main topic discussed in the script is the study of personality in psychology, focusing on the concept of 'self' and its different aspects.

What are the different meanings of 'self' mentioned in the script?

The script mentions several meanings of 'self': the social role self, the self based on memories, the self as an author of acts and responsible for them, and the ideal self.

How does the script describe the relationship between the self and memories?

The script describes the self as being nourished by memories, becoming more intensely existent the more conscious one is of their own history.

What is the 'substantial self' according to the script?

The 'substantial self' is referred to as the cognitive aspect of identity, transcendental, which is the underlying essence of who a person truly is.

How does the script explain the concept of the 'transcendental self'?

The 'transcendental self' is likened to a final judgment where all aspects of a person's life are laid out in a static, spatial order, as if in a painting or a musical score.

What is the difference between knowing one's own personality and knowing the personality of others, as discussed in the script?

The script suggests that knowing one's own personality is more subjective and personal, while knowing the personality of others is more objective and based on comparative data.

Why does the script say that scientific psychology studies the personalities of others rather than one's own?

The script implies that scientific psychology studies the personalities of others because it is impossible for a psychologist to study their own personality without externalizing themselves and relying on comparative data.

What is the script's view on the uniqueness of each personality?

The script states that whether two personalities are identical or each is unique is irrelevant to the study of personality in psychology, as the focus is on comparisons between personalities.

How does the script relate the concept of the 'substantial self' to the end of life?

The script relates the 'substantial self' to the end of life by suggesting that once a person dies, their life's actions are closed in a static form, revealing their 'substantial self' or 'transcendental identity'.

What is the script's analogy for understanding the 'transcendental self'?

The script uses the analogy of a musical score, where all notes are laid out simultaneously, to help understand the 'transcendental self' as a static, spatial arrangement of a person's life.

What does the script suggest about the difficulty of grasping someone's 'transcendental identity'?

The script suggests that it is very difficult to grasp someone's 'transcendental identity' because it includes everything the subject did, removed from the temporal sequence and projected onto a map or score.