Praktek Peradilan Agama: Persidangan Hak Asuh Anak (Kelompok 2, XI.5)

Summary

The transcript captures a tense child custody hearing between the plaintiff, Tiasitri, and defendant, Daptian Sy. The case, involving their child Zaid Guspri Halim, centers around custody and financial support after their divorce. Both parties present differing views on their ability to care for the child, with the plaintiff arguing the defendant's inability to provide proper care. The case includes witness testimonies and video evidence highlighting the troubled relationship. Despite efforts at reconciliation, the court ultimately orders the defendant to provide maintenance, with the possibility of an appeal. The trial concludes with a decision in favor of the plaintiff.

Takeaways

• 😀 The trial involves a child custody case between the plaintiff, Tiasitri, and the defendant, Daftian SY, in Batam Religious Court on November 24, 2022.
• 😀 Both parties were questioned about their identities and confirmed their ages and addresses during the trial's preliminary process.
• 😀 The court emphasized the importance of resolving the custody dispute amicably for the well-being of the child involved, Zaid Guspri Halim.
• 😀 The plaintiff expressed frustration over the defendant's attitude and confirmed that previous peace efforts had failed.
• 😀 The plaintiff requested that the child, Zaid Guspri Halim, be placed under her custody, citing that the child still depends on her as the biological mother.
• 😀 The defendant responded to the lawsuit by claiming the plaintiff's version of events was inaccurate and argued that the plaintiff’s lawsuit should be dismissed.
• 😀 The court read the defendant's response and granted the defendant time to file further answers or objections.
• 😀 The defendant was represented by an attorney, and the court also verified the identity of the plaintiff’s attorney during the proceedings.
• 😀 Witnesses were summoned from both parties, including a witness from the defendant’s side who spoke about the household dynamics and provided video evidence.
• 😀 The court concluded by deciding that the defendant must provide child maintenance to the plaintiff and pay the associated court costs. Both parties were given the option to appeal within 14 days.

Q & A

What is the central issue discussed in the trial?

The central issue in the trial is the custody of a child, Zaid Guspri Halim, between the plaintiff, Tiasitri, and the defendant, Daptian Sy. The case concerns the plaintiff’s request for custody following their divorce.

What is the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant?

The plaintiff, Tiasitri, and the defendant, Daptian Sy, were previously married, but they have since divorced. The case centers around the custody of their minor child.

What is the plaintiff seeking in this case?

The plaintiff is seeking custody of the child, Zaid Guspri Halim, as well as the defendant’s obligation to provide maintenance for the child until they are legally able to support themselves.

What was the defendant's stance in the trial?

The defendant, Daptian Sy, maintains that the plaintiff’s lawsuit should not be accepted. He argues that the events presented in the plaintiff's claim are inaccurate and that the defendant has been raising the child adequately.

What role did peace efforts play in the trial?

Both the plaintiff and defendant have made peace efforts, but these attempts were unsuccessful. The judge advised that resolving the issue amicably would be in the best interest of the child, but both parties remained firm in their positions.

What was the reason for the plaintiff's dissatisfaction with the defendant?

The plaintiff expressed dissatisfaction with the defendant’s behavior, claiming that the defendant had not been a good caregiver for the child and that their treatment of the plaintiff had been intolerable.

How did the defendant respond to the plaintiff's lawsuit?

The defendant responded by filing a counter-claim, asserting that the plaintiff's accusations were incorrect and that he was capable of taking care of the child. He also rejected the idea that he was not fulfilling his responsibilities as a parent.

What was the outcome of the trial?

The panel of judges ruled that the defendant must provide maintenance for the child and bear the costs of the trial. The decision also gave the parties the option to appeal if they were dissatisfied with the outcome.

How did the court deal with the issue of child custody?

The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that the child receives love and care from both parents. Although the plaintiff requested custody, the court focused on the need to resolve the matter amicably and recognized the complexities of custody battles.

What evidence was presented in the trial?

The defense presented a video as evidence, which was related to a commotion at the defendant’s house. The video was submitted to support the defendant’s claims, but its exact contents were not fully described in the transcript.